| Literature DB >> 32474038 |
Sylvain Meylan1, Rachid Akrour2, Jean Regina3, Pierre-Alexandre Bart4, Fabrice Dami5, Thierry Calandra3.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32474038 PMCID: PMC7263266 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect ISSN: 0163-4453 Impact factor: 6.072
Fig. 1Evolution of the Early Warning Score (EWS) over time in the two groups of patients. EWS was assessed at 12-h intervals over a 36-hour time period. Time zero refers to the time at which the last set of physiological variables was recorded prior to ICU admission (ICU group, red) or to the worst respiratory variables (non-ICU group, blue). Median (range) EWS was 1 (0-3) vs 7 (5-8) (p= 0.25) at -36-h; 4 (0-9) vs 7 (3-11) (p = 0.1875) at -24-h, 2 (0-8) vs 9 (0-11) (p = 0.0078) at –12-h and 9 (7-12) vs 4 (0-8) (p= 0.0078) at -0h (Wilcoxon test). Number of patients per treatment group at each time point (-36h: 3 vs. 11; -24h: 7 vs 12, -12h: 9 vs 15, 0h: 8 vs 17).