Literature DB >> 32449556

Sexual Dimorphism in Stress-induced Hyperthermia in SNAP25Δ3 mice, a mouse model with disabled Gβγ regulation of the exocytotic fusion apparatus.

Analisa D Thompson Gray1, Justice Simonetti1, Feyisayo Adegboye1, Carrie K Jones1,2, Zack Zurawski1,3, Heidi E Hamm1.   

Abstract

Behavioral assays in the mouse can show marked differences between male and female animals of a given genotype. These differences identified in such preclinical studies may have important clinical implications. We recently made a mouse model with impaired presynaptic inhibition through Gβγ-SNARE signaling. Here, we examine the role of sexual dimorphism in the severity of the phenotypes of this model, the SNAP25Δ3 mouse. In males, we already reported that SNAP25Δ3 homozygotes demonstrated phenotypes in motor coordination, nociception, spatial memory and stress processing. We now report that while minimal sexually dimorphic effects were observed for the nociceptive, motor or memory phenotypes, large differences were observed in the stress-induced hyperthermia paradigm, with male SNAP25Δ3 homozygotes exhibiting an increase in body temperature subsequent to handling relative to wild-type littermates, while no such genotype-dependent effect was observed in females. This suggests sexually dimorphic mechanisms of Gβγ-SNARE signaling for stress processing or thermoregulation within the mouse. Second, we examined the effects of heterozygosity with respect to the SNAP25Δ3 mutation. Heterozygote SNAP25Δ3 animals were tested alongside homozygote and wild-type littermates in all of the aforementioned paradigms and displayed phenotypes similar to wild-type animals or an intermediate state. From this, we conclude that the SNAP25Δ3 mutation does not behave in an autosomal dominant manner, but rather displays incomplete dominance for many phenotypes.
© 2020 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G-protein coupled receptors; Gβγ; nociception; sex differences; stress-induced hyperthermia

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32449556      PMCID: PMC7520068          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  74 in total

1.  The role of the C terminus of the SNARE protein SNAP-25 in fusion pore opening and a model for fusion pore mechanics.

Authors:  Qinghua Fang; Khajak Berberian; Liang-Wei Gong; Ismail Hafez; Jakob B Sørensen; Manfred Lindau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research.

Authors:  Annaliese K Beery; Irving Zucker
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  A model to measure anticipatory anxiety in mice?

Authors:  F Borsini; A Lecci; G Volterra; A Meli
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Animal models of anxiety and depression: how are females different?

Authors:  P Palanza
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Absence of 5-HT(1B) receptors is associated with impaired impulse control in male 5-HT(1B) knockout mice.

Authors:  J A Bouwknecht; T H Hijzen; J van der Gugten; R A Maes; R Hen; B Olivier
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Variation in orbitofrontal cortex volume: relation to sex, emotion regulation and affect.

Authors:  B Locke Welborn; Xenophon Papademetris; Deidre L Reis; Nallakkandi Rajeevan; Suzanne M Bloise; Jeremy R Gray
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Sex differences in serotonergic but not gamma-aminobutyric acidergic (GABA) projections to the rat ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Anne E Fortino; Eva K Polston
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  Stress-induced hyperthermia in mice: a methodological study.

Authors:  T J Zethof; J A Van der Heyden; J T Tolboom; B Olivier
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1994-01

Review 9.  Sex differences in behavioral circadian rhythms in laboratory rodents.

Authors:  Jessica A Krizo; Eric M Mintz
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Sex Differences in Molecular Signaling at Inhibitory Synapses in the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Nino Tabatadze; Guangzhe Huang; Renee M May; Anant Jain; Catherine S Woolley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.