Hua Zhang1, Yousef I Hassan1, Ronghua Liu1, Lili Mats1, Cheng Yang2, Chunming Liu3, Rong Tsao1. 1. Guelph Research & Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 93 Stone Road West, Guelph, Ontario N1G 5C9, Canada. 2. Food Science Department, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Binhu Qu, Wuxi Shi, Jiangsu Province 214122, China. 3. Central Laboratory, Changchun Normal University, No. 677 North Chang-ji Road, Changchun 130032, China.
Abstract
The mechanisms of cellular absorption and transport underlying the differences between flavonoid aglycones and glycosides and the effect of the structural feature are not well established. In this study, aglycone, mono-, and diglycosides of quercetin and cyanidin were selected to examine the effects of the structural feature on the bioavailability of flavonoids using hexose transporters SGLT1 and GLUT2 in a Caco-2 BBe1 cell model. Cellular uptake and transport of all glycosides were significantly different. The glycosides also significantly inhibited cellular uptake of d-glucose, indicating the involvement of the two hexose transporters SGLT1 and GLUT2 in the absorption, and the potential of the glycosides in lowering the blood glucose level. The in silico prediction model also supported these observations. The absorption of glycosides, especially diglycosides but not the aglycones, was significantly blocked by SGLT1 and GLUT2 inhibitors (phloridzin and phloretin) and further validated in SGLT1 knockdown Caco-2 BBe1 cells.
The mechanisms of cellular absorption and transport underlying the differences between flavonoid aglycones and glycosides and the effect of the structural feature are not well established. In this study, aglycone, mono-, and diglycosides of quercetin and cyanidin were selected to examine the effects of the structural feature on the bioavailability of flavonoids using hexose transporters SGLT1 and GLUT2 in a Caco-2 BBe1 cell model. Cellular uptake and transport of all glycosides were significantly different. The glycosides also significantly inhibited cellular uptake of d-glucose, indicating the involvement of the two hexose transporters SGLT1 and GLUT2 in the absorption, and the potential of the glycosides in lowering the blood glucose level. The in silico prediction model also supported these observations. The absorption of glycosides, especially diglycosides but not the aglycones, was significantly blocked by SGLT1 and GLUT2 inhibitors (phloridzin and phloretin) and further validated in SGLT1 knockdown Caco-2 BBe1 cells.
Sufficient evidence
exists that long-term intake of fruits, vegetables,
and whole-grains is beneficial to human health and holds great potential
for reducing incidences of modern chronic diseases, for example, cardiovascular
and neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, and cancer, owing to the
bioactive phytochemicals especially phenolic compounds.[1,2] Phenolics are the most common and diverse phytochemical group of
food origin and possess a wide spectrum of health-enhancing capabilities
including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, the abilities
in the regulation/transduction of cellular signaling pathways, and
restoring the immune homeostasis, all of which can lead to reduced
risks of degenerative diseases and metabolic syndromes in humans.[3−5] Flavonoids are the largest class of polyphenols that can be further
categorized into several subgroups including flavonols and anthocyanins,
both of which are naturally distributed in plant foods as glycosides
containing single or multiple sugar moieties. Except in fungi and
algae, the most common flavonols of plants, for example, kaempferol,
quercetin, and myricetin are predominantly in glycosidic forms.[6] Similarly, anthocyanidins, for example, pelargonidin,
cyanidin, delphinidin, peonidinpetunidin, and malvidin occur almost
exclusively in glycosidic forms. Moreover, both flavonols and anthocyanidins
are considered as organic pigments that provide colorant features
to plant products. For example, rutin is a quercetin disaccharide
with a pale yellow color that is commonly found in a wide variety
of citrus fruits and onions.[7] Anthocyanins
are abundant in highly pigmented fruits (berries and grapes), vegetables
(red cabbage and purple carrots), and cereals such as black rice and
purple wheat. Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside is perhaps the most commonly
detected anthocyanin in plants.[8] Phenolics
or polyphenols are not readily bioavailable in vivo despite the relatively high bioaccessibility. Flavonoid aglycones
are generally more bioavailable than their respective glycosides,
while their glycosides are rapidly removed from the circulating blood.[9] However, anthocyanins have been reported to be
quickly absorbed in human blood, suggesting these compounds may have
different absorption and uptake mechanisms than other flavonoids.[10] The fate of flavonoid glycosides throughout
the human digestive tract and the further action of the gut microbiome
can all affect the absorption and metabolism of these compounds. The
intestinal epithelial environment is a key part of the gastrointestinal
tract (GIT) for absorption, uptake, and metabolism, and it provides
great means for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying flavonoid
absorption and metabolism.A number of in vitro and in vivo studies have revealed that enzymes
and transporters are involved
in the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of flavonoids within
the GIT.[9] Lactase-phloridzin hydrolase
(LPH) and cystollic β-glucosidase (CBG) distributed within the
small intestine epithelial cells in the brush border are both capable
of cleaving polar glucosides and releasing flavonoid aglycones that
permeate into the intestinal submucosal layer through passive diffusion.[9] However, LPH is not evenly expressed and distributed
along the GIT of mammals, primarily due to region specificity and
the postweaning decline, and in the lower gut, deglycosylation of
flavonoids may be through the action of CBG secreted by the gut microbiota
or microbial hydrolases instead of that by the colonic epithelium
because LPH and CBG expression in the latter is low and insignificant.[11,12] Phase II enzymes can then convert the aglycones into glucuronides,
sulphates, and methyl-ester forms that are consequently excreted into
blood or effluxed back to the lumen.[11] It
is well-known that aglycones of flavonols such as quercetin are more
readily absorbed because of their relatively higher lipophilicity
compared to their glycoside counterparts, where the absorption in vivo is large via passive diffusion.[9] Likewise, flavonol glycosides including quercetin-3 glucoside
and rutin have been found in the basolateral side of the epithelial
membrane monolayer in vitro,[13,14] detected and identified in plasma in in vivo studies.[15−18] Reports also indicate that all forms of polyphenols including intact
aglycones and their original glycosides and their metabolites coexist
in fecal samples in the colon.[19,20] For these reasons,
the mechanisms of absorption in the GIT and how flavonoids, especially
various forms of flavonoids, contribute to intestinal health must
be revisited.Both sodium-glucose-linked cotransporter (SGLT1)
and glucose transporter
(GLUT2) are widely distributed along the intestinal epithelium and
responsible for the uptake and efflux of hexoses into the blood stream
and have been reported to be involved in sensing and uptaking many
intact flavonoid glycosides derived from food matrices.[21−24] Apparently, the glycosylation pattern of flavonoids can have significant
impact on the bioavailability of these compounds, thus can subsequently
affect the metabolism, biological effects, and ultimately health benefits.
It is therefore of foremost importance to understand the mechanism
of cellular uptake and absorption of flavonoids with different glycosylation
patterns. While SGLT1 and GLUT2 are known to be involved in the transport
of flavonoid glycosides, there still lacks a close-up investigation
into how different forms of flavonoids, that is, aglycones and glycosides
pass into the systemic circulation in one study using the same model
system. In the present study, two well-known flavonoid aglycones,
quercetin, cyanidin, and their respective mono- and diglycosides were
used as model molecules in an elaborate intestinal epithelial Caco-2
BBe1 trans-membrane cell model to evaluate flavonoid permeability
and cellular uptake. Although Caco-2 cells are low in LPH compared
with ex vivo intestinal samples, they have similar
physiological properties to human intestinal epithelium particularly
that of colon.[25] Caco-2 cells have been
adopted as an ideal model for investigating flavonoid uptake and relevant
molecular mechanisms, especially due to their ability in expressing
many intestinal enzymes and transporters.[26,27] Caco-2 BBe1, a well-known subclone of Caco-2 cells is characteristic
for its enhanced intestinal brush border protein expression.[28,29] The main focus of this study is not on the bioavailability of aglycones,
as it is already well-established, but on how their glycosides are
taken up and transported by the epithelial cells. The interference/interactions
of the six flavonoids (two aglycones and their mono- and diglycosides)
with intestinal epithelial hexose transporters were also evaluated
to confirm their roles in the uptake of the studied flavonoid glycosides
and to understand the mechanisms of absorption and metabolism inside
the GIT.
Results and Discussion
Uptake and Transportation of Flavonoids in
the Intestinal Epithelial
Cell Models
The bioaccessibility and bioavailability of food
flavonoids depend on many factors, of which chemical structure, food
matrices, and metabolism by gut microbes are most important.[30] The present study focuses on the effect of the
chemical structure, that is, the glycosylation pattern on the absorption
and metabolism of flavonoids in a Caco-2 BBe1 cell model. The permeability
curves of the two sets of flavonoids (quercetin and its mono- and
diglycosides and cyanidin and its mono- and diglycosides), as shown
in Figure , suggest
that the metabolic kinetics of the aglycones were significantly different
from their respective 3-glucoside or diglycoside. Both quercetin and
cyanidin (aglycones) readily permeated into the intestinal mucosa
within 2 h (Figure A,D). Higher percentages of the aglycones in the cells and the basolateral
compartment indicate higher cellular uptake and transport efficiencies
compared to their respective glycosides. This result along with the
reported data collectively supports the hypothesis that aglyconeflavonoids
can pass into the intestinal lumen and systemic circulation using
a mechanism of passive diffusion,[9,31] whereas flavonoidglycosides may cross the intestinal epithelial layer using a different
mode such as an active transport mechanism.[9] Flavonoid glycosides were detected in both cellular lysates and
the basolateral side. Introduction of glycosyl groups (i.e. the hexose
groups) into the aglycone backbones significantly lowered both cellular
uptake and transport of flavonoid glycosides compared with the aglycones
(Figure ). Cellular
uptake was particularly low for diglycosides (Figure E,F).
Figure 1
Cellular uptake and trans-membrane transport
kinetics of flavonoid
aglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides across Caco-2 BBe1
monolayers. The permeability efficiency was assessed by HPLC analysis
of the content of flavonoids collected from the cell lysate or basolateral
compartment normalized by concentrations in the apical compartment
after incubated for 0.5, 2, and 4 h. Cellular uptake and transport
of cyanidin (A), C-3-G (B), cyanin (C), quercetin (D), Q-3-G (E),
and rutin (F) are shown as percent transported (%). Cellular uptake:
filled circles; trans-membrane transport: filled squares. Data are
mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments.
Cellular uptake and trans-membrane transport
kinetics of flavonoidaglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides across Caco-2 BBe1
monolayers. The permeability efficiency was assessed by HPLC analysis
of the content of flavonoids collected from the cell lysate or basolateral
compartment normalized by concentrations in the apical compartment
after incubated for 0.5, 2, and 4 h. Cellular uptake and transport
of cyanidin (A), C-3-G (B), cyanin (C), quercetin (D), Q-3-G (E),
and rutin (F) are shown as percent transported (%). Cellular uptake:
filled circles; trans-membrane transport: filled squares. Data are
mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments.Kinetics study showed that all compounds of the two sets
of flavonoids
(i.e. quercetin and its mono- and diglucosides and cyanidin and its
mono- and diglycosides) were detected in both the cellular lysates
(at different time intervals) and the basolateral compartments except
a trace amount of C-3-G was detected from cells treated with cyanin
possibly as a result of hydrolysis of 5-glucoside (Figure ). Conventional belief is that
flavonoid glucosides cross the intestinal epithelium by SGLT1 and
then are released in the aglycone form by CBG and LPH.[32] However, the Caco-2 BBe1 cell monolayer treated
with flavonoid glycosides in the apical side had no aglycones detected
in both cellular lysates and the basolateral side in the present study
(Figure ), suggesting
that CBG and LPH may not be a crucial active factor involved in the
deglycosylation process. This was validated by the low level of LPH
expression in the Caco-2 cells of the present study (Figure S1). We also evaluated the LPH expression levels in
mouse jejunum, ileum, and colon and confirmed that LPH was high in
the small intestine but low in the colon (Figure S1), a result also supported by previous findings.[25] The low LPH level and lack of deglycosylation
in the mouse colon and Caco-2 cells suggests that quercetin and cyanidinglycosides detected in the cells and basolateral compartments may
be directly transported by the hexose transporters which have been
reported to play a key role in the delivery of intact flavonoid glycosides
into the enterocytes.[24] Carrier-mediated
mechanisms might be necessary for the uptake and transport of intact
flavonoid glycosides as such mechanisms are known to aid polar compounds
to across intestinal epithelial cells.[33]
Figure 2
HPLC
chromatograms of flavonoid aglycones and respective mono-
and diglycosides in cell lysates and basolateral compartment. (A)
cyanidin (C1), C-3-G (C2), and cyanin (C3) in cells; (B) cyanidin
(C1), C-3-G (C2),and cyanin (C3) in the basolateral compartment; (C)
quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2), and rutin (Q3) in cells; and (D) and quercetin
(Q1), Q-3-G (Q2), and rutin (Q3) in the basolateral compartment.
HPLC
chromatograms of flavonoid aglycones and respective mono-
and diglycosides in cell lysates and basolateral compartment. (A)
cyanidin (C1), C-3-G (C2), and cyanin (C3) in cells; (B) cyanidin
(C1), C-3-G (C2),and cyanin (C3) in the basolateral compartment; (C)
quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2), and rutin (Q3) in cells; and (D) and quercetin
(Q1), Q-3-G (Q2), and rutin (Q3) in the basolateral compartment.In terms of the aglycones, a noticeable decrease
was found for
cyanidin in the Caco-2 BBe1 cell lysates and basolateral compartment
as the incubation period reached to 4 h (Figure A), but for quercetin, both concentrations
continued to increase (Figure D). The decline in cyanidin (aglycones) in both cells and
the basolateral medium may be due to its instability in neutral pH
and relatively long incubation time. It is well-known that anthocyanins
are generally more stable at acidic pH.[34] In general, the cellular uptake and transport rates of cyanidin
were faster, and its concentrations were higher than that of quercetin.
This supports and may also explain the significantly higher elimination
rates of anthocyanins in urinary excretion than quercetin in vivo(35) and that absorption
of anthocyanins can occur in the stomach, an acidic environment that
favors the stability thus transportation of anthocyanins.[36] In addition to pH, glycosylation has been found
to increase the stability of anthocyanins throughout the entire digestive
process owing to the heterogeneity of the attached sugar moieties.[37] This further helps explain our observation that
the transport efficiency of the glycosides, that is, C-3-G and cyanin
continued to increase as the incubation period extends from 30 min
to 4 h (Figure B,C),
whereas that of the aglycone, that is, cyanidin started to drop after
2 h of incubation (Figure A). Similar kinetics were observed for Q-3-G and rutin (Figure E,F), but different
from cyanidin, quercetin continues to be transported throughout the
incubation period (Figure D). As noted in recent studies, deglucosylation of conjugated
flavonoids may have a counteractive effect on their absorption rates.[38,39] The differences in absorption kinetics between the mono- and di-glycosides
were not as distinct as between the glycosides and aglycones. There
was a significant increase in transport efficiency between C-3-G and
cyanin, but that between Q-3-G and rutin was not significant (Figure B vs 1C, and 1E vs 1F). It must be pointed out that the two diglycosides of the present
study are technically different as the second sugar moiety is attached
differently to the flavonoid backbone; therefore to better explain
the different kinetics of the two diglycosides, further investigations
are necessary when commercial standards are available. Nevertheless,
introduction of the second sugar moiety led to enhanced heterogeneity
and increased resistance to degradation, which may result in higher
bioavailability as the flavonoids pass through the GIT. The effect
of the structural/chemical feature of conjugated flavonoids on bioavailability,
especially how this is related to the hexose transporters, has recently
captured the attention of researchers as this can help understand
molecular mechanisms underlying the health benefits observed for flavonoids.[9]
Molecular Basis of Intestinal Absorption/Uptake
of Flavonoids
In our previous study, we demonstrated that
hexose transporters
mediated the active transport of intact glycosides of cyanidin and
petunidin in Caco-2 cells.[24] In the present
study, we took a computational modeling approach to assess the ability
of SGLT1 and GLUT2, two hexose transporters, to interact with and
bind to the two sets of flavonoids (Figure S2). The molecular docking calculations showed that the glycosides
(i.e. Q-3-G, rutin, C-3-G, and cyanin) had more intense interactions
with both SGLT1 and GLUT2 than their respective aglycones (i.e. quercetin
and cyanidin) in the parameters tested (Table ). The geometric score, geometric shape complementarity
(topographic area) and the calculated atomic contact energy (ACE)
as listed in Table all increased in the order of aglycone, mono- and diglycosides for
both sets of flavonoids. Conformational features of the tested flavonoids
significantly impacted on ACE, the free energy required for rearranging
water molecules within the protein’s interior and for the protein-substrate
interactions to proceed, thus on the molecules’ sensing and
ligand binding ability of SGLT1 and GLUT2.[24]
Table 1
Geometric Score, Interface Area Size,
and Desolvation Energy (ACE) of GLUT2/SGLT1 Interactions with the
Studied Aglycone Flavonoids and Their Glycosidic Forms
transporter
ligand
score
area
ACE
transformation
Glut2
quercetin
4134
471.80
–234.23
–0.38, −0.00, −2.39, 585.05, −43.81,
179.96
Q-3-G
5422
572.80
–80.81
–1.47, 0.60, −1.19, 586.61, −29.97, 205.93
rutin
5536
629.60
–14.59
3.02, 0.48, −1.11,
577.45, −10.29, 204.91
cyanidin
4168
439.20
–69.75
–1.02, 1.32, −1.26, 586.64, −32.38, 204.32
C-3-G
5558
595.30
–109.12
1.44, 0.98, −1.07, 586.41, −30.42, 205.51
cyanin
6646
778.80
–166.44
1.58, −1.10,
−1.17, 585.79, −30.41, 205.72
SGLT1
quercetin
4030
432.10
–142.25
–1.59, 0.95, −1.41,
7.26, −27.48, −44.76
Q-3-G
5450
639.90
–321.94
–0.28,
−0.84, −0.87, 8.89, −23.03,
−64.14
rutin
5760
795.20
–472.46
2.37, −0.61, −0.69, 9.21, −23.50, −64.64
cyanidin
4140
449.10
–106.15
–1.13,
−0.51, −2.78, 1.97, −39.68,
−50.14
C-3-G
5520
677.80
–311.17
0.23, 0.81, −3.04, 10.66,
−23.79, −66.20
cyanin
6442
817.80
–367.19
–0.96, 0.89, −2.55, 9.18, −23.61, −62.92
Recent studies have
shown that flavonoids inhibit glucose uptake
through competitive binding with the hexose transporters distributed
in the intestinal brush border.[40] Caco-2
cells, representing small-intestinal enterocytes, express both SGLT1
and GLUT2, while only GLUT2 is dominantly distributed in the basolateral
membrane.[41,42] We previously demonstrated that the purple
carrot- and potato-derived anthocyanin glycosides inhibited the glucose
uptake in Caco2 cells.[24] In the present
study, we further demonstrate that the aglyconesquercetin (P < 0.05) and cyanidin (P < 0.01)
also significantly blocked the glucose uptake (Figure ). All glycosides (both mono- and diglycosides)
in both sets of flavonoids showed even more significant inhibition
of glucose uptake (P < 0.001) (Figure ). Although there was no significant
difference in blocking glucose uptake between the mono- and diglycosides,
there was a numeric increase in the inhibition by the diglycosides,
especially by rutin, suggesting a potential role of glycosylation
(Figure ). These data
suggests that glycosylation pattern and steric feature may interfere
with glucose binding to the hexose transporters. Our finding supports
results of a previous study that rutin but not quercetin inhibited
glucose uptake in Caco-2 cells in a SGLT1-depended manner.[43] The difference in glucose uptake may also be
related to the two distinctly different binding sites for rutin and
quercetin within the core of SGLT1 as demonstrated in the molecular
docking studies (Figure S3). Collectively,
results from the present in vitro study indicate
that glucose transporters are possibly responsible for the uptake
and transport of flavonoid glycosides in Caco-2 cells and that different
flavonoid glycosides may act to block the intestinal glucose uptake
in a competitive manner, likely because of the steric hindrance by
the different glycosidic moieties. The different binding capacity
with the glucose transporters also suggest that the glycosylation
patterns of flavonoids are crucial for the active transporters to
sense and deliver them across intestinal epithelial cells, leading
to different degrees of bioavailability and metabolic fates (Table ).
Figure 3
Inhibition of glucose
uptake in Caco-2 BBe1 cells by flavonoid
aglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides. Cells were pretreated
with 50 μM of tested compounds for 2 h. Cellular uptake of glucose
is shown as fluorescent units in Caco-2 BBe1 cells from the group
of the positive control (PC) and groups treated with cyanidin (C1),
C-3-G (C2), cyanin (C3), quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2), and rutin (Q3).
Data are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent
experiments. *P < 0.05, **P <
0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus PC using the one-way
ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc-test.
Inhibition of glucose
uptake in Caco-2 BBe1 cells by flavonoidaglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides. Cells were pretreated
with 50 μM of tested compounds for 2 h. Cellular uptake of glucose
is shown as fluorescent units in Caco-2 BBe1 cells from the group
of the positive control (PC) and groups treated with cyanidin (C1),
C-3-G (C2), cyanin (C3), quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2), and rutin (Q3).
Data are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent
experiments. *P < 0.05, **P <
0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus PC using the one-way
ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc-test.
Hexose Transporters Mediate the Active Transport and Explain
the Absorption Mechanism of Flavonoids
The above-mentioned
results in computational docking and glucose uptake of enterocytes
demonstrate that delivery and transport of intact flavonoid glycosides
through the epithelial layer by SGLT1 and GLUT2 largely depend on
the presence of sugar moieties (Table , Figure ). Particular inhibitors for hexose transporters such as phloridzin
and small interfering RNA (siRNA) known to specifically target SGLT1
can therefore be used to further verify the involvement of the transporters
in the active transport mechanism of flavonoids.[44,45] The present study showed that pretreatment with phloridzin indeed
significantly reduced the amount of cellular and transported Q-3-G,
rutin, C-3-G, and cyanin after 4 h of incubation, whereas it had no
effect on the uptake and transport of the aglycones (i.e. cyanidin
and quercetin) (Figure ). The phloridzin (inhibitor I)-mediated reduction of glycoside absorption
and transport was in general significantly more drastic for the diglycosides
compared to their respective monoglycosides. For cyanidin and its
glycosides, cellular uptake of cyanin (i.e. the cyanidindiglycoside) was significantly inhibited by phloridzin (P < 0.05) and that by C-3-G (monoglycoside) was less significant
(Figure B,C). A similar
result was found for rutin and Q-3-G (Figure B,C). In terms of phloridzin-mediated inhibition
of glycoside transport, the effect was more significant (P < 0.01) for all mono- and diglycosides, that is, 2.31- and 5.77-fold
change for Q-3-G and rutin (P < 0.01), respectively
(Figure B,C) and 3.29-
and 6.45-fold change for C-3-G (P < 0.01) and
cyanin (P < 0.001), respectively (Figure B,C). At the P < 0.001 level, the effect on cyanin transport by phloridzin was
distinctly separated from that on Q-3-G, rutin, and C-3-G transport,
further suggesting the influence by the glycosylation pattern (Figure C). This observation
confirms our in silico prediction in which Q-3-G,
rutin, and C-3-G had similar geometric scores (5450, 5520, and 5760)
but not cyanin (6442) for interactions/binding with SGLT1 (Table ). Compared to other
glycosides, cyanin also had the highest interface area size of 817.8
(Table ). The significant
reduction in flavonoid glycosides by SGLT1 inhibitors such as phloridzin
as exhibited in the present study clearly demonstrates that SGLT1
is involved in the cross-epithelial transportation of these compounds.
To further verify this finding, SGLT1 knockdown Caco-2 BBe1 cells
were used next in this study. As expected, similar reductions in glycosides
transported to the basolateral side were observed in SGLT1 knockdown
Caco-2 BBe1 cells after 4 h of incubation (P <
0.05), and no significant reduction of aglycones was observed (Figure ). The efficiency
of SGLT1 knockdown was around 50% in the present study (Figure A). It was also noted that
the fold changes as expressed in transport rate reduction between
scramble and SGLT1-knockdown Caco-2 BBe1 cells were more significant
for the pair of C-3-G and cyanin (6.35 and 6.45, respectively) than
for Q-3-G and rutin (1.92 and 2.6, respectively), although statistically
they were all at P < 0.05 (Figure B), suggesting that the hexose transporter
SGLT1 may play a much more significant role in the transportation
of anthocyanidin glycosides than that of flavonol glycosides (Figure ). These observations
collectively suggest that additional factors other than SGLT1 may
be involved in the intestinal epithelial transport of quercetin glycosides.
Further studies on other possible transport mechanisms of flavonolglycosides are thus warranted. Meanwhile, although data of the present
study strongly support the mechanism of active transportation of flavonoidglycosides by SGLT1 in intestinal epithelial cells and there was significant
difference between the transport rates of mono- and diglycosides (Figure ), the latter, that
is, the two diglycosidesrutin and cyanin had different glycosylation
patterns; rutin is a diglycoside with a biose (rutinose) moiety attached
to C-3, and the cyanin is a diglycoside with two individual glucose
moieties separately attached to the C-3 and C-5 of the flavonoid backbone.
Strictly speaking, the steric features of the two diglycosides of
the present study are different (Figure S4), and that may affect the binding to the hexose transporters differently.
This can be validated in future studies using cyanidin-3-rutinose
and quercetin 3,5-diglucoside along with cyanin and rutin when those
two compounds are made available.
Figure 4
Phloridzin (inhibitor I) blocks SGLT1-mediated
absorption of flavonoid
aglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides in Caco-2 BBe1 cells.
Cells were pretreated with or without 1 μM of phloridzin (inhibitor
I) and incubated for 30 min, followed by incubation with 50 μM
of cyanidin (C1), C-3-G (C2), cyanin (C3), quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2),
and rutin (Q3) for 4 h. Panels (A–C): C1, C2, and C3 with and
without inhibitor I, respectively; Panels (D–F), Q1, Q2, and
Q3 with and without inhibitor I, respectively. Intact flavonoids were
identified in collected cell lysates and basolateral compartments
and calculated as transport rate (%) over the concentration of compounds
added in the apical compartment. Data are presented as mean ±
SEM of at least three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus treatment without the inhibitor using the unpaired
Student’s t-test.
Figure 5
Confirmation
of SGLT1 in transport and intestinal absorption of
flavonoid aglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides using SGLT1
knockdown Caco-2 BBe1 cells. Cells were transiently transfected with
control siRNA (Scramble) or specific SGLT1 siRNA to generate SGLT1
deficient cells (SGLT1 KD). SGLT1 KD or control (scramble) Caco-2
BBE1 cells were treated with 50 μM of flavonoid aglycones and
respective mono- and diglycosides for 4 h. (A) SGLT1 knockdown was
confirmed by Western blotting, using β-actin as the loading
control. (B) Cellular uptake of cyanidin (C1), C-3-G (C2), cyanin
(C3), quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2), and rutin (Q3) were evaluated in
the cellular lysate and expressed as absorption rate/ng protein. Data
are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments.
*P < 0.05 versus treatment without inhibitors
using the unpaired Student’s t-test.
Phloridzin (inhibitor I) blocks SGLT1-mediated
absorption of flavonoidaglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides in Caco-2 BBe1 cells.
Cells were pretreated with or without 1 μM of phloridzin (inhibitor
I) and incubated for 30 min, followed by incubation with 50 μM
of cyanidin (C1), C-3-G (C2), cyanin (C3), quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2),
and rutin (Q3) for 4 h. Panels (A–C): C1, C2, and C3 with and
without inhibitor I, respectively; Panels (D–F), Q1, Q2, and
Q3 with and without inhibitor I, respectively. Intact flavonoids were
identified in collected cell lysates and basolateral compartments
and calculated as transport rate (%) over the concentration of compounds
added in the apical compartment. Data are presented as mean ±
SEM of at least three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus treatment without the inhibitor using the unpaired
Student’s t-test.Confirmation
of SGLT1 in transport and intestinal absorption of
flavonoid aglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides using SGLT1
knockdown Caco-2 BBe1 cells. Cells were transiently transfected with
control siRNA (Scramble) or specific SGLT1 siRNA to generate SGLT1
deficient cells (SGLT1KD). SGLT1KD or control (scramble) Caco-2
BBE1 cells were treated with 50 μM of flavonoid aglycones and
respective mono- and diglycosides for 4 h. (A) SGLT1 knockdown was
confirmed by Western blotting, using β-actin as the loading
control. (B) Cellular uptake of cyanidin (C1), C-3-G (C2), cyanin
(C3), quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2), and rutin (Q3) were evaluated in
the cellular lysate and expressed as absorption rate/ng protein. Data
are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments.
*P < 0.05 versus treatment without inhibitors
using the unpaired Student’s t-test.The other hexose transporter, GLUT2, which is mainly
distributed
along the intestinal epithelial basolateral membrane, is believed
to play a primary role in the excretion of intact flavonoids into
the lamina propria.[21] Phloretin, a specific
inhibitor of GLUT2,[46] was applied in the
present study to block GLUT2-mediated transportation of the flavonoids.
Similar to the effects with the SGLT1, phloretin (inhibitor II) had
no effect on GLUT2 in both cellular uptake and transport of the aglycones
but significantly inhibited cellular uptake of cyanin (P < 0.05) and very significantly inhibited the transmembrane transport
of all glycosides, that is, Q-3-G, rutin, C-3-G, and cyanin, to the
basolateral compartment (P < 0.01) (Figure ). Similar to SGLT1, GLUT2
tends to favor more of transporting cyanidin glycosides (C-3G and
cyanin) (P < 0.001), as shown in fold changes
of the transport rate that were affected by phloretin (Figure B,C). These data also confirm
results from the molecular docking experiments, where cyanidin glycosides,
particularly cyanin had shown higher affinity for GLUT2 than those
of quercetin; they had the highest affinity score (6646), the topographic
area (778.8), and a low ACE (−166.44) that are required to
rearrange water molecules within the GLUT2 pocket, allowing for transporter/ligand
interactions (Table ). The drastic difference in ACE between rutin and cyanin may explain
the significant differences between the two diglycosides in the phloretin
inhibition experiment (Figure ). Our data also suggest that rutin, which had the highest
ACE requirement, may possibly have a different mechanism(s) of absorption.
The high ACE value of rutin suggests that it could possibly act as
a competitive inhibitor of GLUT2 in a different mechanism of conventional
inhibitors of GLUT2 (such as phloretin) as rutin occupies a different
binding site in comparison to phloretin (Figure D). Finally, a similar approach was taken
to use commercially available siRNA to generate GLUT2 knockdown cells;
however because of the short time span of the effect of siRNA (24–72
h) and the fact that Caco-2 BBe1 cells needed at least 9 days to differentiate
and polarize,[47] we were unable to conduct
the experiment for further validation of the above-proposed mechanism.
In spite of this, it can be concluded that absorption of glycosidicflavonoids (i.e. Q-3-G, rutin, C-3-G, and cyanin) was significantly
inhibited by knocking down SGLT1 and by using known inhibitors phloridzin
and phloretin for SGLT1 and GLUT2, respectively. These findings suggest
that absorption of glycosidic flavonoids in the GIT is primarily mediated
by both SGLT1 and GLUT2. Because the sugar moiety is an essential
ligand targeted by intestinal SGLT1 and GLUT2, it is therefore considered
a major determinant for flavonoid glycoside absorption. Our finding
also supports that an increasing number of sugar moieties enhance
absorption of flavonoid glycosides mediated by intestinal hexose transporters
and provides complementary knowledge to the known fact that flavonolaglycones such as quercetin are absorbed by passive diffusion.
Figure 6
Phloretin (inhibitor
II) blocks GLUT2 mediated transport of flavonoid
aglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides in Caco-2 BBe1 cells.
Cells were pretreated with or without 1 μM of phloretin (inhibitor
II) and incubated for 30 min, followed by incubation with 50 μM
of cyanidin (C1), C-3-G (C2), cyanin (C3), quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2),
and rutin (Q3) for 4 h. Panels (A–C): C1, C2, and C3 with and
without inhibitor II, respectively; Panels( D–F), Q1, Q2, and
Q3 with and without inhibitor II, respectively. Intact flavonoids
were identified in collected cell lysates and basolateral compartments
and calculated as a transport rate (%) over the concentration of compounds
added in the apical compartment. Data are presented as mean ±
SEM of at least three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus treatment without inhibitors using the unpaired
Student’s t-test.
Figure 7
Molecular
docking of SGLT1 and GLUT2 with inhibitors and cyanin/rutin:
(A) Predicted binding sites in SGLT1 with phloridzin (inhibitor I)
and cyanin; (B) predicted binding sites in SGLT1 with phloridzin (inhibitor
I) and rutin; (C) predicted binding sites in GLUT2 with phloretin
(inhibitor II) and cyanin; and (D) predicted binding sites in GLUT2
with phloretin (inhibitor II) and rutin.
Phloretin (inhibitor
II) blocks GLUT2 mediated transport of flavonoidaglycones and respective mono- and diglycosides in Caco-2 BBe1 cells.
Cells were pretreated with or without 1 μM of phloretin (inhibitor
II) and incubated for 30 min, followed by incubation with 50 μM
of cyanidin (C1), C-3-G (C2), cyanin (C3), quercetin (Q1), Q-3-G (Q2),
and rutin (Q3) for 4 h. Panels (A–C): C1, C2, and C3 with and
without inhibitor II, respectively; Panels( D–F), Q1, Q2, and
Q3 with and without inhibitor II, respectively. Intact flavonoids
were identified in collected cell lysates and basolateral compartments
and calculated as a transport rate (%) over the concentration of compounds
added in the apical compartment. Data are presented as mean ±
SEM of at least three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus treatment without inhibitors using the unpaired
Student’s t-test.Molecular
docking of SGLT1 and GLUT2 with inhibitors and cyanin/rutin:
(A) Predicted binding sites in SGLT1 with phloridzin (inhibitor I)
and cyanin; (B) predicted binding sites in SGLT1 with phloridzin (inhibitor
I) and rutin; (C) predicted binding sites in GLUT2 with phloretin
(inhibitor II) and cyanin; and (D) predicted binding sites in GLUT2
with phloretin (inhibitor II) and rutin.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the present study elucidated
the different absorption
mechanisms of aglyconeflavonoids and their glycosides using a human
intestinal epithelial cells model. Using pharmacological inhibitors
(phloridzin and phloretin) and siRNA-generated SGLT1 deficient Caco-2
BBe1 cells, two intestinal hexose transporters, SGLT1 and GLUT2, were
found to play a key role in the absorption of flavonoid glycosides
in the GIT. Both SGLT1 and GLUT2 were more important for the cross-membrane
transport of diglycosides than monoglycosides of quercetin and cyanidin.
Our data also suggest that absorption of flavonoid aglycones is not
by these transporters but is likely mediated by other mechanisms such
as passive diffusion. The information collected through the in silico modeling/docking of transporters/ligands coupled
with data obtained by blocking the activity of involved hexose transporters
clearly demonstrates that the sugar moieties of the flavonoid glycosides
are an essential part of the hexose transporter mechanism. The difference
in absorption between the two sets of flavonoids also suggests that
the structural feature (i.e. flavonols vs anthocyanidins)
and the number and type of the sugar moieties attached to the flavonoid
backbone can also have noticeable impact on the absorption, metabolism,
and ultimately in the functionality of these compounds. By using novel
techniques, we successfully demonstrated the critical and decisive
role of intestinal hexose transporters in mediating the cellular uptake
and transmembrane transport of flavonoid glycosides, hence their cellular
bioavailability. This explains why and how flavonoid glycosides are
also found in the plasma and other tissues in vivo. Also important is the finding that flavonoid glycosides are potent
competitive inhibitors of glucose uptake initiated by hexose transporters.
This provides a strong and promising support for dietary intervention
for hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus with glycosidic flavonoids.
Consumption of flavonoid-rich diets, especially those rich in anthocyanins
(glycosides) such as purple fruits, vegetables, and grains can contribute
to the maintenance of healthy cellular glucose hemostasis, thereby
reducing the risks of developing metabolic disorders. Considering
that these flavonoids also possess strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory
activities, flavonoid-rich foods can be a significant part of the
managing strategy for many chronic diseases.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
and Reagents
All materials including cyanidin,
cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (C-3-G), cyanin (cyanidin
3,5-diglucoside), quercetin, quercetin 3-β-D-glucoside (Q-3-G),
and rutin (quercetin 3-rutinoside) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich
Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium acetate, ferric chloride hexahydrate,
sodium phosphate monobasic, sodium phosphate dibasic, and HPLC-grade
solvents, including methanol, formic acid (FA), and hydrochloric acid
(HCl) were all purchased from EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, NJ, USA),
VWR (Westchester, PA, USA) and Caledon Laboratories Ltd. (Georgetown,
ON, Canada) unless otherwise specified. Western blotting was carried
out using the following antibodies: anti-SGLT1 (ab14686) (Abcam Inc.,
Toronto, ON, Canada) and CST-β-actin (13 × 105) (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA).
Cell Culture
Caco-2 BBe1 cells were obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Cells were seeded between
the 50th to 60th passages onto the polyester (PET) membrane permeable
support inserts (6.5 mm, 0.4 μM pore size, Corning Inc., Corning,
NY, USA) at a cell density of 3 × 104 cells/well and
grown in the DMEM high glucose medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Mississauga,
ON, Canada) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 50 U/mL penicillin–streptomycin,
25 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES; Thermo
Fisher Scientific), 1 mM sodium pyruvate with nonessential amino acids
(Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 0.01 μg/ml HumanTransferrin
(Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C in a humidity-controlled 5% CO2 cell culture incubator. The culture medium was changed every second
day until the cells became confluent monolayer/polarized. Only monolayers
displaying transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) values greater
than 400 Ω cm2 on the 9th postseeding day were incorporated
in actual experiments. TEER values were measured after equilibrating
the cells with HBSS for 30 min at 37 °C using a Millicell-ERS
Volt-Ohm Meter (Millipore, Bedford, MA).
Flavonoids Transport and
Absorption
The transportation
and absorption experiments were carried out by following a previously
described procedure.[24] After washing the
polarized and differentiated cells with warm HBSS, the flavonoids
(50 μM equilibrated into 0.5 mL of HBSS, pH 6.4 for 30 min at
37 °C) were applied to the apical compartment of each well in
which Caco-2 BBe1 cells were cultured and incubated up to 4 h. One
mL of HBSS solution (containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) was added to
the basolateral compartment. The transepithelial transport of flavonoids
was subsequently assessed at 30 min, 2, and 4 h time intervals in
order to determine the metabolic kinetics of glycosylated and aglyconeflavonoids. An equal volume of methanol containing 2% FA was added
to the collected solutions obtained from the basolateral compartment.
This mixture was then applied to the equilibrium Strata-X polymeric
solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (30 mg, Phenomenex, Torrance,
CA, USA) and subsequently collected the methanol containing 1% FA-eluted
purified samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions
after washing with water. The eluted samples were later evaporated
to dryness for subsequent HPLC analysis (described below). After removing
the cell culture media from each individual insert, 500 μL of
cold PBS was added to each insert before extracting and tracking the
cellular uptake of flavonoids. The detached cells were transferred
to a 1.5 mL tube(s) and homogenized for 1 min by brief sonication
(Qsonica Sonicator Q500, Fisher Scientific). A short centrifugation
at 2000g for 5 min followed by the addition of 500
μL of methanol (2% FA) was conducted in order to completely
extract intracellular flavonoids. The supernatant was collected and
cleaned up in a similar fashion to the procedures used for the transepithelial
samples before subjecting to HPLC analysis. The transport efficiency
was calculated as the percentage of flavonoids detected in the basolateral
side/compartment of the cells over the original amount added to the
apical side of the cells/inserts.
RNA Interference and Inhibition
of Flavonoid Uptake and Transport
After inducing the RNA
interference treatment for 48 h (see Section siRNA
Transfections), transfected Caco-BBe1 cells
were treated with the above-mentioned flavonoids to identify the involvement
of SGLT1 in flavonoid uptake. After a 4 h incubation period, the flavonoids
that were added previously to the apical buffer were removed from
each well. Cold PBS was carefully and gently added into each well
to wash cells. After washing, cell membranes were detached using 0.5
mL PBS and were collected into a 1.5 mL tube to extract intracellular
flavonoids. The extraction was carried out exactly as described above.
Inhibition studies were also carried out using the inhibitor phloridzin
in order to investigate the involvement of hexose transporters in
the transportation of flavonoids in Caco-2 BBe1 cells. One μM
of phloridzin was used to pretreat Caco-2 BBe1 cells, which were incubated
for at least 30 min before adding any of the flavonoids.
High Performance
Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analyses of Transported
and Intracellular Flavonoids
The flavonoids transported by
intestinal epithelial cells were analyzed by an Agilent 1100 series
HPLC system consisting of an autosampler, a degasser, a quaternary
pump, and a diode array detector (DAD) as previously described.[24] The flavonoids were separated on a Phenomenex
Luna phenyl-hexyl column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm) (Phenomenex
Inc., Torrance, CA, USA). A binary mobile phase consisting of 5% FA
in water (v/v) (solvent A) and 95% methanol mixed with 5% acetonitrile
(v/v) (solvent B) was used. The solvent gradient was 0–20 min,
0–60% B; 20–25 min, 60–100% B; 25–27 min,
100% B; and 27–33.5 min, 100–0% B. Peaks were monitored
at 360 and 520 nm. Quantification of flavonoid compounds was performed
with external standards of cyanidin, cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, cyanin, quercetin, Q-3-G, and rutin, using linear curves
generated from solutions containing predefined concentrations (between
0 and 50 μM). Data analysis was conducted using the provided
Agilent ChemStation software.
Cellular Glucose Uptake
Assays
Glucose uptake was measured
using the commercial glucose uptake cell-based assay (Cayman, Ann
Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Caco-2 BBe1 cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells per
well in 96-well black/clear flat bottom plates (Corning, Costar) and
grown for overnight. After washing with PBS, cells were pretreated
with 50 μM of each of the above-mentioned flavonoids (individually)
in 100 μL of glucose-free DMEM and incubated for 2 h before
adding 100 μL of glucose-free DMEM containing 300 μg/mL
2-deoxy-2-[(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino]-D-glucose)
(2-NBDG), which was incubated for another 2 h. After the cells were
washed with PBS, the fluorescence intensity was measured using a fluorescence
spectrophotometer PLX800 (Bio-Tek Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) at an excitation
wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 535 nm.
Molecular
Modeling and Computational Docking
Three
dimensional (3D) molecular models of the full-length Homo sapiensglucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) and H. sapienssodium/glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1)
were constructed as described previously.[24] The optimized 3D structures of cyanidin ((PubChem CID: 128861),
cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (PubChem CID: 12303203), cyanin
(PubChem CID: 441688), quercetin (PubChem CID: 5280343), Q-3-G (PubChem
CID: 25203368), and rutin ((PubChem CID: 5280805) were all obtained
from the PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) database of chemical molecules maintained by the National Center
for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The docking of the above-mentioned
flavonoids with the established models of GLUT2 and SGLT1 transporters
was conducted and refined by PATCHDOCK[48] and was completed through the visual inspection of generated transporter/flavonoids
complexes by PyMol,[49] Deep View,[50] and/or UCSF Chimera 1.12.[51]
siRNA Transfections
To knockdown
SGLT1 (SLC5A1) levels/expression,
Caco-2 BBe1 cells were transiently transfected with three different
humanSGLT1 small interfering RNA oligos (#116833, #8138, and #106056)
commercially obtained from Ambion (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Scrambled
siRNA (# 1027310) was used as a negative control (QIAGEN, Germantown,
MD) in these experiments. Fifty nM of siRNA was dissolved in 200 μL
of Opti-MEM and mixed with the Attractene transfection reagent (QIAGEN)
at 1:1 (v/v) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
After 20 min incubation at room temperature, the transfection mixture
was dispensed into the 24-well plates. An equal volume of Opti-MEM
containing 5% FBS and seed cells at 2 × 106 cells/mL
was added to each well. After 48 h post-transfection, transfected
Caco-2 BBe1 cells were treated with the flavonoids.
RNA Extraction
and RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from
small intestine tissues obtained from C57BL/6 mice (Charles River
Laboratories, QC, Canada) or Caco-2 BBe1 cells using the PureLink
RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted RNA samples were quantified
using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scienfitic, Wilmington,
DE). RNA (100 ng) was reverse transcribed using a qScript cDNA Synthesis
Kit (Quanta Biosciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), and real-time quantitative
PCR was carried out using a MyiQ Single Color RT-PCR detection system
(Bio-Rad, Laboratories, Inc.). The sequence of primers is listed in Table S1. Relative gene expression was calculated
using the 2–ΔΔ method
using GAPDH in cells and 18S in tissues as the reference gene. Results
are presented as fold expression change relative to positive control
(PC) group.
Western Blotting
Following the siRNA
treatment, cells
were washed twice with 1 mL of cold PBS and lysed in 100 μL
of ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Thermo Fisher)
containing Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo
Fisher). The Western blot analysis was carried out using the following
procedure described previously[52] with slight
modifications. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred
to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were incubated with
10 mL of 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) Tris-buffered saline with Tween
20 (TBST) containing primary antibody at 1:1000–1:2000 (v/v)
dilution for overnight at 4 °C after blocking with 5% skim milk.
Detection was carried out using 10 mL of HRP-conjugated antimouse
or antirabbit IgG (Promega, Madison, MI, USA) at a dilution rate of
1:10,000 (v/v) and the ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE
Healthcare, Mississauga, ON, Canada). After visualized using the ChemiDoc
system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Mississauga, ON, Canada), the density
of acquired bands was measured using Image J (Image Processing and
Analysis in Java, National Institutes of Health, http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).
Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as mean
± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three measurements
unless otherwise specified. Statistical analyses were carried out
using GraphPad (San Diego, CA, USA). Significant differences between
two independent groups were calculated by the unpaired Student’s t-test. Significant differences between multiple comparisons
were determined using the two-way or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s
multiple-comparison tests with p < 0.05 set as
the threshold of significance.
Authors: Niina M Saarinen; Annika Smeds; Sari I Mäkelä; Jenni Ammälä; Kristo Hakala; Juha-Matti Pihlava; Eeva-Liisa Ryhänen; Rainer Sjöholm; Risto Santti Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2002-09-25 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Daniele Del Rio; Ana Rodriguez-Mateos; Jeremy P E Spencer; Massimiliano Tognolini; Gina Borges; Alan Crozier Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Noelia Cambeiro-Pérez; Xiana González-Gómez; Carmen González-Barreiro; María Rosa Pérez-Gregorio; Iva Fernandes; Nuno Mateus; Victor de Freitas; Borja Sánchez; Elena Martínez-Carballo Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 4.411