Literature DB >> 32473635

Apolipoprotein CIII predicts cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease: a prospective observational study.

Julius L Katzmann1, Christian M Werner2, Tatjana Stojakovic3, Winfried März4,5,6, Hubert Scharnagl4, Ulrich Laufs7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein CIII (apoCIII) is associated with triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism and has emerged as independent marker for risk of cardiovascular disease. The objective was to test whether apoCIII is regulated postprandially and whether apoCIII concentrations in native and chylomicron-free serum predict future cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS: ApoCIII concentrations were measured in native and chylomicron-free serum in the fasting state and after a standardized oral fat load test in 195 patients with stable CAD. Clinical follow-up was 48 months. Chylomicron-free serum was prepared by ultracentrifugation (18,000 rpm, 3 h). The log-rank test and Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the association of apoCIII with recurrent cardiovascular events.
RESULTS: Of the 195 patients included, 92 had a cardiovascular event, and 103 did not. 97% were treated with a statin. No significant changes in apoCIII concentration were observed after the oral fat load test. The apoCIII concentration was associated with event-free survival independent of conventional risk factors. This association reached statistical significance only for apoCIII concentration measured in chylomicron-free serum (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] for apoCIII above the mean: postprandial: 1.67 (1.06-2.29), P = 0.028, fasting: 2.09 (1.32-3.32), P = 0.002), but not for apoCIII concentration measured in native serum (postprandial: 1.47 [0.89-2.43], P = 0.133, fasting: 1.56 [0.95-2.58], P = 0.081). The effects were independent of other risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: ApoCIII concentrations in chylomicron-free serum are independently associated with event-free survival in patients with CAD both in fasting and postprandial state. This findings support considering apoCIII for risk assessment and attempting to test the hypothesis that lowering apoCIII reduces residual cardiovascular risk. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Apolipoprotein CIII concentration measured in chylomicron-free serum predicts recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial which included the participants of this study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00628524) on March 5, 2008.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antisense oligonucleotide; Apolipoprotein CIII; Cardiovascular disease; Chylomicron; Coronary artery disease; Oral fat tolerance test; Risk factor; Triglyceride; Ultracentrifugation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32473635      PMCID: PMC7260843          DOI: 10.1186/s12944-020-01293-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lipids Health Dis        ISSN: 1476-511X            Impact factor:   3.876


Background

Apolipoprotein CIII (apoCIII) is produced in the liver and to a smaller extent in the intestine. It resides on apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins (LDL, intermediate-density lipoproteins [IDL], very LDL [VLDL], chylomicrons, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein [TRL] remnants) and on HDL, between which it is exchanged rapidly [1]. ApoCIII inhibits lipoprotein lipase and hepatic VLDL uptake, and enhances hepatic VLDL secretion, by this increasing TRL levels [2-7]. Proinflammatory and prothrombotic effects of apoCIII have been described [8-10]. Furthermore, apoCIII modifies the effects of other lipoproteins: HDL particles containing apoCIII have been found to be associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, while HDL particles without apoCIII were protective of CAD [11]; and the risk of CAD due to elevated LDL cholesterol appeared mainly to be due to LDL particles containing apoCIII [12], which may be mediated by the above-described mechanisms. A causal relationship of apoCIII and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is suggested by two Mendelian randomization analyses, in which loss-of-function mutations in apoCIII resulted in 40% lower triglyceride levels and a 40% reduction in CAD risk [13, 14]. Prospective observational studies have shown an association of apoCIII with incident CAD [15, 16], with this association being independent from triglyceride levels in some studies [17]. In the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular health (LURIC) study, a J-shaped association between apoCIII and cardiovascular mortality was found [18]. Furthermore, in a meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort and case-control studies, an association of apoCIII levels and CVD was reported [19]. Serum triglycerides are regulated postprandially. In the available studies, apoCIII was measured in the fasting or the postprandial state. Whether apoCIII concentration changes due to food intake has not yet been investigated systematically in a sufficient number of patients. Furthermore, it is not known whether the association of apoCIII with CVD reflects the exogenous or endogenous pathways of lipid metabolism, whereas the first is mainly represented by the cholesterol and triglyceride content and associated apolipoproteins of chylomicrons, and the latter by the concentration of cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoproteins in chylomicron-free serum [20]. This knowledge might improve risk assessment with apoCIII concentration in patients with established CVD in order to identify those at the highest residual risk most likely to benefit from rigorous risk factor control. This study aimed to investigate the course of the apoCIII concentration after a standardized oral fat load test and to assess whether apoCIII predicts disease progression in CAD patients, comparing native and chylomicron-free serum.

Methods

This study encompasses the 195 patients from the prospective Homburg Cream and Sugar study [21] included lastly. For the main study, institutional review was provided by the ethics committee of the Saarland (Number 170/07) and all participants provided written informed consent. In brief, between February 2008 und July 2009, consecutive patients with angiographically documented clinically stable CAD were enrolled. In all patients, a standardized oral triglyceride tolerance test (OTTT) with 75 g fat (250 mL cream drink) was performed. In patients without medical treatment for diabetes mellitus, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed to test for the absence of diabetes mellitus. Blood samples were collected before and 3, 4, and 5 h after the OTTT. Patients were followed for 48 months. After 12, 24, and 48 months, standardized telephone interviews were conducted to assess for the occurrence of primary end point events. Hospital records were consulted if patients had been hospitalized. The study end points were adjudicated by a blinded end point committee consisting of at least two experienced cardiologists blinded to the results of metabolic testing [21]. The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome or for unplanned, symptom-induced coronary angiography, and any revascularisation including bypass surgery.

Laboratory analyses

Routine laboratory analyses were carried out in the core facility of the Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Germany [21]. Lipoprotein separation and analysis was performed from frozen serum samples (stored at − 80 °C) at the Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Austria. Lipoproteins (chylomicrons, VLDL, LDL, and HDL) were separated using ultracentrifugation and precipitation methods. First, the chylomicron fraction was separated by ultracentrifugation (18,000 rpm, 3 h). Lipids and apolipoproteins were measured in total serum and in the infranate after ultracentrifugation (chylomicron-free serum). Second, the chylomicron-free serum was separated in VLDL, LDL, and HDL using a combined ultracentrifugation-precipitation method (beta-quantification) [22, 23]. In brief, VLDL were separated by ultracentrifugation (30,000 rpm, 18 h) at a density of 1.0063 kg/L. After ultracentrifugation, the supernate (containing VLDL) was removed and lipids and apoB were measured in the infranate (containing LDL and HDL). Lipids and apoB in VLDL were calculated as difference between chylomicron-free serum and the LDL/HDL fraction. Then, LDL were precipitated with a phosphotungstic acid/MgCl2 reagent in the infranate after removal of chylomicrons and VLDL. Lipids were measured in HDL and lipids in LDL were calculated as difference between HDL and the LDL/HDL fraction. Total cholesterol (TC), free cholesterol (FC), triacylglycerides (TG), and phospholipids (PL) were measured using enzymatic reagents from Diasys (Holzheim, Germany) and were calibrated using secondary standards from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany; TC, TG) and DiaSys (Holzheim, Germany; FC, PL). Esterified cholesterol (CE) was calculated as the difference between TC and FC. Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were analysed using an enzymatic reagent (ACS-ACOD method) from Wako Chemicals (Neuss, Germany). Apolipoproteins and lipoprotein(a) were determined by immunoturbidimetry using reagents from DiaSys (Holzheim, Germany) and standards from Siemens (Marburg, Germany; apoAI, apoB, apoE), Kamiya Biomedical (Seattle, WA, USA; apoAII, apoCII, apoCIII), and DiaSys (lipoprotein[a]). All measurements were performed on an Olympus AU680 automatic analyzer. The coefficients of variation (between day) were < 5% (Supplemental Figure).

Statistical analyses

Categorical values are expressed as percent. Continuous data are expressed as mean (standard deviation). For comparison of normally distributed data (according to Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), the two-sided t-test was used; otherwise, the Wilcoxon test was applied. Baseline characteristics were compared with ANOVA and chi-squared test. Correlation was assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. The log-rank test was used to examine differences in event-free survival stratified by tertiles of apoCIII concentration. Multivariable Cox regression analyses for apoCIII concentration above vs. below the mean were performed. Tests of the proportional hazards assumption showed that out of all variables, only age had a relevant interaction. For the other covariates, model fit was not improved by using time-dependent interaction terms. Therefore, the models were adjusted for age as a time-dependent variable (interaction term time*age), gender, LDL cholesterol, HOMA index, fasting triglycerides for fasting samples and 5-h triglyceride area under the curve for postprandial samples, respectively, metabolic syndrome, and smoking status. The analyses were conducted with SPSS software version 20.0. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean age of the 195 patients was 66.9 years, 87.2% of the patients were men. 92 patients (47.2%) had a cardiovascular event during 48 months of follow-up, and 103 did not. Of the 92 cardiovascular events, the majority were symptom-induced coronary angiography (n = 81). N = 5 patients had non-fatal myocardial infarction, and n = 6 patients died of cardiovascular causes. In consequence, n = 42 patients received unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and n = 6 patients were surgically treated with aortocoronary bypass operation. The medication was similar in both groups, 97.4% were treated with a statin. More patients without event during follow-up were actively smoking (23.3% vs. 10.9% of the patients with event; P = 0.017). Alcohol consumption in this group was slightly higher (22.3% drinking alcohol more than three times a week vs. 19.6%). 67% of the patients without event had diabetes mellitus compared to 75% of patients with event. The differences in alcohol consumption and diabetes did not reach statistical significance. Fasting triglycerides were higher in patients with event (168.4 [117.7] vs. 135.6 [67.6] mg/dL; P = 0.016), total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol were comparable. The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics

AllNo eventEventP value
General
 N =19510392
 Age in years66.9 (10.2)66.3 (11.0)67.7 (9.2)0.358
 Male87.2 (170)88.3 (91)85.9 (79)0.380
 Received OGTT56.4 (110)60.2 (62)52.2 (48)0.163
Medical History
 Previous myocardial infarction43.1 (84)37.9 (39)48.9 (45)0.079
 Cardiac bypass surgery13.8 (27)9.7 (10)18.5 (17)0.059
 Previous stroke or TIA9.2 (18)9.7 (10)8.7 (8)0.503
 Peripheral artery disease7.7 (15)10.7 (11)4.3 (4)0.081
Medication
 Platelet inhibitors96.9 (189)96.1 (99)97.8 (90)0.396
 ACE inhibitors/ARBs96.4 (188)95.1 (98)97.8 (90)0.271
 Beta blockers91.8 (179)88.3 (91)95.7 (88)0.054
 Statins97.4 (190)98.1 (101)96.7 (89)0.447
Clinical characteristics
 Smoking (active)17.4 (34)23.3 (24)10.9 (10)0.017
 Alcohol regularly21.0 (41)22.3 (23)19.6 (18)0.384
 Positive family history34.3 (67)35.9 (37)32.6 (30)0.369
 Hypertension95.9 (187)92.2 (95)100.0 (92)0.005
 Systolic blood pressure in mmHg126.1 (15.1)124.4 (13.8)128.0 (16.4)0.095
 Diastolic blood pressure in mmHg74.6 (8.1)74.0 (8.1)75.3 (8.1)0.246
 Resting heart rate in min−166.6 (8.4)66.8 (8.2)66.4 (8.8)0.771
 LV ejection fraction in %62.3 (12.3)62.7 (11.9)61.9 (12.8)0.664
 Body mass index in kg/m228.8 (3.9)28.4 (4.1)29.2 (3.6)0.194
 Waist circumference in cm103.8 (10.5)103.0 (10.5)104.8 (10.4)0.224
 Waist-to-hip ratio1.00 (0.06)1.00 (0.06)1.01 (0.07)0.477
Metabolic characterization
 Normal glucose tolerance29.2 (57)33.0 (34)25.0 (23)0.142
 Impaired glucose tolerance24.1 (47)24.3 (25)23.9 (22)
 Diabetes mellitus46.7 (91)42.7 (44)51.1 (47)
 Metabolic syndrome59.5 (116)51.5 (53)68.5 (63)0.011
 Fasting glucose in mg/dL129.9 (38.2)128.4 (37.4)131.7 (39.2)0.557
 Fasting insulin in μIU/mL10.7 (9.7)9.9 (7.8)11.5 (11.4)0.238
 HOMA index3.42 (4.08)3.04 (3.29)3.83 (4,81)0.177
 HbA1c in %6.0 (1.1)5.9 (0.8)6.2 (1.3)0.063
 Total cholesterol in mg/dL174.9 (38.4)173.3 (36.3)176.6 (40.8)0.550
 HDL cholesterol in mg/dL44.9 (13.5)44.9 (11.3)45.0 (15.7)0.970
 LDL cholesterol in mg/dL106.4 (34.1)107.0 (33.3)105.7 (35.2)0.802
 Non-HDL cholesterol mg/dL129.9 (138.2)128.4 (37.4)131.7 (39.2)0.557
 Fasting triglycerides in mg/dL151.1 (95.7)135.6 (67.5)168.4 (117.7)0.016
 Postprandial 5 h-Tg-AUC in mg/dL1065 (599)979 (477)1161 (701)0.033
 C-reactive protein in mg/dL4.8 (8.7)4.6 (7.3)5.0 (10.1)0.741

Numerical variables are presented as mean (standard deviation), the other variables are % (n), or as otherwise indicated. OGTT oral glucose tolerance test, TIA transient ischemic attack, ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARB angiotensin II receptor blocker, LV left ventricular, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, Tg triglycerides, AUC area under the curve

Baseline characteristics Numerical variables are presented as mean (standard deviation), the other variables are % (n), or as otherwise indicated. OGTT oral glucose tolerance test, TIA transient ischemic attack, ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARB angiotensin II receptor blocker, LV left ventricular, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, Tg triglycerides, AUC area under the curve The changes in apolipoproteins after the OTTT in native and chylomicron-free serum are depicted in Table 2. Apolipoprotein concentrations were characterized in four states: in fasting state in native (1) and chylomicron-free (2) serum and in postprandial state in native (3) and chylomicron-free (4) serum. After 5 h, mean apoCIII levels showed a non-significant minor increase when measured in native serum and a slight decrease when measured in chylomicron-free serum, corresponding to an absolute increase of 0.2 mg/dL (3.7%) in native serum and a 0.2 mg/dL decrease (0.6%) in chylomicron-free serum (P = 0.122 for native serum, P = 0.288 in chylomicron-free serum). Apolipoproteins AI, AII, B and E did not change relevantly after OTTT in native and chylomicron-free serum.
Table 2

Apolipoproteins after oral fat tolerance test in native and in chylomicron-free serum

ApoAIApoAIIApoBApoCIIApoCIIIApoE
Native Serum
 0 h134.2 (26.4)37.0 (8.5)82.6 (24.9)3.1 (1.4)10.0 (3.7)11.5 (3.2)
 5 h132.3 (25.1)36.9 (8.7)81.1 (25.2)3.2 (1.5)10.2 (3.9)11.8 (3.4)
 Absolute change (mg/dL)−1.9 (15.0)−0.2 (3.6)−1.4 (8.4)0.0 (0.6)0.2 (1.5)0.4 (1.4)
 Proportional change (%)−0.6 (13.5)−0.1 (10.6)−1.4 (9.7)1.8 (24.0)3.7 (23.1)3.6 (12.6)
P value0.0760.402a0.0190.953a0.122a0.001a
Chylomicron-free serum
 0 h122.1 (26.8)32.3 (8.5)57.3 (20.7)2.4 (1.2)7.5 (4.1)9.6 (2.9)
 5 h121.4 (26.9)32.0 (8.3)55.1 (20.1)2.2 (1.1)7.3 (4.2)9.4 (2.8)
 Absolute change (mg/dL)−0.7 (19.7)−0.4 (5.0)−2.3 (9.2)−0.2 (0.6)−0.2 (1.9)−0.2 (1.6)
 Proportional change (%)−0.5 (15.9)−0.2 (18.0)−1.8 (26.3)−0.6 (31.4)−0.6 (37.4)−0.0 (17.8)
P value0.6220.2680.001<  0.001a0.2880.190

Values are in mg/dL and presented as mean (standard deviation) if not stated otherwise. h hours. a Wilcoxon test, otherwise t test

Apolipoproteins after oral fat tolerance test in native and in chylomicron-free serum Values are in mg/dL and presented as mean (standard deviation) if not stated otherwise. h hours. a Wilcoxon test, otherwise t test The fasting and postprandial apoCIII concentrations (as measured in chylomicron-free serum) were significantly associated with body mass index, fasting glucose, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome. An inverse association was observed with age. In regard to other lipoproteins, there were strong correlations of the apoCIII concentration with triglycerides and total cholesterol. LDL and HDL cholesterol did not show significant correlations with apoCIII (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3

Correlation of apoCIII concentration in chylomicron-free serum fasting and postprandial with baseline characteristics and other lipid parameters

FastingPostprandial
RP valueRP value
Clinical characteristics
 Age−0.180.012−0.150.041
 Body mass index0.200.0050.210.004
Clinical chemistry parameters in native serum
 Fasting glucose0.39<  0.0010.32<  0.001
 HOMA index0.050.5200.070.369
 HbA1c0.120.0980.140.064
 C-reactive protein−0.110.151−0.080.287
 Total cholesterol0.36<  0.0010.294<  0.001
 LDL cholesterol0.140.0610.080.301
 HDL cholesterol−0.080.263− 0.070.378
 Non-HDL cholesterol0.39<  0.0010.32<  0.001
 Remnant cholesterol0.68<  0.0010.63<  0.001
 Fasting triglycerides0.68<  0.0010.63<  0.001
Lipid parameters in lipoprotein subfractions
 Total cholesterol in CFS−0.090.2230.010.933
 Triglycerides in CFS0.240.0010.31<  0.001
 Chylomicron cholesterol0.46<  0.0010.36<  0.001
 Chylomicron triglycerides0.67<  0.0010.53<  0.001
 VLDL cholesterol−0.080.2750.160.024
 VLDL triglycerides0.180.0120.29<  0.001
 LDL cholesterol−0.130.076−0.080.278
 LDL triglycerides0.080.3030.050.469
 HDL cholesterol0.200.0060.210.003
 HDL triglycerides0.30<  0.0010.28<  0.001

R: Pearson correlation coefficient, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, CFS: chylomicron-free serum

Table 4

ApoCIII concentration in chylomicron-free serum fasting and postprandial stratified by metabolic syndrome and diabetes-related traits

ApoCIII concentrations in metabolic syndrome and diabetesFastingPostprandial
ApoCIIIP valueApoCIIIP value
Metabolic syndromeyes8.2 (4.7)0.0037.9 (4.8)0.026
no6.4 (2.7)6.5 (3.0)
IFG, IGT, Diabetesyes8.0 (4.4)0.0137.7 (4.5)0.038
no6.3 (3.1)6.3 (3.2)

Values for apoCIII are in mg/dL and presented as mean (standard deviation). IFG impaired fasting glucose, IGT impaired glucose tolerance

Correlation of apoCIII concentration in chylomicron-free serum fasting and postprandial with baseline characteristics and other lipid parameters R: Pearson correlation coefficient, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, CFS: chylomicron-free serum ApoCIII concentration in chylomicron-free serum fasting and postprandial stratified by metabolic syndrome and diabetes-related traits Values for apoCIII are in mg/dL and presented as mean (standard deviation). IFG impaired fasting glucose, IGT impaired glucose tolerance The apoCIII concentration was higher in patients with a cardiovascular event during follow-up. This association did not reach statistical significance for the apoCIII concentration measured in native serum (P = 0.122 fasting, P = 0.095 postprandial). In contrast, the apoCIII concentration measured in chylomicron-free serum was significantly associated with the primary end point. This association was stronger in the postprandial state (P = 0.035 fasting, P = 0.008 postprandial). The data are shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Primary end point for native and chylomicron-free serum fasting and after fat tolerance test

Primary end pointn =ApoCIII in mg/dL (SD)P value
Native serumfastingNo1039.6 (3.5)0.122
Yes9210.4 (3.8)
postprandialNo1039.8 (3.9)0.095
Yes9210.7 (3.9)
Chylomicron-free serumfastingNo1016.9 (3.9)0.035
Yes878.2 (4.3)
postprandialNo1026.6 (3.7)0.008
Yes878.2 (4.6)
Primary end point for native and chylomicron-free serum fasting and after fat tolerance test In Fig. 1, the Kaplan-Meier curves for event-free survival stratified by apoCIII tertiles as measured in chylomicron-free serum are depicted in fasting (Fig. 1a) and postprandial state (Fig. 1b). The apoCIII concentration in chylomicron-free serum both in the fasting and the postprandial state was significantly associated with a higher probability of events. This association was stronger in postprandial than in fasting state (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI] for third vs. first tertile: postprandial: 2.12 [1.26–3.56], P = 0.004, fasting: 1.74 [1.05–2.90], P = 0.031). If the same analyses were conducted with apoCIII concentration measured in native serum, statistical significance was not reached (postprandial: P = 0.060, fasting: P = 0.105). In contrast to apoCIII concentration, no other apolipoprotein or other lipid parameters were associated with the primary end point in native or chylomicron-free serum (apoAI, AII, B, CII, E, free fatty acids, lipoprotein[a], free cholesterol, cholesteryl esters, phospholipids; ).
Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier curves of event-free survival for 48 months, stratified by tertiles of apoCIII concentrations in chylomicron-free serum fasting (a) and postprandial after standardized fat load test (b). HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval

Kaplan-Meier curves of event-free survival for 48 months, stratified by tertiles of apoCIII concentrations in chylomicron-free serum fasting (a) and postprandial after standardized fat load test (b). HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval In multivariable Cox regression analyses, apoCIII concentration above compared to below the mean in chylomicron-free serum was associated with the primary end point when adjusted for age*time and gender (HR [95% CI] postprandial: 1.79 [1.18–2.71], P = 0.006, fasting: 2.17 [1.42–3.31], P <  0.001). Additionally adjusting for LDL cholesterol, HOMA index, fasting triglycerides for fasting samples and 5-h triglyceride area under the curve for postprandial samples, respectively, metabolic syndrome, and smoking status, apoCIII was associated with the primary end point with a HR (95% CI) of 1.67 (1.06–2.29) postprandial (P = 0.028) and 2.09 (1.32–3.32) fasting (P = 0.002). In contrast, when measured in native serum, apoCIII concentration above vs. below the mean was not significantly associated with the primary end point (HR [95% CI] postprandial: 1.47 [0.89–2.43], P = 0.133, fasting: 1.56 [0.95–2.58], P = 0.081). The results for apoCIII measurement in chylomicron-free serum are shown in Fig. 2. The apoCIII concentration in chylomicron-free serum was also associated with the primary end point when apoCIII was used as continuous variable. Per mg/dL increase in apoCIII, in the minimally adjusted model, the HR (95% CI) was 1.06 (1.01–1.11), P = 0.019 fasting and 1.02 (1.02–1.11), P = 0.007 postprandial, and in the extensively adjusted model, 1.05 (0.98–1.12), P = 0.152 fasting and 1.07 (1.00–1.13), P = 0.036 postprandial.
Fig. 2

Multivariable Cox regression analyses of the association of fasting and postprandial apoCIII below and above the mean (chylomicron-free serum) and the primary end point (fully adjusted for age*time, gender, LDL cholesterol, HOMA index, fasting triglycerides for fasting samples and 5-h triglyceride area under the curve for postprandial samples, respectively, metabolic syndrome, and smoking status). CI: confidence interval

Multivariable Cox regression analyses of the association of fasting and postprandial apoCIII below and above the mean (chylomicron-free serum) and the primary end point (fully adjusted for age*time, gender, LDL cholesterol, HOMA index, fasting triglycerides for fasting samples and 5-h triglyceride area under the curve for postprandial samples, respectively, metabolic syndrome, and smoking status). CI: confidence interval

Discussion

This study has two main findings: First, apoCIII concentrations did not change significantly after standardized oral fat intake; and second, a strong association of apoCIII concentration was found in chylomicron-free serum, but not native serum, in the fasting and postprandial state with recurrent cardiovascular events in CAD patients, even after adjustment for conventional risk factors. This findings imply that in CAD patients, apoCIII concentration in chylomicron-free serum may be a superior predictor of disease progression than apoCIII concentration in native serum. Patients with high apoCIII may benefit from rigorous risk factor control. Changes of the apoCIII concentration after fat intake could have been expected, as previous smaller studies in healthy subjects have shown slight decreases of apoCIII concentration after a duodenal fat infusion (n = 10) [24], after oral fat intake (n = 16) [25], and after several weeks of diet rich in monounsaturated fatty acids (n = 47) [26]. In another investigation of 58 in-patients, no relevant changes in apoCIII concentration during the course of a single day were observed [27]. Similarly, a recent study did not find changes in total apoCIII concentration in n = 91 inpatients after a meal [28]. In contrast, in a case-control subgroup of the Leipzig LIFE-Heart study (n = 911), apoCIII concentration was 7.3% higher postprandially compared to fasting state [29]. Using a highly standardized metabolic test protocol, no significant changes in apoCIII concentration were observed postprandially, neither in native nor in chylomicron-free serum. A strength of this study compared to the above-mentioned studies is the standardized metabolic test protocol and the high level of metabolic and cardiovascular characterization of the participants. Despite known effects of glucose as activator of apoCIII expression and of insulin as inhibitor [30, 31], these were not reflected in changes in apoCIII concentration in the patients who had an OGTT (n = 110, apoCIII [SD] in native serum: fasting 9.8 [3.6] mg/dL, after test 10.0 [3.6] mg/dL, P = 0.071, chylomicron-free serum: fasting 7.4 [4.5] mg/dL, after test 7.4 [4.7] mg/dL, P = 0.972). One could speculate that the effects of glucose and insulin counteracted. Alternatively, the standard OGTT test protocol may be too short to detect glucose-induced changes via transcriptional activation or the changes could have been too small to be captured in this study. However, the observed association of diabetes mellitus and apoCIII concentration suggests an interplay between glucose metabolism and apoCIII. ApoCIII concentrations were associated with cardiovascular events upon follow-up. This association reached statistical significance when apoCIII was measured in chylomicron-free serum, but not in native serum. This indicates differences between the chylomicron-bound proportion of apoCIII and the proportion of apoCIII not attached to chylomicrons. The chylomicron-bound proportion of apoCIII seems to mask the prognostic effect of the proportion of apoCIII bound by lipoproteins other than chylomicrons. After removing chylomicrons, this encompasses especially IDL, VLDL, and HDL [32]. This finding could be explained either by interpreting apoCIII as marker for the associated lipoproteins: chylomicrons cannot penetrate the arterial intima because of their size and are not associated with cardiovascular risk, whereas IDL and VLDL are associated with cardiovascular risk [33, 34]; or by interpreting apoCIII as being atherogenic by itself, whereas its atherogenic properties differ according to the lipoproteins it is bound to. It is likely that the interchange of the apoCIII proportion not bound to chylomicrons between different lipoproteins may also play a role and modulate the associated risk without changing total apoCIII concentration. This observation sets the stage for future studies on apoCIII associated with different lipoproteins [1]. Irrespective of this, and also taking into account that apoCIII was not significantly regulated postprandially, the association of apoCIII and CAD is more likely to be due to the endogenous rather than the exogenous pathways of lipid metabolism. A similar relationship between apoCIII concentration and cardiovascular risk in CAD patients has been reported previously in two studies. Olivieri et al. reported fasting apoCIII as independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality [35]. A nested case-control analysis from the CARE trial showed that fasting apoCIII concentrations of VLDL and LDL were independent predictors of recurrent cardiovascular events [36]. The HRs for cardiovascular events in the subgroups with high apoCIII in both studies were 2 to 2.5, i.e. remarkably similar to the findings observed in this study. The present study shows that beyond the independent role of triglycerides in predicting cardiovascular events [21], assessment of apoCIII provides additional information to stratify this high-risk population. This may help to identify patients with the highest risk who will, in absolute terms, benefit most from an intervention that reduces residual cardiovascular risk. Taken together, the current evidence suggests a causal role of apoCIII in CVD. However, it is not clear whether lowering of apoCIII will reduce CVD risk and if apoCIII by itself or the retarded clearance of remnant lipoproteins due to higher apoCIII concentration are causal drivers of CVD [37]. The recent REDUCE-IT study reported that high-dose icosapent ethyl reduces CVD risk in patients with elevated triglycerides [38]. Antisense oligonucleotides that inhibit apoCIII synthesis proved successful in decreasing apoCIII, triglyceride concentrations and other VLDL-associated apolipoproteins [15, 39–41]. These and other emerging therapeutic strategies may allow to test the importance of apoCIII for cardiovascular risk in the future.

Limitations

A potential limitation of this study is the sample size. Furthermore, statin therapy, which was established in the majority of the patients, may have influenced the observed associations. However, as most CAD patients are treated with statins, this reflects the typical situation in cardiovascular prevention, and underpins that also under statin therapy, apoCIII may be a promising therapeutic target. Strengths include the rigorous metabolic test protocol, the long follow-up, and the prospective design.

Conclusions

In conclusion, no significant changes in apoCIII concentration after standardized fat load were observed. ApoCIII concentration measured in chylomicron-free, but not native serum, predicted future cardiovascular events in patients with CAD. ApoCIII concentration may be a superior risk marker to predict residual cardiovascular risk when measured in chylomicron-free serum, independently of food intake, however this finding needs to be confirmed in larger studies. Patients with elevated apoCIII may benefit from more rigorous risk factor control. The findings of this study support testing the effects of specific lowering of apoCIII, e.g. with antisense oligonucleotides targeting apoCIII mRNA, on residual cardiovascular risk. Additional file 1: Figure S1. Workflow of detailed lipid characterization. * Chylomicron fraction: calculated as difference between total serum and chylomicron-free serum. # LDL fraction: calculated as difference between LDL/HDL fraction (infranate after removal of VLDL) and HDL fraction. Apo: apolipoprotein, TG: triglycerides, PL: phospholipids, FFA: free fatty acids. Additional file 2: Table S1. Kaplan-Meier analyses for apolipoproteins and other lipid parameters.
  40 in total

1.  Apolipoprotein C-III and the metabolic basis for hypertriglyceridemia and the dense low-density lipoprotein phenotype.

Authors:  Chunyu Zheng; Christina Khoo; Jeremy Furtado; Frank M Sacks
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  APOC3, coronary disease, and complexities of Mendelian randomization.

Authors:  Jonathan C Cohen; Stefan Stender; Helen H Hobbs
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 27.287

3.  Apolipoprotein C-III Levels and Incident Coronary Artery Disease Risk: The EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study.

Authors:  Julian C van Capelleveen; Sophie J Bernelot Moens; Xiaohong Yang; John J P Kastelein; Nicholas J Wareham; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Erik S G Stroes; Joseph L Witztum; G Kees Hovingh; Kay-Tee Khaw; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Sotirios Tsimikas
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 8.311

4.  Estimating the fasting triglyceride concentration from the postprandial HDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein CIII concentrations.

Authors:  Keiichiro Kosuge; Takashi Miida; Akihiro Takahashi; Konen Obayashi; Masayuki Ito; Takako Ito; Satoshi Soda; Kazuyuki Ozaki; Satoshi Hirayama; Osamu Hanyu; Yoshifusa Aizawa; Yuichi Nakamura
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 5.162

5.  VLDL, apolipoproteins B, CIII, and E, and risk of recurrent coronary events in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial.

Authors:  F M Sacks; P Alaupovic; L A Moye; T G Cole; B Sussex; M J Stampfer; M A Pfeffer; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Apolipoprotein C-III Strongly Correlates with Activated Factor VII-Anti-Thrombin Complex: An Additional Link between Plasma Lipids and Coagulation.

Authors:  Nicola Martinelli; Marcello Baroni; Annalisa Castagna; Barbara Lunghi; Filippo Stefanoni; Federica Tosi; Jacopo Croce; Silvia Udali; Barry Woodhams; Domenico Girelli; Francesco Bernardi; Oliviero Olivieri
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Concentrations of apolipoproteins B, C-I, C-II, C-III, E and lipids in serum and serum lipoproteins of normal subjects during alimentary lipaemia.

Authors:  G Annuzzi; L Holmquist; L A Carlson
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.713

8.  Risk prediction with triglycerides in patients with stable coronary disease on statin treatment.

Authors:  Christian Werner; Anja Filmer; Marco Fritsch; Stephanie Groenewold; Stefan Gräber; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Laufs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Plasma levels of apolipoproteins C-III, A-IV, and E are independently associated with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Julia Dittrich; Frank Beutner; Andrej Teren; Joachim Thiery; Ralph Burkhardt; Markus Scholz; Uta Ceglarek
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.162

10.  Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein-Associated Apolipoproteins Predict Cardiovascular Events and Are Lowered by Inhibition of APOC-III.

Authors:  Raimund Pechlaner; Sotirios Tsimikas; Xiaoke Yin; Peter Willeit; Ferheen Baig; Peter Santer; Friedrich Oberhollenzer; Georg Egger; Joseph L Witztum; Veronica J Alexander; Johann Willeit; Stefan Kiechl; Manuel Mayr
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  3 in total

1.  Increased atherosclerosis in a mouse model of glycogen storage disease type 1a.

Authors:  Anouk M La Rose; Anouk G Groenen; Benedek Halmos; Venetia Bazioti; Martijn G S Rutten; Kishore A Krishnamurthy; Mirjam H Koster; Niels J Kloosterhuis; Marieke Smit; Rick Havinga; Gilles Mithieux; Fabienne Rajas; Folkert Kuipers; Maaike H Oosterveer; Marit Westerterp
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 2.  Apolipoprotein CIII Is an Important Piece in the Type-1 Diabetes Jigsaw Puzzle.

Authors:  Ismael Valladolid-Acebes; Per-Olof Berggren; Lisa Juntti-Berggren
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Apolipoprotein C3 and necrotic core volume are correlated but also associated with future cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Takayuki Ohwada; Takayuki Sakamoto; Satoshi Suzuki; Yukiko Sugawara; Kazuya Sakamoto; Ayano Ikeda; Fumika Haga; Tomoki Sato; Kazuhiko Nakazato; Yasuchika Takeishi; Kenichi Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.