| Literature DB >> 32461348 |
Daan P Hurkmans1,2, Edwin A Basak3, Nina Schepers3, Esther Oomen-De Hoop3, Cor H Van der Leest4, Samira El Bouazzaoui5, Sander Bins3, Stijn L W Koolen3,6, Stefan Sleijfer3, Astrid A M Van der Veldt3,7, Reno Debets3, Ron H N Van Schaik5, Joachim G J V Aerts2, Ron H J Mathijssen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A minority of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Ineffective effector function of activated T and NK cells may lead to reduced tumor cell death, even when these activated effector cells are released from their immune checkpoint brake. Hence, in this study we aimed to assess the association of baseline serum granzyme B, as well as germline variation of the GZMB gene, with clinical outcome to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade.Entities:
Keywords: genetic markers; immunotherapy; lung neoplasms; programmed cell death 1 receptor; translational medical research
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32461348 PMCID: PMC7254154 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 13.751
Patient characteristics
| Cohort 1 (n=78) | Cohort 2 (n=322) | |
| 63.6 (35–78) | 64.7 (29–85) |
Baseline characteristics of NSCLC cohort 1 and cohort 2. 16.5% of the patients (n=53) from cohort 1 were overlapping with cohort 2.
NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; WHO PS, WHO performance status.
Figure 1Association of serum granzyme B and GZMB genotype with survival (A) Kaplan-Meier plots showing the (A) PFS (in days) and (B) OS (in days) of patients in cohort 2 (n=78) with low (in blue) versus high (in red) baseline serum levels of granzyme B. The (C) PFS and (D) OS of patients in cohort 2 (n=322) with wild type (in red) versus variant germline GZMB (in blue). Numbers at risk are shown below the graph. OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Association between GZMB genotype and clinical outcome
| Parameter | Test variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | ||
| | CC+CT vs TT | 1.39 (1.07 to 1.80) | 0.013* | 1.38 (1.02 to 1.87) | 0.036* |
| WHO | 0 vs ≥1 | 0.66 (0.46 to 0.95) | 0.027* | 0.61 (0.42 to 0.89) | 0.01* |
| Sex | Male vs female | 1.38 (1.06 to 1.80) | 0.018* | 1.29 (0.95 to 1.76) | 0.103 |
| | CC+CT vs TT | 1.19 (0.91 to 1.57) | 0.212 | ||
| WHO | 0 vs ≥1 | 0.52 (0.35 to 0.77) | 0.001* | ||
| Sex | Male vs female | 1.40 (1.05 to 1.86) | 0.023* | ||
Univariate and multivariate analysis of the association of germline variation of GZMB and PFS, OS, or BOR. Patient factors associated with OS/PFS (p value<0.1) were included in the multivariate analysis. Significance is marked by *.
BOR, best overall response; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; WHO, WHO performance status.
Association between investigated SNPs and clinical outcome
| Parameter | Test variables | HR (95% CI) | P value |
| | AA+AT vs TT | 0.76 (0.58 to 0.99) | 0.045 |
| | CC+CT vs TT | 0.80 (0.62 to 1.04) | 0.098 |
| WHO performance status | 0 vs ≥1 | 0.66 (0.46 to 0.95) | 0.027 |
| Sex | Male vs female | 1.38 (1.06 to 1.80) | 0.018 |
| | AA+AT vs TT | 0.79 (0.58 to 1.07) | 0.131 |
| WHO performance status | 0 vs ≥1 | 0.66 (0.45 to 0.95) | 0.024 |
| Sex | Male vs female | 1.26 (0.92 to 1.71) | 0.148 |
| | | | |
| | CC+CT vs TT | 0.81 (0.60 to 1.10) | 0.177 |
| WHO performance status | 0 vs ≥1 | 0.65 (0.45 to 0.93) | 0.019 |
| | | | |
| Sex | Male vs female | 1.29 (0.95 to 1.76) | 0.101 |
| | AA+AT vs TT | 0.76 (0.55 to 1.05) | 0.093 |
| WHO performance status | 0 vs ≥1 | 0.52 (0.34 to 0.77) | 0.001 |
| Sex | Male vs female | 1.45 (1.03 to 2.02) | 0.32 |
| | AA+AT vs TT | 0.72 (0.55 to 0.95) | 0.021 |
| WHO PS | 0 vs ≥1 | 0.52 (0.35 to 0.77) | 0.001 |
| Sex | Male vs female | 1.40 (1.05 to 1.86) | 0.023 |
| | AA+AT vs TT | 0.76 (0.55 to 1.05) | 0.093 |
| WHO performance status | 0 vs ≥1 | 0.52 (0.34 to 0.77) | 0.001 |
| Sex | Male vs female | 1.45 (1.03 to 2.02) | 0.32 |
Univariate and multivariate analysis of the association between germline SNPs (except those related to GZMB variation; those are shown in table 2) and PFS, OS, or BOR. Only SNPs that were associated with OS/PFS/BOR (p value <0.1) are shown and included in the multivariate analysis. Significance is marked by *.
BOR, best overall response; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms; WHO PS, WHO performance status.
Figure 2Association between serum granzyme B and T cell populations with phenotypes that correspond to functional responses. Associations are shown between (A) serum granzyme B levels or (B) GZMB genotype and T cell populations in blood. CD8+ T cells is considered as a subset of T lymphocytes with cytotoxic functions. CCR7−CD45RA+ cytotoxic T cells correspond with terminal differentiation, and PD1+TIM3+ cytotoxic T cells correspond with exhaustion, both signs of T cell activation or cytotoxicity. HET, heterozygous variant; HVAR, homozygous variant; WT, wild type.
Figure 3Mechanism of action. Schematic overview of the proposed mechanism of action of the GZMB SNP. Presence of the GZMB c.128T>C SNP indicates the expression of variant granzyme B isotypes (indicated as pink granzyme B molecules) that might lead to impaired cytotoxic effector functions of T cells, resulting in impaired apoptosis of tumor cells and partial resistance to anti-PD-1 blockade. The molecular mechanism of the PD-1 antibody nivolumab is shown in the white box. This figure was created by DPH in BioRender.com. PD-1, programmed cell death 1 receptor; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.