Literature DB >> 20522519

Effect of exhaled moisture on breathing resistance of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.

Raymond J Roberge1, Emily Bayer, Jeffrey B Powell, Aitor Coca, Marc R Roberge, Stacey M Benson.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of exhaled moisture on the breathing resistance of three classes of filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) following 4 h of continuous wear at a breathing volume of 40 l min(-1), utilizing an automated breathing and metabolic simulator as a human surrogate. After 4 h, inhalation and exhalation resistance increased by 0.43 and 0.23 mm of H(2)O pressure, respectively, and average moisture retention in the respirators was 0.26 ml. Under ambient conditions similar to those of the current study, and at similar breathing volumes, it is unlikely that exhaled moisture will add significantly to the breathing resistance of filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) over 4 h of use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20522519     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meq042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  17 in total

1.  Flat fold and cup-shaped N95 filtering facepiece respirator face seal area and pressure determinations: a stereophotogrammetry study.

Authors:  George Niezgoda; Jung-Hyun Kim; Raymond J Roberge; Stacey M Benson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards?

Authors:  Kai Kisielinski; Paul Giboni; Andreas Prescher; Bernd Klosterhalfen; David Graessel; Stefan Funken; Oliver Kempski; Oliver Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Evaluation of microwave steam bags for the decontamination of filtering facepiece respirators.

Authors:  Edward M Fisher; Jessica L Williams; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impact of low filter resistances on subjective and physiological responses to filtering facepiece respirators.

Authors:  Raymond J Roberge; Jung-Hyun Kim; Jeffrey B Powell; Ronald E Shaffer; Caroline M Ylitalo; John M Sebastian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  What Type of Face Mask Is Appropriate for Everyone-Mask-Wearing Policy amidst COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Mi Na Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator Use during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jared T Roeckner; Nevena Krstić; Bradley H Sipe; Sarah G Običan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  An Improved FFR Design with a Ventilation Fan: CFD Simulation and Validation.

Authors:  Xiaotie Zhang; Hui Li; Shengnan Shen; Yu Rao; Feng Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The Physiological Impact of Masking Is Insignificant and Should Not Preclude Routine Use During Daily Activities, Exercise, and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Rebecca H Haraf; Mark A Faghy; Brian Carlin; Richard A Josephson
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.646

9.  Commentary: Physiological and Psychological Impact of Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jennifer L Scheid; Shannon P Lupien; Gregory S Ford; Sarah L West
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Face Masks and the Cardiorespiratory Response to Physical Activity in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Susan R Hopkins; Paolo B Dominelli; Christopher K Davis; Jordan A Guenette; Andrew M Luks; Yannick Molgat-Seon; Rui Carlos Sá; A William Sheel; Erik R Swenson; Michael K Stickland
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.