| Literature DB >> 32466084 |
JunHui Wang1, JooHyang Kim2, JiHyo Moon3, HakJun Song1.
Abstract
The present study aims to explore Korean domestic tourists' decision-making processes by utilizing an extended model of goal-directed behavior (EMGB) as a theoretical framework. Integrating government policy (PLY) and protection motivation for smog (PMS) with the original model of goal-directed behavior (MGB) makes it easier to better understand the formation process of tourists' behavioral intentions for domestic travel. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is employed to identify the structural relationships among the latent variables. The results of the EMGB indicated that desire had the strongest effect on the behavioral intention of tourists to travel domestically; positive anticipated emotion is the main source of desire, followed by negative anticipated emotion. Government PLY on smog has a significant, positive and indirect effect on behavioral intentions of domestic or potential tourists through the protection motive theory. We found that desires are verified as a determinant of the behavioral intention's formation, more significant than that of perceived behavioral control, frequency of past behavior and protection motivation. In addition, this study offers theoretical and practical suggestions.Entities:
Keywords: extended model of goal-directed behavior; policy; protection motivation for smog; structural equation modeling; threat; tourists’ behavior
Year: 2020 PMID: 32466084 PMCID: PMC7277908 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Profile of survey respondents (n = 583).
| Characteristic | Frequency | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 284 | 48.7 |
| Female | 299 | 52.3 | |
| Age | 20–29 | 102 | 17.5 |
| 30–39 | 105 | 18.0 | |
| 40–49 | 138 | 23.7 | |
| 50–59 | 133 | 22.8 | |
| >60 | 105 | 18.0 | |
| Education | High school or less | 100 | 17.2 |
| College | 69 | 11.8 | |
| Four-year University | 343 | 58.8 | |
| Graduate school | 71 | 12.2 | |
| Occupation | Technician/Academic | 154 | 26.4 |
| Business person or self-employed | 42 | 7.2 | |
| Service person | 69 | 11.8 | |
| Office worker | 71 | 12.2 | |
| Civil workers | 27 | 4.6 | |
| Student | 47 | 8.1 | |
| Housewives | 96 | 16.5 | |
| Freelancer | 26 | 4.5 | |
| Retired | 17 | 2.9 | |
| Others | 34 | 5.8 | |
| Marital status | Single | 181 | 31.1 |
| Married | 392 | 67.2 | |
| Others | 10 | 1.7 | |
| Monthly income | Less than KRW1 million | 54 | 9.3 |
| KRW 1–1.9 million | 76 | 13.0 | |
| KRW 2–2.9 million | 128 | 21.9 | |
| KRW 3–3.9 million | 113 | 19.4 | |
| KRW 4–4.9 million | 77 | 13.2 | |
| KRW 5–5.9 million | 54 | 9.3 | |
| KRW 6–6.9 million | 28 | 4.8 | |
| KRW 7–7.9 million | 22 | 3.8 | |
| Over KRW 8 million | 31 | 5.3 |
Confirmatory factor analysis and factor loadings.
| Nine Factors and Scale Items | Standardized |
|---|---|
|
| |
| I think domestic travel is positive. | 0.863 |
| I think domestic travel is beneficial. | 0.907 |
| I think domestic travel is very valuable. | 0.896 |
| I think domestic travel is attractive. | 0.853 |
|
| |
| Those who influence my decision will approve me for domestic travel. | 0.859 |
| Those who influence my decision will support me for domestic travel. | 0.902 |
| Those who influence my decision will understand my domestic travel. | 0.875 |
| Those who influence my decision will recommend me for a domestic travel. | 0.870 |
|
| |
| I can travel domestically at any time I want. | 0.721 |
| I have the overall ability to travel domestically. | 0.917 |
| I have enough financial resources to travel domestically. | 0.828 |
|
| |
| I will be excited if I can travel domestically. | 0.905 |
| I will be glad if I can travel domestically. | 0.889 |
| I will be satisfied if I can travel domestically. | 0.870 |
| I will be happy if I can travel domestically. | 0.925 |
|
| |
| I will be angry if I cannot travel domestically. | 0.866 |
| I will be disappointed if I cannot travel domestically. | 0.920 |
| I will be worried if I cannot travel domestically. | 0.759 |
| I will be upset if I cannot travel domestically. | 0.859 |
|
| |
| The government is improving or building active space facilities (such as indoor sports facilities, air purification facilities, etc.) that can protect against smog. | 0.716 |
| To reduce smog emissions, the government has tightened emission standards of coal-fired power plants and imposed emission charges. | 0.733 |
| The government is pinpointing the cause of smog. | 0.777 |
| The government is pursuing a policy to spread green cars. | 0.784 |
|
| |
| I considered discussing with the people around me to protect myself from smog before traveling domestically. | 0.788 |
| I searched for news and policies related to smog in South Korea before traveling domestically. | 0.825 |
| I planned the best tourist route to avoid smog before traveling domestically. | 0.844 |
|
| |
| I am interested in traveling domestically in the near future. | 0.864 |
| I want to travel domestically in the near future. | 0.908 |
| I hope to travel domestically in the near future. | 0.911 |
| I am eager to travel domestically in the near future. | 0.823 |
|
| |
| I am planning to travel domestically in the near future. | 0.830 |
| I will make an effort to travel domestically in the near future. | 0.858 |
| I would like to travel domestically again in the near future. | 0.867 |
| I am willing to invest money and time for domestic travel in the near future. | 0.908 |
Notes: All standardized factor loadings are significant at p < 0.001.
Results of measurement model.
| Construct | ATT | SN | PAE | NAE | PBC | PLY | PMS | DES | BI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATT |
| 0.548 | 0.530 | 0.091 | 0.125 | 0.018 | 0.064 | 0.395 | 0.300 |
| (0.741) | (0.728) | (0.301) | (0.353) | (0.134) | (0.253) | (0.629) | (0.547) | ||
| SN | 0.028 |
| 0.401 | 0.079 | 0.163 | 0.025 | 0.065 | 0.315 | 0.257 |
| (0.634) | (0.281) | (0.404) | (0.157) | (0.256) | (0.561) | (.507) | |||
| PAE | 0.026 | 0.026 |
| 0.117 | 0.142 | 0.010 | 0.023 | 0.606 | 0.442 |
| (0.342) | (0.377) | (0.100) | (0.150) | (0.778) | (0.665) | ||||
| NAE | 0.025 | 0.023 | 0.026 |
| 0.062 | 0.076 | 0.087 | 0.201 | 0.166 |
| (0.249) | (0.276) | (0.295) | (0.448) | (0.407) | |||||
| PBC | 0.023 | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.026 |
| 0.043 | 0.070 | 0.148 | 0.156 |
| (0.209) | (0.264) | (0.385) | (0.395) | ||||||
| PLY | 0.027 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.034 | 0.027 |
| 0.091 | 0.018 | 0.025 |
| (0.302) | (0.134) | (0.158) | |||||||
| PMS | 0.023 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.029 | 0.024 | 0.029 |
| 0.039 | 0.067 |
| (0.197) |
| ||||||||
| DES | 0.025 | 0.023 | 0.028 | 0.026 | 0.021 | 0.024 | 0.020 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| BI | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.027 | 0.028 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 0.021 | 0.029 | 0.750 |
|
| 0.930 | 0.929 | 0.942 | 0.913 | 0.856 | 0.838 | 0.859 | 0.926 | 0.923 |
|
| 0.932 | 0.930 | 0.943 | 0.914 | 0.865 | 0.839 | 0.860 | 0.930 | 0.923 |
Note: ATT = attitude; SN = subjective norm; PAE = positive anticipated emotion; NAE = negative anticipated emotion; PBC = perceived behavioral control; PLY = policy; PMS = protection motivation for smog; DES = desire; BI = behavioral intention; CR = composite reliability; * Highest correlation between pairs of constructs; AVE values are along the diagonal; squared correlations among latent constructs are above the diagonal; correlations among latent constructs are in parentheses; standard errors among latent constructs are below the diagonal.
Standardized parameter estimates of structural model.
| Hypotheses | Coefficients | Test of Hypotheses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | ATT→DE | 0.075 | 1.242 | Rejected |
| H2 | SN→DE | 0.043 | 0.833 | Rejected |
| H3 | PAE→DE | 0.612 | 11.837 | Accepted |
| H4 | NAE→DE | 0.194 | 5.272 | Accepted |
| H5 | PBC→DE | 0.065 | 1.761 | Rejected |
| H6 | FPB→DE | −0.017 | −0.639 | Rejected |
| H7 | PBC→BI | 0.079 | 2.040 | Accepted |
| H8 | FPB→BI | 0.071 | 2.695 | Accepted |
| H9 | DE→BI | 0.745 | 19.600 | Accepted |
| H10 | PLY→DE | −0.013 | −0.359 | Rejected |
| H11 | PLY→BI | 0.323 | 6.783 | Accepted |
| H12 | PMS→DE | 0.006 | 0.181 | Rejected |
| H13 | PMS→BI | 0.082 | 2.648 | Accepted |
| H14 | PLY→PMS | 0.019 | 0.412 | Rejected |
Figure 1Structural model results. Notes 1: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Notes 2: ATT = attitude; SN = subjective norm; PAE = positive anticipated emotion; NAE = negative anticipated emotion; PBC = perceived behavioral control; PLY = policy; PMS = protection motivation for smog; DES = desire; BI = behavioral intention.