| Literature DB >> 32448335 |
Shuo Wu1, Liang Zhang1, Huan Li1, Junnan Xu1, Cui Jiang1, Tao Sun2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence of new molecular targeted drugs provides new prospects for the treatment of advanced breast cancer; the future therapeutic trend includes chemotherapy combined with molecular targeted therapy. Apatinib mesylate, a novel, small anti-angiogenic agent, highly selectively inhibits the activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase. Apatinib mesylate also blocks the signaling of vascular endothelial growth factor binding to its receptor, thereby strongly inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and exerting an anti-tumor effect. However, there have been no reports of a randomized controlled clinical trial of apatinib combined with vinorelbine for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We will compare the therapeutic effect of vinorelbine alone or in combination with apatinib mesylate, in patients with recurrent or metastatic TNBC in North China who have received at least two drug treatments, including anthracyclines and taxanes. METHODS/ANALYSIS: This study is a triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. We plan to include 238 female patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC, admitted to the Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Northeast China. All enrolled patients will be randomized to oral vinorelbine alone (40 mg, thrice a week (Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays) in each 3-week cycle), or in combination with oral apatinib mesylate (500 mg, once daily in each 3-week cycle). Radiographic assessment will be performed every 6 weeks for 36 weeks and every 9 weeks thereafter. The primary outcome is progression-free survival and secondary outcomes include overall survival, disease control rate, objective response rate, and incidence of adverse events at grades 3 and 4, as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Version 4.0. Outcome measures will be evaluated at baseline (< 2 weeks before starting treatment), every 6 weeks during treatment, and at 4 weeks and every 3 months after treatment discontinuation. DISCUSSION: Based on the data from this trial, we hope to identify a treatment plan that is suitable for female patients with TNBC, who have been treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, in Northeast China. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03932526. Registered on 30 April 2019.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced breast cancer; Apatinib; Metastatic; Triple-negative breast cancer; Vinorelbine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32448335 PMCID: PMC7245760 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04342-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Recent clinical studies conducted within the past 5 years on treatment with apatinib or vinorelbine in patients with TNBC pretreated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy
| Study | Design | Subjects | Assignment | Treatment | Outcome measures | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment with apatinib | ||||||
| Hu et al. [ | Phase II cohort study | 84 patients previously treated with anthracycline and/or taxane: 25 in phase IIa trial: 59 in phase IIb trial | – | Phase IIa trial: apatinib, daily dose of 750 mg Phase IIb trial: apatinib, daily dose of 500 mg | ORR and CBR were 10.7% and 25.0%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 3.3 and 10.6 months, respectively | An apatinib dose of 500 mg rather than 750 mg is the recommended starting dose for heavily pretreated patients with mTNBC with a measurable rate of partial response and PFS |
| Li et al. [ | Retrospective analysis | 44 patients with advanced TNBC with failed first-line or second-line therapy | Apatinib + capecitabine or capecitabine alone | Apatinib (500 mg) was orally administered daily on days 1–28 of each 4-week cycle and/or capecitabine (12,500 mg/m2) was orally taken twice daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest period until disease progression | PFS, ORR (CR + PR), DCR (CR + PR + SD), and toxicity For apatinib + capecitabine or capecitabine alone: PFS, 5.5, 3.5 months; ORR, 40.9%, 13.4%; DCR, 68.2%, 31.8% | Treatment with a combination of apatinib and capecitabine can achieve a better efficacy and similar rate of serious adverse events compared with capecitabine alone, as the third-line treatment for advanced TNBC |
| Hu et al. [ | Case report | A female patient with stage IV TNBC. She had previously undergone whole-brain radiation therapy. Paclitaxel, platinum, UTD1, capecitabine, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and single-agent apatinib were then administered as first-line to fifth-line therapies | – | Treatment with apatinib + CPT-11 + S-1 as the sixth-line therapy | Alleviation of the brain edema was achieved, and this was maintained for 7 months | Apatinib in combination with CPT-11 + S-1 to treat refractory BMs in a patient with TNBC |
| Zhou et al. [ | Case report | A female patient with triple-negative spindle cell carcinoma | – | After treatment failure with bevacizumab combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin, the patient was treated with apatinib | Apatinib was more effective than bevacizumab for this patient | Apatinib is a safe and effective drug for treating advanced spindle cell breast carcinoma, especially in patients who have a prior experience of chemotherapy failure, or a poor physical condition |
| Treatment with vinorelbine | ||||||
| Rodler et al. [ | Phase I cohort study | 50 patients with advanced TNBC | – | A 3 + 3 dose escalation design evaluated veliparib and vinorelbine, followed by veliparib monotherapy | Median PFS in 50 patients was 5.5 months | Veliparib (300 mg, twice daily) combined with cisplatin and vinorelbine is well-tolerated with encouraging response rates |
| Zhang et al. [ | Prospective cohort study | 44 patients with metastatic TNBC pretreated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes | – | Biweekly combination of vinorelbine and oxaliplatin (NVBOX) | ORR 31.6%, median PFS 4.3 months, OS 12.6 months | A biweekly NVBOX regimen is effective and well-tolerated as a second-line or third-line treatment for patients with mTNBC |
| Wang et al. [ | Retrospective analysis | 48 female patients with TNBC | – | Patients were given vinorelbine plus cisplatin (NP group, | The ORR, DCR, and median TTP were 45.5%, 77.3%, and 5 months, respectively, in the NP group, and 46.2%, 80.8%, and 5.2 months, respectively, in the GP group A lower incidence of thrombocytopenia and rash, and a higher incidence of phlebitis was found in the NP group compared to the GP group | Both the NP and GP regimens are active and tolerated in cases of metastatic TNBC with anthracycline and/or taxane resistance. These regimens may be used as a salvage treatment for metastatic TNBC |
| Du et al. [ | Retrospective analysis | 48 patients with metastatic TNBC pretreated with anthracyclines and one taxane | – | 22 patients were treated with vinorelbine plus platinum (NP), and 26 patients with vinorelbine plus capecitabine (NX) | Total: ORR, 20.8%; CBR, 43.8%; median PFS, 4.4 months; median OS, 15.5 months ORR and PFS were better in the NP arm versus NX | Vinorelbine-based combination chemotherapy shows moderate efficacy in the treatment of metastatic TNBC, and has manageable toxicity. The NP regimen shows potential superiority over the NX regimen. |
| Li et al. [ | Retrospective analysis | 41 patients with advanced TNBC (pretreated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes, before or after surgery) in whom disease progressed after a certain period of time | – | Treatment with vinorelbine plus platinum (NP) regimen | ORR, 34.1%; CR, 7.3%; partial response, 26.8%; stable disease, 34.1%; median OS, 18.9 months; PFS, 6.7 months | The NP regimen showed clinical activity in patients with metastatic TNBC, and the toxicity was acceptable and manageable |
PFS median progression-free survival, ORR objective response rate, DCR disease control rate, BM brain metastasis, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, CBR clinical benefit rate, OS overall survival, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, TTP time to progression
Fig. 1Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT). Timepoint (t): -t1: baseline evaluations (conducted within 2 weeks of the start of protocol therapy); t0: random allocation; t1: during treatment (evaluations will be conducted every 6 weeks (two cycles)); t2: patients will be monitored for new or existing AEs at 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation; t3: follow up for survival will be monitored every 3 months after treatment discontinuation until patient death or study completion. *Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either oral vinorelbine plus placebo (control group) or oral vinorelbine combined with apatinib mesylate (experimental group). a Concomitant medication includes opioid analgesics and new anticancer treatment. b Laboratory examinations include hematology (hemoglobin, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, and platelet count); blood biochemical tests (total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, serum creatinine, total protein, Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl−, Ca2+, urea, and pregnancy test (if applicable); and tumor marker detection (breast cancer-associated antigen CA153 and carcinoembryonic antigen). ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EORTC QLQ-C30, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30
Fig. 2Schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
Principle for the adjustment of apatinib dose
| Classification of adverse reactions | NCI-CTC level | Dose adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| Hematologic adverse reactions | 3 | Drug administration will be paused at level 3 and will be continued at the initial dose when the NCI level is restored to ≤ level 2. If NCI ≥ level 3 occurs again, drug administration at the secondary dose will be continued |
| 4 | Drug administration will be paused at level 4 and will be continued at the secondary dose when the NCI is ≤ level 2 | |
| Non-hematologic adverse reactions | 3 | Drug administration will be paused at level 3 and will be continued at the initial dose when the NCI is restored to ≤ level 1. If the NCI ≥ level 3 occurs again, drug administration at the secondary dose will be continued |
| 4 | Drug administration will be paused at level 4 and will be continued at the secondary dose when the NCI is ≤ level 1 |
Adverse reactions will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) Version 430
Criteria for drug withdrawal and re-administration
| Neutrophil | Level 3 or 4 |
| Platelet | Level 3 or 4 |
| Serum creatinine | 1.5 times over the upper limit of normal value (44–132 μM) |
| Infection | Infectious fever with temperature > 38 °C |
| Diarrhea, mouth ulcers | Level 3 or 4 |
| Others | When adverse reactions occur in addition to the above, and the investigators cannot judge whether drug administration can be continued or not, the drug will be discontinued |
| Neutrophil | > 1.0 × 109/L |
| Platelet | > 50 × 109/L |
| Serum creatinine | < the upper limit of normal value (44–132 μM) |
| Infection | No infectious fever |
| Diarrhea, mouth ulcers | ≤ Level 1 |
| Others | When adverse reactions leading to drug withdrawal are alleviated or disappear, the administration can be resumed as determined by the investigators |
Drug withdrawal and re-administration will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) Version 430