Anna C Pham1, Kang-Yu Peng1, Malinda Salim1, Gisela Ramirez1, Adrian Hawley2, Andrew J Clulow1, Ben J Boyd1,3. 1. Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. 2. SAXS/WAXS Beamline, Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. 3. ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Abstract
Lipids in mammalian milks such as bovine milk and human breast milk have been shown to self-assemble into various liquid crystalline materials during digestion. In this study, the direct correlation between the composition of the lipids from three types of mammalian milk, three brands of infant formulas (IFs), and soy milk and the liquid crystalline structures that form during their digestion was investigated to link the material properties to the composition. The self-assembly behavior was assessed using in vitro digestion coupled with in situ small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Lipid composition was determined during in vitro digestion using ex situ liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. All tested milks self-assembled into ordered structures during digestion, with the majority of milks displaying nonlamellar phases. Milks that released mostly long-chain fatty acids (>95 mol % of the top 10 fatty acids released) with more than 47 mol % unsaturation predominantly formed a micellar cubic phase during digestion. Other milks released relatively more medium-chain fatty acids and medium-chain monoglycerides and produced a range of ordered liquid crystalline structures including the micellar cubic phase, the hexagonal phase, and the bicontinuous cubic phase. One infant formula did not form liquid crystalline structures at all as a consequence of differences in fatty acid distributions. The self-assembly phenomenon provides a powerful discriminator between different classes of nutrition and a roadmap for the design of human milklike systems and is anticipated to have important implications for nutrient transport and the delivery of bioactives.
Lipids in mammalian milks such as bovine milk and human breast milk have been shown to self-assemble into various liquid crystalline materials during digestion. In this study, the direct correlation between the composition of the lipids from three types of mammalian milk, three brands of infant formulas (IFs), and soy milk and the liquid crystalline structures that form during their digestion was investigated to link the material properties to the composition. The self-assembly behavior was assessed using in vitro digestion coupled with in situ small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Lipid composition was determined during in vitro digestion using ex situ liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. All tested milks self-assembled into ordered structures during digestion, with the majority of milks displaying nonlamellar phases. Milks that released mostly long-chain fatty acids (>95 mol % of the top 10 fatty acids released) with more than 47 mol % unsaturation predominantly formed a micellar cubic phase during digestion. Other milks released relatively more medium-chain fatty acids and medium-chain monoglycerides and produced a range of ordered liquid crystalline structures including the micellar cubic phase, the hexagonal phase, and the bicontinuous cubic phase. One infant formula did not form liquid crystalline structures at all as a consequence of differences in fatty acid distributions. The self-assembly phenomenon provides a powerful discriminator between different classes of nutrition and a roadmap for the design of human milklike systems and is anticipated to have important implications for nutrient transport and the delivery of bioactives.
Milk is a naturally
occurring complex emulsion consisting of proteins
(whey and casein), fats, salts, sugars, and vitamins, which are essential
for the growth and development of infants during the first months
and years of life. Approximately 45–50% of the energy provided
to babies comes from the lipids within the breast milk.[1] In adults, bovine milk continues to provide energy
and nutrients for bone health. Bovine milk is the most consumed mammalian
milk primarily due to its early domestication.[2] Goat milk has also grown popular as an alternative to bovine milk.[3,4] Commercially available full-cream bovine milk contains approximately
3.0–4.5 wt % fat, of which 98 wt % is in the form of triglycerides
(TGs).[5] The triglycerides exist in water
as stabilized fat droplets, ranging in diameter from 3 to 20 μm
in raw milk and 0.2 to 2.0 μm in commercial homogenized and
pasteurized milk.[6] Native fat droplets
are enveloped by milk fat globular membranes, consisting of a trilayer
of phospholipids intercalated with a wide range of glycoproteins and
other compounds.[7]Plant-based juices
controversially marketed as “milk”
have also become increasingly popular as milk substitutes. This can
be attributed to a range of factors including ethical beliefs, lifestyle
choices, or an increase in lactose intolerance among the global population.[8,9] Plant-based juices such as soy milk contain a different distribution
of triglycerides in the cores of the fat globules compared to mammalian
milk.[10] Unlike milk droplets where the
triglyceride core is enveloped by the milk fat globular membrane,
soy milk lipid droplets are stabilized by a monolayer of phospholipids
and proteins (oleosins).[11,12]The complex blend
of triglycerides in mammalian milks and plant-based
juices comprises three, potentially all different, fatty acids (FAs).
The plethora of possible combinations of different chain lengths/unsaturations
esterified to the glycerol backbone means that hundreds of different
lipid species are present. Under the action of esterases (and more
specifically lipases), the triglycerides undergo lipolysis primarily
in the small intestine to form diglycerides (DGs) and ultimately are
further and completely digested to form monoglycerides (MGs) and fatty
acids.[13] The digestion products are more
polar and amphiphilic than the triglycerides and interact with bile
salts and phospholipids to form mixed micelles for the transport of
the lipids to the luminal wall where absorption occurs.While
the milk fat and vegetable oils in milk and milk substitutes
are essentially unstructured liquids at physiological temperature,
the digestion products have been shown to self-assemble in aqueous
environments into liquid crystalline structures during the digestion
of bovine and human milk[14−16] using in situ small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) (Figure ). The complex mixtures of different triglycerides,
diglycerides, monoglycerides, and fatty acids present at various stages
of digestion in bovine milk allow for a range of self-assembled structures
to form at different stages of the digestion process, depending on
the starting triglyceride composition. In the case of bovine milk,
a lamellar (Lα) phase (containing calcium ions shown
in Figure ) is formed,
which persists throughout the digestion process but coexists with
a transient micellar cubic (I2) phase, a hexagonal (H2) phase, and finally a bicontinuous cubic (V2)
phase, which persists until the end of digestion.[16]
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the in vitro lipolysis apparatus
(left) coupled with in situ small-angle X-ray scattering
(middle) for the determination of self-assembled structures (right)
that arise during the digestion of milk and milk substitutes. Liquid
crystalline structures were drawn with inspiration from Salentinig et al. and Clulow et al.[14,16]
Schematic diagram of the in vitro lipolysis apparatus
(left) coupled with in situ small-angle X-ray scattering
(middle) for the determination of self-assembled structures (right)
that arise during the digestion of milk and milk substitutes. Liquid
crystalline structures were drawn with inspiration from Salentinig et al. and Clulow et al.[14,16]The formation of liquid crystalline
phases was also seen during
the digestion of human milk, forming a persistent Lα phase associated with calcium soaps, followed by an inverse micellar
I2 phase that remained throughout the digestion. The differences
in the liquid crystalline structures formed by human and bovine milk
during digestion were hypothesized to be due to differences in the
length and unsaturation of the fatty acid chains in the parent triglycerides
and their positional distribution.[10,17]Infant
formula (IF) is often used in place of breast milk when
breast milk is unavailable or where personal preference precludes
breastfeeding. Infant formula also allows for long-term storage through
pasteurization and sterilization procedures during manufacturing,[18] as fresh milk is perishable and expires soon
after expression. It is not known why infants fed formula tend to
have poorer long-term health outcomes than those fed breast milk.
Our studies aim to answer this question from the lipid structural
perspective and the self-assembly behavior during digestion. The self-assembly
behavior during the digestion of infant formula compared to human
breast milk may provide one measure of this. Infant formulas mainly
consist of vegetable oils such as palm oil, soybeanoil, rapeseed
oil, coconut oil, among others, and are enriched with vitamins, minerals,
and essential amino acids. While the total fatty acid composition
of human breast milk may be matched during the commercial preparation
of infant formulas, the fat sourced from vegetable oils possesses
a different positional distribution of fatty acids to human milk.
It is known that human milk contains a significant amount of triglycerides
bearing two oleoyl chains at the sn-1 and sn-3 positions with palmitoyl chains at the sn-2 position (so-called “OPO”).[19] The consequent link between the self-assembly of digestion products
into liquid crystalline structures and the fatty acid disposition
in the parent triglycerides was unknown at the outset of this study.
It was hypothesized that a link must exist between triglyceride composition,
the composition of digestion products, and structure formation during
digestion. Therefore, the aim of this study was to understand the
correlation between lipid composition and liquid crystalline structure
formation during the digestion of a range of milk and milklike systems
including three different commercial infant formulae.
Experimental Section
Materials
Commercially available
homogenized bovine
milk (3.4% fat), soy milk (3.0% fat), goat milk (3.6% fat), and infant
formula 3 (IF 3) were purchased from a local supermarket (Coles, Mount
Waverley Supermarket, VIC, Australia). Human breast milk was donated
by the Mercy Health Breastmilk Bank (Heidelberg, VIC, Australia),
with ethics approval from the Mercy Health Human Ethics Research Committee
(Approval CF14/624-2014000188 and 2017-035). The nutritional information
of all milk formulations is listed in Table . Two additional commercial brands of infant
formula (IF 1 and IF 2) were kindly provided by the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation. Trizma maleate, sodium taurodeoxycholate hydrate
(NaTDC) ≥95% purity, 4-bromophenyl boronic acid (4-BPBA ≥95.0%),
1-butanol (for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), ≥99.7%),
2-propanol (hypergrade for liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry,
LC–MS, LiChrosolv), glycerol standard solution, and casein
from bovine milk, sodium azide (≥99.5%), and ammonium formate
(reagent grade, 97%) (St. Louis, MO, USA). Calcium chloride dihydrate
(AR grade), sodium chloride (AR grade), and hydrochloric acid (32%)
were purchased from Ajax Finechem Pty. Tributyrin (>97.0%, gas
chromatography
grade) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan).
Sodium hydroxide (puriss p.a. grade), acetonitrile (liquid chromatography
grade), methanol (liquid chromatography (LC) grade), chloroform, ammonium
acetate (ACS reagent), and tetrahydrofuran (THF, liquid chromatography
grade) were purchased from Merck Pty. Ltd., Australia. Pancreatic
lipase was extracted from porcine pancreatin (also containing amylases
and proteases) obtained from Southern Biological (Nunawading, VIC,
Australia) using the method described below. Triolein (>80.0% purity,
with trilinolein as the major impurity) was purchased from TCI Chemicals
(Tokyo, Japan). The following internal standards were used for lipid
profiling: FA mixture [containing 13C-labeled FA(C16:0),
FA(C16:1), FA(C18:0), FA(C18:1), and FA(C18:2)], FA(C10:0)-d19, and FA(20:0)-d39 were purchased from Cambridge Isotopes, Inc. (MA). Deuterated fatty
acids (C8:0)-d15 and FA(C12:0)-d23 were produced by the National Deuteration
Facility of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
(ANSTO, Lucas Heights, NSW). Deuterated FA(C18:3)-d14 was purchased from Cayman Chemical (MI). The monoglyceride
(C21:0), diglyceride (C21:0/C21:0), and triglyceride (C19:0/C19:0/C19:0)
were purchased from Nu-Chek Prep, Inc. (MN, USA). The solvents and
salts used for LC–MS were all at least LC grade, and all materials
were used without further purification unless otherwise stated.
Table 1
Manufacturer-Specified Nutritional
Content of Milks (Mass per 100 mL)a
bovine milk
goat milk
human milkb
IF 1
IF 2
IF 3
soy milk
total fat
3.8 g
3.6 g
2.20 ± 0.13% w/v
3.8 g
3.8 g
3.6 g
3.0 g
saturated fat
2.5 g
2.5 g
N/A
1.5 g
2.1 g
N/A
0.4 g
protein
3.4 g
3.4 g
N/A
1.6 g
1.5 g
1.3 g
3.3 g
carbohydrate
4.8 g
4.0 g
N/A
8.8 g
7.9 g
7.3 g
5.0 g
sugars
4.8 g
4.0 g
1.3 g
1.2 g
N/A
2.3 g
sodium
40 mg
60 mg
N/A
25 mg
35.6 mg
16 mg
60 mg
calcium
115 mg
130 mg
N/A
63 mg
59.6 mg
45 mg
120 mg
vitamin A
41 μg
N/A
N/A
80 μg
59.6 μg
69 μg
120 mg
riboflavin (B2)
0.2 μg
N/A
N/A
100 μg
108 μg
110 μg
0.22 mg
vitamin D
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0 μg
1.3 μg
1.2 μg
N/A
Note that the nutritional
contents
of the infant formulae are listed as mass per 100 mL of the reconstituted
formulae and not of the powder.
The full nutritional information
was not available for the sample and was not analyzed. The fat content
of the human breast milk was determined using a triglyceride reagent
kit.
Note that the nutritional
contents
of the infant formulae are listed as mass per 100 mL of the reconstituted
formulae and not of the powder.The full nutritional information
was not available for the sample and was not analyzed. The fat content
of the human breast milk was determined using a triglyceride reagent
kit.
Methods
Preparation
of Freeze-Dried Pancreatic Lipase
To prepare
the lipase supernatant, 25 mL of Milli-Q-grade water was added to
20 g of pancreatin in a 50 mL Falcon tube. The Falcon tube was briefly
vortexed to form a dispersion and centrifuged twice at 2205g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the lipase was collected
in the supernatant. The supernatant containing pancreatic lipase was
freeze-dried, and the activity was determined by conducting a tributyrin
test.[20] Briefly, 9 mL of Tris buffer (pH
7.5) and 5.8 mL of tributyrin (equivalent to 6 g) were added into
an in vitro digestion vessel under constant magnetic
stirring. The temperature of the digestion vessel was maintained at
37 °C, and the pH of the digest was adjusted to 7.500 ±
0.003. The digest was stirred for 15 min prior to the addition of
reconstituted pancreatic lipase (1 mL), which contained a known mass
of dried pancreatic lipase. The activity of the lipase, expressed
as tributyrin units (TBUs), was the number of moles of butyric acid
titrated using the pH-stat autotitrator (μmol) per minute of
digestion.
In Vitro Digestions
Milk and milk
substitutes were diluted in an equal volume of Tris buffer. The Tris
buffer contained 50 mM trizma maleate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM
calcium chloride dihydrate, and 6 mM sodium azide. The infant formula
was prepared in Tris buffer, so no additional Tris buffer was added
prior to digestion. The milk/Tris buffer systems were added into a
thermostated glass vessel maintained at 37 °C under constant
magnetic stirring, with the pH adjusted to 6.500 ± 0.003. The
digestion process was initiated by the addition of the pancreatic
lipase supernatant (10% of the total final digest volume), with an
enzyme activity of approximately 500–800 TBU/mL of the digest.
The fatty acids released by triglyceride hydrolysis decreased the
pH of the digest, which signaled the dosing unit to titrate NaOH solution
(0.2–2 M) into the digestion vessel to maintain the pH at 6.500.
The volume of the NaOH solution titrated was used to calculate the
amount of fatty acids (ionized) released during digestion in each
milk or milk-substitute system. After 60 min of digestion, the pH
was increased to 9 (back-titration) to account for unionized fatty
acids on the surface of emulsion droplets during digestion. The digestion
of each milk was performed in triplicate for lipid analysis.
Correlation between the Rate of Digestion and Structure Formation
In Vitro Lipolysis Apparatus Coupled with SAXS
All SAXS experiments were conducted on the SAXS/WAXS beamline at
the Australian Synchrotron, part of ANSTO (Clayton, VIC, Australia).
Real-time SAXS analysis of in vitro digestion was
conducted according to the method reported previously.[21] The pH-stat autotitrator apparatus coupled with
SAXS was used to conduct in vitro digestions (Figure ). A peristaltic
pump was used to circulate the digestion media at 10 mL/min out from
the digestion vessel through a 1.5 mm diameter quartz capillary, which
was aligned in the synchrotron X-ray beam. The sample–detector
distance was 1522–1527 mm, and wavelengths λ of 1.1271–0.954
Å (photon energy = 11–13 keV) was used to acquire a q-range of 0.013 < q (Å–1) < 0.652. The scattering vector, q, is defined
aswhere 2θ is the scattering
angle. Two-dimensional (2D) scattering images were acquired using
a Pilatus 1M detector (5 s acquisition time and a delay of 15 s between
acquisitions). An in-house built software ScatterBrain was used to
radially integrate the 2D scattering patterns into plots of scattered
X-ray intensity vsq, from which
liquid crystalline structures can be identified from their characteristic
diffraction patterns. The lattice parameter, which describe the dimensions
of a three-dimensional (3D) unit cell within the liquid crystalline
lattice, was also calculated. The scattering vector q of each diffraction peak in the scattering pattern (often called
Bragg peaks) can be used to calculate d, the interplanar
spacing between atomic planes in each liquid crystalline system according
to the following equation[22]Finally,
the lattice parameter (α) can
be calculated using eq for the Lα phase, eq for the cubic phase, and eq for the H2 phase[23]where h, k, and l correspond
to the Miller indices, which
define the planes within the sample from the position of the peaks
with regards to the unit cell vectors for the known liquid crystalline
phases. The scattering profiles were obtained from single in vitro digestion separate from those used for lipid assays.
Determination of Lipid Composition Using LC–MS
Lipid Extraction
Method
Milks were digested as described
in the previous section (in vitro digestions). Aliquots
(150 μL) were taken after 0 and 60 min of digestion into 1.5
mL Eppendorf tubes preloaded with the lipase inhibitor 4-BPBA (15
μL, 0.05 M in methanol). The single-phase lipid extraction method
of Peng et al. was used, with some modifications.[24] Samples were further diluted with Milli-Q-grade
water by a factor of 3 (1:2), and aliquots (20 μL) of the diluted
samples were added to 20 μL of an internal standard mix dissolved
in 1-butanol/methanol (1:1 v/v) (description in Table ) and 400 μL of chloroform/methanol
(2:1). The samples were placed on a tube roller mixer (Ratek Instruments,
VIC, Australia) for 10 min, followed by sonication in a water bath
(Branson Ultrasonic Cleaner, Danbury, CT) for 30 min in an ice bath.
The samples were left to rest upright for 20 min to allow any proteins
to sediment, followed by centrifugation at 16 000g for 10 min. The supernatants were carefully transferred to a 96-deep-well
plate for drying overnight under nitrogen gas. Dried samples were
sealed with an aluminum plate sealer and kept at −20 °C
until further analysis. Prior to analysis, 100 μL of 1-butanol
was added to reconstitute the pellets, followed by sonication for
10 min in a water bath. A further 100 μL of methanol was added
to the reconstituted samples, which were subsequently centrifuged
for 5 min (3700g). The supernatants were then transferred
to 1.5 mL glass vials with a 250 μL glass insert for LC–MS
analysis.
Table 2
List of Lipid Species in the Internal
Standard (ISTD) Mix for Semiquantitative Analysisa
lipid ISTD
mix
ISTD concentration
(in the sample)
TG(19:0/19:0/19:0)
0.001 mM
DG(21:0/21:0)
0.002 mM
MG(21:0)
0.200 mM
13C-labeled
mixed
FA (14:0, 16:1, 16:0, 17:0, 18:2, 18:1, 18:0)
11.16 μg/mL
FA(8:0)-d15
0.014 mM
FA(10:0)-d19
0.012 mM
FA(12:0)-d23
0.009 mM
FA(18:3)-d14
0.003 mM
FA(20:0)-d39
0.006 mM
TG = triglyceride, DG = diglyceride,
MG = monoglyceride, and FA = fatty acid
TG = triglyceride, DG = diglyceride,
MG = monoglyceride, and FA = fatty acidA Shimadzu Nexera X2 UHPLC system coupled with a Shimadzu
#8050
tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operated by Shimadzu LabSolutions
software (Shimadzu, Sydney, NSW, Australia), was used for targeted
lipid profiling of bovine milk, goat milk, human breast milk, IF 1,
and IF 2. A 4.6 × 75 mm2 Waters Symmetry C18 (100 Å, 3.5 μm spherical silica) column (Waters Corp.,
Milford, MA) with a 4 × 2 mm2 Gemini C18 guard column (Phenomenex, NSW, Australia) was used for lipid separation,
with an oven temperature of 40 °C. A 37.5 min (long) acquisition
method was used to analyze triglycerides, diglycerides, monoglycerides,
and phospholipids (TG, DG, MG, and PL, respectively), and a 16.5 min
(short) acquisition method was used for FA analysis alone. An injection
volume of 1 μL was used for each analysis.The eluent
system for the long method consisted of solvent A =
water/acetonitrile (4:6 v/v) and solvent B = acetonitrile/2-propanol
(1:9 v/v), both containing 10 mM ammonium acetate, with a flow rate
of 0.4 mL/min using a gradient method. The gradient method consisted
of 40% solvent B from 0 min, which was increased to 70% solvent B
over 3 min, and then gradually increased to 98.1% solvent B over the
next 30 min. The column was then cleaned with 100% B for 2 min, followed
by an equilibration run for 2.5 min with 100% solvent A. The eluent
system for the short method consisted of solvent = A water/acetonitrile
(9:1 v/v) and solvent B = acetonitrile/2-propanol (1:9 v/v), both
containing 10 mM ammonium acetate, with a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min.
The eluents for the gradient method consisted of linear changes between
the following eluent mixtures at the given times: 0% B from 0 min,
60% B from 3 min, 92% B from 11 min, followed by a 3.5 min wash with
100% B, and then a 2 min equilibration run with 100% A. A total of
207 lipid species (TG, DG, MG, and PL) were assayed with the long
method, and 32 FAs were assayed using the short method.For
the lipid profiling of IF 3 and soy milk, a 50 × 2 mm2 Phenomenex C18 column (110 Å, 3 μm)
was used on a Shimadzu Nexera X2 UHPLC system coupled with a Shimadzu
#8030 tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operated by Shimadzu
LabSolutions software (Shimadzu, Sydney, NSW, Australia). The solvent
system consisted of solvent A = water/acetonitrile (4:6 v/v) and solvent
B = water/2-propanol (1:9 v/v), with 1 mM aqueous solution of ammonium
formate and a flow rate of 0.15 mL/min. A gradient method similar
to the aforementioned long method was used, with a longer total run
time of 38.5 min. An injection volume of 5 μL was used, with
239 lipid species detected in a single measurement. The change of
the lipid profiling method was due to the solvent pump becoming blocked
when using the previously described method, likely resulting from
precipitated ammonium acetate contaminating the electrospray ionization
(ESI) chamber of the mass spectrometer with the first protocol described.
Further LC–MS parameters can be found in Table . Lipid data was processed using Skyline
(version 4.1, Seattle, WA).
Table 3
List of Lipid Classes,
the Number
of Lipid Species Detected, and Key Instrumental Settings for the LC–MS
Lipid Profiling Methoda
first
method
voltage settings
lipid class
no.
parent ion
fragment
pattern
internal
standard
interface
voltage
Q1 pre bias
CE
Q3 pre bias
triacylglycerol
96
[M + NH4]+
NI, fatty acid
TG(19:0/19:0/19:0)
5
–32
–21
–22
diacylglycerol
79
[M + NH4]+
NI, fatty acid
DG(21:0/21:0)
4
–14
–21
–18
monoacylglycerol
32
[M + H]+
NI, fatty acid
MG(21:0)
5
–14
–11
–18
fatty acid
32
[M + acid]−
PI: [M – H]−
isotopic fatty acids
–3
15
10
15
NI = negative ion; PI = positive
ion.
NI = negative ion; PI = positive
ion.
Determination of the Lipid
Content of Human Breast Milk
The amount of triglyceride content
in human breast milk samples was
analyzed using a triglyceride (GPO) reagent kit (Pointe Scientific
Inc., MI, USA). Human breast milk (100 μL) was diluted with
900 μL of tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME) for
lipid extraction. Human breast milk and TBME were vortexed for 10
min and then left to rest for 20 min at room temperature. This resulted
in a phase separation, with the upper TBME solvent layer containing
the triglycerides and the lower layer containing water-soluble milk
components. The upper TBME layer containing the triglycerides was
transferred into a 1.5 mL vial and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen
gas. The triglycerides were reconstituted in methanol, followed by
5 min of sonication in a sonication bath. The lipid extraction was
conducted in triplicates.The glycerol standard solution (2.5
mg/mL) was used to prepare a set of stock standards (0, 0.5, 1.0,
2.0, 5.0, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mg/mL) in methanol.Aliquots of
20 μL (samples and stock standards) were transferred
into a 96-well plate, and 180 μL of the triglyceride (GPO) reagent
was added to the samples. A plastic seal was placed on top of the
96-well plate, followed by an incubation of 30 min at 37 °C.
The absorbance was measured at 490 nm using an Enspire Multilabel
Plate Reader (PerkinElmer, MA, USA).
Results
Formation of
Ordered Fat Droplets during the Digestion of Milk
and Milklike Systems
The digestion of the milks in
vitro resulted in the transition from disordered liquid fat
droplets to a variety of ordered self-assembled structures (Figure ). In situ SAXS measurements revealed similar structural behavior during the
early stages of the digestion of bovine milk (Figure A) and goat milk (Figure B), with lamellar (Lα),
inverse hexagonal (H2), and bicontinuous cubic (V2) phases being observed. From the relative positions of the three
characteristic diffraction peaks at low q values,
with spacing ratios of √2, √4, and √6, it is
apparent that the V2 phase possessed the Im3m space group.[25] However,
the persistent V2 phase observed at the end of the digestion
of the fat droplets in bovine milk was not seen in the case of goat
milk. Instead, the V2 phase formed in the droplets in goat
milk swelled during digestion, indicated by an increase in the lattice
parameter (from 167 to 191 Å), and then disappeared toward the
end of goat milk digestion, leaving only the Lα phase.
Human milk (Figure C) and soy milk (Figure G) both formed micellar cubic (I2) phases, with
the Fd3m space group in the fat
droplets, and were digested more slowly than bovine/goat milk (digestion
profiles shown in Figure S3, Supporting
Information), which indicated that the self-assembled liquid crystalline
phases had a greater negative curvature at the oil–water interface
than the other milks. The lattice parameter of the I2 phase
in human milk was initially 157 Å and gradually decreased to
153 Å. The lattice parameter of the Fd3m I2 phase in soy milk was similar (151 Å).
Figure 2
Time-resolved
scattering profiles obtained during the digestion
of milk and milklike systems, showing the evolution of liquid crystalline
structures over time. (A) Digestion of bovine milk,[16] (B) goat milk, (C) human breast milk,[15] (D) infant formula 1, (E) infant formula 2, (F) infant
formula 3, and (G) soy milk, with time dependence of annotated liquid
crystalline structures shown on the right of each panel (Lα = the lamellar phase, V2 = the bicontinuous cubic phase
with the Im3m space group, H2 = the hexagonal phase, I2 = the micellar cubic
phase with the Fd3m space group).
Digestion time between 0 and 30 min is shown for all milk types as
the structures remained persistent until 60 min. The results of bovine
milk and human breast milk have been reported previously and reanalyzed
for this work in the context of their lipid digestion profiles.
Time-resolved
scattering profiles obtained during the digestion
of milk and milklike systems, showing the evolution of liquid crystalline
structures over time. (A) Digestion of bovine milk,[16] (B) goat milk, (C) human breast milk,[15] (D) infant formula 1, (E) infant formula 2, (F) infant
formula 3, and (G) soy milk, with time dependence of annotated liquid
crystalline structures shown on the right of each panel (Lα = the lamellar phase, V2 = the bicontinuous cubic phase
with the Im3m space group, H2 = the hexagonal phase, I2 = the micellar cubic
phase with the Fd3m space group).
Digestion time between 0 and 30 min is shown for all milk types as
the structures remained persistent until 60 min. The results of bovine
milk and human breast milk have been reported previously and reanalyzed
for this work in the context of their lipid digestion profiles.The digestion of the infant formulas resulted in
the formation
of different liquid crystalline structures in the fat droplets. During
the digestion of IF 1 (Figure D), a persistent Lα phase with a repeat unit
distance of 46 Å, typical of calcium soaps of liberated fatty
acids, appeared after 2 min of digestion in the same manner as the
digestion of milk.[16] After 17 min of digestion,
diffraction peaks corresponding to an I2 phase (Fd3m space group) with a lattice parameter
of 159 Å appeared. The sequence of structure formation exhibited
by IF 1 followed a similar progression to that of human milk, with persistent Lα (45
Å) and I2 phases (159–164 Å) formed during
the digestion of IF 1. In the case of IF 2 (Figure E), a Lα phase with a repeat
distance unit of 45 Å associated with calcium soaps was initially
present, followed by the appearance of a H2 phase with
a lattice parameter of 59 Å, which is similar to that formed
during the early stages of the digestion of bovine and goat milk.
Finally, only a Lα phase with a lattice parameter
of 46 Å associated with calcium soaps was formed during the digestion
of IF 3 (Figure F).
Composition of Lipolysis Products after Digestion
The
relative quantities of the top 10 most-abundant fatty acids produced
after 60 min digestion are shown in Figure A, while the equivalent data for monoglycerides
is shown in Figure B. The relative percentages of medium-chain and long-chain fatty
acids (MCFAs and LCFAs) and monoglycerides within the top 10 most-abundant
species are shown in Tables and 5, respectively. The relative
percentages of fatty acids and monoglycerides produced at increasing
time during digestion are provided in Figures S1 and S2, respectively.
Figure 3
(A) Comparison of the top 10 fatty acids
observed after 60 min
of the digestion of each milk type and (B) comparison of the top 10
monoglycerides observed after 60 min of the digestion of each milk.
The relative percentages of fatty acids and monoglycerides of each
chain length are shown with the associated liquid crystal (LC) structures
present at 60 min digestion. Note that the total percentages of fatty
acids/monoglycerides do not add up to 100% as only the top 10 species
of fatty acids are shown, which account for more than 90% of the lipids
detected in each mixture for each lipid class.
Table 4
The Percentage of Medium-Chain Fatty
Acids (MCFAs, 6–12-carbon chains), the Percentage of Long-Chain
Fatty Acids (LCFAs, >12-Carbon Chains), and the Percentage of Unsaturation
in the LCFA Based on the Top 10 Fatty Acids Detected in the Different
Milk Types at 60 min Digestion
bovine
goat
human
IF 1
IF 2
IF 3
soy
percentage
of MCFA based
on the top 10 fatty acid species
3.35 ± 0.14
2.33 ± 0.09
1.04 ± 0.00
3.45 ± 0.24
13.51 ± 0.42
4.90 ± 0.35
0.92 ± 0.17
percentage of LCFA based
on the top 10 fatty acid species
89.74 ± 0.21
92.78 ± 0.22
96.19 ± 0.21
95.57 ± 0.24
85.47 ± 0.44
93.81 ± 0.38
97.39 ± 0.21
percentage of unsaturation
in LCFA based on the top 10 fatty acid species
30.50 ± 0.87
40.64 ± 0.66
65.51 ± 1.64
47.79 ± 1.55
44.68 ± 1.73
43.25 ± 3.70
69.19 ± 0.35
Table 5
The Percentage of Medium-Chain Monoglycerides
(MCMGs, 6–12-Carbon Chains), the Percentage of Long-Chain Monoglycerides
(LCMGs, >12-Carbon Chains), and the Percentage of Unsaturation
in
the LCMG Based on the Top 10 Monoglycerides Detected in the Different
Milk Types at 60 min Digestion
bovine
goat
human
IF 1
IF 2
IF 3
soy
percentage
of MCMG based
on the top 10 monoglycerides
4.78 ± 0.30
13.09 ± 0.41
3.74 ± 0.29
4.03 ± 0.08
8.15 ± 0.71
3.89 ± 0.22
0.12 ± 0.03
percentage of LCMG based
on the top 10 monoglycerides
95.22 ± 0.30
86.91 ± 0.41
96.26 ± 0.29
95.97 ± 0.08
91.85 ± 0.71
96.11 ± 0.22
99.88 ± 0.03
percentage of unsaturation
in LCMG based on the top 10 monoglycerides
38.32 ± 0.30
40.64 ± 0.66
24.30 ± 1.72
94.59 ± 0.75
90.76 ± 0.80
84.24 ± 1.12
95.70 ± 1.71
(A) Comparison of the top 10 fatty acids
observed after 60 min
of the digestion of each milk type and (B) comparison of the top 10
monoglycerides observed after 60 min of the digestion of each milk.
The relative percentages of fatty acids and monoglycerides of each
chain length are shown with the associated liquid crystal (LC) structures
present at 60 min digestion. Note that the total percentages of fatty
acids/monoglycerides do not add up to 100% as only the top 10 species
of fatty acids are shown, which account for more than 90% of the lipids
detected in each mixture for each lipid class.Most of the ordered structures formed during the digestion of bovine
and goat milks were similar, i.e., Lα, I2, and V2 phases, which was reflected in
similar fatty acid compositions after 60 min of digestion. However,
for goat milk, the V2 structure was no longer present at
60 min.Milk systems that formed the I2 structure
upon digestion, i.e., human milk, IF 1, and soy milk,
contained a larger
proportion of long-chain unsaturated fatty acids such as oleic acid
(C18:1) and linolenic acid (C18:2) (Figure A). The percentages of long-chain fatty acids, i.e., stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), linoleic/linolelaidic
(C18:2) acid, and paullinic (C20:1) acid, were similar and also greater
in proportion relative to short-chain fatty acids within human breast
milk and IF 1 (Figure A). However, the percentages of lauric (C12:0) and palmitic (C16:0)
acids in IF 1 were significantly greater than that in human breast
milk, while the percentage of palmitoleic (C16:1) acid was significantly
greater in human breast milk relative to that in IF 1. Soy and human
milk contained the largest proportion of long-chain unsaturated fatty
acids at approximately 70% of the total long-chain fatty acid components.
Unlike all other milks tested, diffraction from Lα phases was not observed during the digestion of soy milk. However,
proportions of long-chain unsaturated fatty acids were greater in
human milk, IF 1, and soy milk (65.51 ± 1.64, 47.79 ± 1.55,
and 69.13 ± 0.35%, respectively), relative to other milks not
forming the I2 phase. Additionally, the relative percentage
of long-chain unsaturated monoglycerides in human milk was significantly
lower than that in IF 1 and soy milk. This suggests that a balance
of long-chain fatty acids and/or monoglycerides was responsible for
the formation of the I2 structure. Furthermore, the large
proportion of monopalmitin (C16:0) in combination with higher proportions
of long-chain unsaturated fatty acids such as oleic acid (C18:1) emphasized
the specific OPO structural arrangements of the triglycerides in human
milk that was not seen with the infant formulas studied (Figure A,B). Infant formulas
contain almost no monopalmitin in their final digested products compared
to the human milk, which was mostly monopalmitin (53.85 ± 3.85%).Milk systems that formed hexagonal (H2) phases such
as IF 2 contained significantly greater percentages of caprylic (C8:0)
and capric (C10:0) acids relative to the other infant formulas. The
percentage of medium-chain fatty acids was high—of the 10 most
abundant fatty acids measured IF 2 had by far the largest of any of
the milks studied. No I2 phase was formed, which, given
the discussion above, can be attributed to the lower proportion of
long-chain fatty acids.The only structure formed during the
digestion of IF 3 was a Lα phase, with the major
difference in lipid composition
being a larger proportion of monopalmitin (C16:0) and myristic (C14:0)
fatty acid relative to other infant formulas.Bovine and goat
milk contained both butyric (C4:0) and caproic
(C6:0) acid residues in the triglyceride form in substantial amounts
(Table S2 in the Supporting Information).
Consequently, butyric acid would be expected to be detected as one
of the top 10 fatty acids at the end of digestion;[26] however, this is not apparent in the analysis of samples
at the end of digestion in Figure A. This may be due to poor ionization of short-chain
fatty acids during LC–MS analysis, potential loss from evaporation
during the extraction process, or variable and low extraction efficiency
in organic solvents. Therefore, the underestimation of short-chain
fatty acids is likely.
Closer Examination of the Relationship between
Structure Formation
and Fatty Acid Compositions
Principal component analysis
(PCA) was conducted using Orange software version 3.16[48] to provide deeper and clearer insights into
differences between each of the studied milk types. The percentages
of fatty acids detected after 60 min of digestion for bovine milk,
goat milk, humanmilk, IF 1, IF 2, IF 3, and soy milk were used to
generate the score plots shown in Figure A (PC1 vs PC3, loading plots
in Figure B,C). PC1
and PC3 accounted for 55 and 10% of the variance between the samples,
respectively. PC2 (score plots and loading plots provided in Figures S4 and S5, respectively) resulted in
a less clear separation between the classes of milks; therefore, PC3
was used. The final (nonlamellar) structure formed after 60 min of
digestion is labeled around the clusters for each milk type. Interestingly,
clusters with PC1 values ≥0 form an I2 phase, whereas
clusters with PC1 values ≈0 or <0 form either I2 or H2 phases. As the PC1 values become more negative,
the milks form H2 and V2 phases. Importantly,
overall, the PCA analysis reveals more clearly the critical role of
fatty acid composition at the end of digestion in the self-assembled
structures formed.
Figure 4
(A) Principal component analysis for the percentage of
fatty acids
after 60 min digestion of the different milks and milk substitutes,
(B) PC1 loading plots comparing the percentage of fatty acids at 60
min after the initiation of digestion, and (C) PC3 loading plots comparing
the percentage of fatty acids at 60 min after the initiation of digestion.
PC1 and PC3 accounted for 55 and 10% of the variance between samples,
respectively. The following fatty acids were also included in the
PC loadings but were not included in the loading plots figure as their
values were equal to 0: C22:2, C22:3, C22:4, C22:5, and C22:6. Each
milk type was studied in triplicate, leading to the three individual
data points for each milk type in the score plot.
(A) Principal component analysis for the percentage of
fatty acids
after 60 min digestion of the different milks and milk substitutes,
(B) PC1 loading plots comparing the percentage of fatty acids at 60
min after the initiation of digestion, and (C) PC3 loading plots comparing
the percentage of fatty acids at 60 min after the initiation of digestion.
PC1 and PC3 accounted for 55 and 10% of the variance between samples,
respectively. The following fatty acids were also included in the
PC loadings but were not included in the loading plots figure as their
values were equal to 0: C22:2, C22:3, C22:4, C22:5, and C22:6. Each
milk type was studied in triplicate, leading to the three individual
data points for each milk type in the score plot.Clear separations between clusters of the fatty acids in soy milk
and human milk could be seen in Figure A. The corresponding loading plot for PC1 in Figure B (that differentiates
soy milk and human milk from the other milks) contained abundant oleic
(C18:1) and linoleic (C18:2) acids. The fatty acid compositions of
bovine milk and goat milk were found to be similar, with palmitic
acid (C16:0) present in abundance. Similar fatty acids were also seen
in infant formulas as in bovine milk and goat milk, although the cluster
was not as closely grouped due to heterogeneity of the fatty acid
species after 60 min of digestion. Based on the loading plot for PC3
in Figure C, mammalian
milk was separated in the score plot from IF and soy milk because
stearic (C18:0), oleic (C18:1), and palmitic (C16:0) acids were more
abundant in mammalian milks than in IF and soy milk, which were rich
in linoleic acid (C18:2).When applying the same approach to
monoglyceride composition after
60 min of digestion (Figure ), mammalian milks were separated from infant formula and
soy milk based on PC1 loadings (Figure A), which explained 83% of the variance between the
samples (Figure B).
In agreement with previous studies, monopalmitin (C16:0) was abundant
in mammalian milk,[27] which is also consistent
with a high content of OPO triglycerides in human milk prior to digestion.[28] Monolinolein (C18:2) and monolinolenin (C18:3)
were more abundant in infant formula and soy, which is a consequence
of IF fats being derived from vegetable oil sources. The PC2 loading
plot in Figure C (accounting
for 9% variance between samples) showed similarities between soy milk
and human milk, where monopalmitolein (C16:1), monolinolenin (C18:3),
and monodocosapentaenoin (C22:5) were more abundant. In contrast,
bovine milk, goat milk, and infant formulas were richer in monoolein
(C18:1) relative to human milk and soy milk.
Figure 5
(A) Principal component
analysis of the percentage of monoglycerides
at 60 min after the initiation of digestion. (B) PC1 loading plot
and (C) PC2 loading plot comparing the percentage of monoglycerides
at 60 min after the initiation of digestion. Each milk type was studied
in triplicate.
(A) Principal component
analysis of the percentage of monoglycerides
at 60 min after the initiation of digestion. (B) PC1 loading plot
and (C) PC2 loading plot comparing the percentage of monoglycerides
at 60 min after the initiation of digestion. Each milk type was studied
in triplicate.
Discussion
The
term milk, which was used to describe a liquid food source
that has been expressed from the mammary gland, has over time found
use beyond its strict definition. According to the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), milks are, “Food products made exclusively or principally
from the lacteal secretion obtained from one or more healthy milk-producing
animals, e.g., bovines, goats, sheep, and water buffalo...”.[29] Presently, so-called milk covers not only mammalian
milk but also liquids resembling milk that have been extracted from
vegetable sources such as soy, rice, almond, etc.
Infant formula falls somewhere between these, and while infant formula
is not marketed as milk per se, it is often marketed
as a substitute or replacement for mother’s milk. Thus, in
this manuscript, we use the term milk in its traditional and legal
sense to mean the milk of a mammal and “milklike systems”
for the other materials.In this study, it was evident that
the composition of mammalian
milks was much more complex than that of soy milk based on the variety
of fatty acids in terms of their chain lengths and degree of unsaturation
and the intramolecular structural arrangements of the triglycerides.
Although the structural isomers of the triglycerides were not quantified
directly, the monoglycerides present at 60 min digestion provide an
indication of the fatty acid residue at the sn-2
position of the parent triglyceride, and the corresponding fatty acids
give an indication of the overall substitution at the sn-1 and sn-3 positions.The milks in this study
formed a diverse range of self-assembled
structures from the mixtures of fatty acids and monoglycerides generated
during digestion, highlighting the importance of the initial lipid
formulation in generating these structures. The mammalian milks in
this study contained triglycerides with digestion products that drive
the highly specific self-assembly into both lamellar calcium soaps
and nonlamellar phases. In infant formulas IF 1 and IF 2, nonlamellar
liquid crystalline structures were also formed during the digestion
of the triglycerides but not in the case of IF 3, which only formed
the lamellar phase from calcium soaps. Notably, an inverse micellar
I2 phase was seen during the digestion of IF 1 as with
human milk but not with the other two IFs, which highlight that although
they are designed specifically to be consumed by humaninfants for
nutrition, their composition and hence self-assembly behavior are
less well matched to that of human milk compared to IF 1. Only IF
1 behaved similarly to human breast milk in a structural manner, which
may have significant consequences with regards to fatty acid and nutrient
delivery in vivo.Triglycerides rich in saturated
fatty acids in the sn-1- and sn-3
positions have typically been linked
to constipation and reduced bioavailability of calcium in infants
due to the formation of insoluble calcium soaps.[30,31] The calcium soap formation was confirmed by the SAXS analysis, with
diffraction peaks from calcium soaps being observed in all samples,
except for the soy milk. Due to the abundance of palmitic acid (C16:0)
relative to oleic acid (C18:1) after 60 min of digestion in the infant
formulas studied, the formation of calcium palmitate would reduce
the amount of lipid absorbed, which can potentially result in reduced
weight gain in infants.[32] However, the
Lα phase associated with the presence of calcium
soaps was also exhibited during the digestion of human breast milk,
although absorption of calcium fatty acids from human breast milk
in infants has been shown to be higher than in infants fed infant
formula.[33] Diffraction from lamellar phases
formed from the calcium soaps of long-chain unsaturated lipids tends
to be weaker than for saturated lamellar phases when dispersed in
ethanol.[16] As soy milk contains a large
proportion of long-chain unsaturated lipids, weak diffraction peaks
of the Lα formed from calcium soaps of these lipids
may be masked by the diffraction from the I2 phase, which
forms at a similar q-range of ∼0.14 Å.
Both soy milk and human milk also contain a high abundance of long-chain
fatty acids, and there was a significant amount of oleic acid (C18:1)
relative to palmitic acid (C16:0) because of the dominant OPO arrangement
in the TG of human breast milk fat. Studies by de Fouw et
al.[34] also demonstrated differences
in the absorption of fatty acids, with Betapol [73% C16:0 and approximately
15% oleic acid (C18:1) at the sn-2 position] providing
a significant increase in palmitic acid absorption and overall absorption
of fatty acids relative to the control systems with 6% of C16:0 at
the sn-2 position.Traditionally, infant formulas
are designed by matching the overall
types of fatty acids to mimic human milk composition and polyunsaturated
fatty acids (PUFAs) are added to help cognitive development in children.
These are typically achieved by blending various types of vegetable
oils such as palm, coconut, rapeseed, sunflower, and soybeanoil as
described in the ingredient lists provided by the manufacturers and
would typically contain a mixture of saturated and unsaturated fatty
acids at the sn-1 and sn-3 positions
of the glycerol backbone (approximately 40–48% unsaturation
in long-chain fatty acids based on the top 10 fatty acid species)
as was shown in our studies (Table ). All infant formulas studied were rich in monolinolein
(C18:2) and monoolein (C18:1), suggesting that the sn-2 position of their triglycerides primarily contained linoleic acid
and oleic acid since the digestion of triglycerides using pancreatin
typically cleaves fatty acids from the sn-1 and sn-3 positions. In contrast, the mammalian milks in this
study were rich in monopalmitin (C16:0), which is consistent with
the findings of previous studies.[17] The
high proportion of monodocosapentaenoin (C22:5) was found in both
soy milk and human milk, which has been linked to cognitive development
and reducing inflammation.[35]With
the exception of IF 3, a general trend was established to
link lipid composition with the mode of self-assembled structures
formed. Systems comprising high levels of long-chain fatty acids and/or
long-chain monoglycerides exhibited the I2 phase, while
those comprising more medium-chain fatty acids and/or monoglycerides
like bovine milk, goat milk, or IF 2 exhibited either the V2 phase or H2 phases during their digestion. The mole percent
of each chain type/length of the lipids may also be important for
determining whether nonlamellar self-assembled structures will form,
with IF 3 only exhibiting the lamellar phase during digestion, despite
the mole percent of medium- and long-chain fatty acids/monoglycerides
liberated during its digestion being between that of IF 1 and IF 2.The fundamental reason for the formation of these structures is
clearly driven by the specific triglyceride composition and consequent
fatty acid and monoglyceride distribution after digestion, but whether
the structure formation itself serves a specific function is not yet
clear. The driving force for absorption of drugs is known to be dependent
on the nature of the structure formed and hypothesized to reflect
differences in the thermodynamic activity of the cargo in different
self-assembly systems.[36] The formation
of the mesoporous self-assembled spongelike V2 phase may
also be linked to enabling the access of lipase to substrates through
either water channel access or increased surface roughness from the
nodular topology of the particle–bulk solution interface.[37] There may also be an underlying immunological
consequence of the formation of such irregularly shaped particles.
While any evolutionary or physiological reason for the formation of
the ordered structure in digesting milk droplets is not yet clear,
their formation is an intriguing aspect of this natural process.The self-assembled structures observed in these studies are also
of interest in drug delivery. In particular, the bicontinuous V2 and the H2 phase are of great interest as they
have been shown to enhance the uptake of poorly water-soluble drugs
when co-administered in rats via the oral gavage.[38−44] The lipid systems used in those studies were mainly prehydrated
to form liquid crystalline structures prior to oral administration,
and the impact of the structure on absorption was investigated. In
contrast, milk can be considered a “precursor” formulation,
which will form various self-assembled structures during digestion
as shown in this study. The digestion products of milk have been shown
to enhance the solubility of halofantrine, cinnarizine, and the antimalarial
drugs OZ439 and ferroquine, which are poorly water-soluble drugs that
typically exhibit low solubility in undigested milk fat.[45−47] This approach can logically be extended to the delivery of fat-soluble
nutrients during the digestion of milk.
Conclusions
In this study,
we have shown that there is a correlation between
lipid composition during digestion and the structural behavior of
the digestion products of various types of mammalian milks and milklike
systems. All mammalian milks studied were able to self-assemble into
nonlamellar liquid crystalline structures, with coexisting lamellar
phases associated with calcium soap formation. All of the three infant
formulas tested formed different structures during digestion, some
more similar to human milk than others in that respect. In general,
systems that liberated long-chain fatty acids during digestion, which
are expected to impart more negative curvature at the oil–water
interface, showed the inverse micellar cubic I2 phase during
digestion. In contrast, those systems liberating a greater proportion
of medium-chain fatty acids tended to exhibit either the V2 phase or a H2 hexagonal phase during their digestion,
both structures with reduced negative curvatures at the oil–water
interface. These new correlations between lipid composition and liquid
crystalline structure formation are a critical consideration in the
design of a milk substitute for lipophilic nutrient delivery. Future
studies will determine the influence of liquid crystalline structures
on the absorption of the lipids in vivo and examine
the effects of nonlipid milk components on the self-assembly behavior
during the digestion of milk and milk substitutes.
Authors: C Ballabio; S Chessa; D Rignanese; C Gigliotti; G Pagnacco; L Terracciano; A Fiocchi; P Restani; A M Caroli Journal: J Dairy Sci Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.034
Authors: Anna C Pham; Linda Hong; Oliver Montagnat; Cameron J Nowell; Tri-Hung Nguyen; Ben J Boyd Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Nafia F Khan; Malinda Salim; Syaza Y Binte Abu Bakar; Kurt Ristroph; Robert K Prud'homme; Adrian Hawley; Ben J Boyd; Andrew J Clulow Journal: Int J Pharm X Date: 2022-02-09
Authors: Syaza Y Binte Abu Bakar; Malinda Salim; Andrew J Clulow; Adrian Hawley; Joseph Pelle; Donna T Geddes; Kevin R Nicholas; Ben J Boyd Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 6.676