| Literature DB >> 32469155 |
Ovidiu Chioncel1,2, John Parissis3,4, Alexandre Mebazaa5, Holger Thiele6,7, Steffen Desch6,7, Johann Bauersachs8, Veli-Pekka Harjola9, Elena-Laura Antohi1,2, Mattia Arrigo10, Tuvia Ben Gal11,12, Jelena Celutkiene13, Sean P Collins14, Daniel DeBacker15, Vlad A Iliescu1,2, Ewa Jankowska16, Tiny Jaarsma17,18, Kalliopi Keramida4,19, Mitja Lainscak20,21, Lars H Lund22,23, Alexander R Lyon24,25, Josep Masip26,27, Marco Metra28, Oscar Miro29,30, Andrea Mortara31, Christian Mueller32, Wilfried Mullens33,34, Maria Nikolaou3, Massimo Piepoli35, Susana Price36, Giuseppe Rosano37,38, Antoine Vieillard-Baron39,40, Jean M Weinstein41, Stefan D Anker42,43, Gerasimos Filippatos44,45, Frank Ruschitzka10, Andrew J S Coats46, Petar Seferovic47,48.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex multifactorial clinical syndrome with extremely high mortality, developing as a continuum, and progressing from the initial insult (underlying cause) to the subsequent occurrence of organ failure and death. There is a large spectrum of CS presentations resulting from the interaction between an acute cardiac insult and a patient's underlying cardiac and overall medical condition. Phenotyping patients with CS may have clinical impact on management because classification would support initiation of appropriate therapies. CS management should consider appropriate organization of the health care services, and therapies must be given to the appropriately selected patients, in a timely manner, whilst avoiding iatrogenic harm. Although several consensus-driven algorithms have been proposed, CS management remains challenging and substantial investments in research and development have not yielded proof of efficacy and safety for most of the therapies tested, and outcome in this condition remains poor. Future studies should consider the identification of the new pathophysiological targets, and high-quality translational research should facilitate incorporation of more targeted interventions in clinical research protocols, aimed to improve individual patient outcomes. Designing outcome clinical trials in CS remains particularly challenging in this critical and very costly scenario in cardiology, but information from these trials is imperiously needed to better inform the guidelines and clinical practice. The goal of this review is to summarize the current knowledge concerning the definition, epidemiology, underlying causes, pathophysiology and management of CS based on important lessons from clinical trials and registries, with a focus on improving in-hospital management.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; Mechanical circulatory support; Multidisciplinary team; Organ dysfunction
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32469155 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1922
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Heart Fail ISSN: 1388-9842 Impact factor: 17.349