Michael P Kelly1, Mary Barker2. 1. Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, University of Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. Electronic address: mk744@medschl.cam.ac.uk. 2. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that six common errors made in attempts to change behaviour have prevented the implementation of the scientific evidence base derived from psychology and sociology; to suggest a new approach which incorporates recent developments in the behavioural sciences. STUDY DESIGN: The role of health behaviours in the origin of the current epidemic of non-communicable disease is observed to have driven attempts to change behaviour. It is noted that most efforts to change health behaviours have had limited success. This paper suggests that in policy-making, discussions about behaviour change are subject to six common errors and that these errors have made the business of health-related behaviour change much more difficult than it needs to be. METHODS: Overview of policy and practice attempts to change health-related behaviour. RESULTS: The reasons why knowledge and learning about behaviour have made so little progress in alcohol, dietary and physical inactivity-related disease prevention are considered, and an alternative way of thinking about the behaviours involved is suggested. This model harnesses recent developments in the behavioural sciences. CONCLUSION: It is important to understand the conditions preceding behaviour psychologically and sociologically and to combine psychological ideas about the automatic and reflective systems with sociological ideas about social practice.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that six common errors made in attempts to change behaviour have prevented the implementation of the scientific evidence base derived from psychology and sociology; to suggest a new approach which incorporates recent developments in the behavioural sciences. STUDY DESIGN: The role of health behaviours in the origin of the current epidemic of non-communicable disease is observed to have driven attempts to change behaviour. It is noted that most efforts to change health behaviours have had limited success. This paper suggests that in policy-making, discussions about behaviour change are subject to six common errors and that these errors have made the business of health-related behaviour change much more difficult than it needs to be. METHODS: Overview of policy and practice attempts to change health-related behaviour. RESULTS: The reasons why knowledge and learning about behaviour have made so little progress in alcohol, dietary and physical inactivity-related disease prevention are considered, and an alternative way of thinking about the behaviours involved is suggested. This model harnesses recent developments in the behavioural sciences. CONCLUSION: It is important to understand the conditions preceding behaviour psychologically and sociologically and to combine psychological ideas about the automatic and reflective systems with sociological ideas about social practice.
Authors: M Barker; W T Lawrence; T C Skinner; C O Haslam; S M Robinson; H M Inskip; B M Margetts; A A Jackson; D J P Barker; C Cooper Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2008-02-26 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Ellinor K Olander; Helen Fletcher; Stefanie Williams; Lou Atkinson; Andrew Turner; David P French Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Fiona N Conway; Marianne Domingues; Robert Monaco; Laura M Lesnewich; Anne E Ray; Brandon L Alderman; Sabrina M Todaro; Jennifer F Buckman Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Parag A Chevli; Krupal J Hari; Alka M Kanaya; Sameera A Talegawkar; Belinda L Needham; David Herrington Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 3.455