Literature DB >> 32449327

What Type of Face Mask Is Appropriate for Everyone-Mask-Wearing Policy amidst COVID-19 Pandemic?

Mi Na Kim1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32449327      PMCID: PMC7246185          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


× No keyword cloud information.
The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an unprecedented situation that we have never experienced during the last century.1 To cope with this situation in the absence of curative treatment or vaccine, we must turn to universal infection control resources; hand hygiene, environmental control, personal protective equipment (PPE) and quarantine.2 All of these resources are limited and should be used rationally.2 The global supply chains of PPE have collapsed, so that PPE is not available for the person, place and time requiring it the most, while it is overused than needed elsewhere. Public use of PPE should be prudential when long-term reign of COVID-19 pandemic with multiple waves is expected. Here I purposed to break the myth of a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) mask for everyone-mask-wearing policy based on previous reports and one simple experiment. How to prevent the spread of common cold and flu are well understood from plentiful resources.3 First, the respiratory viruses are transmitted more commonly via contact than droplet. Secondly, the control measure to reduce spread of respiratory viruses should therefore focus on contact precaution. The single most important protective measure is hand washing, rather than mask wearing. Lastly, the person who wear a face mask to prevent the droplet transmission is the one who have respiratory symptoms. Because COVID-19 is an infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the seventh coronavirus to infect human4 all above mentioned measures are applicable for COVID-19 too. Unlike other respiratory virus infections, COVID-19 has shown many cases with mild or no presenting symptoms, who are highly infectious during asymptomatic period.5 Consequently, new policy has been implemented in the COVID-19 pandemic era, that everyone in public area wears masks not to transfer their germ to others. Long-term implementation of such policy might be difficult without the threat of a looming pandemic. Although proper assessment on the feasibility of this policy has not been made, it appears to settle in as the ‘new normal’ these days. Therefore it is important what type of mask is appropriate for the policy. The most important factor in choosing mask type will be how well it can contain user-generated droplets. Indeed, HEPA mask filters can collect particles more efficiently than surgical mask filters, only when the mask fits to the face sealing the boundary (Table 1).6 However, the compliance will be affected by how comfortable is mask-wearing,3 especially for a long-term use. HEPA masks such as KF94 or N95 are more uncomfortable, such as demanding tedious cautions (Table 1). Surgical masks are used to protect the operation field from droplets generated from body fluids of users' nasal and oral mucosa by talking or coughing (Table 1).7 Its effectiveness has long been proven in practice, although it is loose-fitting, allowing possible leakage of aerosol droplets through open boundaries.8 Homemade masks made of cotton also have significantly reduced droplet and particle transmission when coughing, but their efficiency is only one third of surgical masks.9 The surgical mask is a pleated rectangular three-layer mask, efficiently preventing wetting to the outer surface by user generated droplets (Fig. 1). HEPA filters are affected by the moisture in the exhaled air10 and it is not recommended to use single mask for longer than 4 hours.2 When the more tightly the HEPA mask fits to the face, droplets will be better contained inside it and will break the mask filter faster.10 If symptomatic patients wear the HEPA mask properly-fitted, they are possibly suffocated by own secretions, otherwise the mask will be unsealed and useless.
Table 1

Features of surgical mask, HEPA filter mask and cotton mask

FeaturesSurgical maskCotton maskHEPA filter mask
KF80KF94/N95
Approval by FDATherapeutic device 32100NoneTherapeutic device 32200Therapeutic device 32200a
Fine dust maskRespirator
Intended useTo protect the patient from large particles expelled from the wearer-such as spit and mucous.To avoid touching nose and mouth.To help reduce the wearer's exposure to fine dust particles.To help reduce the wearer's exposure to fine dust particles and infectious airborne particles.
To use as a fluid barrier.To help contain spit or mucous expelled by the wearer, similar to covering a cough or sneeze with a face tissue.Filter efficiency 80%, small and large particles.Filter efficiency 95%, small particle aerosols to large droplets.
FitFits loosely, leaving gaps between face and the mask.Fits loosely, leaving gaps between face and the mask.Designed to fit tightly, creating a seal between face and the mask.Designed to fit tightly, creating a seal between face and the mask.
Requires fit testing and user seal checks.
CautionsDisposableReuse after cleaning1. Conduct a user seal check every time.
2. Respirators can be worn until they are dirty/wet, damaged/deformed or difficult to breathe.
3. Disposable: possible contamination of filter with bioaerosols after use.
4. Relative contraindication: pregnancy, respiratory illness, children/elderly, closed space in low oxygen air < 18%.
5. Do not insert anything (tissue, gauze, etc.) between face and boundary of mask.
6. Hand hygiene before and after wearing.
7. No routine decontamination and reuse.
8. Cleanshaven in the respiratory seal area.
9. Medical evaluation required for occupational (long-term) users.
Basic structure3-layer constructionUsually rectangular mask with earloop4-layer construction
Pleated rectangular mask3-fly flat fold or cup shaped
Nosepiece wireNosepiece wire
Tie or earloopHeadband or earloop with hook fastener
Filter materialsNon-woven fibrous filterCottonNon-woven fibrous filter
Fluid ResistanceYesNoNoNo/Yesb

HEPA = high efficiency particulate air, FDA = Ministry of Food and Drugs.

aN95 cleared for use as surgical mask by FDA in US; bThe highest level of fluid resistance is required for surgical N95 respirator.

This table was adapted from Korea Ministry of Food and Drugs information (https://nedrug.mfds.go.kr) and 3M PPE information and guidelines (https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/medical-us/coronavirus/ppe-information-and-guidance/#protection).

Fig. 1

The inner and outer surfaces of the KF94 mask and surgical mask after inoculating 3 drops of 5 µL of methylene blue dye on the inner surfaces of both masks. The dye diffused from the inner surfaces (A) of the KF94 mask to the extent that it was visible on the outer surface (B), while the dye diffused only in inner layer (C) of the surgical mask, leaving the outer surface (D) dry.

In conclusion, a surgical mask is the best type for a person wearing a mask to prevent the droplet transmission, with or without symptoms. A cotton mask rather than a HEPA mask can be the last resort for the person without respiratory symptoms.
  7 in total

1.  Effect of exhaled moisture on breathing resistance of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.

Authors:  Raymond J Roberge; Emily Bayer; Jeffrey B Powell; Aitor Coca; Marc R Roberge; Stacey M Benson
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-06-03

2.  Sterile field contamination from powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) versus contamination from surgical masks.

Authors:  Rex A Howard; George W Lathrop; Nathaniel Powell
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Cochrane Review: Interventions for the interruption or reduction of the spread of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Ruth Foxlee; Chris Del Mar; Liz Dooley; Eliana Ferroni; Bill Hewak; Adi Prabhala; Sreekumaran Nair; Alessandro Rivetti
Journal:  Evid Based Child Health       Date:  2008-12-10

4.  Asymptomatic Transmission, the Achilles' Heel of Current Strategies to Control Covid-19.

Authors:  Monica Gandhi; Deborah S Yokoe; Diane V Havlir
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic?

Authors:  Anna Davies; Katy-Anne Thompson; Karthika Giri; George Kafatos; Jimmy Walker; Allan Bennett
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.385

6.  The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 17.745

7.  Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients.

Authors:  Seongman Bae; Min-Chul Kim; Ji Yeun Kim; Hye-Hee Cha; Joon Seo Lim; Jiwon Jung; Min-Jae Kim; Dong Kyu Oh; Mi-Kyung Lee; Seong-Ho Choi; Minki Sung; Sang-Bum Hong; Jin-Won Chung; Sung-Han Kim
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 25.391

  7 in total
  9 in total

1. 

Authors:  Karl-Christian Bergmann; Sebastian Kugler; Torsten Zuberbier; Sylvia Becker
Journal:  Allergo J       Date:  2021-08-13

2.  The Impact of Wearing a Face Mask during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Temporomandibular Joint: A Radiological and Questionnaire Assessment.

Authors:  Moath Zuhour; Majid Ismayilzade; Mehmet Dadacı; Bilsev Ince
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

3.  Increased Prevalence of Face Mask-Induced Itch in Health Care Workers.

Authors:  Piotr K Krajewski; Łukasz Matusiak; Marta Szepietowska; Rafał Białynicki-Birula; Jacek C Szepietowski
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07

4.  Rhinovirus Incidence Rates Indicate We Are Tired of Non-pharmacological Interventions Against Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Min-Chul Kim; Joung Ha Park; Seong-Ho Choi; Jin-Won Chung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Face Mask Practice and Technique During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nonrepresentative Cross-Sectional Study in Sudan.

Authors:  Itimad I A Ayed; Rehana Khalil; Ishag Adam; Osama Al-Wutayd
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Risk Factors for Contracting COVID-19 and Changes in Menstrual and Sleep Cycles in Japanese Female Athletes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Yuka Tsukahara; Yuka Hieda; Satomi Takayanagi; Aleksandra Macznik
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28

7.  Fit Test for N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators and KF94 Masks for Healthcare Workers: a Prospective Single-center Simulation Study.

Authors:  Jin Ju Park; Yu Bin Seo; Jacob Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  A COVID-19 Exposure at a Dental Clinic Where Healthcare Workers Routinely Use Particulate Filtering Respirators.

Authors:  Dosup Kim; Jae-Hoon Ko; Kyong Ran Peck; Jin Yang Baek; Hee-Won Moon; Hyun Kyun Ki; Ji Hyun Yoon; Hyo Jin Kim; Jeong Hwa Choi; Ga Eun Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Face masks suitable for preventing COVID-19 and pollen allergy. A study in the exposure chamber.

Authors:  Karl-Christian Bergmann; Sebastian Kugler; Torsten Zuberbier; Sylvia Becker
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2021-07-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.