Literature DB >> 24879761

Incidence, prevalence, severity, and risk factors for ruminal acidosis in feedlot steers during backgrounding, diet transition, and finishing.

E Castillo-Lopez1, B I Wiese2, S Hendrick3, J J McKinnon1, T A McAllister4, K A Beauchemin4, G B Penner5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, prevalence, severity, and risk factors for ruminal acidosis in feedlot steers during backgrounding, diet transition, and finishing. Steers were purchased from a local auction market (n = 250; mean ± SD; 330 ± 20.0 kg initial BW) and were grouped together with 28 steers fitted with a ruminal cannula (248 ± 25.5 kg initial BW). Steers were randomly allocated to 1 of 8 pens (3 to 4 cannulated steers per pen with a total of 35 steers/pen). The feeding period (143 d) was divided into 4 phases: backgrounding (BKGD; d 1 to 20), diet transition (TRAN; d 21 to 40), and the first (FIN1; d 41 to 91) and second half (FIN2; d 92 to 143) of finishing. The BKGD diet contained (% DM) barley silage (45.7%), barley grain (41.6%), canola meal (4.2%), and a pelleted mineral and vitamin supplement (8.5%). Steers were transitioned to a finishing diet containing (% DM) barley silage (5%), barley grain (80.9%), canola meal (4.9%), and a pelleted mineral and vitamin supplement (9.2%) using 4 transition diets. Feed was offered to achieve 5% refusals (as-is basis). Ruminal pH was recorded in cannulated steers every 10 min throughout the study, and feed refusals and BW were recorded at 2 wk intervals. Mean ruminal pH (P < 0.01) was 6.4, 6.3, 6.2, and 6.0 ± 0.01 during the BKGD, TRAN, FIN1, and FIN2, respectively. The duration (P < 0.01) pH < 5.5 was 4.1, 12.1, 78.7, and 194 ± 9.4 min/d during BKGD, TRAN, FIN1, and FIN2, respectively. Using a threshold of ruminal pH < 5.5 for at least 180 min to diagnose ruminal acidosis, incidence was defined as the number of times steers experienced ruminal acidosis during each period and prevalence was defined as the percentage of steers that experienced acidosis during each period. On average, the incidence rate (P < 0.01) of ruminal acidosis was 0.1, 0.3, 6.7, and 14.8 ± 0.97 episodes during BKGD, TRAN, FIN1, and FIN2, respectively. In the same order, the prevalence (P < 0.01) was 0.7, 1.7, 15.4, and 37.8 ± 2.0%. Based on multiple regression, factors associated with prevalence of ruminal acidosis and the duration pH < 5.5 were feeding phase (P < 0.01) and DMI (P < 0.01). Overall, the greatest incidence, prevalence, and severity of ruminal acidosis were observed towards the end of the finishing phase and were associated with days on feed and DMI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backgrounding; diet transition; feedlot cattle; finishing; prevalence; ruminal acidosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24879761     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-7599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Optimum roughage proportion in barley-based feedlot cattle diets: total tract nutrient digestibility, rumination, ruminal acidosis, short-chain fatty absorption, and gastrointestinal tract barrier function.

Authors:  Gwinyai E Chibisa; Karen A Beauchemin; Karen M Koenig; Gregory B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of dietary energy substrate and days on feed on apparent total tract digestibility, ruminal short-chain fatty acid absorption, acetate and glucose clearance, and insulin responsiveness in finishing feedlot cattle.

Authors:  F Joy; J J McKinnon; S Hendrick; P Górka; G B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Technical Note: The comparison of pH and redox potential in different locations in the reticulo-rumen of growing beef steers supplemented with different levels of quebracho extract.

Authors:  Luiz F Dias Batista; Aaron B Norris; Jordan M Adams; Thomas B Hairgrove; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

4.  Insulin resistance increases as days on feed advance in feedlot Bos indicus beef cattle offered a high-concentrate finishing diet.

Authors:  Osvaldo A de Sousa; Bruno I Cappellozza; Vitor G L Fonseca; Reinaldo F Cooke
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Effect of ruminal acidosis and short-term low feed intake on indicators of gastrointestinal barrier function in Holstein steers.

Authors:  Rae-Leigh A Pederzolli; Andrew G Van Kessel; John Campbell; Steve Hendrick; Katie M Wood; Gregory B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Transcriptome analysis of ruminal epithelia revealed potential regulatory mechanisms involved in host adaptation to gradual high fermentable dietary transition in beef cattle.

Authors:  K Zhao; Y H Chen; G B Penner; M Oba; L L Guan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  The Effects of Decreasing Dietary Crude Protein on the Growth Performance, Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality of Finishing Charolais Bulls.

Authors:  Martina Cortese; Severino Segato; Igino Andrighetto; Nicola Ughelini; Maria Chinello; Eliana Schiavon; Giorgio Marchesini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Effects of Dietary Barley Starch Contents on the Performance, Nutrient Digestion, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community of Fattening Hu Sheep.

Authors:  Xiaowen Ma; Wenjing Zhou; Tongqing Guo; Fei Li; Fadi Li; Tao Ran; Zhian Zhang; Long Guo
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-01-27

9.  Progressive microbial adaptation of the bovine rumen and hindgut in response to a step-wise increase in dietary starch and the influence of phytogenic supplementation.

Authors:  Sara Ricci; Cátia Pacífico; Ezequias Castillo-Lopez; Raul Rivera-Chacon; Heidi E Schwartz-Zimmermann; Nicole Reisinger; Franz Berthiller; Qendrim Zebeli; Renee M Petri
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.064

10.  Optimum roughage proportion in barley-based feedlot cattle diets: growth performance, feeding behavior, and carcass traits.

Authors:  Karen M Koenig; Gwinyai E Chibisa; Gregory B Penner; Karen A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.