Young K Chae1, Fangxin Hong2, Christos Vaklavas3,4, Heather H Cheng5, Peter Hammerman6, Edith P Mitchell7, James A Zwiebel8, S Percy Ivy9, Robert J Gray2, Shuli Li2, Lisa M McShane10, Larry V Rubinstein10, David Patton11, P Mickey Williams12, Stanley R Hamilton13, Aaron Mansfield14, Barbara A Conley15, Carlos L Arteaga16, Lyndsay N Harris15, Peter J O'Dwyer17, Alice P Chen8, Keith T Flaherty18. 1. Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 2. Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA. 3. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. 4. Huntsman Cancer Institute of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 5. Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, WA. 6. Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 7. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA. 8. Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 9. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 10. Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 11. Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 12. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD. 13. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 14. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 15. Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 16. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 17. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 18. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: NCI-MATCH is a nationwide, histology-agnostic, signal-finding, molecular profile-driven trial for patients with refractory cancers, lymphomas, or myelomas. Patients with tumors harboring actionable aberration(s) in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 were treated with AZD4547, an oral FGFR1-3 inhibitor. METHODS: Patients' tumors were screened by next-generation sequencing for predefined FGFR amplification, activating mutations, or fusions. Patients were treated with AZD4547, 80 mg orally twice daily until progression of disease or drug intolerance. A response rate of 16% was considered promising. RESULTS: Between July 2016 and June 2017, 70 patients were assigned and 48 received protocol therapy and are eligible for analysis. Patients' tumors harbored FGFR1 or FGFR2 amplification (n = 20), FGFR2 or FGFR3 single-nucleotide variants (n = 19), or FGFR1 or FGFR3 fusions (n = 9). The most common primary tumors were breast (33.3%), urothelial (12.5%), and cervical cancer (10.4%).Grade 3 adverse events were consistent with those described in previous clinical trials. Confirmed partial responses were seen in 8% (90% CI, 3% to 18%) and were observed only in patients whose tumors harbored FGFR1-3 point mutations or fusions. Stable disease was observed in 37.5% (90% CI, 25.8% to 50.4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months, and the 6-month PFS rate was 15% (90% CI, 8% to 31%). For patients with tumors harboring FGFR fusions, the response rate was 22% (90% CI, 4.1% to 55%), and 6-month PFS rate was 56% (90% CI, 31% to 100%). CONCLUSION: Preliminary signals of activity appeared to be limited to cancers harboring FGFR activating mutations and fusions, although AZD4547 did not meet the primary end point. Different FGFR somatic alterations may confer different levels of signaling potency and/or oncogene dependence.
PURPOSE: NCI-MATCH is a nationwide, histology-agnostic, signal-finding, molecular profile-driven trial for patients with refractory cancers, lymphomas, or myelomas. Patients with tumors harboring actionable aberration(s) in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 were treated with AZD4547, an oral FGFR1-3 inhibitor. METHODS: Patients' tumors were screened by next-generation sequencing for predefined FGFR amplification, activating mutations, or fusions. Patients were treated with AZD4547, 80 mg orally twice daily until progression of disease or drug intolerance. A response rate of 16% was considered promising. RESULTS: Between July 2016 and June 2017, 70 patients were assigned and 48 received protocol therapy and are eligible for analysis. Patients' tumors harbored FGFR1 or FGFR2 amplification (n = 20), FGFR2 or FGFR3 single-nucleotide variants (n = 19), or FGFR1 or FGFR3 fusions (n = 9). The most common primary tumors were breast (33.3%), urothelial (12.5%), and cervical cancer (10.4%).Grade 3 adverse events were consistent with those described in previous clinical trials. Confirmed partial responses were seen in 8% (90% CI, 3% to 18%) and were observed only in patients whose tumors harbored FGFR1-3 point mutations or fusions. Stable disease was observed in 37.5% (90% CI, 25.8% to 50.4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months, and the 6-month PFS rate was 15% (90% CI, 8% to 31%). For patients with tumors harboring FGFR fusions, the response rate was 22% (90% CI, 4.1% to 55%), and 6-month PFS rate was 56% (90% CI, 31% to 100%). CONCLUSION: Preliminary signals of activity appeared to be limited to cancers harboring FGFR activating mutations and fusions, although AZD4547 did not meet the primary end point. Different FGFR somatic alterations may confer different levels of signaling potency and/or oncogene dependence.
Authors: Milind Javle; Maeve Lowery; Rachna T Shroff; Karl Heinz Weiss; Christoph Springfeld; Mitesh J Borad; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Lipika Goyal; Saeed Sadeghi; Teresa Macarulla; Anthony El-Khoueiry; Robin Kate Kelley; Ivan Borbath; Su Pin Choo; Do-Youn Oh; Philip A Philip; Li-Tzong Chen; Thanyanan Reungwetwattana; Eric Van Cutsem; Kun-Huei Yeh; Kristen Ciombor; Richard S Finn; Anuradha Patel; Suman Sen; Dale Porter; Randi Isaacs; Andrew X Zhu; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Tanios Bekaii-Saab Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Chih-Jian Lih; Robin D Harrington; David J Sims; Kneshay N Harper; Courtney H Bouk; Vivekananda Datta; Jonathan Yau; Rajesh R Singh; Mark J Routbort; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Keyur P Patel; Geeta S Mantha; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Karyn Ronski; Zenta Walther; Karin E Finberg; Sandra Canosa; Hayley Robinson; Amelia Raymond; Long P Le; Lisa M McShane; Eric C Polley; Barbara A Conley; James H Doroshow; A John Iafrate; Jeffrey L Sklar; Stanley R Hamilton; P Mickey Williams Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Luigi Formisano; Kimberly M Stauffer; Christian D Young; Neil E Bhola; Angel L Guerrero-Zotano; Valerie M Jansen; Mónica M Estrada; Katherine E Hutchinson; Jennifer M Giltnane; Luis J Schwarz; Yao Lu; Justin M Balko; Olivier Deas; Stefano Cairo; Jean-Gabriel Judde; Ingrid A Mayer; Melinda Sanders; Teresa C Dugger; Roberto Bianco; Thomas Stricker; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gottfried E Konecny; Neil Finkler; Agustin A Garcia; Domenica Lorusso; Paula S Lee; Rodney P Rocconi; Peter C Fong; Matt Squires; Kaushal Mishra; Allison Upalawanna; Yongyu Wang; Rebecca Kristeleit Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Leisl M Packer; Xinyan Geng; Vanessa F Bonazzi; Robert J Ju; Clare E Mahon; Margaret C Cummings; Sally-Anne Stephenson; Pamela M Pollock Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jingchuan Zhang; Lin Zhang; Xinying Su; Ming Li; Liang Xie; Florian Malchers; ShuQiong Fan; XiaoLu Yin; YanPing Xu; Kunji Liu; Zhengwei Dong; Guanshan Zhu; Ziliang Qian; Lili Tang; Jakob Schöttle; Ping Zhan; Qunsheng Ji; Elaine Kilgour; Paul D Smith; A Nigel Brooks; Roman K Thomas; Paul R Gavine Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yohann Loriot; Andrea Necchi; Se Hoon Park; Jesus Garcia-Donas; Robert Huddart; Earle Burgess; Mark Fleming; Arash Rezazadeh; Begoña Mellado; Sergey Varlamov; Monika Joshi; Ignacio Duran; Scott T Tagawa; Yousef Zakharia; Bob Zhong; Kim Stuyckens; Ademi Santiago-Walker; Peter De Porre; Anne O'Hagan; Anjali Avadhani; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yi-Mi Wu; Fengyun Su; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Nickolay Khazanov; Bushra Ateeq; Xuhong Cao; Robert J Lonigro; Pankaj Vats; Rui Wang; Su-Fang Lin; Ann-Joy Cheng; Lakshmi P Kunju; Javed Siddiqui; Scott A Tomlins; Peter Wyngaard; Seth Sadis; Sameek Roychowdhury; Maha H Hussain; Felix Y Feng; Mark M Zalupski; Moshe Talpaz; Kenneth J Pienta; Daniel R Rhodes; Dan R Robinson; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Mohamed E Salem; Benjamin A Weinberg; Samantha A Armstrong; Rita Malley; Hongkun Wang; Heinz-Josef Lenz; David Arguello; Wafik S El-Deiry; Joanne Xiu; Zoran Gatalica; Jimmy J Hwang; Philip A Philip; Anthony F Shields; John L Marshall Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2021-10
Authors: Daniel Zingg; Jinhyuk Bhin; Julia Yemelyanenko; Sjors M Kas; Frank Rolfs; Catrin Lutz; Jessica K Lee; Sjoerd Klarenbeek; Ian M Silverman; Stefano Annunziato; Chang S Chan; Sander R Piersma; Timo Eijkman; Madelon Badoux; Ewa Gogola; Bjørn Siteur; Justin Sprengers; Bim de Klein; Richard R de Goeij-de Haas; Gregory M Riedlinger; Hua Ke; Russell Madison; Anne Paulien Drenth; Eline van der Burg; Eva Schut; Linda Henneman; Martine H van Miltenburg; Natalie Proost; Huiling Zhen; Ellen Wientjens; Roebi de Bruijn; Julian R de Ruiter; Ute Boon; Renske de Korte-Grimmerink; Bastiaan van Gerwen; Luis Féliz; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Jeffrey S Ross; Marieke van de Ven; Sven Rottenberg; Edwin Cuppen; Anne Vaslin Chessex; Siraj M Ali; Timothy C Burn; Connie R Jimenez; Shridar Ganesan; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Jos Jonkers Journal: Nature Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Alberto Servetto; Luigi Formisano; Violeta Sánchez; Ingrid A Mayer; Carlos L Arteaga; Melinda E Sanders Journal: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Date: 2022-09-12
Authors: Suet Kee Loo; Megan E Yates; Sichun Yang; Steffi Oesterreich; Adrian V Lee; Xiao-Song Wang Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 5.006