| Literature DB >> 32466601 |
Kamila Czarnecka1, Małgorzata Girek1, Przemysław Wójtowicz1, Paweł Kręcisz1, Robert Skibiński2, Jakub Jończyk3, Kamil Łątka3, Marek Bajda3, Anna Walczak4, Grzegorz Galita4, Jacek Kabziński4, Ireneusz Majsterek4, Piotr Szymczyk5, Paweł Szymański1.
Abstract
A series of new tetrahydroacridine and 3,5-dichlorobenzoic acid hybrids with different spacers were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their ability to inhibit both cholinesterase enzymes. Compounds 3a, 3b, 3f, and 3g exhibited selective butyrylcholinesterase (EqBuChE) inhibition with IC50 values ranging from 24 to 607 nM. Among them, compound 3b was the most active (IC50 = 24 nM). Additionally, 3c (IC50 for EeAChE = 25 nM and IC50 for EqBuChE = 123 nM) displayed dual cholinesterase inhibitory activity and was the most active compound against acetylcholinesterase (AChE). Active compound 3c was also tested for the ability to inhibit Aβ aggregation. Theoretical physicochemical properties of the compounds were calculated using ACD Labs Percepta and Chemaxon. A Lineweaver-Burk plot and docking study showed that 3c targeted both the catalytic active site (CAS) and the peripheral anionic site (PAS) of AChE. Moreover, 3c appears to possess neuroprotective activity and could be considered a free-radical scavenger. In addition, 3c did not cause DNA damage and was found to be less toxic than tacrine after oral administration; it also demonstrated little inhibitory activity towards hyaluronidase (HYAL), which may indicate that it possesses anti-inflammatory properties. The screening for new in vivo interactions between 3c and known receptors was realized by yeast three-hybrid technology (Y3H).Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Ellman’s method; acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; molecular modeling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32466601 PMCID: PMC7312527 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113765
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Scheme 1Synthetic pathway of compounds 2a–2h and 3a–3h. Reagents: (a) 3,5-dichlorobenzoic acid, CDMT, N-methylmorpholine, THF; (b) HCl/ether.
Cholinesterase inhibitory activities of the synthesized compounds 3a–3h.
| Compound | Selectivity for AChE c | Selectivity for BuChE d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.690 ± 0.108 | 0.140 ± 0.012 | 0.203 | 4.935 |
|
| 0.139 ± 0.005 | 0.024 ± 0.001 | 0.174 | 5.756 |
|
| 0.025 ± 0.003 | 0.123 ± 0.011 | 4.864 | 0.206 |
|
| 12.436 ± 0.237 | >20 | - | - |
|
| >20 | >20 | - | - |
|
| 0.115 ± 0.012 | 0.033 ± 0.006 | 0.289 | 3.457 |
|
| 0.958 ± 0.036 | 0.607 ± 0.020 | 0.634 | 1.577 |
|
| 0.111 ± 0.004 | 0.324 ± 0.047 | 2.914 | 0.343 |
|
| 0.078 ± 0.008 | 0.015 ± 0.001 | 0.192 | 5.204 |
a IC50: 50% inhibitory concentration (means ± SD of three independent experiments) of AChE. b IC50: 50% inhibitory concentration (means ± SD of three independent experiments) of BuChE. c Selectivity for AChE: IC50 (BuChE)/IC50(AChE). d Selectivity for BuChE: IC50(AChE)/IC50(BuChE).
Figure 1Lineweaver–Burk reciprocal plots of initial velocity and without the presence of inhibitor 3c (three concentrations), illustrating the mixed nature of EeAChE inhibition.
Figure 2Inhibition of Aβ aggregation by various concentrations of 3c.
SH-SY5Y cell viability (%) after treatment with H2O2 (100 µM) or a mixture of rotenone (30 µM) and oligomycin A (10 µM) at selected concentrations of 3c. Cell viability was determined by the MTT test. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Experiments were performed in quadruplicate and repeated three times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| % cell viability | |||||
|
| 13.68 ± 0.87 | 78.97 ± 10.74 | 90.01 ± 3.15 | 91.53 ± 1.30 | ||
| Trolox | 99.22 ± 3.30 | 99.38 ±9.81 | 98.62 ± 1.36 | 96.41 ± 1.51 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| % cell viability | |||||
|
| Pre-incubation | 39.51 ± 5.18 | 43.31 ± 4.10 | 45.20 ± 5.13 | 48.28 ± 4.24 | |
| Co-incubation | 53.64 ± 4.79 | 54.63 ± 3.27 | 59.43 ± 7.91 | 63.07 ± 5.57 | ||
| Trolox | Pre-incubation | 44.26 ± 3.73 | 46.38 ± 2.06 | 47.91 ± 4.48 | 46.23 ± 3.65 | |
| Co-incubation | 48.09 ± 8.01 | 50.34 ± 8.11 | 50.83 ± 6.98 | 42.11 ± 6.28 | ||
LD50 and toxicity class prediction of tacrine, bis-7-tacrine, and 2a-2h hybrids. The prediction was performed with ProTox-II (http://tox.charite.de/protox_II), a web-server for the prediction of small molecule toxicity [38].
| Compound | Predicted LD50 (mg/Kg) | Predicted Toxicity Class | Average Similarity (%) | Prediction Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2100 | 5 | 71.64 | 69.26 |
|
| 400 | 4 | 71.50 | 69.26 |
|
| 1000 | 4 | 70.45 | 69.26 |
|
| 1000 | 4 | 70.01 | 69.26 |
|
| 1000 | 4 | 70.01 | 69.26 |
|
| 1000 | 4 | 69.92 | 68.07 |
|
| 1000 | 4 | 69.92 | 68.07 |
|
| 1000 | 4 | 69.92 | 68.07 |
|
| 40 | 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
|
| 400 | 4 | 82.33 | 70.97 |
Figure 3Stages of the in vivo acute oral toxicity studies.
Figure 4Scatterplots of mathematical formula results obtained for our compound with a regression equation. (A) Plot pH vs. pH-log(Ax−Aa)/(Ab−Ax) 310/336 nm; (B) Plot pH vs. pH-log(Ax−Aa)/(Ab−Ax) 336/310 nm; (C) Plot pH vs. pH-log(Ax−Aa)/(Ab−Ax) 310/336 nm; (D) Plot pH vs. pH-log(Ax−Aa)/(Ab−Ax) 336/310 nm.
Experimental and computer calculated pKa values of 2c.
| Experimental | ChemAxon | ACD/Percepta | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7.93 ± 0.36 * | 8.89 | 9.06 |
|
| 11.21 ± 0.63 ** | 14.16 | 13.78 |
|
| 4.994 ± 0.34 *** | 5.59 | 6.52 |
* pKa1 value ± Residual Standard Deviation of regression line for pKa1 calculations. ** pKa2 value ± Residual Standard Deviation of regression line for pKa2 calculations. *** logP value ± Residual Standard Deviation of calibration curve for logP calculations.
Figure 5Binding mode of compound 3b within acetylcholinesterase (A) and butyrylcholinesterase (B).
Figure 6Binding mode of compound 3c within acetylcholinesterase (A) and butyrylcholinesterase (B).
Substances used to prepare the calibration curve.
| Substance Name | Experimental Properties | |
|---|---|---|
| log | p | |
| Procainamide HCl | 0.88 | 9.32 [ |
| Tacrine | 2.71 | 9.95 [ |
| Thymol | 3.3 | - |
| Naphtalene | 3.6 | - |
| Promazine HCl | 4.55 | 9.36 [ |
| Prometazine HCl | 4.81 | 9.1 [ |
| Chlorpromazine HCl | 5.41 | 9.3 [ |
| Thiorydazine HCl | 5.9 | 9.5 [ |