Literature DB >> 32470148

Serum KL-6 concentrations as a novel biomarker of severe COVID-19.

Miriana d'Alessandro1, Paolo Cameli1, Rosa Metella Refini1, Laura Bergantini1, Valerio Alonzi1, Nicola Lanzarone1, David Bennett1, Giuseppe Domenico Rana1, Francesca Montagnani2,3, Sabino Scolletta4, Federico Franchi4, Bruno Frediani5, Serafina Valente6, Maria Antonietta Mazzei7, Francesco Bonella8, Elena Bargagli1.   

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-induced direct cytopathic effects against type I and II pneumocytes mediate lung damage. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is mainly produced by damaged or regenerating alveolar type II pneumocytes. This preliminary study analyzed serum concentrations of KL-6 in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to verify its potential as a prognostic biomarker of severity. Twenty-two patients (median age [interquartile range] 63 [59-68] years, 16 males) with COVID-19 were enrolled prospectively. Patients were divided into mild-moderate and severe groups, according to respiratory impairment and clinical management. KL-6 serum concentrations and lymphocyte subset were obtained. Peripheral natural killer (NK) cells/µL were significantly higher in nonsevere patients than in the severe group (P = .0449) and the best cut-off value was 119 cells/µL. KL-6 serum concentrations were significantly higher in severe patients than the nonsevere group (P = .0118). Receiver operating characteristic analysis distinguished severe and nonsevere patients according to KL-6 serum levels and the best cut-off value was 406.5 U/mL. NK cell analysis and assay of KL-6 in serum can help identify severe COVID-19 patients. Increased KL-6 serum concentrations were observed in patients with severe pulmonary involvement, revealing a prognostic value and supporting the potential usefulness of KL-6 measurement to evaluate COVID-19 patients' prognosis.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; KL-6; biomarker; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32470148      PMCID: PMC7283867          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


intensive care unit interstitial lung disease Krebs von den Lungen‐6

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) emerged in Wuhan (China) in December 2019 and was declared pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. It has been hypothesized that CD4‐ and CD8‐positive cells play a crucial role in defence against coronavirus, together with activated B cells producing specific antibodies and proinflammatory cytokines. Elevated serum concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress mediators participate in lung injury, facilitating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in severe patients. Host susceptibility and virus‐induced direct cytopathic effects against type I and II pneumocytes mediate lung damage. Krebs von den Lungen‐6 (KL‐6) is a high molecular weight glycoprotein, elevated in serum of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. It is mainly produced by damaged or regenerating alveolar type II pneumocytes. This mucin protein is recognized as a prognostic bioindicator of ILDs, predicting response to antifibrotic therapies. , , It has also been proposed as a prognostic marker of ARDS: high KL‐6 concentrations have been demonstrated in ventilated patients and showed a correlation with risk of mortality. KL‐6 serum levels in ARDS may reflect the alveolar epithelial cell damage induced by mechanical ventilatory support. High peripheral levels of this protein have also been reported in Legionella, Pneumocystis jivorecii infections, , and measles‐associated pneumonia, as well as in viral pneumonia. This preliminary study analyzed serum concentrations of KL‐6 for the first time in a population of hospitalized coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) patients to verify its potential as a prognostic biomarker of severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

Twenty‐two patients (median age [interquartile range {IQR}] 63 [59‐68] years, 16 males), hospitalized at Siena University Hospital with COVID‐19, were enrolled prospectively. Patients were divided into mild‐moderate and severe groups, according to respiratory impairment and clinical management. All patients in the severe group underwent intubation and mechanical ventilation in the COVID intensive care unit (ICU), while mild‐moderate patients (not requiring intubation) were hospitalized for pharmacological treatment and oxygen supplementation or noninvasive ventilation. Patients in the severe group included nine patients with bilateral diffuse interstitial pneumonia and three patients with focal bilateral pneumonia. The 12 mild‐moderate patients included three with bilateral diffuse pneumonia, one with monolateral pneumonia, and the other eight with focal bilateral pneumonia, all documented radiologically. Patients with pre‐existing ILDs, chronic obstructive lung disease, or concomitant infections were excluded from the study. Twenty‐two healthy volunteers (median age [IQR] 54 [29‐60] years, six males) were also enrolled. They had no history of concomitant pathologies and were not on any medication. They had normal lung function test parameters and normal chest X‐ray. All patients gave their written informed consent to the study. The study was approved by our local ethics committee (BIOBANCA‐MIU‐2010).

KL‐6 assay

Serum samples were obtained from all patients at hospital admission before any biological treatment or infusion of high‐dose intravenous steroids or invasive ventilation. Serum concentrations of KL‐6 (sKL‐6) were measured by KL‐6 reagent assay (Fujirebio Europe, UK), as previously reported. , , The principle of the assay is agglutination of sialylated carbohydrate antigen in samples with KL‐6 monoclonal antibody by antigen–antibody reaction. The change in absorbance was measured to determine KL‐6 concentrations, which were expressed in U/mL.

Flow cytometry analysis

Blood samples were processed by flow cytometry using a panel of monoclonal antibodies (BD Multitest™ 6‐color TBNK; BD‐Biosciences, San Jose, CA), including fluorescein isothiocyanate‐labelled CD3, phycoerythrin‐labelled CD16 and CD56, PerCPCy5.5‐labelled CD45, PECy7‐labelled CD4, APC‐labelled CD19, and APCCy7‐labelled CD8, according to the manufacturer's instructions. At least 30 000 events were collected for each sample. Data were analyzed using DIVA software (BD‐Biosciences). Lymphocytes were phenotyped on the basis of forward (FSC) vs side (SSC) scatters and additional gating was applied using SSC vs CD45 to distinguish lymphocytes from cell debris. Specific panels were subsequently assessed to identify T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and natural killer (NK) cells. T lymphocyte subpopulations were gated to distinguish CD3+CD4+ (T‐helper), CD3+CD8+ (T‐cytotoxic), and CD3− CD16+/56+ (NK).

Statistical analysis

The data did not show a normal distribution. One‐way analysis of variance nonparametric test (Kruskal–Wallis test) and Dunn test were used for multiple comparisons. The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare pairs of variables. The χ 2 test was used for categorical variables as appropriate. Immunological data were also compared between the severe and nonsevere groups, assessing areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis and graphic representation of the data were performed with GraphPad Prism 8.0 software.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the main characteristics of our COVID‐19 population together with lymphocyte subset results and KL‐6 concentrations in serum, dividing patients into severe vs mild‐moderate groups on the basis of whether mechanical ventilation requirements.
Table 1

Main characteristics of population including age (median [IQR]), sex (%), lymphocyte subsets, and KL‐6 concentrations at the hospital admission

ParametersSevere cases (n = 12)Nonsevere cases (n = 10) P‐value
Age (median [IQR])62 [60‐68]64 [51‐64].5761
Sex, M/F9/36/4.6517
Lymphocyte subsets (median [IQR])
CD45, cells/µL792 [548‐1156]1039 [655‐1612].2268
CD3%73 [65‐81]72 [69‐73].6504
CD3, cells/µL495 [406‐789]794 [569‐1014].1956
CD4%45 [37‐54]40 [39‐43].2894
CD4, cells/µL356 [232‐533]458 [342‐551].4695
CD8%21 [15‐33]29 [25‐33].4320
CD8, cells/µL136 [89‐307]333 [217‐432].1422
CD19%12 [9‐21]15 [12‐18].5358
CD19, cells/µL109 [58‐139]135 [113‐226].1883
NK cells %10 [6‐13]14 [9‐15].1148
NK, cells/µL74 [32‐101]141 [88‐205].0449
CD4/CD82.3 [1.1‐3.4]1.5 [1.2‐1.8].3402
KL‐6, U/mL1021 [473‐1909]293 [197‐362].0118

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

Main characteristics of population including age (median [IQR]), sex (%), lymphocyte subsets, and KL‐6 concentrations at the hospital admission Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. The total number of lymphocytes (CD45+) was found to be depleted in all patients (median [IQR] 797 [566‐1150] cells/µL) and peripheral NK cells/µL were significantly higher in nonsevere patients than in the severe group (median [IQR] 141 [88‐205] vs 74 [32‐101]; P = .0449). ROC analysis distinguished these two groups with an AUC of 78.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55‐100; P = .0425; Figure 1A) and the best cut‐off value was 119 cells/µL (71% sensitivity and 92% specificity).
Figure 1

A, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of natural killer cells/µL between severe and nonsevere coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) patients. B, Krebs von den Lungen‐6 (KL‐6) concentrations in COVID‐19 patients and healthy controls. (P < .05). C, ROC analysis of serum KL‐6 concentrations between severe and nonsevere COVID‐19 patients

A, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of natural killer cells/µL between severe and nonsevere coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) patients. B, Krebs von den Lungen‐6 (KL‐6) concentrations in COVID‐19 patients and healthy controls. (P < .05). C, ROC analysis of serum KL‐6 concentrations between severe and nonsevere COVID‐19 patients KL‐6 serum concentrations were significantly higher in severe patients than the nonsevere group (median [IQR] 1021 [473‐1909] vs 293 [197‐362], P = .0118; Figure 1B). ROC analysis distinguished severe and nonsevere patients according KL‐6 serum levels with AUC 82.4% (95% CI: 62‐100, P = .0129; Figure 1C) and the best cut‐off value was 406.5 U/mL (83% sensitivity and 89% specificity). When KL‐6 concentrations were compared between COVID‐19 patients and healthy controls, the latter showed serum concentrations of KL‐6 similar to those of nonsevere patients (median [IQR] 239 [132‐371] vs 293 [197‐362], P = .5277; Figure 1B), while on the other hand, KL‐6 concentrations were significantly higher in severe patients than in healthy controls (median [IQR] 1021 [473‐1909] vs 239 [132‐371], P = .012; Figure 1B).

DISCUSSION

In this study, KL‐6 was analyzed for the first time in a population of patients with COVID‐19. Serum concentrations of KL‐6 were only elevated in severe patients admitted to the ICU and requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation for diffuse interstitial pneumonia, and not in mild‐moderate patients with less severe respiratory impairment. Patients with mild‐moderate COVID interstitial pneumonia showed serum concentrations of KL‐6 similar to those of healthy controls. Although these results are preliminary (this was a monocentric study with a limited number of patients), they are of interest because KL‐6 emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker readily detected in serum of COVID‐19 patients and helpful for phenotyping patients according to disease severity. This mucin protein has been widely studied in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and patients with ARDS but limited data have so far been available on its prognostic potential in infective pneumonia. , , No data have hitherto been available on its pattern in coronavirus‐induced interstitial pneumonia. Our interest was aroused by the observation that this biomarker was correlated with prognosis in ILDs and ARDS, reflecting alveolar type I and type II pneumocyte damage. KL‐6 concentrations at peripheral blood level can reflect severe interstitial lung damage, epithelial lung alterations and regenerative processes secondary to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. In this context, a further aim will be to perform a serial evaluation of KL‐6 in the follow‐up of COVID‐19 patients. Another interesting finding, in line with previous studies on series of ILD and ARDS patients, was that KL‐6 showed potential as a prognostic biomarker of COVID‐19 pneumoniapatients with serum concentrations greater than 406 U/mL showed severe disease and a high risk of intubation. Likewise, Sato et al reported median serum concentrations of KL‐6 of 537 U/mL in 28 patients with ARDS. These results are worthy of further validation in a larger cohort to define the cut‐off value for identifying patients at high risk of severe respiratory failure. Moreover, these parameters may help clinicians establish correct timing of mechanical ventilation in this specific population. Lymphocyte depletion and decreased NK subsets in peripheral blood were accentuated in COVID‐19 patients with severe interstitial pneumonia and high serum concentrations of KL‐6. In conclusion, lymphocyte phenotyping including NK cell analysis and assay of KL‐6 in serum can help identify severe COVID‐19 patients. Serum concentrations of KL‐6 were only elevated in patients with severe pulmonary involvement, revealing a prognostic value and supporting the potential usefulness of KL‐6 measurement to evaluate COVID‐19 patients' prognosis.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

MD conceived the study and supervised all aspects of study. MD, PC, RMR, LB, VA, NL, DB, GDR, FM, SS, FF, BF, SV, MAM, and EB collected data and built the database. MD, PC, LB, EB, and FB conducted the data analysis and interpretation of results. All authors drafted and revised the papers.
  12 in total

1.  Bronchoalveolar lavage and serum KL-6 concentrations in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: correlations with radiological and immunological features.

Authors:  Nicola Lanzarone; Francesco Gentili; Valerio Alonzi; Laura Bergantini; Miriana d'Alessandro; Paola Rottoli; Rosa Metella Refini; Maria Pieroni; Lucia Vietri; Francesco Bianchi; Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Luca Volterrani; Anna Perrone; Paolo Cameli; Elena Bargagli; Piersante Sestini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Serial KL-6 analysis in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with nintedanib.

Authors:  Laura Bergantini; Elena Bargagli; Paolo Cameli; Behar Cekorja; Nicola Lanzarone; Lucrezia Pianigiani; Lucia Vietri; David Bennett; Piersante Sestini; Paola Rottoli
Journal:  Respir Investig       Date:  2019-02-21

3.  Serial change in serum biomarkers during treatment of Non-HIV Pneumocystis pneumonia.

Authors:  Naohisa Urabe; Susumu Sakamoto; Go Sano; Ai Ito; Ryo Sekiguchi; Sakae Homma
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.211

4.  Peripheral lymphocyte subset monitoring in COVID-19 Italian patients.

Authors:  Miriana D'Alessandro; David Bennett; Francesca Montagnani; Paolo Cameli; Anna Perrone; Laura Bergantini; Federico Franchi; Sabino Scolletta; Maria A Mazzei; Luca Volterrani; Serafina Valente; Giacomo Zanelli; Lucia Migliorini; Barbara Rossetti; Massimiliano Fabbiani; Cecilia Vagaggini; Nicola Lanzarone; Pier L Capecchi; Maria G Cusi; Piersante Sestini; Elena Bargagli; Bruno Frediani
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Serum KL-6 levels in pulmonary Langerhans' cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  Miriana d'Alessandro; Laura Bergantini; Paolo Cameli; Nicola Lanzarone; Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Valerio Alonzi; Piersante Sestini; Elena Bargagli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.686

6.  Clinical utility of serum beta-D-glucan and KL-6 levels in Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia.

Authors:  Hideta Nakamura; Masao Tateyama; Daisuke Tasato; Syusaku Haranaga; Satomi Yara; Futoshi Higa; Yuji Ohtsuki; Jiro Fujita
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 1.271

7.  KL-6 levels are elevated in plasma from patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  H Sato; M E J Callister; S Mumby; G J Quinlan; K I Welsh; R M duBois; T W Evans
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Serum KL-6 levels as a biomarker of lung injury in respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Yukihiko Kawasaki; Yoshimichi Aoyagi; Yusaku Abe; Hayato Go; Takashi Imamura; Mari Kaneko; Masaki Ito; Masahiko Katayose; Koichi Hashimoto; Mitsuaki Hosoya
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.327

9.  Serum KL-6 concentrations as a novel biomarker of severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Miriana d'Alessandro; Paolo Cameli; Rosa Metella Refini; Laura Bergantini; Valerio Alonzi; Nicola Lanzarone; David Bennett; Giuseppe Domenico Rana; Francesca Montagnani; Sabino Scolletta; Federico Franchi; Bruno Frediani; Serafina Valente; Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Francesco Bonella; Elena Bargagli
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.327

10.  Serum KL-6 levels reflect the severity of interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue disease.

Authors:  Jeong Seok Lee; Eun Young Lee; You-Jung Ha; Eun Ha Kang; Yun Jong Lee; Yeong Wook Song
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Alveolar type II cells and pulmonary surfactant in COVID-19 era.

Authors:  A Calkovska; M Kolomaznik; V Calkovsky
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.881

2.  Association of serum KL-6 levels on COVID-19 severity: A cross-sectional study design with purposive sampling.

Authors:  Titah Dhadhari Suryananda; Resti Yudhawati
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-12

3.  Association of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 and chest CT as potential prognostic factors in severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Lucia Manganaro; Elisa Guiducci; Simone Ciaglia; Miriam Dolciami; Alessandra Spagnoli; Francesco Alessandri; Antonio Angeloni; Annarita Vestri; Carlo Catalano; Paolo Ricci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.313

4.  Prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with severe COVID-19 is associated with serial modified-lung ultrasound scores: A single-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Hayato Taniguchi; Aimi Ohya; Hidehiro Yamagata; Masayuki Iwashita; Takeru Abe; Ichiro Takeuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Usefulness of monocyte distribution width and presepsin for early assessment of disease severity in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Sei Won Kim; Heayon Lee; Sang Haak Lee; Sung Jin Jo; Jehoon Lee; Jihyang Lim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Clinical Outcomes of Sotrovimab Treatment in 10 High-Risk Patients with Mild COVID-19: A Case Series.

Authors:  Kenichiro Takeda; Hajime Kasai; Seiichiro Sakao; Mikihito Saito; Kohei Shikano; Akira Naito; Mitsuhiro Abe; Takeshi Kawasaki; Misuzu Yahaba; Toshibumi Taniguchi; Hidetoshi Igari; Takuji Suzuki
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-08

7.  Serum KL-6 concentrations as a novel biomarker of severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Miriana d'Alessandro; Paolo Cameli; Rosa Metella Refini; Laura Bergantini; Valerio Alonzi; Nicola Lanzarone; David Bennett; Giuseppe Domenico Rana; Francesca Montagnani; Sabino Scolletta; Federico Franchi; Bruno Frediani; Serafina Valente; Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Francesco Bonella; Elena Bargagli
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.327

8.  Serum KL-6 can distinguish between different phenotypes of severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Hideta Nakamura; Kazuya Miyagi; Mariko Otsuki; Yuri Higure; Naoya Nishiyama; Takeshi Kinjo; Masashi Nakamatsu; Shusaku Haranaga; Masao Tateyama; Jiro Fujita
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 20.693

9.  Peripheral biomarkers' panel for severe COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Miriana d'Alessandro; Laura Bergantini; Paolo Cameli; Giuseppe Curatola; Lorenzo Remediani; Piersante Sestini; Elena Bargagli
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 20.693

10.  Serum concentrations of Krebs von den Lungen-6 in different COVID-19 phenotypes.

Authors:  Miriana d'Alessandro; Paolo Cameli; Laura Bergantini; Federico Franchi; Sabino Scolletta; Elena Bargagli
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 20.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.