| Literature DB >> 32455559 |
Edyta Reszka1, Monika Lesicka1, Edyta Wieczorek1, Ewa Jabłońska1, Beata Janasik2, Maciej Stępnik3, Tomasz Konecki4, Zbigniew Jabłonowski4.
Abstract
The alteration of redox homeostasis constitutes an important etiological feature of common human malignancies. We investigated DNA damage, selenium (Se) levels and the expression of cytoprotective genes involved in (1) the KEAP1/NRF2/ARE pathway, (2) selenoprotein synthesis, and (3) DNA methylation and histone deacetylation as putative key players in redox status dysregulation in the blood of urinary bladder cancer (UBC) patients. The study involved 122 patients and 115 control individuals. The majority of patients presented Ta and T1 stages. UBC recurrence occurred within 0.13 to 29.02 months. DNA damage and oxidative DNA damage were significantly higher in the patients compared to the controls, while plasma Se levels were significantly reduced in the cases compared to the controls. Of the 25 investigated genes, elevated expression in the peripheral blood leukocytes in patients was observed for NRF2, GCLC, MMP9 and SEP15, while down-regulation was found for KEAP1, GSR, HMOX1, NQO1, OGG1, SEPW1, DNMT1, DNMT3A and SIRT1. After Bonferroni correction, an association was found with KEAP1, OGG1, SEPW1 and DNMT1. Early recurrence was associated with the down-regulation of PRDX1 and SRXN1 at the time of diagnosis. Peripheral redox status is significantly dysregulated in the blood of UBC patients. DNA strand breaks and PRDX1 and SRXN1 expression may provide significant predictors of UBC recurrence.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage; DNA methylation and histone deacetylation; NRF2-target genes; blood; comet assay; gene expression; recurrence; selenium; selenoproteins; urinary bladder cancer
Year: 2020 PMID: 32455559 PMCID: PMC7280975 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Demographic and histopathological features.
| Characteristic | Urinary Bladder Cancer | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age mean ± SD | 62.88 ± 10.07 | 66.38 ± 4.73 | 0.0008 1 |
| Gender | |||
| Males | 86 (70.49%) | 81 (70.43%) | NS |
| Females | 36 (29.51%) | 34 (29.57%) | |
| BMI mean ± SD | 27.29 ± 4.60 | 26.79 ± 3.25 | NS |
| Smoking habit | |||
| Yes | 42 (34.42%) | 15 (13.04%) | 0.0001 2 |
| No | 80 (65.57%) | 100 (86.96%) | |
| Alcohol | |||
| Yes | 85 (69.67%) | 100 (86.96%) | 0.001 2 |
| No | 37 (30.33%) | 15 (13.04%) | |
| T stage | |||
| Ta | 61 (50.0%) | ||
| T1 | 21 (17.21%) | ||
| T2 | 15 (12.30%) | ||
| Unknown | 25 (20.49%) | ||
| G grade | |||
| G1 | 57 (46.72%) | ||
| G2 | 26 (21.31%) | ||
| G3 | 14 (11.48%) | ||
| Unknown | 25 (20.49%) | ||
| Recurrence | |||
| Recurrence months | 10.01 ± 7.96 | ||
| Early <1 year | 38 (31.15%) | ||
| Late recurrence ≥1 year | 39 (31.97%) | ||
| Free | 22 (18.03%) | ||
| Unknown | 23 (18.85%) | ||
| No of tumors | |||
| Single | 71 (58.20%) | ||
| Multiple | 38 (31.15%) | ||
| Unknown | 13(10.65%) | ||
| Size of tumors | |||
| Small (≤3 cm) | 72 (59.01%) | ||
| Large (>3 cm) | 40 (32.79%) | ||
| Unknown | 10 (8.20%) |
1 The p-values were calculated using the Student’s t-test; 2 the p-values were calculated using the Pearson Chi-Square test; NS, not significant.
Redox status in the blood of the Urinary bladder cancer patients and the controls.
| Redox Parameter | Urinary Bladder Cancer | Control | Beta (ß) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Se 2 | 67.52 ± 16.43 | 74.67 ± 16.98 | −0.204 | 0.004 |
|
| 8.540 ± 0.337 | 8.448 ± 0.257 | 0.142 | 0.044 |
|
| 5.466 ± 0.336 | 5.848 ± 0.410 | −0.460 |
|
|
| 7.970 ± 0.281 | 7.983 ± 0.261 | −0.047 | 0.511 |
|
| 5.932 ± 0.744 | 5.973 ± 0.473 | −0.056 | 0.431 |
|
| 6.427 ± 0.398 | 6.307 ± 0.318 | 0.153 | 0.027 |
|
| 7.834 ± 0.346 | 7.890 ± 0.224 | −0.122 | 0.089 |
|
| 7.189 ± 0.371 | 7.280 ± 0.524 | −0.184 | 0.009 |
|
| 10.390 ± 0.260 | 10.420 ± 0.200 | −0.013 | 0.851 |
|
| 8.649 ± 0.357 | 8.820 ± 0.256 | −0.199 | 0.003 |
|
| 8.475 ± 0.824 | 8.201 ± 0.606 | 0.164 | 0.021 |
|
| 5.461 ± 0.509 | 5.620 ± 0.486 | −0.160 | 0.023 |
|
| 3.144 ± 0.479 | 3.541 ± 0.692 | −0.316 |
|
|
| 9.491 ± 0.226 | 9.534 ± 0.158 | −0.070 | 0.309 |
|
| 9.075 ± 0.306 | 9.064 ± 0.239 | 0.010 | 0.884 |
|
| 11.00 ± 0.53 | 10.91 ± 0.429 | 0.134 | 0.060 |
|
| 7.944 ± 0.492 | 7.874 ± 0.534 | 0.063 | 0.379 |
|
| 3.393 ± 0.861 | 3.572 ± 1.051 | −0.036 | 0.620 |
|
| 11.82 ± 0.55 | 11.72 ± 0.42 | 0.092 | 0.182 |
|
| 7.371 ± 0.248 | 7.363 ± 0.314 | 0.091 | 0.200 |
|
| 9.108 ± 0.161 | 9.090 ± 0.142 | 0.137 | 0.047 |
|
| 6.058 ± 0.335 | 6.480 ± 0.439 | −0.497 |
|
|
| 5.151 ± 0.482 | 5.170 ± 0.344 | −0.097 | 0.170 |
|
| 6.696 ± 0.314 | 6.869 ± 0.260 | −0.320 |
|
|
| 6.316 ± 0.403 | 6.408 ± 0.306 | −0.187 | 0.009 |
|
| 6.191 ± 0.274 | 6.262 ± 0.261 | −0.139 | 0.050 |
| Tail DNA (%) 3 | 6.902 ± 2.741 | 4.694 ± 1.705 | 0.446 | 0.000 |
| Ox Tail DNA (%) 4 | 10.810 ± 3.350 | 7.195 ± 2.001 | 0.536 | 0.000 |
1 The p-values were calculated by a linear regression on Box-Cox transformed values adjusted by age, gender, BMI, and smoking and alcohol habits; separate statistical models for each gene were used; 2 plasma selenium level (µg/L); values in bold are significant after Bonferroni correction for 25 genes, p-value < 0.002; NQO1—1 missing patient; UGT1A6—6 missing patients and 113 controls; OGG1—1 missing patient; the percentages of DNA damage 3 and oxidative DNA damage 4.
Odds ratio multivariate analyses for redox status indices in the urinary bladder cancer patients.
| Variables | Median | Group | ≤Median | Median< | Cut-Off Value 2 | OR | 95.00% | 95.00% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Se 3 | 75.5 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 6.19 | 3.04 | 12.59 | 0.04 |
|
| 8.46 | Co | 59 | 56 | >Median | 1.57 | 0.88 | 2.80 | 0.13 |
|
| 5.89 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 9.83 | 4.41 | 21.91 |
|
|
| 6.32 | Co | 58 | 57 | >Median | 1.21 | 0.68 | 2.16 | 0.51 |
|
| 7.31 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 1.44 | 0.81 | 2.57 | 0.21 |
|
| 8.82 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 2.23 | 1.22 | 4.07 | 0.009 |
|
| 8.24 | Co | 59 | 56 | >Median | 2.00 | 1.11 | 3.63 | 0.02 |
|
| 5.64 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 2.38 | 1.31 | 4.33 | 0.005 |
|
| 3.51 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 3.33 | 1.79 | 6.23 |
|
|
| 9.08 | Co | 59 | 56 | >Median | 1.83 | 1.02 | 3.30 | 0.04 |
|
| 6.52 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 6.19 | 3.04 | 12.59 |
|
|
| 6.83 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 1.89 | 1.06 | 3.37 | 0.03 |
|
| 6.41 | Co | 59 | 56 | ≤Median | 2.03 | 1.11 | 3.69 | 0.02 |
|
| 6.27 | Co | 58 | 57 | ≤Median | 1.56 | 0.88 | 2.77 | 0.13 |
| Tail DNA 4 | 4.26 | Co | 58 | 22 | >Median | 4.96 | 2.55 | 9.62 | 0.0000 |
| Ox Tail DNA 5 | 6.76 | Co | 58 | 57 | >Median | 11.72 | 5.16 | 26.61 | 0.0000 |
1 The P-values were calculated by a logistic regression adjusted by age, BMI, and smoking and alcohol habits, separately for each gene; 2 cut-off median values for the >median and ≤median of controls; UBC—Urinary Bladder Cancer; Co—Control group; 3 plasma selenium level (µg/L), OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30–0.97 in the highest category of Se exposure compared to in the lowest one; values in bold are significant after Bonferroni correction for 25 genes, p-value < 0.002; the percentages of DNA damage 4 and oxidative DNA damage 5.
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier curves for recurrence-free survival according to (A) tumor stage (Ta, T1, T2); (B) tertiles of tail DNA (%)—Tertile 1 (≤3.74% Tail DNA; N = 7), Tertile 2 (3.75–5.11% Tail DNA; N = 24) and Tertile 3 (>5.1% Tail DNA; N = 91); (C) tertiles of gene expression of SRXN1—low SRXN1 expression (≤7.68; N = 35), medium SRXN1 expression (7.68–8.03; N = 35) and high SRXN1 expression (>8.03; N = 52); and (D) tertiles of gene expression of PRDX1—low PRDX1 expression (≤9.47; N = 66), medium PRDX1 expression (9.47–9.61; N = 16) and high PRDX1 expression (>9.61; N = 40). P-values were calculated by the log-rank test; p < 0.05.
Figure 2Association between DNA damage and selected cytoprotective gene expression in the study group for (A) MAFG; (C) KEAP1—Tertile 1 (≤3.74% Tail DNA; N = 7), Tertile 2 (3.75–5.11% Tail DNA; N = 24) and Tertile 3 (>5.1% Tail DNA; N = 91); (B) MAFG; and (D) KEAP1—Tertile 1 (≤6.21% Ox Tail DNA; N = 8), Tertile 2 (6.22–7.37% Ox Tail DNA; N = 6) and Tertile 3 (>7.37% Ox Tail DNA; N = 108). p-values were calculated by the two-way ANOVA p < 0.05; the percentages of DNA damage (Tail DNA) and oxidative DNA damage (Ox Tail DNA).