Literature DB >> 30360958

Effect of breast reconstruction modality on the development of postmastectomy shoulder morbidity.

Kyong-Je Woo1, Kyeong-Tae Lee2, Goo-Hyun Mun2, Jai-Kyong Pyon2, Sa Ik Bang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of breast reconstruction modality on the incidence of shoulder morbidity.
METHODS: Breast cancer patients who underwent immediate reconstructions using three modalities, namely, tissue expander-implant, latissimus dorsi (LD) pedicled flap, and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, from 2008 to 2013 were examined. The cumulative incidence of shoulder morbidity was compared among the reconstruction modalities, and risk factor analysis was performed using multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 430 reconstructions (223 expander-implant, 44 LD flap, and 163 DIEP flap) in 420 patients were analyzed in this study. Shoulder morbidity developed in 95 patients (22.1%) and was most common in the LD group (43.2%) followed by the expander-implant (23.8%) and the DIEP (14.1%) groups over a mean follow-up of 52 (range: 24-120) months. The multivariable analysis showed that the expander-implant (odds ratio (OR) 2.15, p = 0.010) and the LD flap (OR 6.27, p < 0001) were significant risk factors for shoulder morbidity, compared to the DIEP flap. Old age (p = 0.041), presence of tumor-positive lymph nodes (p = 0.014), and receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for the development of shoulder morbidity. Early rehabilitation within 2 postoperative-months reduced the risk of sustained shoulder morbidity.
CONCLUSION: The choice of reconstruction modality might affect the development of postmastectomy shoulder morbidity. Understanding the risk factors for shoulder morbidity would help to improve the informed consent process and assist surgeons in the early diagnosis and initiation of rehabilitation therapy to prevent chronic shoulder dysfunction after breast reconstruction.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap; Expander-implant; Latissimus dorsi flap; Rehabilitation; Shoulder morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30360958     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

1.  Physical side-effects following breast reconstructive surgery impact physical activity and function.

Authors:  Deirdre E McGhee; Julie R Steele
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A comprehensive approach to risk factors for upper arm morbidities following breast cancer treatment: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ifat Klein; Leonid Kalichman; Noy Chen; Sergio Susmallian
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Patient Perspective on Post-Breast Reconstruction Exercise and Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Margaret J Higgins; Nisha Kale; Christopher Homsy; Kelsey L Alabaster; Peter Ferrin; Cadence Miskimin; Abigail E Chaffin; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-09-20

4.  Implant-based versus Autologous Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Justin M Broyles; Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Wangnan Cao; Monika Reddy Bhuma; Shivani Mehta; Laura S Dominici; Andrea L Pusic; Ian J Saldanha
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.