Literature DB >> 15164062

Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.

Jude F Mitchell1, Gene R Stoner, John H Reynolds.   

Abstract

A question of long-standing interest to philosophers, psychologists and neuroscientists is how the brain selects which signals enter consciousness. Binocular rivalry and attention both involve selection of visual stimuli, but affect perception quite differently. During binocular rivalry, awareness alternates between two different stimuli presented to the two eyes. In contrast, attending to one of two different stimuli impairs discrimination of the ignored stimulus, but without causing it to disappear from consciousness. Here we show that despite this difference, attention and rivalry rely on shared object-based selection mechanisms. We cued attention to one of two superimposed transparent surfaces and then deleted the image of one surface from each eye, resulting in rivalry. Observers usually reported seeing only the cued surface. They were also less accurate in judging unpredictable changes in the features of the uncued surface. Our design ensured that selection of the cued surface could not have resulted from spatial, ocular or feature-based mechanisms. Rather, attention was drawn to one surface, and this caused the other surface to be perceptually suppressed during rivalry. These results raise the question of how object representations compete during these two forms of perceptual selection, even as the features of those objects change unpredictably over time.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15164062     DOI: 10.1038/nature02584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  63 in total

Review 1.  The emotion paradox in the aging brain.

Authors:  Mara Mather
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Context-dependent perceptual modulation of single neurons in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Nikos K Logothetis; David A Leopold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Stimulus-specific competitive selection in macaque extrastriate visual area V4.

Authors:  Mazyar Fallah; Gene R Stoner; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; James Stout; Christof Koch; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Attentional modulation of visual responses by flexible input gain.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cognitively directed spatial selection in the frontal eye field in anticipation of visual stimuli to be discriminated.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Zhou; Kirk G Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Psilocybin links binocular rivalry switch rate to attention and subjective arousal levels in humans.

Authors:  Olivia L Carter; Felix Hasler; John D Pettigrew; Guy M Wallis; Guang B Liu; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jocelyn L Sy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  The normalization model of attention.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; David J Heeger
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.