Anne M Libby1, Hannah G McGinnes1,2, Judith G Regensteiner3. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine and Center for Women's Health Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 2. Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Institute for Clinical Research Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Medicine and Center for Women's Health Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Abstract
Background: This study was a national scan of education resources on integrating sex and gender considerations into research. The purpose was to assess capacity for educating researchers and to identify gaps, with implications for implementation of guidelines or mandates to consider sex and gender differences in research. Information sources were U.S. training programs in women's health and sex/gender difference research, Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH), and published peer-reviewed biomedical literature. Materials and Methods: This descriptive study used multiple methods: a national survey and a comprehensive literature review. BIRCWH leaders responded to a survey regarding education on sex/gender difference research for BIRCWH scholars (response rate 100%, 20 of 20). A comprehensive literature review was conducted for 1993-2018. Results: Nearly half (45%) of BIRCWH institutions offered education on integrating sex or gender differences in clinical translational research; of those, roughly half (54%) offered in-person training and one-third (31%) offered content within existing for-credit courses. Respondents preferred online training (84%) to in-person offerings or reference materials (47% and 42% respectively). Published indexed literature on sex or gender differences has quadrupled since 1993, although growth in these publications remained flat in the most recent six years. Conclusions: Published resources to educate researchers on integrating sex and gender differences into medical research have increased, and BIRCWH programs connect scholars to national resources. Educational gaps remain due to limited access to curricula on applied research approaches, design, and methods for sex/gender difference research. BIRCWH programs desire curricula that are easily accessible online and asynchronously; sanctioned and supported by national thought leaders; linked to required training such as rigor and reproducibility; foster collaboration; and offer practical applications. Evidence-based, high-quality educational curricula and a dissemination plan are needed to enhance the adoption and integration of sex and gender into scientific endeavors.
Background: This study was a national scan of education resources on integrating sex and gender considerations into research. The purpose was to assess capacity for educating researchers and to identify gaps, with implications for implementation of guidelines or mandates to consider sex and gender differences in research. Information sources were U.S. training programs in women's health and sex/gender difference research, Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH), and published peer-reviewed biomedical literature. Materials and Methods: This descriptive study used multiple methods: a national survey and a comprehensive literature review. BIRCWH leaders responded to a survey regarding education on sex/gender difference research for BIRCWH scholars (response rate 100%, 20 of 20). A comprehensive literature review was conducted for 1993-2018. Results: Nearly half (45%) of BIRCWH institutions offered education on integrating sex or gender differences in clinical translational research; of those, roughly half (54%) offered in-person training and one-third (31%) offered content within existing for-credit courses. Respondents preferred online training (84%) to in-person offerings or reference materials (47% and 42% respectively). Published indexed literature on sex or gender differences has quadrupled since 1993, although growth in these publications remained flat in the most recent six years. Conclusions: Published resources to educate researchers on integrating sex and gender differences into medical research have increased, and BIRCWH programs connect scholars to national resources. Educational gaps remain due to limited access to curricula on applied research approaches, design, and methods for sex/gender difference research. BIRCWH programs desire curricula that are easily accessible online and asynchronously; sanctioned and supported by national thought leaders; linked to required training such as rigor and reproducibility; foster collaboration; and offer practical applications. Evidence-based, high-quality educational curricula and a dissemination plan are needed to enhance the adoption and integration of sex and gender into scientific endeavors.
Entities:
Keywords:
SABV; education; gender difference; sex factors; training; women's health research
Authors: Virginia M Miller; Morrisa Rice; Londa Schiebinger; Marjorie R Jenkins; Janice Werbinski; Ana Núñez; Susan Wood; Thomas R Viggiano; Lynne T Shuster Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Michael M Song; Cheryl K Simonsen; Joanna D Wilson; Marjorie R Jenkins Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Juliana M Kling; Steven H Rose; Lisa N Kransdorf; Thomas R Viggiano; Virginia M Miller Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 5.027