Literature DB >> 32447367

Optimum roughage proportion in barley-based feedlot cattle diets: total tract nutrient digestibility, rumination, ruminal acidosis, short-chain fatty absorption, and gastrointestinal tract barrier function.

Gwinyai E Chibisa1, Karen A Beauchemin1, Karen M Koenig1, Gregory B Penner2.   

Abstract

Cattle need physically effective fiber to promote rumination and maintain rumen health, but economics favor the use of low-roughage feedlot diets. The study investigated the optimum barley silage proportion in barley-based finishing diets. Apparent total-tract digestibility (4-d total fecal collection), chewing behavior (6-d video recording), ruminal pH (6-d indwelling pH recording), and fermentation (1 day, sampling 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 h postfeeding), short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) absorption (washed reticulo-rumen technique), gastrointestinal tract barrier function (marker infusion), and blood variables (catheters) were measured. Eight ruminally fistulated crossbred beef heifers (653 ± 44.2 kg; mean starting body weight [BW] ± SD) were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 28-d periods. Dietary treatments were 0%, 4%, 8%, and 12% of dietary dry matter (DM) as barley silage, with diets containing 80%, 76%, 72%, and 68% barley grain, respectively. Increasing silage proportion decreased dietary starch content from 49.0% to 43.1% DM, while neutral detergent content increased from 22.7% to 25.1% DM. Silage proportion had no effect on DM intake, but apparent DM digestibility decreased quadratically (86.0%, 82.1%, 81.1%, 79.5% for the four diets, respectively; P < 0.001). Although, silage proportion had no effect on eating activity, rumination time increased quadratically (246, 289, 302, 316 min/d; P = 0.04). Increased silage proportion increased minimum (5.07, 5.27, 5.29, 5.41; quadratic, P = 0.011) and mean (5.61, 5.87, 5.93, 5.95; quadratic, P = 0.007) ruminal pH, and there was a quadratic (P ≤ 0.047) decrease in duration and area under the pH acidosis threshold curves of 5.8, 5.5, and 5.2. Although increasing silage proportion decreased ruminal acidosis, it was not completely eliminated even with a diet containing 12% silage DM. SCFA concentration in ruminal fluid was not affected by diet, but silage proportion quadratically (P ≤ 0.088) increased ruminal acetate:propionate. There was no effect of diet on absolute or fractional rates of absorption of acetate, propionate, butyrate or total SCFA, and no effect on gastrointestinal barrier function or blood measurements. In conclusion, responses to roughage level were mostly quadratic with greatest improvements in acidosis variables between 0% and 4% barley silage, with incremental improvements with further increases in silage levels. The study showed a trade-off between maximizing digestibility and energy intake to promote animal performance and minimizing the risk of acidosis. © Crown copyright 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chewing; feedlot; roughage; rumen pH; rumination; short-chain fatty acids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32447367      PMCID: PMC7447917          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  47 in total

1.  Modification of the Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements.

Authors:  P J Kononoff; A J Heinrichs; D R Buckmaster
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Effects of grain type, roughage level and monensin level on finishing cattle performance.

Authors:  R A Stock; M H Sindt; J C Parrott; F K Goedeken
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?

Authors:  J B Russell; D B Wilson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 4.  Diagnosis and Management of Rumen Acidosis and Bloat in Feedlots.

Authors:  Nathan F Meyer; Tony C Bryant
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.357

5.  Effects of corn grain conservation method on ruminal digestion kinetics for lactating dairy cows at two dietary starch concentrations.

Authors:  M Oba; M S Allen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation.

Authors:  E Khafipour; D O Krause; J C Plaizier
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Effects of barley silage chop length on productivity and rumen conditions of lactating dairy cows fed a total mixed ration.

Authors:  M S Einarson; J C Plaizier; K M Wittenberg
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Incidence, prevalence, severity, and risk factors for ruminal acidosis in feedlot steers during backgrounding, diet transition, and finishing.

Authors:  E Castillo-Lopez; B I Wiese; S Hendrick; J J McKinnon; T A McAllister; K A Beauchemin; G B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Magnesium absorption from the digestive tract of sheep.

Authors:  A D Care; R C Brown; A R Farrar; D W Pickard
Journal:  Q J Exp Physiol       Date:  1984-07

10.  Effects of mechanical processing on the nutritive value of barley silage for lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  J-S Eun; K A Beauchemin; S-H Hong; W Z Yang
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impacts of added roughage on growth performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and ruminal pH of feedlot steers fed wheat-based feedlot diets containing 30% modified distillers grains with solubles.

Authors:  Wayde J Pickinpaugh; Bryan W Neville; Rebecca L Moore; Joel S Caton
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-12

2.  Optimum roughage proportion in barley-based feedlot cattle diets: growth performance, feeding behavior, and carcass traits.

Authors:  Karen M Koenig; Gwinyai E Chibisa; Gregory B Penner; Karen A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.