Literature DB >> 32448935

Is it time to abandon episiotomy use? A randomized controlled trial (EPITRIAL).

Lena Sagi-Dain1,2, Inna Kreinin-Bleicher3, Rabia Bahous3, Noga Gur Arye3, Tamar Shema3, Aya Eshel3, Orna Caspin3, Ron Gonen4,3, Shlomi Sagi3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this trial was to evaluate whether avoidance of episiotomy can decrease the risk of advanced perineal tears.
METHODS: In this randomized (1:1) parallel-group superiority trial, primiparous women underwent randomization into "avoidance of episiotomy" (the study group in which episiotomy was allowed only in cases of fetal distress) or "standard care." The primary outcome was the incidence of advanced (3rd- and 4th-degree) perineal tears.
RESULTS: The participants were randomized into "standard care" (n = 337) vs. "no episiotomy" (n = 339) groups, not differing in any demographic or obstetric characteristics. Episiotomy rates were significantly lower in the study group (19.6%) compared with the standard care group (29.8%, p = 0.004). Five (1.5%) advanced tears were diagnosed in the study group vs. ten = 3.0% in the controls, yielding an odds ratio of 0.50 (95% CI 0.17-1.50) in favor of the "no episiotomy" group (p = 0.296). No differences were noted in any secondary outcomes. By per protocol analysis (omitting cases in which episiotomy was performed for indications other than fetal distress in the study group), a trend to decreased risk of advanced tears in the study group was noted (p = 0.0956). By per protocol analyses, no severe tears were noted in the 53 vacuum deliveries in the study group vs. 4/65 (6.2%) tears in the controls (p = 0.126).
CONCLUSIONS: Since decreased use of episiotomy was not associated with higher rates of severe tears or any other adverse outcomes, we believe this procedure can be avoided in spontaneous as well as vacuum-assisted deliveries. Trial registration no. NCT02356237.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced perineal tears; Episiotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32448935     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04332-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  10 in total

1.  Need for and consequences of episiotomy in vaginal birth: a critical approach.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 2.  The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature.

Authors:  Lena Sagi-Dain; Shlomi Sagi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  [Use of hyperbaric oxygenation in the complex treatment of patients following acute asphyxia].

Authors:  M V Romasenko; E A Churkin; I S Iufit; N G Vertogradskaia
Journal:  Klin Med (Mosk)       Date:  1987-03

4.  No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis.

Authors:  Lena Sagi-Dain; Rabia Bahous; Orna Caspin; Inna Kreinin-Bleicher; Ron Gonen; Shlomi Sagi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic review of changing practices.

Authors:  Christophe Clesse; Joëlle Lighezzolo-Alnot; Sylvie De Lavergne; Sandrine Hamlin; Michèle Scheffler
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2018-04-02

Review 6.  Operative vaginal delivery: a review of four national guidelines.

Authors:  Ioannis Tsakiridis; Sonia Giouleka; Apostolos Mamopoulos; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Angelos Daniilidis; Themistoklis Dagklis
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 1.901

7.  Women's experiences of perineal pain during the immediate postnatal period: a cross-sectional study in Brazil.

Authors:  Adriana Amorim Francisco; Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos de Oliveira; Flora Maria Barbosa da Silva; Debra Bick; Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.372

8.  Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).

Authors:  M D Barber; M D Walters; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12).

Authors:  Rebecca G Rogers; Kimberly W Coates; Dorothy Kammerer-Doak; Satkirin Khalsa; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-07-25

10.  Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement.

Authors:  Gilda Piaggio; Diana R Elbourne; Stuart J Pocock; Stephen J W Evans; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Adanna Okeahialam; Ka Woon Wong; Swati Jha; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 1.932

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.