Literature DB >> 32472706

The long-standing history of Corynebacterium parvum, immunity, and viruses.

Beniamino Palmieri1,2, Maria Vadalà2, Luca Roncati3, Andrea Garelli4, Francesco Scandone5, Moreno Bondi6, Claudio Cermelli7.   

Abstract

We report a review of all the experimental and clinical studies performed in the last 60 years on the antiviral activity of inactivated Corynebacterium parvum (Cutibacterium acnes). This bacterium has been originally investigated and used for its oncolytic properties linked to immunomodulating activity, but the interest to successfully prevent and treat bacterial, fungal, and viral infections and lethality, uprising the innate immunity barriers produced many experimental models and very few clinical studies. The dramatic defenseless situation due to impending CoViD-19 pandemic claims to exhume and highlight this aspecific strategy in preventive and therapeutic settings; as a matter of fact, no new or mutated virus can potentially escape to this strong innate immune surveillance strengthened by adequate C. parvum protocols.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. parvum; coronavirus; immune responses; immunomodulation; innate immunity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32472706      PMCID: PMC7300755          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   20.693


INTRODUCTION

Cutibacterium acnes (formerly known as Propionibacterium acnes or Corynebacterium parvum) has been widely investigated as far as the skin microbiota environment. In 1900, it was identified as Bacillus acnes ; in the following years, because of its club‐shaped appearance it was classified as Corynebacterium, but, its mainly anaerobic metabolism and biochemical characteristics were more similar to propionic acid bacteria. For this reason, the name Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) was successfully maintained up to 2016, when it was reclassified as Cutibacterium acnes due to peculiar genomic adaptive changes. P. acnes is a Gram‐positive anaerobic bacillus that belongs to the normal cutaneous microbiota provided of immunomodulatory activity when used as a heat‐ or phenol‐killed suspension. Among its main biological activities, P. acnes promotes macrophage activation, , displays oncolytic properties, , , and is an effective adjuvant when added to normal vaccines‐enhancing soluble and cell‐mediated immune response; , all these properties boost up the infection resistance observed after intraperitoneal or subcutaneous administration. , , , The mechanisms responsible for the modulating effects of P. acnes on both innate and acquired immunity are mediated by interferon and proinflammatory cytokines, and are related on Toll‐like receptor 2 (TLR2), Toll‐like receptor 9 (TLR9), and Myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) receptors , , ; they also enhance the Th1 population function. , The experimental in vitro/in vivo and clinical studies on immunomodulating properties of C. parvum go back to 1964 when Halpern first discovered and published his experience of reticuloendothelial stimulation by C. parvum injection, with enlargement of spleen and liver that reverted after the peak at 14 day, and whose reticuloendothelial hyperplasia cleared quickly intravenous delivered carbon particles.

Experimental studies on immunomodulating properties of C. parvum

In 1966, the same author and coworkers demonstrated that mice pretreated with C. parvum were refractory to priming of tumor cells transplant. In 1977, Geniteau et al published a paper, entitled: Effect of Corynebacterium parvum on various viral infections in the mouse. In the same year, Glasgow et al injected C. parvum in mice 7 to 10 days before inoculation of herpes simplex virus hominis type 2 (HSV‐2), Murine encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV), murine cytomegalovirus virus (MCMV), and Semliki Forest Virus. The different groups of animals were highly protected against lethal infections. In the encephalomyocarditis experiment, the virus infection was counteracted either by the intraperitoneal, or the respiratory route of C. acnes administration, with a systemic, rather than local effect. C. acnes was not effective in new borne animals, probably requiring maturation of the soluble‐ and cell‐mediated immune responses. The lymphoreticular system played a central role as demonstrated by transfer of enhanced resistance against HSV‐2 to recipient animals infused with peritoneal exudate cells harvested from C. acnes‐pretreated mice. The same cells inhibited in vitro the herpetic virus colonization into target cells. In this experimental study the activated macrophages were the key of immune modulating resistance to viral infections. Also, Kirchner et al reported protective effect of C. parvum in normal and immunosuppressed mice. In this same year, Szmigielski et al demonstrated that the intraperitoneal injection of C. parvum in HSV‐2 encephalomyelitis reduced the mortality rate from 90% to 30%. The same author neutralized the mortality of varicella and hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection in proper experimental models. Papaevangelou et al investigated the immune potentiating effect of the intradermal administration of four doses (0.25 mL) of a standard suspension of killed C. parvum (2 mg/mL) in 10 asymptomatic chronic Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers, compared with 11 persons with antibodies to HBsAg (anti‐HBs) and six without HBsAg or anti‐HBs. HBsAg, anti‐HBs, and leukocyte migration inhibition studies were performed in pre‐and postinoculation blood samples. C. parvum produced a substantial increase of anti‐HBs titer in persons with pre‐existing anti‐HB immunity. However, anti‐HBs responses were not induced in carriers. HBsAg was not eliminated and its titer remained practically unchanged in chronic carriers. The conclusive hypothesis is, that the specific defect in the immune response to HBsAg in carriers ought to be at the B cell level. Kobus and Szmigielski demonstrated that subcutaneous C. parvum injection simultaneously with live attenuated viral vaccines achieved an higher immunity rate and protection in several experiments. Teixeira et al evaluated the adjuvant role of C. parvum in BALB/c mice with HIVBr18, a DNA vaccine containing 18 CD4+T cell epitopes from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), specifically and steadily uprising the CD4+ and CD8+T cell responses. The C. parvum added to vaccine administration increased the proliferation of HIV‐1‐specific CD4+ and CD8+T lymphocytes, the polyfunctional profile of CD4+T cells, the production of interferon gamma (IFN‐γ), and the number of recognized vaccine‐encoded peptides; the immunological reinforcement was more striking using the whole dead C. parvum as adjuvant compared with its bacterial polysaccharides extract; IFN‐γ production as well as T cells proliferation were maintained up to 10 weeks after the challenge with the whole dead bacterium. Since it has been successfully used as an adjuvant in experimental trials, P. acnes can be a suitable candidate for integration in human vaccines to enhance the immune response. , Moreover, Budzko et al showed a dose‐dependent response in Junin virus infection in mice: 280 mcg injected intraperitoneally uplifted the survival rate to 80% compared with 20% of the untreated animals. Naficy et al reported the antiviral activity of five different C.parvum strains in comparison with simple vaccination, stressing an effective adjuvant role. Also the French researcher Cerutti demonstrated the antiviral/protective activity of C. parvum against lethal infections of Newcastle disease virus (NDV), EMCV, and vesicular stomatitis viruses (VSV) in mice experimental models. Schindler et al observed a protective effect when C. parvum was given 2 hours before or 2 hours after viral infection with mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) a Coronavirus strain 3 (MHV‐3). He suggested also that C. parvum determined a significant decrease of virus yield in cultures of peritoneal exudate cells infected with MHV3. He showed that contemporary intraperitoneal injection of the virus and of C. parvum prevented the infection with activation of interferon and natural killer cells but also with a direct action upon macrophages who are the primary target of virus replication. In fact, Belyavsky et al demonstrated that Coronavirus MHV‐3 produces fulminant lethal infection in fully susceptible BALB/c mice with massive‐apoptosis in macrophages that play a key role in the virus induced liver failure. Mak et al showed that intranasal administration of 350 µg C. parvum 3 days in advance protected different mice strains (c57BL/6j, BALB/CBalb/cnu+NU+) from influenza lethality. A substantial reduction of the intrapulmonary copies of virus was detected in parallel to the level of interferon and macrophage activation in the lung. Despite the increase in macrophage content, the level of specific immune responses to infection, such as cytotoxic T‐cell activity, delayed‐type hypersensitivity reaction, and antihemagglutinin antibody, remained unchanged by C. parvum treatment so that the major if not exclusive effect of this treatment was supposed to be an uplift in the general components of the immune system. Zgórniak‐Nowosielska et al achieved strong resistance against vaccinia viruses and Herpes Virus‐1 with C. parvum pretreatment. Splenomegaly was induced by the procedure, but the specific antibodies titer was unchanged suggesting enhancement of natural immunity rather than specific soluble immunity stimulation. Kounoue et al prevented the virus induced encephalomyocarditis of mice with a 3 to 14 tailored pretreatments of C. parvum; this therapy prevented pancreas colonization by virus, causing insulae destruction and diabetes. Cohen et al treated ectromelia virus‐infected mice with intraperitoneal C. parvum in comparison with mineral oil adjuvant injection. The protection was obtained through macrophage uptaking and killing of the viruses and interferon induction. Mayr et al evaluated in vitro and in vivo the immunomodulation activity of levamisole, BCG, and C. parvum in viral and bacterial infections outlining a superior activity of both the bacteria compared with the synthetic drug. Cox (1998) used P. acnes to treat cat's anemia due to Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV) infection. He obtained a marked improvement of erythrocyte and leukocytes, compared with the untreated group. The same American researcher Cow with the researcher Weiss investigated also in the cat viral peritonitis model treatment with interferons (IFNs) and C. parvum (either single or joined administration) different dosages for prevention or therapy. Notwithstanding the high lethal dose of virus, the survival rate of the group treated with interferon or interferon plus C. parvum was much higher than in the control untreated group. Hall et al treated bovine papilloma virus (BPV) infections with local infiltrations of C. parvum; the animals healed definitely in 15 weeks. Flaminio et al evaluated in healthy young horses the immunological impact of three injections of C. parvum either in blood and in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 0, 7, and 14 days. Total peripheral blood white cell count was increased (P < .05) at 14 day. l BAL fluid cell count decreased (P < .01) on day 14 due to lymphocyte (P < .01) and macrophage (P < .01) reduction with an inversion of lymphocyte/macrophages ratio; total (P < .05) and proportional (P < .05) counts of CD4+T lymphocytes were increased in the peripheral blood. On day 14, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid proportion of CD4+ (P < .05), CD5+ (P < .001) and major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) (P < .05) lymphocytes increased as well; nonopsonized phagocytic activity in peripheral blood increased (P < .0005); lymphokine‐activated killing cell activity in peripheral blood and BAL fluid leukocytes was enhanced (P < .005). Serum IgG and IgM remained unchanged. This investigation demonstrated the immunostimulant and modulatory properties of P. acnes, by increased CD4+T lymphocyte expression and lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) activity in peripheral blood and BAL fluid, by increased nonopsonized phagocytosis in peripheral blood leukocytes but with reduced number of live cells in BAL. Megid et al dealing with dogs in veterinary setting, affected by oral papillomatosis, a virus‐induced pathology of the mouth, at different ages achieved complete regression after five average weekly injections of C. parvum, locally delivered. The same author (2002) examined in the rabies infected swiss mice the lethality and distribution of the virus copies comparing the plain vaccination versus vaccination + C. parvum. The survival rate was higher in the C. parvum added treatment group, and it was related to a greater number of viruses sequestration into the spleen and lymph node macrophages. Megid, 1 year before, had measured the natural killer (NK) activity and lethality in the same mice model exposed to rabies virus and treated with C. acnes; the mice were progressively killed and the spleen cells rescued and analyzed. Higher NK activity and better survival rate were observed in the P. acnes cohort outlining this lymphocyte population as the key mechanism of rabies virus neutralization. In a mouse model of vaccination, the same author (2006) analyzed the cytokines response to rabies vaccine propagated in VERO cells, compared with the same vaccination procedure plus C. parvum or C. parvum alone. The highest survival was achieved with one or two doses of P.acnes alone: on the contrary antirabies VERO vaccine alone or with three doses of P. acnes survived at a lesser rate. The mortality was directly related to the highest IL‐6 concentration accordingly with the clinical symptoms. Obviously, P. acnes counteracted the IL‐6 overexpression in the rabies model being this cytokine responsible of the mice mortality. Davis et al successfully administered C. parvum in horse tracheobronchial viral infections, detecting increased blood levels of interferon, monocytes and killer lymphocytes in parallel to the symptoms relieve. Caney reports the current professional veterinary use of C. parvum as immunomodulator especially effective in FeLV with anecdotal reports of curing the affected cats. Paillot reviewed the immunomodulation properties of inactivated Parapoxvirus Ovis (iPPVO) and P. acnes for prophylactic treatment of bronchopulmonary infections usually of viral origin in horses. The action mechanism relies on a non–antigen specific interaction with the innate and/or adaptive immune responses. iPPVO stimulates and regulates cytokine secretion by leukocytes, while P. acnes acts primarily through the activation of macrophages; in the author's opinions, both immunomodulators can be profitably added to conventional antibiotic therapy or vaccination. Vail et al added P. acnes to conventional therapy of Equine Respiratory Disease Complex (ERDC). A first group of 25 horses received conventional therapy + C. parvum and a second group of 20 horses (negative controls) received conventional therapy plus 12.5% ethanol‐saline solution. Two weeks later, 96% (24/25) of the horses treated with C. parvum and conventional therapy underwent full recovery or clinical improvement; while in the control group only 35% (7/20) showed clinical improvement or complete recovery. Adams et al performed a study on weaning horses, usually severely distressed in that life period, with reduced immunity and increased susceptibility to gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders. Thus, preventative administration of immunomodulator aimed at mitigating the weaning‐associated stress was studied in 21 pony foals (205 days ± 5‐day‐old). Of these, 11 animals received the C. parvum‐based immunostimulant EqStim and other (n.10) received a saline control on days −7, −3, and 0 (day of weaning). At days 3, 7, 14, and 21, the following clinical parameters were measured: cortisol, immune function by flow cytometry, and real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for gene expression, and nasal swabs (NSs) and C reactive protein (polymerase chain reaction, PCR). Results showed an overall time effect of weaning for most parameters: decreased rectal temperature, increased nasal discharge, and NS PCR detection of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus, increased serum cortisol levels, and both decreased and increased production of cytokines (lymphocyte production interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) and whole blood levels of Interleukin 1 beta (IL‐1β), TNF‐α, and Interleukin 10 (IL‐10). In addition, there was an increase on cortisol concentrations and peripheral blood mononuclear cell production of IL‐1β. These data suggest that, regardless of treatment, the weaning process produces significant changes in clinical and immunologic measures in foals.

Clinical studies on immunomodulating properties of C. parvum

Coming to clinical trials, Nasser treated 20 patients severely affected by multiple common warts infections (caused by different strains of papilloma virus) with repeated local injections of C. parvum, 0.2 mL subcutis (10 patients) compared with placebo (saline solution). The procedure was repeated from 1 to 5 months dependently by the regression rate and it was definitely effective in 9 cases out of 10, with partial regression in the last one but none of the placebo group had any benefit except one partial regression. Our literature search was not able to find in the past any human trial or anecdotal report on C. parvum treatment of viral infections except the contribution of Papaevangelou et al and Nasser (see above). Forty years ago, Palmieri et al during some clinical trials on cancer‐bacteria immunotherapy had the chance to successfully use dead C. parvum primarily in severe zoster infections occasionally coaffecting three cancer patients. The C. parvum intratumor injection very quickly suppressed the infections. This serendipitous finding disclosed the hypothesis of treatment benefits on a wider viruses range. The injection protocol varied from 2 mL of dry lyophilized bacterium subcutis each other day for three sessions, to five sessions following the course of the infection. These positive antivirus results were even more striking because no Herpes suppressing drug was market available at that time (except the weakly effective lysozyme). The author subsequently followed up growing C. parvum in the hospital facilities and treated anecdotally further patients with severe impending common viral infection symptoms (including huge skin eruptions, vesical mucositis, high fever, lymph nodes and salivary glands enlargements bronchopulmonary complications, etc). All the viral infections, such as herpes simplex (n = 12), herpes zoster (n = 12), influence (n = 4), mumps (n = 2), varicella (n = 2), and measles (n = 3) subsided very quickly. The recovery was safe and quick, with fever and symptoms downstaging after 18 to 72 hours; no relevant side effects of the procedure were detected and the remission of neurological, respiratory, cardiovascular, cutaneous and fatigue symptoms overall satisfactory.

DISCUSSION

Corynebacterium parvum is the protagonist of a unique long‐standing international publications series reporting its peculiar immunomodulating role against a wide variety of virus infections, and mortality (Table 1) either in experimental lab or in domestic animals. Its wide spectrum antiviral activity is supposedly due to an aspecific activity potentiating monocytes, and natural killer cells with regard to their number and function, and interferon gene activation; this is the basic very first barrier to virus invasion, a mechanism confirmed by a great number of experimental studies on different animal species.
Table 1

Description of studies on C. parvum

No.Study typeVirus typeAimResultsReferences
#1In vivo study ‐Myco­bacterium tuberculosis, BCG or saprophytes, eg, M. phlei,Stimulation of macrophages and fagocitary activity after Corynebacterium parvum (C. parvum) injectionHe confirmed of reticuloendothelial stimulation by C. parvum injection, with enlargement of spleen and liver that reverted after the peak at 14 d.Halpern et al 6
#2In vivo study‐Epithelioid sarcomaThe effect of C. parvum on tumors of sarcomatous or epithelial originHe demonstrated that C. parvum pretreated mice were refractory to challenge of tumor cellsHalpern et al 8
#3In vivo study‐Several virusesAntiviral properties of five strains of C. parvum Naficy et al 33
#4In vivo study

NDV

EMCV

VSV

Therapeutic effect of C. parvum in infected miceHe verified the antiviral/protective activity of C. parvum against lethal NDV infections, encephalomyocarditis, and vesicular stomatitis viruses in mice experimental modelsCerutti et al 34
#5In vivo study‐Several virusesEffect of C. parvum on various viral infections in the mouseGeniteau et al 22
#6CLINICAL TRIAL‐Hepatitis BThe immunopotentiating effect of the intradermal administration of killed C. parvum (four doses) in 27 patients: 10 asymptomatic HBsAg, 11 persons with anti‐HBs, and 6 without HBsAg or anti‐HBs.The author hypothesized that in carriers the specific defect in the immune response to HBsAg probably exists at the B cell level.Papaevangelou et al 27
#7In vivo study‐EMCV‐1Effect of Corynebacterium acnes, C. parvum and bacilli Calmette‐Guèrin in mice infected with EMCV‐1The cells of the lymphoreticular system inhibited the progression of herpetic infection in tissue culture, possibly through activation of macrophagesGlasgow et al 23
#8In vivo study‐Junin virusThe effect of intraperitoneal C. parvum administration in mice infected with Junin virusThe data showed that the symptoms, in mice, were not the consequence of cell damage caused directly by the virus but of a undefined indirect mechanism induced by the virus, not necessarily mediated by macrophages.Budzko et al 32
#9In vivo study‐HSV‐1Effect of C. parvum and Bordetella pertussis in mice infected with HSV‐1The authors suggested that intraperitoneal (IP) injection of killed C. parvum (10 mg/kg) 1 wk before IP infection of adult mice with HSV‐1 protected them from encephalitis and death. The data evidenced high levels of interferon in the serum of mice injected with C. parvum 5 to 12 d previously.Kirchner et al 24
#10In vivo study‐Guèrin tumorEffect of C. parvum injection into the Guèrin tumorThe author observed a synergistic effect with heat (43°C for 60 min) that resulted in augmented tumor regression and increased macrophage activity against the tumor cell in vitroSzmigielski 25
#11In vivo study

Herpes simplex,

VACV,

MHV‐3

Effect of Propionibacterium granulosum kp‐45 in BALB/c mice infected with three different viruses (herpes simplex, VACV, and mouse hepatitis)The data showed a significant lowering of the number of paralysed mice and in a decrease of the mortality rate.Szmigielski et al 26
#12In vivo study‐MHV‐3Protective effect of intraperitoneal C. parvum injection in MHV‐3‐infected susceptible C57Bl/6 miceThe author observed an effect when C. parvum was given 2 h before or 2 h after viral infection. He suggested also that C. parvum determined a significant decrease of virus yield in cultures of peritoneal exudate cells infected with MHV3Schindler et al 35
#13In vivo study‐Influenza virusEffect of intranasally C. parvum inoculation (350 µg/mouse) in C57BL/6J, BALB/c, BALB/c, nu+/nu+ miceHe showed that protected different mice strains from influenza lethalityMak et al 37
#14In vivo study‐ECTVEffect of intraperitoneal C. parvum in comparison with mineral oil adjuvant injection in ectromelia virus infected miceThe protection was obtained through macrophage uptaking and killing of the viruses and interferon inductionCohen et al 40
#15In vivo and in vitro study

VSV and Aujeszky virus.

Tumor model (radiation induced osteosarcoma in the mouse)

Effect of individual immunostimulants (C.parvum, BCG, and levamisole)The immunomodulation activity of these components in viral and bacterial infections outlined a superior activity of both the bacteria compared with the synthetic drugMayr et al 41
#16In vivo studyEMCV induction of diabetes mellitusEffect of C.parvum in encephalomyocarditis virus‐induced diabetes in miceThe C. parvum inoculation given 3‐14 d before the virus infection inhibited the virus replication in the pancreas of the miceKounoue et al 39
#17In vivo study

VACV,

HSV‐1

Effect of Proprionibacterium acnes (formerly C. parvum) in infected miceThe data achieved strong resistance against VACV and HSV‐1 with P. acnes pretreatmentZgòrniak‐Nowosaelska et al 38
#18In vivo study‐Equine respiratory disease complex (ERDC)Effect of P.acnes (Eqstim) treating horses with ERDCThe authors treated 25 horses with Eqstim and 20 with conventional therapy. The 96% of the horses of the first group showed clinical improvement or complete recoveryVail et al 52
#19In vivo study‐Feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIP‐V)Effect of P.acnes, interferon, and combination of these drugs in 74 cats infected with FIPVThe survival rate of the group treated with interferon or interferon plus C. parvum was much higher than in the control untreated group.Weiss et al 42
#20In vivo study‐BPVEvaluation od C. parvum suspension in BPVThe data showed that intralesional administration of C. parvum induced regression of bovine papillomas in 8‐15 wkHall et al 43
#21In vivo study‐HSV‐1Effect of heat‐killed lyophilized Propionibacterium avidum KP‐40 (PA) and/or the herpes‐specific antiviral substance acyclovir (ACL) as immune‐modifier in NMRI mice with HSV‐1The P.avidum applied 4 d before HSV‐1 infection lowered the mortality rate to 27%, while treatment 2 d after infection was less effective and the mortality rate reached 44%, but it was significantly lower (P < .01) than in untreated controls. A combined treatment with P. avidum and protected 93% of animals against the development of encephalitis.Kobus et al 28
#22In vivo study‐Respiratory diseaseEvaluation of inactivated P. acnes (Eqstim) in horsesThe data confirmed immunostimulant and immunomodulatory properties of P. acnes, evidenced by increased CD4+T lymphocyte expression and LAK activity in peripheral blood and BAL fluid, increased nonopsonized phagocytosis in peripheral blood leukocytes and decreased pulmonary cellularity.Flaminio et al 44
#23In vivo and vitro study‐MHV‐3Evaluation of macrophages role in the pathogenesis of MHV‐3‐induced hepatitis.The results evidenced that murine coronavirus MHV‐3 could be a RNA‐containing viruses capable of inducing apoptosis.Belvasky et al 36
#24In vivo study‐Rabies virusEvaluation of treatment with the immunomodulators onco‐BCG, avridine and P. acnes in mice with rabies virus and then inoculated with Fuenzalida‐Palacios mouse brain human rabies vaccineThe results showed higher levels of IFN‐gamma in the mice treated with P. acnes.Megid69
#25In vivo study‐Street rabies virusImmunomodulation of P. acnes in swiss mice experimentally infected with street rabies virusThe data evidenced higher Natural killer activity and percentual of survival were observed in mice submitted to P. acnes.Megid & Kaneno 47
#26In vivo study‐Canine oral papillomaEffect of P. acnes in 16 dogs with oral wartsThese results suggested the use of P. acnes as an alternative in these symptomsMegid et al 45
#27In vivo study‐Street rabies virusImmunomodulant effect of P. acnes in swiss mice infected with street rabies virus and then vaccinatedThe mice vaccinated and after treated with C. parvum presented a superior percentage of survival to that observed in mice treated only with P. acnes Megid et al 46
#28In vivo studyImmunomodulant action of C. parvum in healthy horsesThe authors showed that horses treated with a P. acnes‐based immunomodulator exhibited increased IFN‐gamma and NK‐lysin gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cellsDavis et al 49
#29In vivo study‐Street rabies virusImmunomodulation of C. parvum in swiss mice infected by rabies virus and after vaccinatedThe authors observed, in vaccinated mice treated with P. acnes, greater survival rates, higher IL‐10 and low IL‐6 serum concentration.Megid70
#30In vivo study‐FeLVEffect of C. parvum, and other antiviral agents in feline infectious diseasesThe author showed therapeutic effects and no side effectsCaney 50
#31In vivo study‐Rabies virusEvaluation of the survival and cytokine serum concentration of rabies virus‐infected mice treated with P. acnes in conjunction with or the antirabies‐VERO vaccine.The greatest survival was observed in animals given one or two doses of P. acnes in the absence of vaccination. While, the mice inoculated with antirabies VERO vaccine alone or with three doses of P. acnes had the second highest survival rate.Megid et al 48
#32CLINICAL TRIAL‐Human papilloma virus (HPV)Efficacy of C. parvum in saline solution for the treatment of skin warts in 20 patientsIn nine patients treated with the P. parvum solution, the warts disappeared without scars and in one patient it decreased in size.Nasser 54
#33Review‐Respiratory disease and other infections, such as iPPVOThe action as immuno‐modulators of iPPVO and P. acnes for prophylactic treatment or adjunct to conventional therapy in horsesThis paper summarizes the scientific literature and reports available about iPPVO and C. parvum use in horses, particularly in the prevention or treatment of equine respiratory diseasesPaillot 51
#34In vivo study‐Nasal shedding of respiratory pathogensImmunostimulant action of P. acnes (EqStim) in 21 pony foals; of these 11 received the C.parvum and 10 received a saline control C. parvum vaccination had no effect on the incidences of nasal shedding of respiratory pathogens or other clinical parameters, but raised cortisol after weaning and enhanced innate immunity.Adams et al 53
#35In vivo study‐HIVEvaluation of adjuvant action of P. acnes in BALB/c mice with HIVBr18, a DNA vaccine containing 18 CD4+T cell epitopes from HIVThe data showed an increase of the proliferation of HIV‐1‐specific CD4+ and CD8+T lymphocytes, of the polyfunctional profile of CD4+T cells, of the production of IFN‐γ, and of the number of recognized vaccine‐encoded peptidesTeixeria et al 29
#36Clinical trialHerpes zoster, varicella, measles, mumps, influence P. acnes subcut & aerosol quick and effective control of infectionThe results showed quick and safe symptoms remission and recoveryPalmieri et al 55

Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; BPV, bovine papilloma virus; EMCV, murinencephalomyocarditis virus; ECTV, ectromelia virus; HSV, herpes simplex virus; LAK, lymphocyte activated killer; MHV, mouse hepatitis virus; NDV, Newcastle disease virus; VACV, vaccinia viruses; VSV, vesicular stomatitis viruses.

Description of studies on C. parvum NDV EMCV VSV Herpes simplex, VACV, MHV‐3 VSV and Aujeszky virus. Tumor model (radiation induced osteosarcoma in the mouse) VACV, HSV‐1 Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; BPV, bovine papilloma virus; EMCV, murinencephalomyocarditis virus; ECTV, ectromelia virus; HSV, herpes simplex virus; LAK, lymphocyte activated killer; MHV, mouse hepatitis virus; NDV, Newcastle disease virus; VACV, vaccinia viruses; VSV, vesicular stomatitis viruses. Thus C. parvum antagonism against virus infections is projected either in neutralizing virus‐induced cell dysfunction and death (for instance respiratory epithelium, hepatocytes, dendritic macrophages, etc), or in counteracting the antivirus‐triggered inflammatory cytokine cascade turning an endogenous defense weapon into a self‐destructive lethal mechanism. Kalis et al focused primarily on the bacterium‐host immune cell interaction to better understand the immunomodulating mechanisms of killed C. parvum preparation through systemic and organ specific (lung) innate immunity: The receptor type involved in this interaction is Toll‐like receptor 9 (TLR9). As a matter of fact, TLR9−/− clock out mice, C. parvum stimulation is not able to induce either splenomegaly and extra bone marrow hemopoiesis, or TNF alfa and interferon gamma (based on Modulation of IFN‐γ mRNA expression) productions; also resistance to murine typhoid fever morbidity and mortality fails in C. pavum immunized TLR9−/− mice based on this investigation. The promyelocytic dendritic macrophages, migrating class of monocytes plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) represent 0.2 to 0.8% of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and display plasma cell morphology in humans. They express only TLR7, 8 and 9, but not TLR2, TLR3, TLR4 and TLR5. Therefore, they are supposed through TLR9 and TLR7 to play a primary role in DNA and RNA virus to some DNA and RNA viruses, preventing the infections either shaping and upgrading innate immunity, or translating the innate response to adoptive immunity. pDCs produce massive amounts of type I interferon, activating NK cells, NKT cells, B cells, T cells, and myeloid uncommitted DCs and then complete the suppression and clearance of the virus particles. C. parvum probably recruits and activates these cells with chemotactic signal, enhancing the defense against viruses. We suppose that in humans, as in the experimental animal models, the dead bacterium acts initially as a strong TLR9 agonist, activating macrophages and promoting high levels of Th1, TNF, interferon, and natural killer cells to clear the infecting pathogens. Another intriguing interplay between viruses and C. parvum is the pivotal role of vimentin. We know from dermatological investigations that inflammation of sebaceous glands and keratinocytes by Cutibacterium acnes involves a complex cytokines cascade, and that live C. acnes enters into monocytes and tissue cells and can survive and proliferate interacting with vimentin network, a component of the cytoskeleton. , P. acnes invades the prostate cells that express vimentin, which is able to activate immune response against the bacterium through the Nuclear factor‐κB (NFkB) intracellular innate immune signaling. Also, several viruses, for example severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‐CoV) and Enterovirus 71, , , like C. parvum interact with vimentin on the cell membrane surface; vimentin acts as virus receptor promoting endocytosis, trapping pathogenic agents, and finally triggering the NFkB pathway. Subsequently, after the inflammatory reaction, we find extracellular vimentin extruded from activated macrophages, to definitely remove the infectious agents. The virulence of intracellular surviving viruses and bacteria can further be expressed by their enzymatic modification and intracellular distribution of vimentin filaments, neutralizing its defense function. On the other hand, vimentin is a ligand of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Nucleotide‐binding oligomerization domain‐containing protein 2 (NOD2), Dectin‐1, and NLPR3 (nucleotide‐binding domain, leucine‐rich‐containing family, pyrin domain‐containing‐3 OR NOD‐like receptor protein 3), and the specific virus interceptor RIG‐1‐like receptors (retinoic acid‐inducible gene‐I‐like receptors, RLRs). , , , These PRRs, once alerted, activate the inflammasome and NF‐kB cascade to destroy the hosts. Pathogenic viruses, however, can try to overwhelm these defense mechanisms, inactivating the vimentin–PRRs complex by posttranslational modifications. In this perspective, the puzzling competition between the subcutaneous injected dead C. parvum and virus infections plays a determinant role to balance the innate immune defense mechanisms and virulence factors.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the long experimental history documenting a wide spectrum antiviral activity of C. parvum lysates, both in vitro and in vivo, besides a limited number of clinical trials, strongly supports the hypothesis that also SARS‐CoV‐2 virus can be effectively neutralized by this treatment, suggesting that further investigation is worth to be carried out, mainly by clinical trials. This potential aspecific anti SARS‐CoV‐2 activity could efficiently prevent and treat this dramatically world spreading viral disease and help the recovery of social and productive life.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

BP: Conceptualization (lead); writing–original draft (lead); formal analysis (lead); writing – review and editing (equal). MV: Writing – original draft (equal); formal analysis (equal); writing–review and editing (lead). LR: Conceptualization (supporting); review and editing (equal). Andrea Garelli: Conceptualization (equal). FS: Conceptualization (equal). MB: Writing–original draft (equal). CC: Review and editing (supporting).
  62 in total

1.  Astrogliosis involves activation of retinoic acid-inducible gene-like signaling in the innate immune response after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Juan Pablo de Rivero Vaccari; Julia Minkiewicz; Xiaoliang Wang; Juan Carlos De Rivero Vaccari; Ramon German; Alex E Marcillo; W Dalton Dietrich; Robert W Keane
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 7.452

2.  Antiviral properties of five strains of Corynebacterium.

Authors:  K Naficy; R Nategh; M Malekian
Journal:  Prog Immunobiol Stand       Date:  1971

3.  Protection of mice against mouse hepatitis virus by Corynebacterium parvum.

Authors:  L Schindler; G Streissle; H Kirchner
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Requirement for TLR9 in the immunomodulatory activity of Propionibacterium acnes.

Authors:  Christoph Kalis; Marina Gumenscheimer; Nikolaus Freudenberg; Sandrine Tchaptchet; György Fejer; Antje Heit; Shizuo Akira; Chris Galanos; Marina A Freudenberg
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Propionibacterium acnes induces an adjuvant effect in B-1 cells and affects their phagocyte differentiation via a TLR2-mediated mechanism.

Authors:  Monica Gambero; Daniela Teixeira; Liane Butin; Mayari Eika Ishimura; Mario Mariano; Ana Flavia Popi; Ieda Maria Longo-Maugéri
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 3.144

6.  Treatment of common warts with the immune stimulant Propionium bacterium parvum.

Authors:  Nilton Nasser
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.896

7.  Natural killer activity in mice infected with rabies virus and submitted to P. acnes (Propionibacterium acnes) as immunomodulator.

Authors:  J Megid; R Kaneno
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.268

8.  Immunomodulation of host resistance to experimental viral infections in mice: effects of Corynebacterium acnes, Corynebacterium parvum, and Bacille calmette-guérin.

Authors:  L A Glasgow; J Fischbach; S M Bryant; E R Kern
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Induced regression of bovine papillomas by intralesional immunotherapy.

Authors:  H Hall; C Teuscher; P Urie; B Boden; R Robison
Journal:  Ther Immunol       Date:  1994-12

10.  Interaction of Cutibacterium ( formerly Propionibacterium) acnes with bone cells: a step toward understanding bone and joint infection development.

Authors:  Guillaume Ghislain Aubin; Marc Baud'huin; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Régis Brion; François Gouin; Didier Lepelletier; Cédric Jacqueline; Dominique Heymann; Karim Asehnoune; Stéphane Corvec
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  COVID-19 vaccine and boosted immunity: Nothing ad interim to do?

Authors:  Luca Roncati; Maria Vadalà; Veronica Corazzari; Beniamino Palmieri
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Innate Immunity Stimulation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenge by Parvulan.

Authors:  Beniamino Palmieri; Antonio Manenti; Francesca Galotti; Maria Vadalà
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 3.  The long-standing history of Corynebacterium parvum, immunity, and viruses.

Authors:  Beniamino Palmieri; Maria Vadalà; Luca Roncati; Andrea Garelli; Francesco Scandone; Moreno Bondi; Claudio Cermelli
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 20.693

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.