Mary H Foltz1, Robert M O'Leary2, Diana Reader2, Nicholas L Rudolph2, Krista A Schlitter2, Jutta Ellermann3, Casey P Johnson4,5, David W Polly6, Arin M Ellingson7,8,9. 1. Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 2. Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 5. Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 7. Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. ellin224@umn.edu. 8. Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. ellin224@umn.edu. 9. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. ellin224@umn.edu.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo porcine imaging study. OBJECTIVES: Quantitatively evaluate change in MRI signal at the discs caudal to spinal fusion instrumentation. Individuals who receive posterior spinal instrumentation are at risk of developing accelerated disc degeneration at adjacent levels. Degeneration is associated with a loss of biochemical composition and mechanical integrity of the disc, which can be noninvasively assessed through quantitative T2* (qT2*) MRI techniques. However, qT2* is sensitive to magnetic susceptibility introduced by metal. METHODS: Nine ex vivo porcine lumbar specimens were imaged with 3 T MRI. Fast spin-echo T2-weighted (T2w) images and gradient-echo qT2* maps were acquired, both without and with posterior spinal fusion instrumentation. Average T2* relaxation times of the nuclei pulposi (NP) were measured at the adjacent and sub-adjacent discs and measurements were compared using t tests before and after instrumentation. The size of the signal void and metal artifact were determined (modified ASTM F2119-07) within the vertebral body and spinal cord for both MRI sequences. The relationship between T2* signal loss and distance from the instrumentation was evaluated using Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between adjacent and sub-adjacent NP T2* relaxation time prior to instrumentation (p = 0.86). Following instrumentation, there was a significant decrease in the T2* relaxation time at the adjacent NP (average = 20%, p = 0.02), and no significant difference at the sub-adjacent NP (average = - 3%, p = 0.30). Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between signal loss and distance to disc (r = - 0.61, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal fusion instrumentation interferes with T2* relaxation time measurements at the adjacent disc but not at the sub-adjacent discs. However, there is sufficient signal at the adjacent disc to quantify changes in the T2* relaxation time following spinal fusion. Hence, baseline MRI scan following spinal fusion surgery are required to interpret and track changes in disc health at the caudal discs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo porcine imaging study. OBJECTIVES: Quantitatively evaluate change in MRI signal at the discs caudal to spinal fusion instrumentation. Individuals who receive posterior spinal instrumentation are at risk of developing accelerated disc degeneration at adjacent levels. Degeneration is associated with a loss of biochemical composition and mechanical integrity of the disc, which can be noninvasively assessed through quantitative T2* (qT2*) MRI techniques. However, qT2* is sensitive to magnetic susceptibility introduced by metal. METHODS: Nine ex vivo porcine lumbar specimens were imaged with 3 T MRI. Fast spin-echo T2-weighted (T2w) images and gradient-echo qT2* maps were acquired, both without and with posterior spinal fusion instrumentation. Average T2* relaxation times of the nuclei pulposi (NP) were measured at the adjacent and sub-adjacent discs and measurements were compared using t tests before and after instrumentation. The size of the signal void and metal artifact were determined (modified ASTM F2119-07) within the vertebral body and spinal cord for both MRI sequences. The relationship between T2* signal loss and distance from the instrumentation was evaluated using Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between adjacent and sub-adjacent NP T2* relaxation time prior to instrumentation (p = 0.86). Following instrumentation, there was a significant decrease in the T2* relaxation time at the adjacent NP (average = 20%, p = 0.02), and no significant difference at the sub-adjacent NP (average = - 3%, p = 0.30). Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between signal loss and distance to disc (r = - 0.61, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal fusion instrumentation interferes with T2* relaxation time measurements at the adjacent disc but not at the sub-adjacent discs. However, there is sufficient signal at the adjacent disc to quantify changes in the T2* relaxation time following spinal fusion. Hence, baseline MRI scan following spinal fusion surgery are required to interpret and track changes in disc health at the caudal discs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adjacent disc disease; Disc health; Image artifact; Metal artifact; Metal interference; Spinal fusion instrumentation
Authors: Paul Park; Hugh J Garton; Vishal C Gala; Julian T Hoff; John E McGillicuddy Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Gene Cheh; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Jacob M Buchowski; Michael D Daubs; Yongjung Kim; Christy Baldus Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Suzanne E L Detiger; Roderick M Holewijn; Roel J W Hoogendoorn; Barend J van Royen; Marco N Helder; Ferco H Berger; Joost P A Kuijer; Theo H Smit Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Kenneth M C Cheung; Jaro Karppinen; Danny Chan; Daniel W H Ho; You-Qiang Song; Pak Sham; Kathryn S E Cheah; John C Y Leong; Keith D K Luk Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 3.468