Literature DB >> 32471016

Virtual melanoma checks during a pandemic.

M Janda1, S M Swetter2, C Horsham1, H P Soyer3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32471016      PMCID: PMC7300448          DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   11.113


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Healthcare services internationally are experiencing unprecedented strain due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Governments mandate strict social distancing to reduce the spread of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, and as a result, people are avoiding health services for less urgent issues. In this crisis, it is important that patients continue to receive preventive and surveillance care without compromising their safety or that of healthcare workers. Early detection of melanoma is important to reduce mortality. Delaying a visit to a primary care provider or dermatologist for a potential melanoma may result in a worse prognosis.1 Most melanomas are initially noticed by the patients themselves or by their families, which then prompts them to present for a clinical skin examination.2 In the current environment, presenting for a clinical skin examination may be viewed as less important and thus postponed. While most dermatology practices have deferred nonessential care, early detection of melanoma is still encouraged and could be delivered using telehealth services for those unwilling to attend a clinic setting. Virtual melanoma checks using either store‐and‐forward or video real‐time technologies have been trialled for servicing patients in rural areas. These technologies may now be used for patients at highest risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, including those frail or elderly, with chronic diseases or under immunosuppression, and others who are fearful of visiting doctors for risk of infection. Telehealth also eliminates risk of contracting the virus for the healthcare workers. During COVID‐19, the virtual melanoma check has been important for triaging. If the lesion appears to require a biopsy, the biopsy may be postponed depending on the healthcare system constraints during COVID‐19. Of note, virtual melanoma checks should be used with caution for high‐risk patients with suspected malignant pigmented lesions, as any delay in diagnosis for such patients may be particularly problematic.3 Additionally, frail or elderly people may require the most training or assistance with conducting virtual melanoma checks. In the consumer‐initiated store‐and‐forward model, people can use their smartphone with or without a dermatoscope attachment and corresponding app in their home. Patients would be required to purchase their own, hire or borrow a dermatoscope, and this will add additional costs or logistical requirements, which will need to be considered. Dermatoscope purchase costs vary from approximately 30 Australian dollars each to over a thousand dollars depending on the magnification, light source, operating system and quality of the mobile app. Teledermatology can also be initiated by doctors asking patients to monitor lesions between clinical visits. During doctor–patient video consultations, any lesions submitted via teledermoscopy could be discussed. Whether or not a patient is suitable for virtual melanoma checks should be assessed individually based on their access to a smartphone and internet connectivity, nature of appointment, personal circumstances, and risk factors associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. We recently conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing patients using skin self‐examination (SSE) with or without using a mobile dermatoscope at home. Both groups had a high degree of sensitivity (> 75%) and specificity (> 87%) in detecting suspicious lesions that the dermatologist also thought were worthwhile checking, and in the mobile teledermoscopy group no melanoma was overlooked by the patients.4 Based on these findings, during the SARS‐CoV‐2 crisis we propose a two‐step process for consumer‐based SSE. Firstly, we recommend that a person conduct whole‐body naked‐eye SSE. Individuals should be provided with educational material on how to conduct a whole‐body SSE and detect a suspicious skin spot, such as the commonly known ‘ABCDE’ rule.2 Conducting naked‐eye SSE initially may prevent individuals from overimaging their lesions, and reduce workload for doctors. Secondly, the person conducts mobile teledermatology (with or without a dermatoscope attachment) on these preselected lesions and/or any that their doctor wanted them to monitor (for established patients). Building on the International Skin Imaging Collaboration guidelines for image quality,5 we developed a consumer guide to taking standardized photos (Table 1), which enabled all but a small proportion of photos (5%) submitted during our RCT to be of good enough quality for telediagnosis. Concerns over patient confidentiality, privacy and image storage are often raised in telehealth, but these can be addressed in the patient consent. The patient consent should make explicit what the process involves, limitations of virtual compared with in‐person checks, timeframe of providing results, who will view, diagnose and have access to the images and what will be done with this information, and the secure transfer and storage of images. The record of consent is given for the time period over which the images are stored.
Table 1

Guide to taking standardized photos for consumer‐based skin self‐examination

Virtual melanoma checks at home: a guide for patients to take standardized images
To provide an accurate diagnosis, the image needs to be high quality:
Use natural daylight, or a brightly lit space. Use a plain, neutral‐coloured background.
Remove any jewellery.
Move anything creating a shadow out of the way, including your hair.
If your photos are coming out blurry, ask another person to help you with photo taking, especially in hard‐to‐reach body locations.
Take two photos of each skin spot or mole.
The first photo is an overview image of the skin spot or mole. Hold the camera approximately 20 cm from the skin spot or mole. Point to the skin spot or mole if there are multiple skin spots visible in the photo. Move the camera until you have a clear photo, then hold the camera still and take the image.
The second photo is a dermoscopic image (if applicable). Dermoscopic images are magnified close‐up images. When using the dermatoscope place the lens directly contacting the skin.
When photographing the lesion hold the camera horizontally each time to ensure the same orientation.
Ensure the skin spot or mole is in the centre of the image.
Record the body location.
In the notes or comments section select any symptoms that may describe the skin spot or mole photographed such as:
change in size or shape;
more raised;
change in colour;
more than two colours;
itchy;
bleeding;
scaly or rough surface;
sore or painful;
duration of lesion.
Patients should provide a brief medical history including date of birth, sex, skin type and previous skin cancer history.
Guide to taking standardized photos for consumer‐based skin self‐examination Teledermatology services are promising and could be particularly helpful during the COVID‐19 pandemic and future global health crises. However, the ‘digital divide’ whereby such services are more difficult for people with lower health literacy skills or technology access needs to be addressed to ascertain equity in access to telehealth services.
  5 in total

1.  Proposed Technical Guidelines for the Acquisition of Clinical Images of Skin-Related Conditions.

Authors:  Anna Finnane; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Glen Wimberley; Liam Caffery; Chinmayee Katragadda; Allan Halpern; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Josep Malvehy; Harald Kittler; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Ivo Abraham; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 2.  Melanoma patient self-detection: a review of efficacy of the skin self-examination and patient-directed educational efforts.

Authors:  Sarah Yagerman; Ashfaq Marghoob
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.512

3.  Accuracy of teledermatology for pigmented neoplasms.

Authors:  Erin M Warshaw; Frank A Lederle; Joseph P Grill; Amy A Gravely; Ann K Bangerter; Lawrence A Fortier; Kimberly A Bohjanen; Karen Chen; Peter K Lee; Harold S Rabinovitz; Robert H Johr; Valda N Kaye; Sacharitha Bowers; Rachel Wenner; Sharone K Askari; Deborah A Kedrowski; David B Nelson
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Accuracy of mobile digital teledermoscopy for skin self-examinations in adults at high risk of skin cancer: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Monika Janda; Caitlin Horsham; Dimitrios Vagenas; Lois J Loescher; Nicole Gillespie; Uyen Koh; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Allan Halpern; David C Whiteman; Jennifer A Whitty; B Mark Smithers; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-02-20

5.  Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study.

Authors:  Minjoung Monica Koo; Ruth Swann; Sean McPhail; Gary A Abel; Lucy Elliss-Brookes; Greg P Rubin; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 41.316

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on care of melanoma patients in Berlin, Germany: the Mela-COVID survey

Authors:  Miriam Teuscher; Katharina Diehl; Marthe-Lisa Schaarschmidt; Juliane Weilandt; Bianca Sasama; Jan Ohletz; Andreas Könnecke; Wolfgang Harth; Uwe Hillen; Wiebke Katharina Peitsch
Journal:  Eur J Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Impact of delay in follow-up due to COVID-19 pandemic on skin cancer progression: a real-life experience from an Italian hub hospital.

Authors:  Mario Valenti; Giulia Pavia; Luigi Gargiulo; Paola Facheris; Ombretta Nucca; Luca Mancini; Francesco Sacrini; Riccardo G Borroni; Alessandra Narcisi; Antonio Costanzo
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.204

3.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic delay of skin cancer: a call to restart screening activities.

Authors:  C Dessinioti; C Garbe; A J Stratigos
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 9.228

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.