| Literature DB >> 32455788 |
Durmuş Alpaslan Kaya1, Mihaela Violeta Ghica2, Elena Dănilă3, Şevket Öztürk1, Musa Türkmen1, Mădălina Georgiana Albu Kaya4, Cristina-Elena Dinu-Pîrvu2.
Abstract
Myrtus communis L. is one of the important aromatic and medicinal species from the Mediterranean area. It is used in various fields such as culinary, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, therapeutic, and industrial applications. Thus, a Box-Wilson experimental plan was used in this study to select the optimal operating conditions in order to obtain high volumes of essential oils. The factorial design method was applied to evaluate at an industrial scale the effect of major process variables on the essential oil extraction from Myrtus communis L. herbs by the steam distillation method. The input variables considered as significant operating conditions were: X1-boiler occupancy rate (boilers were filled to 50%, 75%, and 100%), X2-distillation duration (distillation was continued 60, 75, and 90 min), and X3-particle size (herbs were cut in sizes of 10, 20, and 30 mm via guillotine). The dependent variable selected, coded as Y, was the essential oil volume obtained (mL). The steps of the classical statistical experimental design technique were complemented with the Taguchi method to improve the extraction efficacy of essential oil from Myrtus communis L., and the optimum parameter conditions were selected: boiler occupancy rate 100%, distillation duration 75 min, and particle size 20 mm. Following the optimum parameters, the GC-MS assay revealed for the Myrtus communis L. essential oil two predominant components, α-pinene-33.14% and eucalyptol-55.09%.Entities:
Keywords: GC-MS assay; Myrtus communis L. essential oil; Taguchi approach; factorial design
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32455788 PMCID: PMC7287582 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25102399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Coded values and physical levels of the variables used in different experimental trials of the fractional matrix Box–Wilson and the corresponding observed and predictive responses.
| Trials No. | Input Variables Coded Level (Physical Level) | Response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 (%) | X2 (min) | X3 (mm) | Y (mL) | ||
| Obs. | Pre. | ||||
| 1 | 1 (50) | 1 (60) | 1 (10) | 280 | 309 |
| 2 | 3 (100) | 1 (60) | 1 (10) | 730 | 675 |
| 3 | 1 (50) | 3 (90) | 1 (10) | 295 | 248 |
| 4 | 3 (100) | 3 (90) | 1 (10) | 760 | 796 |
| 5 | 1 (50) | 1 (60) | 3 (30) | 275 | 308 |
| 6 | 3 (100) | 1 (60) | 3 (30) | 745 | 674 |
| 7 | 1 (50) | 3 (90) | 3 (30) | 270 | 247 |
| 8 | 3 (100) | 3 (90) | 3 (30) | 740 | 795 |
| 9 | 1 (50) | 2 (75) | 2 (20) | 285 | 336 |
| 10 | 3 (100) | 2 (75) | 2 (20) | 750 | 793 |
| 11 | 2 (75) | 1 (60) | 2 (20) | 545 | 538 |
| 12 | 2 (75) | 3 (90) | 2 (20) | 590 | 568 |
| 13 | 2 (75) | 2 (75) | 1 (10) | 560 | 519 |
| 14 | 2 (75) | 2 (75) | 3 (30) | 540 | 518 |
| 15 | 2 (75) | 2 (75) | 2 (20) | 555 | 565 |
Analysis of variance for the reduced regressional polynomial model.
| Responses | Sources of Variation | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Squares | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y | Regression | 4704598 | 4 | 1176150 | 526.94 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 24552 | 11 | ||||
| Total | 4729150 | 15 |
Figure 1(a) Plot showing correlation between observed and predicted values for essential oil volume (mL); (b) plot showing correlation between expected normal values and residuals for essential oil volume (mL).
Figure 23D response surface and contour plot showing the effect of different operating conditions on essential oil volume (Y): (a) boiler occupancy rate (X1) and duration of distillation (X2); (b) boiler occupancy rate (X1) and particle size (X3); (c) duration of distillation (X2) and particle size (X3).
The values for the signal/noise (S/N) ratio of the system response for the experiments included in the fractional factorial design.
| Run Order | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S/N (dB) | 48.94 | 57.26 | 49.36 | 57.61 | 48.78 | 57.44 | 48.62 | 57.38 | 49.0 | 57.50 | 54.72 | 55.41 | 54.96 | 54.64 | 54.88 |
Optimal combinations of independent variables coded levels, identified by the Taguchi technique, and their effect size on S/N ratio for the dependent variable, expected, and observed S/N value.
| Control Factors (Independent Variables) | Y | |
|---|---|---|
| “Larger—the—Better” | Effect Size | |
| X1 | 3 | 3.662 |
| X2 | 2 | 0.438 |
| X3 | 2 | 0.545 |
| S/N expected (dB) | 58.42 | |
| S/N observed (dB) | 57.50 | |
Figure 3Control factors effects on the S/N ratio for the essential oil volume.
Essential oil components of Myrtus communis L. herbs.
| RT | Compound Name | SI | RSI | CAS Number | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.99 | α-Phellandrene | 931 | 970 | 1529-99-3 | 0.24 |
| 13.38 | α-Pinene | 985 | 987 | 80-56-8 | 33.14 |
| 14.19 | cis-Ocimene | 681 | 786 | 6874-10-8 | 0.06 |
| 15.49 | Δ-3-Carene | 976 | 976 | 13466-78-9 | 0.43 |
| 15.96 | β-Pinene | 674 | 810 | 127-91-3 | 0.09 |
| 16.82 | γ-Terpinene | 958 | 978 | 99-85-4 | 0.29 |
| 18.08 | Eucalyptol | 984 | 985 | 470-82-6 | 55.09 |
| 20.73 | α-Terpineolene | 875 | 923 | 586-62-9 | 0.17 |
| 21.50 | Linalool | 978 | 980 | 78-70-6 | 1.79 |
| 24.44 | trans-Pinocarveol | 897 | 956 | 547-61-5 | 0.13 |
| 26.43 | α-Terpineol | 782 | 936 | 10482-56-1 | 0.06 |
| 27.00 | Terpinen-4-ol | 907 | 966 | 562-74-3 | 0.15 |
| 28.00 | β-Fenchyl alcohol | 938 | 955 | 470-08-6 | 3.20 |
| 33.73 | trans-Pinocarvyl acetate | 781 | 931 | 1686-15-3 | 0.12 |
| 35.27 | 3(10)-Caren-4-ol, acetoacetic acid ester | 862 | 862 | NA | 1.08 |
| 36.50 | α-Terpinenyl acetate | 958 | 988 | 80-26-2 | 1.93 |
| 38.47 | β-Elemene | 759 | 891 | 515-13-9 | 0.04 |
| 39.15 | Linalyl acetate | 747 | 876 | 115-95-7 | 0.14 |
| 40.14 | trans-Caryophyllene | 955 | 970 | 87-44-5 | 0.19 |
| 41.96 | α-Humulene | 872 | 940 | 6753-98-6 | 0.08 |
| 48.07 | Caryophyllene oxide | 738 | 893 | 1139-30-6 | 0.06 |
Process variables and experimental conditions in 3-factor, 3-level Box–Wilson experimental designs.
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Boiler occupancy rate, (%) | X1 | 50 | 75 | 100 |
| Duration of distillation, (min) | X2 | 60 | 75 | 90 |
| Particle size, (mm) | X3 | 10 | 20 | 30 |
|
|
|
| ||
| Essential oil volume (mL) | Y | Maximize | ||