Literature DB >> 29509098

Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic review of changing practices.

Christophe Clesse1,2,3, Joëlle Lighezzolo-Alnot2, Sylvie De Lavergne3, Sandrine Hamlin3, Michèle Scheffler3,4.   

Abstract

The authors' purpose for this article is to identify, review and interpret all publications about the episiotomy rates worldwide. Based on the criteria from the PRISMA guidelines, twenty databases were scrutinized. All studies which include national statistics related to episiotomy were selected, as well as studies presenting estimated data. Sixty-one papers were selected with publication dates between 1995 and 2016. A static and dynamic analysis of all the results was carried out. The assumption for the decline in the number of episiotomies is discussed and confirmed, recalling that nowadays high rates of episiotomy remain in less industrialized countries and East Asia. Finally, our analysis aims to investigate the potential determinants which influence apparent statistical disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29509098     DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1445253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Women Int        ISSN: 0739-9332


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of Accuracy of Episiotomy Incision in a Governmental Maternity Unit in Palestine: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Hadil Y Ali-Masri; Sahar J Hassan; Kaled M Zimmo; Mohammed W Zimmo; Khaled M K Ismail; Erik Fosse; Hasan Alsalman; Åse Vikanes; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Episiotomy in modern clinical practice: friend or foe?

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Stefano Salvatore; Diaa Rizk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Is it time to abandon episiotomy use? A randomized controlled trial (EPITRIAL).

Authors:  Lena Sagi-Dain; Inna Kreinin-Bleicher; Rabia Bahous; Noga Gur Arye; Tamar Shema; Aya Eshel; Orna Caspin; Ron Gonen; Shlomi Sagi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Episcissors-60™ and obstetrics anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Olga Divakova; Aethele Khunda; Paul A Ballard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Impact of animated instruction on tablets and hands-on training in applying bimanual perineal support on episiotomy rates: an intervention study.

Authors:  Kaled Mikki Zimmo; Katariina Laine; Erik Fosse; Mohammed Zimmo; Hadil Ali-Masri; Bettina Böttcher; Manuela Zucknick; Åse Vikanes; Sahar Hassan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Episiotomy practice in six Palestinian hospitals: a population-based cohort study among singleton vaginal births.

Authors:  Kaled Zimmo; Katariina Laine; Erik Fosse; Mohammed Zimmo; Hadil Ali-Masri; Manuela Zucknick; Åse Vikanes; Sahar Hassan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Patient attitude and acceptance towards episiotomy during pregnancy before and after information provision: a questionnaire.

Authors:  James W Alexander; Emmanuel Karantanis; Robin M Turner; Kate Faasse; Chelsea Watt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  A novel classification for evaluating episiotomy practices: application to the Burgundy perinatal network.

Authors:  Thomas Desplanches; Emilie Szczepanski; Jonathan Cottenet; Denis Semama; Catherine Quantin; Paul Sagot
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives: a cross-sectional study from China.

Authors:  Jingxuan Yang; Hua Bai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Episiotomy practice and associated factors among mothers who gave birth at public health facilities in Metema district, northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Enyew Woretaw; Muluken Teshome; Muluneh Alene
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.