Nikita R Bhatt1, Louise Murchison2, George Yardy3, Milind Kulkarni2, Azad B Mathur3,2. 1. Department of Urology, Ipswich Hospital, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT), Heath Rd, Ipswich, IP4 5PD, UK. nikitarb89@gmail.com. 2. Department of Paediatric Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH), Norwich, UK. 3. Department of Urology, Ipswich Hospital, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT), Heath Rd, Ipswich, IP4 5PD, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bladder Bowel Dysfunction (BBD) has been described in patients with Down's Syndrome (DS). Our aim was to report the incidence, demographics, presentation, complications and management of the bladder in DS patients with BBD. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines and search terms "{[(trisomy 21) OR down's syndrome]} AND [("non-neurogenic") OR voiding dysfunction]" in the search engines MEDLINE and SCOPUS. We also include a case series from two paediatric urology centres. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients with BBD and DS were included. Mean age was 12 years (newborn to 21 years), the male:female ratio was 2:1. Functional constipation (90%), recurrent urinary tract infections (38%) and enuresis were common at presentation (56%), while over 56% patients required surgical intervention. Medical treatment and behavioral modification were less successful while intermittent catheterisation did not work. CONCLUSION: This study reviews the largest cohort of patients with BBD in DS. It is common with serious consequences requiring operative intervention. Usual interventions are unreliable due to poor compliance. Early identification and management protect the renal tract. Regular screening for urogenital anomalies in DS is currently not performed. We recommend a thorough history of bladder function in DS patients to identify these cases early.
INTRODUCTION: Bladder Bowel Dysfunction (BBD) has been described in patients with Down's Syndrome (DS). Our aim was to report the incidence, demographics, presentation, complications and management of the bladder in DS patients with BBD. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines and search terms "{[(trisomy 21) OR down's syndrome]} AND [("non-neurogenic") OR voiding dysfunction]" in the search engines MEDLINE and SCOPUS. We also include a case series from two paediatric urology centres. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients with BBD and DS were included. Mean age was 12 years (newborn to 21 years), the male:female ratio was 2:1. Functional constipation (90%), recurrent urinary tract infections (38%) and enuresis were common at presentation (56%), while over 56% patients required surgical intervention. Medical treatment and behavioral modification were less successful while intermittent catheterisation did not work. CONCLUSION: This study reviews the largest cohort of patients with BBD in DS. It is common with serious consequences requiring operative intervention. Usual interventions are unreliable due to poor compliance. Early identification and management protect the renal tract. Regular screening for urogenital anomalies in DS is currently not performed. We recommend a thorough history of bladder function in DS patients to identify these cases early.