| Literature DB >> 32454830 |
Pedro Fernandes1, Joaquim Soares do Brito1, Isabel Flores2, Jacinto Monteiro1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the impact of a Quality and Safety Program (QSP) on the reduction of blood loss and transfusion needs in pediatric spinal deformity surgery, while defining risk factors for transfusion.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32454830 PMCID: PMC7229536 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8246309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Hematol
Characterization of the population under study before and after the implementation of the QSP program (Group A).
| Characteristic | Before QSP (A1) % (N) | After QSP (A2) % (N) | Pearson chi-squared (Mann–Whitney) |
| OR (95% CI) (eta-squared) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 63% (49) | 83.3% (60) | 5.69 | 0.017 | 2.9 [1.18; 7.09] |
| Weight (kg) | 57 ± 19.5 (36) | 50 ± 12 (56) | −3.11 | 0.002 | 0.1 |
| Age (years) | 15 ± 3(49) | 14 ± 2 (60) | 0.219 | 0.820 | 0.0004 |
| Cobb angle (°) | 64 ± 25.75 (49) | 62.3 ± 24.7 (60) | −0.198 | 0.843 | 0.0003 |
| Adit. procedure | 22% (11) | 10% (6) | 3.175 | 0.076 | 0.384 [0.13; 1.13] |
| Pre-op hb | 12.5 ± 1.8 (49) | 13.8 ± 1.3 (58) | 3.406 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
| Levels | 13 ± 3 (49) | 12 ± 3 (60) | −2.511 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| OP time (m) | 254.5 ± 48 (46) | 285 ± 57 (60) | 2.859 | 0.004 | 0.077 |
∗indicates anterior releases.
Characterization of the population under study before and after the implementation of the multimodal approach program to decrease transfusion needs in patients with scoliosis associated with neuromuscular syndromic and muscular dystrophies diseases (Group B).
| Characteristic | Before MAP (B1) % (N) | After MAP (B2) % (N) | Pearson chi-squared (Mann–Whitney) |
| OR (95% CI) (eta-squared) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 50% (52) | 58% (48) | 0.698 | 0.406 | 1.4 [0.63; 0.57] |
| Weight (kg) | 38 ± 16.5 (40) | 40 ± 24.8 (45) | 1.194 | 0.233 | 0.016 |
| Age (years) | 13.5 ± 5 (52) | 13 ± 4 (48) | −0.097 | 0.923 | <0.0001 |
| Cobb angle (°) | 79.5 ± 38.8 (52) | 83.9 ± 30.15 (48) | 0.821 | 0.412 | 0.006 |
| Levels | 16 ± 3 (52) | 15 ± 2 (48) | −1.723 | 0.085 | 0.029 |
| Adit. procedure | 28.8% (15) | 12.5% (6) | 4.02 |
| 0.352 [0.12; 1.00] |
| Pre-op hb | 13 ± 2.3 (48) | 13.5 ± 1.4 (48) | 1.008 | 0.313 | 0.01 |
| OP time (m) | 272.5 ± 60 (40) | 300 ± 102 (47) | 1.109 | 0.268 | 0.014 |
∗indicates anterior releases.
Perioperative outcomes in patients with scoliosis associated with idiopathic deformities and congenital treated as idiopathic before and after multimodal approach program (MAP).
| Characteristic | Before MAP (B1) % (N) | After MAP (B2) % (N) | Pearson chi-squared (Mann–Whitney) |
| Eta-squared OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg intra-op | 9.8 ± 3 1.7 (49) | 10.3 ± 1.8 (59) | 1.488 | 0.137 | 0.02 |
| Hg post-op day 1 | 9.7 ± 1.4 (48) | 9.2 ± 1.6 (60) | −1.38 | 0.66 | 0.017 |
| Hg low post-op | 9.1 ± 1.5 (45) | 8.75 ± 1.43 (60) | −1.344 | 0.179 | 0.017 |
| Hct low intra-op | 29.3 ± 3.5 (40) | 30.1 ± 4.95 (53) | 0.63 | 0.529 | 0.004 |
| Hct post-op day 1 | 28.7 ± 4.4 (40) | 27.3 ± 5.1 (53) | −0.572 | 0.567 | 0.003 |
| Hct low pos-op | 27.7 ± 3.8 (40) | 25.5 ± 5.05 (53) | −1.153 | 0.123 | 0.025 |
| Total losses | 500 ± 450 (37) | 460 ± 300 (59) | −1.519 | 0.129 | 0.02 |
| Losses/vol (%) | 13.1 ± 9 (32) | 12.3 ± 11(56) | −0.013 | 0.99 | <0.001 |
| Losses/level | 41.7 ± 31.4(37 | 39.29 ± 23.33 (59) | −0.61 | 0.542 | 0.004 |
| Transf. rate (%) (n) | 83.7% (49) | 28.3% (60) | 33.178 | <0.001 | 0.077 [0.03; 0.198] |
| Transf. index (N/pt) | 2 ± 1(49) | 0 ± 1 | −6.347 | <0.001 | 0.37 |
Perioperative outcomes in patients with scoliosis associated with scoliosis associated to neuromuscular, syndromic and muscular dystrophies before and after multimodal approach program (MAP).
| Characteristic | Before MAP (B1) % (N) | After MAP (B2) % (N) | Pearson chi-squared (Mann–Whitney) |
| Eta-squared OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg intra-op | 9 ± 2.35 (49) | 9.65 ± 2.25(48) | 1.488 | 0.137 | 0.023 |
| Hg post-op day 1 | 9.65 ± 2.7 (48) | 9.5 ± 1.4 (48) | 1.488 | 0.137 | 0.023 |
| Hg low post-op | 8.5 ± 1.8 (48) | 8.4 ± 2.08 (48) | 1.386 | 0.166 | 0.02 |
| Hct low intra-op | 26.3 ± 6.4 (40) | 28.4 ± 6 (39) | 1.992 | 0.046 | 0.046 |
| Hct post-op day 1 | 25 ± 4.75 (40) | 24.6 ± 5.5 (39) | −1.691 | 0.091 | 0.032 |
| Hct low pos-op | 28.3 ± 7.3 (40) | 27.6 ± 5.2 (39) | −0.433 | 0.665 | 0.002 |
| Total losses | 600 ± 500(43) | 500 ± 550 (47) | −1.028 | 0.304 | 0.012 |
| Losses/vol (%) | 21.4 ± 13.3 (37) | 16.6 ± 14.4 (45) | −2.232 | 0.026 | 0.06 |
| Losses/level | 43.3 ± 32.35(43) | 37.5 ± 37.5 | −1.176 | 0.240 | 0.015 |
| Transf. rate (%) (n) | 98.7% (52) | 66% (47) | 17.906 | <0.001 | 0.038 [0.05; 0.30] |
| Transf. index (N/pt) | 3 ± 3 (52) | 1 ± 2 | −5.373 | 0.009 | 0.29 |
Regression coefficients of the standardized linear models.
| Dependent variable | B expo ( | B EXPO diagnosis B ( | Model R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.433 (0.003) | 0.216 (0.189) | 0.209 |
|
| −0.257 (0.084) | 0.539 (0.001) | 0.241 |
|
| −0.416 (0.005) | 0.330 (0.066) | 0.171 |
Figure 1Process model mediated by transfusion in the calculation of transfusion probability.
Logistic regression for variables which affect the occurrence of a transfusion.
| B | SE | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp (B) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1a | ZHgp | −7.23 | 0.259 | 7.776 | 1 | 0.005 | 0.485 |
| ZCobbM | 1.038 | 0.308 | 11.326 | 1 | 0.001 | 2.824 | |
| DIAG_BI | 1.480 | 0.467 | 10.037 | 1 | 0.002 | 4.392 | |
| Anest | −0.999 | 0.485 | 4.237 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.368 | |
| AcTrax | −2.332 | 0.507 | 21.112 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.097 | |
| Constant | 1.870 | 0.437 | 18.307 | 1 | 0.000 | 6.487 | |
aVariable(s) entered on step 1: ZHgp, ZCobbM, DIAG_BI, Anest, and AcTrax. Calculations were performed with the standardized value for continuous variables. Categorical variables were defined as dummies with 1 for “yes” and 0 for “no.” The advantages of using standardized variables are related to the better understanding of relative ODDS in the presence of continuous and categorical variables as predictors. To use this regression as a predictive value, the following should be considered: the “Cobb” variable has a normal distribution with mean = 74.716 and SD = 22.621; the variable “HgP” is also normally distributed with mean = 13.192 and SD = 1.4329. To use the provided coefficients, the users should follow the formula: logit = 1.870–0.723 [(HgP-13.192)/1.4329] + 1.038[(Cobb-74.716)/22.621] − 0.99(remifentanil) − 2.332(tranexamic acid) + 1.480 (neuromuscular diagnosis) and entering the HgP value and Cobb angle of their patient. To transform the logit into a more familiar concept of probability (P), the formula to be used is p = EXP (logit)/[EXP (logit) + 1].
Figure 2ROC curve for the explanatory model for transfusion calculated according to the estimated probabilities for the event.