| Literature DB >> 32456319 |
Jeong Jin Park1, Chulho Kim2,3, Jin Pyeong Jeon3,4,5,6.
Abstract
We investigated the role of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in identifying delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We measured the cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) continuously for 14 days. The differences in rSO2 according to DCI were analyzed. We also compared the diagnostic accuracy of NIRS and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) for DCI detection using the area under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Fifty-two patients treated with coil embolization were enrolled, including 18 with DCI (34.6%) and 34 without DCI (65.4%). Significant differences in rSO2 levels were observed from days 7 to 9. The rSO2 level was 60.95 (58.10-62.30) at day 7 in the DCI vs. 63.90 (62.50-67.10) in the non-DCI patients. By day 8, it was 59.50 (56.90-64.50) in the DCI vs. 63.30 (59.70-68.70) in the non-DCI cases. By day 9, it was 61.85 (59.40-65.20) in the DCI vs. 66.00 (62.70-68.30) in the non-DCI. A decline of >12.7% in SO2 rate yielded a sensitivity of 94.44% (95% CI: 72.7-99.9%) and a specificity of 70.59% (95% CI: 52.5-84.9%) for identifying DCI. Changes in NIRS tended to yield better diagnostic accuracy than TCD, but were not statistically significant. NIRS is a feasible method for real-time detection of DCI.Entities:
Keywords: delayed cerebral ischemia; near-infrared spectroscopy; subarachnoid hemorrhage
Year: 2020 PMID: 32456319 PMCID: PMC7290832 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Baseline characteristics of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage enrolled in this study.
| Variables | Non-DCI ( | DCI ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Female | 18 (52.9%) | 8 (44.4%) | 0.564 |
| Age, years | 62.5 ± 10.6 | 58.6 ± 10.7 | 0.210 |
| Hypertension | 9 (26.5%) | 5 (27.8%) | 0.920 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 3 (8.8%) | 3 (16.7%) | 0.404 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 8 (23.5%) | 3 (16.7%) | 0.568 |
| Smoking | 5 (14.7%) | 5 (27.8%) | 0.260 |
| H-H grade IV and V | 12 (35.3%) | 11 (61.1%) | 0.077 |
|
| |||
| Hemoglobin | 11.6 ± 1.1 | 11.2 ± 0.8 | 0.216 |
| SaO2 (%) | 95.5 ± 1.6 | 94.9 ± 2.5 | 0.384 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 92.6 ± 4.3 | 100.7 ± 5.4 | <0.001 |
| Heart rate (BPM) | 90.4 ± 9.3 | 94.5 ± 8.4 | 0.124 |
|
| |||
| Anterior location | 29 (85.3%) | 16 (88.9%) | 0.721 |
| Size (mm) | 5.4 ± 1.4 | 5.8 ± 1.2 | 0.311 |
| Fisher grade 3 and 4 | 12 (35.3%) | 13 (72.2%) | 0.012 |
|
| |||
| Chemical angioplasty | - | 7 (38.9%) | - |
| Poor outcome | 8 (23.5%) | 9 (50.0%) | 0.055 |
BPM, beats per minute; DCI, delayed cerebral ischemia; H-H, Hunt and Hess; MAP, mean arterial pressure. Data are expressed as the numbers of subjects (percentage) representing discrete and categorical variables in the form of mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 1Chronological changes in cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) according to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and the number of patients showing the onset of DCI following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
Figure 2The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve is 0.865. Reduction in cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) >12.7% revealed a sensitivity of 94.44% (95% CI: 72.7–99.9%) and a specificity of 70.59% (95% CI: 52.5–84.9%). CI, confidence interval.
A linear mixed-effects model predicting NIRS parameters in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
| Variables | Standardized Estimate (95% CI) | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H-H grade IV and V (vs. I, II, and III) | −1.76 (−2.75 to −0.76) | −1.76 | <0.001 |
| Fisher grade 3 and 4 (vs. 1 and 2) | −0.58 (−1.63 to 0.46) | 0.53 | 0.272 |
| MAP | 0.04 (−0.04 to 0.11) | 0.04 | 0.307 |
| DCI | −1.46 (−2.47 to −0.46) | 0.51 | 0.004 |
H-H: Hunt and Hess; MAP, mean arterial pressure; DCI, delayed cerebral ischemia; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.
Figure 3A comparison of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves involving NIRS changes and TCD velocity for the detection of severe vasospasm via cerebral angiography. The difference between AUROC curves was 0.044 (95% CI: −0.108 to 0.195; p = 0.571). AUROC, area under the ROC curve; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.