Literature DB >> 32471878

Physical Salience and Value-Driven Salience Operate through Different Neural Mechanisms to Enhance Attentional Selection.

Matthew D Bachman1, Lingling Wang1, Marissa L Gamble1, Marty G Woldorff2.   

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that both increased physical salience and increased reward-value salience of a target improve behavioral measures of attentional selection. It is unclear, however, whether these two forms of salience interact with attentional networks through similar or different neural mechanisms, and what such differences might be. We examined this question by separately manipulating both the value-driven and physical salience of targets in a visual search task while recording response times (RTs) and event-related potentials, focusing on the attentional-orienting-sensitive N2pc event-related potential component. Human participants of both sexes searched arrays for targets of either a high-physical-salience color or one of two low-physical-salience colors across three experimental phases. The first phase ("baseline") offered no rewards. RT and N2pc latencies were shorter for high-physical-salience targets, indicating faster attentional orienting. In the second phase ("equal-reward"), a low monetary reward was given for fast correct responses for all target types. This reward context improved overall performance, similarly shortening RTs and enhancing N2pc amplitudes for all target types, but with no change in N2pc latencies. In the third phase ("selective-reward"), the reward rate was made selectively higher for one of the two low-physical-salience colors, resulting in their RTs becoming as fast as the high-physical-salience targets. Despite the equally fast RTs, the N2pc's for these low-physical-salience, high-value targets remained later than for high-physical-salience targets, instead eliciting significantly larger N2pc's. These results suggest that enhanced physical salience leads to faster attentional orienting, but value-driven salience to stronger attentional orienting, underscoring the utilization of different underlying mechanisms.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Associating relevant target stimuli with reward value can enhance their salience, facilitating their attentional selection. This value-driven salience improves behavioral performance, similar to the effects of physical salience. Recent theories, however, suggest that these forms of salience are intrinsically different, although the neural mechanisms underlying any such differences remain unclear. This study addressed this issue by manipulating the physical and value-related salience of targets in a visual search task, comparing their effects on several attention-sensitive neural-activity measures. Our findings show that, whereas physical salience accelerates the speed of attentional selection, value-driven salience selectively enhances its strength. These findings shed new insights into the theoretical and neural underpinnings of value-driven salience and its effects on attention and behavior.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; N2pc; attention; attentional capture; reward; value

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32471878      PMCID: PMC7343324          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1198-19.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task.

Authors:  Jane E Raymond; Jennifer L O'Brien
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-22

Review 2.  Neurobiology of value-driven attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-13

Review 3.  Rewards teach visual selective attention.

Authors:  Leonardo Chelazzi; Andrea Perlato; Elisa Santandrea; Chiara Della Libera
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Exogenous visual orienting by reward.

Authors:  Michel F Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials. I: Scalp topography.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; P Berg; M Scherg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Alan G Sanfey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The Rapid Capture of Attention by Rewarded Objects.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Jens-Max Hopf; Mandy V Bartsch; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict.

Authors:  Berry van den Berg; Ruth M Krebs; Monicque M Lorist; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials.

Authors:  Javier Lopez-Calderon; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluating individual differences in rewarded Stroop performance: reliability and associations with self-report measures.

Authors:  Brent Pitchford; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Reward magnitude enhances early attentional processing of auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Brittany Glassberg; Marissa L Gamble; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  The diachronic account of attentional selectivity.

Authors:  Alon Zivony; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 4.  Gotcha: Working memory prioritization from automatic attentional biases.

Authors:  Susan M Ravizza; Katelyn M Conn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 5.  Multiregional communication and the channel modulation hypothesis.

Authors:  Bijan Pesaran; Maureen Hagan; Shaoyu Qiao; Ryan Shewcraft
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  μ Opioid Antagonist Naltrexone Partially Abolishes the Antidepressant Placebo Effect and Reduces Orbitofrontal Cortex Encoding of Reinforcement.

Authors:  Marta Peciña; Jiazhou Chen; Thandi Lyew; Jordan F Karp; Alexandre Y Dombrovski
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-03-06

7.  Reward and loss incentives improve spatial working memory by shaping trial-by-trial posterior frontoparietal signals.

Authors:  Youngsun T Cho; Flora Moujaes; Charles H Schleifer; Martina Starc; Jie Lisa Ji; Nicole Santamauro; Brendan Adkinson; Antonija Kolobaric; Morgan Flynn; John H Krystal; John D Murray; Grega Repovs; Alan Anticevic
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 7.400

8.  On the Influence of Spatial and Value Attentional Cues Across Individuals.

Authors:  Kelly G Garner; Michelle Lovell-Kane; Luke Carroll; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-06-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.