Shaojie Chen1, Boris Schmidt2, Alexander Seeger3, Stefano Bordignon3, Shota Tohoku3, Franziska Willems3, Lukas Urbanek3, Christina Throm3, Athanasios Konstantinou3, Karin Plank3, Max Hilbert3, Simone Zanchi3, Lorenzo Bianchini3, Fabrizio Bologna3, Nikolaos Tsianakas3, Claudia Kreuzer3, K R Julian Chun4. 1. Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Frankfurt Academy For Arrhythmias (FAFA), Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Die Sektion Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. Electronic address: drsjchen@126.com. 2. Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Frankfurt Academy For Arrhythmias (FAFA), Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Electronic address: b.schmidt@ccb.de. 3. Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Frankfurt Academy For Arrhythmias (FAFA), Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 4. Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Frankfurt Academy For Arrhythmias (FAFA), Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Medizinische Klinik II, Kardiologie/Angiologie/Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. Electronic address: j.chun@ccb.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-power, short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates the procedure and improve effectiveness; however, esophageal injury remains a safety concern. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during high-power ablation for PVI in terms of endoscopic esophageal lesion. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic AF underwent ablation index-guided high-power (AI-HP) PVI (50 W; AI anterior wall/posterior wall: 550/400). In the first consecutive set of patients, an insulated esophageal temperature probe was used for LET monitoring (cutoff LET >39°C) (group A). In the second consecutive set of patients, the probe was not used (group B). All patients were scheduled to undergo esophageal endoscopy 1-3 days after ablation. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (60 group A; 60 group B) were included in the study (mean age 67.8 years; 64% male). Baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Procedural PVI was achieved in all patients. First-pass PVI rate was 96.6%. Mean procedural radiofrequency (RF) time was 11.5 minutes, mean procedural time was 55.5 minutes, and fluoroscopic time was 5.6 minutes. Mean contact force at the LA posterior wall was 23 g, and mean RF ablation time at the LA posterior wall was 3.2 minutes. Two patients in group A and 1 patient in group B had endoscopic small esophageal lesions (P = .99). No serious procedural adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing AI-HP (50 W) PVI, the incidences of ablation-related endoscopic esophageal lesion in patients with and those without use of a temperature probe for LET monitoring (cutoff 39°C) were comparably low.
BACKGROUND: High-power, short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates the procedure and improve effectiveness; however, esophageal injury remains a safety concern. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during high-power ablation for PVI in terms of endoscopic esophageal lesion. METHODS:Patients with symptomatic AF underwent ablation index-guided high-power (AI-HP) PVI (50 W; AI anterior wall/posterior wall: 550/400). In the first consecutive set of patients, an insulated esophageal temperature probe was used for LET monitoring (cutoff LET >39°C) (group A). In the second consecutive set of patients, the probe was not used (group B). All patients were scheduled to undergo esophageal endoscopy 1-3 days after ablation. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (60 group A; 60 group B) were included in the study (mean age 67.8 years; 64% male). Baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Procedural PVI was achieved in all patients. First-pass PVI rate was 96.6%. Mean procedural radiofrequency (RF) time was 11.5 minutes, mean procedural time was 55.5 minutes, and fluoroscopic time was 5.6 minutes. Mean contact force at the LA posterior wall was 23 g, and mean RF ablation time at the LA posterior wall was 3.2 minutes. Two patients in group A and 1 patient in group B had endoscopic small esophageal lesions (P = .99). No serious procedural adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing AI-HP (50 W) PVI, the incidences of ablation-related endoscopic esophageal lesion in patients with and those without use of a temperature probe for LET monitoring (cutoff 39°C) were comparably low.
Authors: Yuki Ishidoya; Eugene Kwan; Derek J Dosdall; Rob S Macleod; Leenhapong Navaravong; Benjamin A Steinberg; T Jared Bunch; Ravi Ranjan Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Wern Yew Ding; Lilith Tovmassian; Cedric Bierme; Nikola Kozhuharov; Richard L Snowdon; Dhiraj Gupta Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2022-05-26