Literature DB >> 35106856

Fusion-associated carcinomas of the breast: Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance.

Suet Kee Loo1,2, Megan E Yates1,3,4, Sichun Yang5, Steffi Oesterreich1,6, Adrian V Lee1,6,7, Xiao-Song Wang1,2,8.   

Abstract

Recurrent gene fusions comprise a class of viable genetic targets in solid tumors that have culminated several recent breakthrough cancer therapies. Their role in breast cancer, however, remains largely underappreciated due to the complexity of genomic rearrangements in breast malignancy. Just recently, we and others have identified several recurrent gene fusions in breast cancer with important clinical and biological implications. Examples of the most significant recurrent gene fusions to date include (1) ESR1::CCDC170 gene fusions in luminal B and endocrine-resistant breast cancer that exert oncogenic function via modulating the HER2/HER3/SRC Proto-Oncogene (SRC) complex, (2) ESR1 exon 6 fusions in metastatic disease that drive estrogen-independent estrogen-receptor transcriptional activity, (3) BCL2L14::ETV6 fusions in a more aggressive form of the triple-negative subtype that prime epithelial-mesenchymal transition and endow paclitaxel resistance, (4) the ETV6::NTRK3 fusion in secretory breast carcinoma that constitutively activates NTRK3 kinase, (5) the oncogenic MYB-NFIB fusion as a genetic driver underpinning adenoid cystic carcinomas of the breast that activates MYB Proto-Oncogene (MYB) pathway, and (6) the NOTCH/microtubule-associated serine-threonine (MAST) kinase gene fusions that activate NOTCH and MAST signaling. Importantly, these fusions are enriched in more aggressive and lethal breast cancer presentations and appear to confer therapeutic resistance. Thus, these gene fusions could be utilized as genetic biomarkers to identify patients who require more intensive treatment and surveillance. In addition, kinase fusions are currently being evaluated in breast cancer clinical trials and ongoing mechanistic investigation is exposing therapeutic vulnerabilities in patients with fusion-positive disease.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast carcinoma; diagnostic significance; gene fusions; prognostic significance; therapeutic significance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35106856      PMCID: PMC8930468          DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  106 in total

1.  MYB Labeling by Immunohistochemistry Is More Sensitive and Specific for Breast Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma than MYB Labeling by FISH.

Authors:  Justin S Poling; Raluca Yonescu; Andrea P Subhawong; Rajni Sharma; Pedram Argani; Yi Ning; Ashley Cimino-Mathews
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Promotion of homologous recombination and genomic stability by RAD51AP1 via RAD51 recombinase enhancement.

Authors:  Claudia Wiese; Eloïse Dray; Torsten Groesser; Joseph San Filippo; Idina Shi; David W Collins; Miaw-Sheue Tsai; Gareth J Williams; Bjorn Rydberg; Patrick Sung; David Schild
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Prospective multicentre evaluation of PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions as diagnostic and prognostic urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gisele H J M Leyten; Daphne Hessels; Sander A Jannink; Frank P Smit; Hans de Jong; Erik B Cornel; Theo M de Reijke; Henk Vergunst; Paul Kil; Ben C Knipscheer; Inge M van Oort; Peter F A Mulders; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Problematic breast tumors reassessed in light of novel molecular data.

Authors:  Fresia Pareja; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 5.  Function and regulation of Dyrk1A: towards understanding Down syndrome.

Authors:  Joongkyu Park; Woo-Joo Song; Kwang Chul Chung
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Triple negative breast cancer: the kiss of death.

Authors:  Adriana-Andreea Jitariu; Anca Maria Cîmpean; Domenico Ribatti; Marius Raica
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

7.  Genomic landscape of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Luciano G Martelotto; Maria R De Filippo; Charlotte K Y Ng; Rachael Natrajan; Laetitia Fuhrmann; Joanna Cyrta; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Huei-Chi Wen; Raymond S Lim; Ronglai Shen; Anne M Schultheis; Y Hannah Wen; Marcia Edelweiss; Odette Mariani; Göran Stenman; Timothy A Chan; Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo; Larry Norton; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  A novel low-grade nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma characterized by a GOLGB1-BRAF fusion gene.

Authors:  Justin Bubola; Cristina R Antonescu; Ilan Weinreb; David Swanson; John R De Almeida; Christina M MacMillan; Brendan C Dickson
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 9.  The Mysterious Ways of ErbB2/HER2 Trafficking.

Authors:  Vibeke Bertelsen; Espen Stang
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-06

10.  Driver Fusions and Their Implications in the Development and Treatment of Human Cancers.

Authors:  Qingsong Gao; Wen-Wei Liang; Steven M Foltz; Gnanavel Mutharasu; Reyka G Jayasinghe; Song Cao; Wen-Wei Liao; Sheila M Reynolds; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Lijun Yao; Lihua Yu; Sam Q Sun; Ken Chen; Alexander J Lazar; Ryan C Fields; Michael C Wendl; Brian A Van Tine; Ravi Vij; Feng Chen; Matti Nykter; Ilya Shmulevich; Li Ding
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.