Literature DB >> 32462972

Circular RNA hsa_circ_0000376 Participates in Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer by Targeting miR-1285-3p.

Ziqi Peng1, Boyang Xu2, Feng Jin1.   

Abstract

This study was designed to identify novel circular RNAs and the related regulatory axis to provide research targets for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. The circular RNA expression microarray "GSE101123" related to breast cancer was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The differentially expressed circular RNAs between tumor and normal samples were screened using Limma package. The targeted microRNAs of the differentially expressed circular RNAs and the targeted messenger RNAs of the microRNAs were predicted using miRanda and miRWalk, respectively, and a circular RNAs-microRNAs-messenger RNAs network was constructed. Then, functional enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction network construction, and drug-gene interaction analysis were conducted for the messenger RNAs. A total of 11 differentially expressed circular RNAs were identified between the breast cancer and normal samples, of which 3 were upregulated, while 8 were downregulated. The circular RNA-microRNA-messenger RNA network contained 1 circular RNA (hsa_circ_0000376), 2 microRNAs (miR-1285-3p and miR-1286), and 353 messenger RNAs. The protein-protein interaction network contained 150 nodes and 240 interactions. The hub genes in the protein-protein interaction network were all targeted messenger RNAs of miR-1285-3p that were significantly enriched in the ubiquitin-proteasome system, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest-related pathways, and cancer-related pathways involving SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1, β-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, tumor protein P53 among others. Twenty-two drugs were predicted to target 4 messenger RNAs, including tumor protein P53. A novel circular RNA, hsa_circ_0000376, was identified in breast cancer that may act as a sponge targeting miR-1285-3p expression which through its target genes, SMURF1, BTRC, and TP53, may further regulate tumorigenesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  circular RNA; competing endogenous RNA; differentially expressed circRNAs; microRNA protein–protein interaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32462972      PMCID: PMC7257864          DOI: 10.1177/1533033820928471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


Introduction

Circular RNA (circRNA) is a kind of endogenous RNA without a 5′ cap or 3′ poly (A) tail that forms a closed continuous loop structure through covalent bonds.[1] Recently, with the advances in high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics, abundant circRNAs have been identified in the eukaryotic transcriptome that plays crucial roles in the regulation of gene expression at transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels through binding to microRNAs (miRNAs) or other RNA-associated proteins.[2] Circular RNAs are derived from exons or introns through a back splicing process and are characterized as being conserved and stable.[3] Circular RNAs are implicated in the development of various cancers through a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) mechanism in which the circRNAs serve as miRNA sponges.[2] For example, circ_0067934 acts as a sponge inhibiting miR-1324 expression which regulates its target gene, frizzled class receptor 5 (FZD5), to further regulate the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma.[4] Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and is considered as a great public health problem worldwide.[5] The incidence and mortality of breast cancer presents an increasing trend, and breast cancer–related mortality has increased by nearly 18% since 2008.[6] Recently, increasing number of studies have demonstrated that circRNAs play a crucial role in breast cancer. Circular RNAs can provide promising diagnostic value in breast cancer.[7] Liang et al reported overexpression of circABCB10 in breast cancer that accelerates tumor progression by targeting miR-1271.[8] In addition, circAGFG1 was found to be upregulated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and accelerates tumor progression through the circAGFG1–miR-195-5p–cyclin E1 regulatory axis, and the level of circAGFG1 was related to the tumor stage, grade, and unfavorable prognosis.[9] Nevertheless, there are several uncharacterized circRNAs that still need to be investigated. Therefore, we intended to identify novel circRNAs and the related regulatory axis to further provide research targets and theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. In our study, we used the circRNA expression microarray data set “GSE101123” (contributed by Xu and Chen in July 2018). We first screened the differentially expressed circRNAs (DE-circRNAs) between the tumor and normal samples that were then used to predict the targeted interactions to further construct the DE-circRNAs–miRNAs–messenger RNA (mRNA) regulatory network. Finally, functional enrichment analysis, protein–protein interactions (PPI) network construction, and drug–gene interaction analysis were performed for the mRNA.

Materials and Methods

Microarray Data

The circRNA expression microarray data set “GSE101123” related to breast cancer was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and contained 8 breast cancer tissue samples and 3 normal mammary gland tissue samples. The platform used was GPL19978 Agilent-069978 Arraystar Human CircRNA microarray V1.

Data Preprocessing and Identification of DE-circRNAs

The raw data were read using the Limma package[10] (Version 3.10.3, http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.9/bioc/html/limma.html), and the data were preprocessed using robust multi-array average method, including background correction, normalization, and expression calculation. The probes were matched to gene symbols based on the annotation files from the platform, in which, the probes were removed without the corresponding gene symbol, while the mean expression value was considered as the final expression value of this circRNA when multiple probes matched the gene symbol. The classical Bayes test in limma package was used to perform the DE analysis, and the DE-circRNAs were identified using the threshold of adjusted P value <0.05 and |log fold changes (FC)| >2. Differentially expressed circRNAs were converted into universal name based on circBase, heatmaps, and volcano plots of the DE-circRNAs were constructed using the matrix data.

Differentially Expressed circRNA–miRNA–Target Regulatory Associations

The targeted miRNAs of DE-circRNAs were predicted using miRanda (Version: 3.3a, https://omictools.com/miranda-tool) with the parameter setting of score >170 and energy <−30. Then, the targeted genes of the miRNAs above were predicted using miRWalk2.0[11] (http://zmf.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk 2 /) with the following parameter setting (species: human; other databases: miRWalk, miRanda, miRDB, miRMap, Pictar2, RNA22, and Targetscan; retrieval relation: AND). The target genes that emerged in more than 6 databases were selected. Finally, the DE-circRNA–miRNA–target regulatory network was constructed based on the DE-circRNA–miRNA regulatory pairs and miRNA–target regulatory pairs.

Functional Enrichment Analysis of Target Genes

The functional enrichment analysis of target genes was performed using Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; Version 6.8, https://david-d.ncifcrf.gov/), including biological processes in Gene ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signaling pathways. The enrichment genes count was set as ≥2, and the P value <0.05 were selected to identify the significantly enriched results.

Protein–Protein Interaction Network of Target Genes

The interactions pairs between target genes were retrieved from the search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes (STRING) database (Version: 10.0, http://www.string-db.org/) with PPI score setting as 0.4 (median confidence). Then, based on the interactions pairs, the PPI network was visualized using Cytoscape (version 3.2.0, http://www.cytoscape.org/), and the topological properties of PPI network were analyzed using CytoNCA plugin[12] (Version 2.1.6, http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/cytonca), with the parameter setting of “without weight.” The hub genes were identified based on the degree score of the nodes in the network. In addition, the functional enrichment analysis was performed for the top 10 hub genes using the method mentioned above.

Drug–Gene Interaction Analysis

The drug–gene interaction database (DGIdb) is an open public information platform of known and potential drug–gene interactions. Here, the drug–gene interactions were predicted for the top 10 hub genes mentioned above using DGIdb 2.0[13] (http://www.dgidb.org/) with default parameters, and the databases were limited to DrugBank and Food and Drug Administration. Then, based on the drug–gene interactions, the network was visualized using Cytoscape.

Tissue Samples and Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

Ten luminal A breast cancer samples, 10 TNBC samples, and 10 nontumor breast samples were collected from The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (April 2019 to October 2019). The nontumor breast samples were obtained from a minimum of 5 cm distance from the tumor. All samples were confirmed by histopathology and none of the patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before the surgery. The samples were approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese University of Science. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent. The TaKaRa PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser was used to reverse transcribe the RNA. The reactions were run in an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). U6 was chosen as the reference gene. The sequences of primers used for miR-1285-3p were Forward 5′-GCGTCTGGGCAACAAAGTG-3′, Reverse 5′-AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT-3′, and RT-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACAGGTCT. The sequences of the primers used for miR-1286 were Forward 5′-CGCGTGCAGGACCAAGATG-3′, Reverse 5′-AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT-3′, and RT-GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACAGGGCT. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) data were analyzed using relative quantification or ΔΔCt method based on mRNA copy number ratio (R) of target gene versus reference genes U6 in each tumor sample relative to another reference sample.

Results

Identification of DE-circRNAs

We first performed principal component analysis on the standardized matrix data, and the tumor sample (T04) that seriously deviated was removed in the following analysis (Figure 1A). A total of 11 DE-circRNAs were identified between tumor and normal samples, including 3 upregulated and 8 downregulated DE-circRNAs. As shown in the heatmaps and volcano plot of the DE-circRNAs in Figure 1B and C, the DE-circRNAs could clearly distinguish the samples, suggesting that it was significant for further analysis.
Figure 1.

The results of differential expression analysis. A, PCA before and after data standardization preprocessing; B, Heatmaps of the DE-circRNAs; C, Volcano plot of the DE-circRNAs. DE-circRNAs indicates differentially expressed circRNAs; PCA, principal component analysis.

The results of differential expression analysis. A, PCA before and after data standardization preprocessing; B, Heatmaps of the DE-circRNAs; C, Volcano plot of the DE-circRNAs. DE-circRNAs indicates differentially expressed circRNAs; PCA, principal component analysis.

Differentially Expressed circRNA–miRNA–Target Regulatory Network

In all, 14 DE-circRNA–miRNA interaction pairs and 349 miRNA–target interaction pairs were obtained. A total of 351 DE-circRNA–miRNA–target regulatory associations were included based on the overlapped miRNAs, including 2 DE-circRNA–miRNA interaction pairs and 349 miRNA–target interaction pairs. The DE-circRNA–miRNA–target regulatory network was constructed based on the 351 DE-circRNA–miRNA–target regulatory associations (Figure 2), and there were 356 nodes in the network, including 1 DE-circRNA (hsa_circ_0000376), 2 miRNAs (miR-1285-3p and miR-1286), and 353 target genes.
Figure 2.

The circRNAs–miRNAs–mRNA regulatory network. Green squares represent circRNAs; red triangles represent miRNAs; yellow circles represent mRNAs. circRNA indicates circular RNA; miRNA, microRNA; mRNA, messenger RNA.

The circRNAs–miRNAs–mRNA regulatory network. Green squares represent circRNAs; red triangles represent miRNAs; yellow circles represent mRNAs. circRNA indicates circular RNA; miRNA, microRNA; mRNA, messenger RNA. Functional enrichment analysis was performed to further explore the biological processes (BPs) and pathways of target genes involved using DAVID. A total of 30 GO_BPs and 9 KEGG pathways were significantly enriched for the target genes of miR-1285-3p, such as, “GO:0045944 ∼ positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter,” “GO:0043161 ∼ proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process,” and “hsa04144: Endocytosis.” Similarly, 10 GO_BPs and 1 KEGG pathways were significantly enriched for the target genes of miR-1286, such as “GO:0006396 ∼ RNA processing,” “GO:0007399 ∼ nervous system development,” and “hsa04022: cGMP-PKG signaling pathway.” The top 10 significantly enriched Gene ontology–biological processes (GO-BPs) and KEGG pathways are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.

The Results of Functional Enrichment Analysis for the Target Genes.

CategoryTermsCount P valueGenes
Results of functional enrichment for the target genes of miR-1258
GO_BPGO:0045944—positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter282.64E-04MEF2C, AKNA, TFE3, BMPR2, PML, FSTL3, SRF, CBFA2T2, TAL1, RARB, FGF1, PIK3R1, DAB2IP, NOS1, GRIN1, TP53, NPAS4, HLTF, PLAC8, CAPRIN2, HDAC2, RNF4, SP1, GSK3B, CSRNP1, TFAP2A, TCF12, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0043161—proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process101.60E-03GSK3B, PML, TP53, SMURF1, RNF4, PSMA5, BTRC, RNF24, ZNRF1, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0030220—platelet formation41.91E-03MEF2C, TAL1, C6ORF25, SRF
GO_BPGO:0043524—negative regulation of neuron apoptotic process81.92E-03MEF2C, GPI, NRP1, KDM2B, UNC5B, GRIN1, SNCA, CHL1
GO_BPGO:0000209—protein polyubiquitination93.24E-03ARIH1, PSMA5, BTRC, RNF24, SMURF1, HLTF, ZNRF1, UBE2L3, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0050900—leukocyte migration75.78E-03CD84, ICAM1, ATP1B2, PODXL, SLC7A5, PIK3R1, SPN
GO_BPGO:0060079—excitatory postsynaptic potential45.93E-03MEF2C, GRIN1, SNCA, NPAS4
GO_BPGO:0007616—long-term memory45.93E-03RASGRF1, GRIN1, NPAS4, SRF
GO_BPGO:1901796—regulation of signal transduction by p53 class mediator76.25E-03TAF11, HDAC2, PML, TP53, MDM4, RMI1, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0046621—negative regulation of organ growth37.37E-03SLC6A4, WWC2, STK4
KEGG_Pathwayhsa04144: Endocytosis123.40E-04RAB11FIP4, CHMP1B, RAB11FIP3, ACAP3, PML, PSD3, GRK6, SNX1, PIP5K1C, SMURF1, IQSEC3, VPS36
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05223: Non-small cell lung cancer56.48E-03TP53, RARB, STK4, PIK3R1, AKT2
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05220: Chronic myeloid leukemia51.54E-02HDAC2, GAB2, TP53, PIK3R1, AKT2
KEGG_Pathwayhsa04919: Thyroid hormone signaling pathway61.86E-02HDAC2, ATP1B2, GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1, AKT2
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05169: Epstein-Barr virus infection62.34E-02ICAM1, HDAC2, TP53, PIK3R1, SPN, AKT2
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05215: Prostate cancer52.98E-02GSK3B, TP53, CREB5, PIK3R1, AKT2
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05213: Endometrial cancer43.19E-02GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1, AKT2
KEGG_Pathwayhsa04070: Phosphatidylinositol signaling system54.18E-02CDS2, PIP5K1C, ITPKB, INPP5B, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05210: Colorectal cancer44.97E-02GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1, AKT2
Results of functional enrichment for the target genes of miR-1268
GO_BPGO:0006396—RNA processing41.23E-02ATXN1, HNRNPK, GRSF1, SF3A1
GO_BPGO:0007399—nervous system development61.39E-02MEF2C, MAFB, NAIP, ST8SIA2, GAS7, DLG2
GO_BPGO:0002634—regulation of germinal center formation22.45E-02MEF2C, RC3H1
GO_BPGO:0045727∼positive regulation of translation32.83E-02RPS27L, LIN28A, LARP1
GO_BPGO:0010606—positive regulation of cytoplasmic mRNA processing body assembly22.93E-02CNOT6 L, CNOT2
GO_BPGO:0016567—protein ubiquitination63.25E-02DCAF5, DCAF7, BACH2, NAIP, TRIM62, RC3H1
GO_BPGO:0031123—RNA 3′-end processing23.41E-02PAPOLB, LIN28A
GO_BPGO:0000288—nuclear-transcribed mRNA catabolic process, deadenylation-dependent decay23.89E-02CNOT2, RC3H1
GO_BPGO:0046007—negative regulation of activated T cell proliferation24.36E-02PRKAR1A, RC3H1
GO_BPGO:2000008—regulation of protein localization to cell surface24.36E-02KCNAB2, RAB11B
KEGG_Pathwayhsa04022: cGMP-PKG signaling pathway42.56E-02MEF2C, VDAC3, INSR, ITPR2

Abbreviations: BP, biological process; BTRC, β-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; GO, Gene ontology; GSK3, glycogen synthase kinase 3; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; mRNA, messenger RNA; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; SMURF1, SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; TP53, tumor protein P53.

The Results of Functional Enrichment Analysis for the Target Genes. Abbreviations: BP, biological process; BTRC, β-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; GO, Gene ontology; GSK3, glycogen synthase kinase 3; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; mRNA, messenger RNA; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; SMURF1, SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; TP53, tumor protein P53. The PPI network contained 150 nodes and 240 interactions (Figure 3). The top 10 hub nodes with high degrees were all target genes of miR-1285-3p (Table 2). Ubiquitin A-52 residue ribosomal protein fusion product 1 (UBA52) had the highest degree in the PPI network, followed by tumor protein P53 (TP53) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3B).
Figure 3.

The PPI network of mRNAs. Blue circles represent the targeted mRNAs of miR-1286; purple circles represent the targeted mRNAs of miR-1285-3p; yellow rhombuses represent the overlapping targeted mRNAs of miR-1285-3p and miR-1286. mRNA indicates messenger RNA; PPI, protein–protein interaction.

Table 2.

The Top 10 Nodes in the PPI Network Ranked by Degree.

NodesmiRNADegree
UBA52hsa-miR-1285-3p32
TP53hsa-miR-1285-3p22
GSK3Bhsa-miR-1285-3p12
PMLhsa-miR-1285-3p11
SMURF1hsa-miR-1285-3p11
POLR2Fhsa-miR-1285-3p11
BTRChsa-miR-1285-3p10
PIK3R1hsa-miR-1285-3p10
RNF4hsa-miR-1285-3p9
FBXL7hsa-miR-1285-3p9

Abbreviations: BTRC, β-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; GSK3B, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; miRNA, microRNA; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; PPI, protein–protein interaction; SMURF1, SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; TP53, tumor protein P53.

The PPI network of mRNAs. Blue circles represent the targeted mRNAs of miR-1286; purple circles represent the targeted mRNAs of miR-1285-3p; yellow rhombuses represent the overlapping targeted mRNAs of miR-1285-3p and miR-1286. mRNA indicates messenger RNA; PPI, protein–protein interaction. The Top 10 Nodes in the PPI Network Ranked by Degree. Abbreviations: BTRC, β-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; GSK3B, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; miRNA, microRNA; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; PPI, protein–protein interaction; SMURF1, SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; TP53, tumor protein P53. Functional enrichment analysis was performed to further explore the functions of the top 10 hub genes. A total of 14 KEGG pathways and 37 GO-BPs were significantly enriched for the top 10 hub genes in PPI network, and the top 10 significantly enriched GO-BPs and KEGG pathways are listed in Table 3. Beta-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (BTRC), promyelocytic leukemia (PML), and SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (SMURF1) were significantly enriched in “hsa04120: Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis,” while BTRC, GSK3B, and TP53 were significantly enriched in “hsa04310: Wnt signaling pathway.” In addition, it was observed that GSK3B, TP53, and phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1 (PIK3R1) were significantly enriched in various cancers or diseases. In addition, “GO:0043161 ∼ proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process” was the most significant enriched GO_BP, involving GSK3B, SMURF1, TP53, among others.
Table 3.

The Results of Functional Enrichment Analysis for the Top 10 Hub Genes in PPI Network.

CategoryTermsCount P valueGenes
GO_BPGO:0043161—proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process72.36E-10SMURF1, TP53, GSK3B, RNF4, BTRC, PML, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0045944—positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter66.97E-05RNF4, GSK3B, PML, TP53, UBA52, PIK3R1
GO_BPGO:0006977—DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrest34.75E-04PML, TP53, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0016567—protein ubiquitination47.40E-04SMURF1, RNF4, BTRC, FBXL7
GO_BPGO:0007179—transforming growth factor β receptor signaling pathway31.04E-03PML, SMURF1, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0043066—negative regulation of apoptotic process41.47E-03GSK3B, TP53, UBA52, PIK3R1
GO_BPGO:1901796—regulation of signal transduction by p53 class mediator31.88E-03PML, TP53, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0000086—G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycle32.29E-03BTRC, FBXL7, UBA52
GO_BPGO:0050852—T cell receptor signaling pathway32.67E-03BTRC, UBA52, PIK3R1
GO_BPGO:0038095—Fc-epsilon receptor signaling pathway33.83E-03BTRC, UBA52, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05213: Endometrial cancer31.15E-03GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05210: Colorectal cancer31.63E-03GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05215: Prostate cancer33.26E-03GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05200: Pathways in cancer45.45E-03GSK3B, PML, TP53, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa04919: Thyroid hormone signaling pathway35.51E-03GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa04722: Neurotrophin signaling pathway35.98E-03GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05162: Measles37.31E-03GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa05160: Hepatitis C37.31E-03GSK3B, TP53, PIK3R1
KEGG_Pathwayhsa04120: Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis37.74E-03SMURF1, BTRC, PML
KEGG_Pathwayhsa04310: Wnt signaling pathway37.85E-03BTRC, GSK3B, TP53

Abbreviations: BP, biological process; BTRC, β-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; GO, Gene ontology; GSK3B, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; PPI, protein–protein interaction; SMURF1, SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; TP53, tumor protein P53.

The Results of Functional Enrichment Analysis for the Top 10 Hub Genes in PPI Network. Abbreviations: BP, biological process; BTRC, β-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; GO, Gene ontology; GSK3B, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; PPI, protein–protein interaction; SMURF1, SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; TP53, tumor protein P53. In addition, 22 drugs were predicted to be implicated with the 4 target genes of miR-1285-3p using DGIdb, including GSK3B, PIK3R1, TP53, and PML (Figure 4, Table 4). Isoprenaline and SF-1126 were predicted to be an agonist and inhibitor of PIK3B, respectively. Aspirin was predicted to regulate the acetylation of TP53, while alsterpaullone was an inhibitor of GSK3B.
Figure 4.

The results of drug–gene interaction analysis. Purple ellipses represent targeted mRNAs of miR-1285-3p; gray squares represent the predicted drugs. mRNA indicates messenger RNA.

Table 4.

The Results of Drug–Gene Interaction Analysis.

GeneDrugInteraction typesSourcesPmids
TP53CHEMBL1235116NADrugBank10592235
TP53ASPIRINacetylationDrugBank21475861
TP53LesogaberanNADrugBankNA
GSK3BA-443654NADrugBank10592235
GSK3BCHEMBL524266inhibitorGuideToPharmacologyInteractions| DrugBank10592235
GSK3BCHEMBL428963NADrugBank10592235
GSK3BALSTERPAULLONEinhibitorGuideToPharmacologyInteractions| DrugBank10592235|17139284|17016423
GSK3BCHEMBL156987NADrugBank10592235|17139284|17016423
GSK3BCHEMBL227381NADrugBank10592235
GSK3BCHEMBL428462NADrugBank10592235
GSK3BCHEMBL259850NADrugBank10592235|17139284|17016423
GSK3BCHEMBL456218NADrugBank10592235
GSK3BCHEMBL1082152NADrugBank10592235|17139284|17016423
GSK3BSTAUROSPORINENADrugBank17139284|17016423
GSK3BCHEMBL1082552inhibitorGuideToPharmacologyInteractions| DrugBank10592235|17139284|17016423
GSK3BCHEMBL259833NADrugBank10592235
GSK3BCHEMBL1230989NADrugBank17139284|17016423
PMLARSENIC TRIOXIDENACGI|CIViC|FDA11704842
PMLTRETINOINNAPharmGKB|CGI|CIViC|FDA21505136|8674046|21613260|23670176|11704842
PIK3R1WORTMANNINNADrugBank10592235
PIK3R1SF-1126inhibitorMyCancerGenome|ChemblInteractions| DrugBankNA
PIK3R1ISOPRENALINEagonistDrugBank15110780|15618457|15985706|15381832|15527548

Abbreviations: FDA, Food and Drug Administration; GSK3B, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; NA, not available; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; TP53, tumor protein P53.

The results of drug–gene interaction analysis. Purple ellipses represent targeted mRNAs of miR-1285-3p; gray squares represent the predicted drugs. mRNA indicates messenger RNA. The Results of Drug–Gene Interaction Analysis. Abbreviations: FDA, Food and Drug Administration; GSK3B, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; NA, not available; PIK3R1, phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; TP53, tumor protein P53.

Evaluation of Genes by qPCR

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the expression of miR-1285-3p and miR-1286 in cancer tissues and normal tissues. As shown in Figure 5, the expression level of miR-1285-3p in the tumor tissue was significantly lower than in the control (P < .05). The expression of miR-1286 in luminal A breast tissue and triple-negative tumor tissue was significantly lower than in the control (P < .05).
Figure 5.

Relative expression level of miRNAs in tissues. A, Relative expression level of miR-1285-3p in tissues; B, Relative expression level of miR-1286 in tissues. Control represents the nontumor breast tissues; LA indicates luminal A breast tissues; TC, triple-negative breast cancer tissues. miRNA, microRNA.

Relative expression level of miRNAs in tissues. A, Relative expression level of miR-1285-3p in tissues; B, Relative expression level of miR-1286 in tissues. Control represents the nontumor breast tissues; LA indicates luminal A breast tissues; TC, triple-negative breast cancer tissues. miRNA, microRNA.

Discussion

In the current study, 11 DE-circRNAs were screened between breast cancer samples and normal samples, while only one circRNA was identified in the circRNA–miRNA–mRNA regulatory network, that was hsa_circ_0000376, a novel circRNA found to be downregulated in breast cancer. MiR-1285-3p and miR-1286 are hsa_circ_0000376 targets, and the targeted mRNAs of miR-1285-3p were the hub genes in PPI network that were significantly enriched in ubiquitin–proteasome system, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest–related pathways and cancer-related pathways, involving SMURF1, BTRC, TP53, and other genes. In addition, the drugs including SF-1126 and aspirin were predicted to target PIK3B and TP53, and these drugs had been reported in the treatment of breast cancer in previous studies.[2] For example, Deng et al indicated that a combination of SF1126 and gefitinib triggered apoptosis in TNBC cells through the PI3K/AKT-mTOR pathway.[14] MiR-1285 was first identified from a massive parallel sequencing of human embryonic stem cells.[15] It was reported that the expression of tumor suppressor p53 was repressed by miR-1285 ectopic expression, while its expression decreases upon depletion of miR-1285 in the cells of human neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma, and breast cancer.[16] Gao et al indicated that downregulation of miR-1285 was observed in stage I lung squamous cell carcinoma and could be considered as a promising diagnostic biomarkers.[17] In addition, the proliferation, migration, and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells were significantly inhibited by miR-1285 through targeting Yes Associated Protein 1, showing a tumor suppressor role.[18] Further, a previous study revealed that miR-1285-3p expression was decreased in the plasma of hepatocellular carcinoma and could be used to predict the prognosis of patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization. Meanwhile, miR-1285-3p can also inhibit the expression of v-jun avian sarcona virus 17 oncogene homolog (JUN) oncogene in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, which suggests that it has a tumor suppressive effect.[19] However, few studies have reported the functions of miR-1285-3p in breast cancer. In our study, miR-1285-3p was the target of hsa_circ_0000376, and we speculated that hsa_circ_0000376 might be involved in the progression of breast cancer by targeting miR-1285-3p. In this study, we have detected the expression of miR-1285-3p and miR-1286 in cancer and normal tissues, and the result indicates that these 2 miRNAs showed lower expression level in cancer tissues than normal tissue. Notably, the targeted mRNAs of miR-1285-3p were significantly enriched in ubiquitin–proteasome system, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest–related pathways. Vriend and Reiter reported in a review that BRCA1, a susceptibility gene, served as an ubiquitin ligase, and suggested that ubiquitin–proteasome system was associated with the regulation of breast cancer susceptibility.[20] In addition, several studies have reported the role of ubiquitin–proteasome system in breast cancer.[2] In our study, SMURF1, BTRC, and TP53 were enriched in ubiquitin–proteasome system-related BPs and pathways. SMURF1 encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase that regulates SMAD ubiquitination and degradation.[21] Fukunaga et al revealed that SMURF1 expression was improved by SMURF2 knockdown that in turn increased cell migration and bone metastasis in breast cancer.[22] Yu et al indicated that the increased expression of SMURF1 by SND1 caused the ubiquitinated and degradation of RhoA which destroyed F-actin cytoskeletal structure and further accelerated metastasis in breast cancer.[23] Beta-transducin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, also called as β-TrCP1, is an E3-ubiquitin ligase receptor subunit that mediates protein stability and acts as a tumor inhibitor or oncogene.[24] It was reported that β-TrCP1 expression was downregulated in TNBC cells, and β-TrCP1 knockdown repressed cell proliferation, suggesting that it could be a potential target in the treatment of TNBC.[25] TP53 encodes a tumor suppressor protein which plays a crucial role in monitoring following DNA damage, and it triggers damage repair or apoptosis.[26] Reportedly, TP53 mutation was commonly found in the tumorigenesis of various cancers, including breast cancer, and TP53 germline mutation is associated with highly increased risk of developing breast cancer.[27] TP53 polymorphisms are related to the risk and type of breast cancer and could be a prognostic biomarker.[28] Hereby, we concluded that hsa_circ_0000376 could target the expression of miR-1285-3p to further regulate cell proliferation, metastasis, and tumorigenesis of breast cancer. The target genes of miR-1285-3p are SMURF1, BTRC, and TP53. A novel circRNA, hsa_circ_0000376, and its related ceRNA mechanism were identified in our study; however, experimental verification is needed to further confirm the role of this circRNA and its related regulatory mechanism in breast cancer. In addition, there are many target genes of miR-1285-3p. Further experiments are also needed to screen and identify the regulatory mechanisms. In addition, the predicted drugs that were not reported needed to be tested experimentally. In conclusion, we identified a novel circRNA, hsa_circ_0000376, and its related ceRNA mechanism in breast cancer. hsa_circ_0000376 might be a sponge, firstly targeted the expression of miR-1285-3p which mediates its target genes, SMURF1, BTRC, and TP53, to further regulate cell proliferation, metastasis, and tumorigenesis of breast cancer.
  27 in total

1.  miRWalk2.0: a comprehensive atlas of microRNA-target interactions.

Authors:  Harsh Dweep; Norbert Gretz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  CytoNCA: a cytoscape plugin for centrality analysis and evaluation of protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Yu Tang; Min Li; Jianxin Wang; Yi Pan; Fang-Xiang Wu
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  MicroRNA-1285 inhibits malignant biological behaviors of human pancreatic cancer cells by negative regulation of YAP1.

Authors:  H Huang; G Xiong; P Shen; Z Cao; L Zheng; T Zhang; Y Zhao
Journal:  Neoplasma       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.575

Review 4.  TP53 and breast cancer.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Effects of grape seed-derived polyphenols on amyloid beta-protein self-assembly and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Kenjiro Ono; Margaret M Condron; Lap Ho; Jun Wang; Wei Zhao; Giulio M Pasinetti; David B Teplow
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  CircRNA circ_0067934 promotes tumor growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma through regulation of miR-1324/FZD5/Wnt/β-catenin axis.

Authors:  Qian Zhu; Guiyu Lu; Zihua Luo; Fenfang Gui; Jinghua Wu; Dongwei Zhang; Yong Ni
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  β-TrCP1 degradation is a novel action mechanism of PI3K/mTOR inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Yong Weon Yi; Hyo Jin Kang; Edward Jeong Bae; Seunghoon Oh; Yeon-Sun Seong; Insoo Bae
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 8.718

Review 8.  Clinical implications of germline mutations in breast cancer: TP53.

Authors:  Katherine Schon; Marc Tischkowitz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Identification of circular RNAs as a promising new class of diagnostic biomarkers for human breast cancer.

Authors:  Lingshuang Lü; Jian Sun; Peiyi Shi; Weimin Kong; Kun Xu; Biyu He; Simin Zhang; Jianming Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-04

10.  The circRNA circAGFG1 acts as a sponge of miR-195-5p to promote triple-negative breast cancer progression through regulating CCNE1 expression.

Authors:  Rui Yang; Lei Xing; Xiaying Zheng; Yan Sun; Xiaosong Wang; Junxia Chen
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 41.444

View more
  6 in total

1.  YY1 as a promoter regulating the circ_0001946/miR-671-5p/EGFR axis to promote chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Ge Gao; Xiaoyan Li; Jiabeini Zhang; Hong Yu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Integrated bioinformatics and statistical approaches to explore molecular biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis and therapies.

Authors:  Md Shahin Alam; Adiba Sultana; Md Selim Reza; Md Amanullah; Syed Rashel Kabir; Md Nurul Haque Mollah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Integrated Analysis of Circular RNA-Associated ceRNA Network Reveals Potential circRNA Biomarkers in Human Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Han Sheng; Huan Pan; Ming Yao; Longsheng Xu; Jianju Lu; Beibei Liu; Jianfen Shen; Hui Shen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Circular RNA hsa_circ_0001658 regulates apoptosis and autophagy in gastric cancer through microRNA-182/Ras-related protein Rab-10 signaling axis.

Authors:  Xinxing Duan; Xiong Yu; Zhengrong Li
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 3.269

5.  CircRNA_400029 promotes the aggressive behaviors of cervical cancer by regulation of miR-1285-3p/TLN1 axis.

Authors:  Yue Ma; Jing Liu; Zhuo Yang; Peng Chen; Dan-Bo Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 6.  The biogenesis, function and clinical significance of circular RNAs in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan Zeng; Yutian Zou; Guanfeng Gao; Shaoquan Zheng; Song Wu; Xiaoming Xie; Hailin Tang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.248

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.