Literature DB >> 3245695

Comparative pharmacokinetics and serum inhibitory activity of clindamycin in different dosing regimens.

J F Flaherty1, L C Rodondi, B J Guglielmo, J C Fleishaker, R J Townsend, J G Gambertoglio.   

Abstract

The comparative pharmacokinetics and serum inhibitory effects of clindamycin were evaluated in six healthy male subjects given multiple-dose infusions of the following regimens in a crossover fashion: 600 mg every 6 h, 900 mg every 8 h, and 1,200 mg every 12 h. Serial blood samples were obtained after the last dose in each regimen and analyzed for clindamycin by a sensitive and specific high-performance liquid chromatography assay technique. Clindamycin pharmacokinetics were estimated by using noncompartmental methods, and serum inhibitory titers were serially determined against Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 and evaluated by using area under the serum inhibitory curve (AUIC). Maximum and minimum concentrations in plasma averaged 12.2 +/- 1.6 and 1.2 +/- 0.6, 16.3 +/- 4.0 and 0.9 +/- 0.5, and 16.8 +/- 2.5 and 0.4 +/- 0.2 micrograms/ml for the 600-, 900-, and 1,200-mg regimens, respectively. Clindamycin plasma clearance and elimination half-life averaged 23.3 +/- 4.0 liters/h and 1.9 +/- 0.4 h for the 600-mg regimen, 25.6 +/- 8.2 liters/h and 2.1 +/- 0.4 h for the 900-mg regimen, and 26.4 +/- 4.7 liters/h and 2.1 +/- 0.4 h for the 1,200-mg regimen. These results were not significantly different. Apparent volume of distribution increased significantly for the 1,200-mg regimen compared with the 600-mg regimen. Mean maximum reciprocal serum inhibitory titers were 96 +/- 35, 101 +/- 43, and 160 +/- 78 for the 600-, 900-, and 1,200-mg regimens, respectively. Minimum reciprocal serum inhibitory titers averaged 12 +/- 4, 6 +/- 3, and 5 +/- 2 for the low-, medium-, and high-dose regimens, respectively. Mean AUIC increased roughly in proportion to dose. Similar daily values for the area under the concentration-time curve and for AUIC for each of the regimens suggest similar daily drug exposure and serum inhibitory activity. A regimen of 1,200 mg every 12 h may represent an alternative dosing strategy for clindamycin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3245695      PMCID: PMC176026          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.32.12.1825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  14 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic studies of clindamycin phosphate.

Authors:  R M DeHaan; C M Metzler; D Schellenberg; W D Vandenbosch
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1973 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  Serum protein binding of erythromycin, lincomycin, and clindamycin.

Authors:  R C Gordon; C Regamey; W M Kirby
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Absorption, excretion and half-life of clinimycin in normal adult males.

Authors:  J G Wagner; E Novak; N C Patel; C G Chidester; W L Lummis
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.378

4.  Analysis of a new method for assessing activity of combinations of antimicrobials: area under the bactericidal activity curve.

Authors:  S L Barriere; E Ely; J E Kapusnik; J G Gambertoglio
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Serum dilution test for bactericidal activity. II. Standardization and correlation with antimicrobial assays and susceptibility tests.

Authors:  L B Reller; C W Stratton
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Stability and cost analysis of clindamycin-gentamicin admixtures given every eight hours.

Authors:  J M Mansur; P W Abramowitz; S A Lerner; R B Smith; R J Townsend
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1985-02

7.  Interaction of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime against pathogenic bacteria. Assessment with the serum bactericidal test.

Authors:  L B Reller
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Prospective, randomized comparative study of clindamycin, chloramphenicol, and ticarcillin, each in combination with gentamicin, in therapy for intraabdominal and female genital tract sepsis.

Authors:  G K Harding; F J Buckwold; A R Ronald; T J Marrie; S Brunton; J C Koss; M J Gurwith; W L Albritton
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Comparative serum bactericidal activity against test anaerobes in volunteers receiving imipenem, clindamycin, latamoxef and metronidazole.

Authors:  P Van der Auwera; Y Van Laethem; N Defresne; M Husson; J Klastersky
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Bacteroides fragilis: current susceptibilities, mechanisms of drug resistance, and principles of antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  G J Cuchural; F P Tally
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: kill curves versus MIC.

Authors:  Markus Mueller; Amparo de la Peña; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Anti-anaerobic antimicrobial agents: cefoxitin, cefotetan, clindamycin, and metronidazole.

Authors:  J A Bosso; R A Prince
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

3.  Pharmacokinetic variability of clindamycin and influence of rifampicin on clindamycin concentration in patients with bone and joint infections.

Authors:  Emmanuel Curis; Vincent Pestre; Vincent Jullien; Luc Eyrolle; Denis Archambeau; Philippe Morand; Laure Gatin; Matthieu Karoubi; Nicolas Pinar; Valérie Dumaine; Jean-Claude Nguyen Van; Antoine Babinet; Philippe Anract; Dominique Salmon
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Clostridioides difficile-Associated Antibiotics Alter Human Mucosal Barrier Functions by Microbiome-Independent Mechanisms.

Authors:  Jemila C Kester; Douglas K Brubaker; Jason Velazquez; Charles Wright; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Treatment of lower extremity infections in diabetics.

Authors:  W S Joseph
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Interethnic differences in pharmacokinetics of antibacterials.

Authors:  Danny Tsai; Janattul-Ain Jamal; Joshua S Davis; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Protein binding of clindamycin in sera of patients with AIDS.

Authors:  J F Flaherty; G Gatti; J White; J Bubp; M Borin; J G Gambertoglio
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation of two dosage regimens of clindamycin phosphate.

Authors:  K I Plaisance; G L Drusano; A Forrest; R J Townsend; H C Standiford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Interspecies allometric scaling of antimalarial drugs and potential application to pediatric dosing.

Authors:  S M D K Ganga Senarathna; Kevin T Batty
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Is the penetration of clindamycin into the masseter muscle really enough to treat odontogenic infections?

Authors:  Paula I Faggion; Gabriela Isoton; Eduarda Possa; Leandro Tasso
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.