Literature DB >> 3246693

Interaction of contact velocity and cord compression in determining the severity of spinal cord injury.

P A Kearney1, S A Ridella, D C Viano, T E Anderson.   

Abstract

Rate, depth, and duration of compression are the principal determinants of experimental spinal cord injury (SCI) severity. Since existing models do not allow independent control of these variables, the interaction of these factors has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to define the interactive relation of velocity (V) and compression (C) in SCI using a constrained stroke pneumatic impactor that allowed independent control of these variables. Computer simulation of previous weight-drop experiments using a lumped-mass model were compared with this series of impacts. After rigid stabilization of adjacent cervical vertebrae, the spinal cord (SC) in 48 male ferrets was compressed through the C6-C7 interspace. Maximum compression was 25%, 35%, 50%, or 65% of the SC diameter. Impacts were delivered at five velocities from 1.5 m/s to 6 m/s. Severity of injury was determined by pre and postinjury measurement of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and blinded quantitation of histopathologic findings. Twenty-three of 48 animals (48%) had measurable SEP at 4 hs. No animal recovered SEP at 65% compression at any velocity, or at a velocity of 6 m/s for any level of compression. Recovery of SEP and histologic severity score correlated better with velocity-compression product, or maximum viscous response (VC) than with either V or C alone. The mean histologic severity score was higher in animals exhibiting no recovery of SEP. Modeling the viscoelastic elements of the SC using existing force-time and force-deflection data suggests that estimates of compression from current weight-drop techniques may be inaccurate. At low contact velocity, functional and anatomic damage is best predicted by maximum SC compression. However, as velocity increases, SCI severity becomes a function of the viscous response (VC), demonstrating the rate sensitivity of spinal cord tissue. Tolerance to SC compression decreases as the rate of deformation increases. This helps to explain apparent discrepancies between compression and severity of experimental SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3246693     DOI: 10.1089/neu.1988.5.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  11 in total

1.  Microglial activation in rat experimental spinal cord injury model.

Authors:  Alireza Abdanipour; Taki Tiraihi; Taher Taheri; Hadi Kazemi
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2013

2.  Spinal canal narrowing during simulated frontal impact.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Adam M Pearson; S Elena Gimenez; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Causes and control of spinal cord injury in automotive crashes.

Authors:  D C Viano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Characterization of graded multicenter animal spinal cord injury study contusion spinal cord injury using somatosensory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gracee Agrawal; Candace Kerr; Nitish V Thakor; Angelo H All
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Effects of white, grey, and pia mater properties on tissue level stresses and strains in the compressed spinal cord.

Authors:  Carolyn J Sparrey; Geoffrey T Manley; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Severity of spinal cord injury in adult and infant rats after vertebral dislocation depends upon displacement but not speed.

Authors:  Ngee-Soon Stephen Lau; Catherine A Gorrie; Jie Yu Chia; Lynne E Bilston; Elizabeth C Clarke
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Impact depth and the interaction with impact speed affect the severity of contusion spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Cameron J Lam; Peggy Assinck; Jie Liu; Wolfram Tetzlaff; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Management and outcomes of spinal epidural hematoma during vertebroplasty: Case series.

Authors:  Miao Fang; Jiaojiao Zhou; Dongjun Yang; Yu He; Yong Xu; Xin Liu; Yong Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Brainstem-Evoked Transcription of Defensive Genes After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Walter J Jermakowicz; Melissa M Carballosa-Gautam; Alberto A Vitores; Ian D Hentall
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  The influence of the energy of trauma, the timing of decompression, and the impact of grade of SCI on outcome.

Authors:  Michael J H McCarthy; Simon Gatehouse; Monica Steel; Ben Goss; Richard Williams
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2011-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.