Literature DB >> 32445638

Bidirectional pharmacological perturbations of the noradrenergic system differentially affect tactile detection.

Jim McBurney-Lin1, Yina Sun2, Lucas S Tortorelli2, Quynh Anh T Nguyen1, Sachiko Haga-Yamanaka1, Hongdian Yang3.   

Abstract

The brain neuromodulatory systems heavily influence behavioral and cognitive processes. Previous work has shown that norepinephrine (NE), a classic neuromodulator mainly derived from the locus coeruleus (LC), enhances neuronal responses to sensory stimuli. However, the role of the LC-NE system in modulating perceptual task performance is not well understood. In addition, systemic perturbation of NE signaling has often been proposed to specifically target the LC in functional studies, yet the assumption that localized (specific) and systemic (nonspecific) perturbations of LC-NE have the same behavioral impact remains largely untested. In this study, we trained mice to perform a head-fixed, quantitative tactile detection task, and administered an α2 adrenergic receptor agonist or antagonist to pharmacologically down- or up-regulate LC-NE activity, respectively. We addressed the outstanding question of how bidirectional perturbations of LC-NE activity affect tactile detection, and tested whether localized and systemic drug treatments exert the same behavioral effects. We found that both localized and systemic suppression of LC-NE impaired tactile detection by reducing motivation. Surprisingly, while locally activating LC-NE enabled mice to perform in a near-optimal regime, systemic activation impaired behavior by promoting impulsivity. Our results demonstrate that localized silencing and activation of LC-NE differentially affect tactile detection, and that localized and systemic NE activation induce distinct behavioral changes.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32445638      PMCID: PMC7318910          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.250


  92 in total

Review 1.  Consequences of tuning network function by tonic and phasic locus coeruleus output and stress: Regulating detection and discrimination of peripheral stimuli.

Authors:  David M Devilbiss
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  In vivo voltammetry monitoring of electrically evoked extracellular norepinephrine in subregions of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

Authors:  Natalie R Herr; Jinwoo Park; Zoé A McElligott; Anna M Belle; Regina M Carelli; R Mark Wightman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes.

Authors:  Craig W Berridge; Barry D Waterhouse
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2003-04

4.  Effects of reward and response costs on inhibition in ADHD children.

Authors:  Fiorella Iaboni; Virginia I Douglas; A G Baker
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1995-02

5.  Evidence that locus coeruleus is the site where clonidine and drugs acting at alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors affect sleep and arousal mechanisms.

Authors:  G B De Sarro; C Ascioti; F Froio; V Libri; G Nisticò
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Norepinephrine and impulsivity: effects of acute yohimbine.

Authors:  Alan C Swann; Marijn Lijffijt; Scott D Lane; Blake Cox; Joel L Steinberg; F Gerard Moeller
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Effects of locally infused pharmacological agents on spontaneous and sensory-evoked activity of locus coeruleus neurons.

Authors:  L M Adams; S L Foote
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Tuning arousal with optogenetic modulation of locus coeruleus neurons.

Authors:  Matthew E Carter; Ofer Yizhar; Sachiko Chikahisa; Hieu Nguyen; Antoine Adamantidis; Seiji Nishino; Karl Deisseroth; Luis de Lecea
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Through the looking glass: differential noradenergic modulation of prefrontal cortical function.

Authors:  A F Arnsten
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Performance in a GO/NOGO perceptual task reflects a balance between impulsive and instrumental components of behaviour.

Authors:  A Berditchevskaia; R D Cazé; S R Schultz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive control of synaptic plasticity integrates micro- and macroscopic network function.

Authors:  Daniel N Scott; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 8.294

2.  The Importance of Accounting for Movement When Relating Neuronal Activity to Sensory and Cognitive Processes.

Authors:  Edward Zagha; Jeffrey C Erlich; Soohyun Lee; Gyorgy Lur; Daniel H O'Connor; Nicholas A Steinmetz; Carsen Stringer; Hongdian Yang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Pupil diameter is not an accurate real-time readout of locus coeruleus activity.

Authors:  Marine Megemont; Jim McBurney-Lin; Hongdian Yang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Locus coeruleus spiking differently correlates with S1 cortex activity and pupil diameter in a tactile detection task.

Authors:  Hongdian Yang; Bilal A Bari; Jeremiah Y Cohen; Daniel H O'Connor
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Silence, Solitude, and Serotonin: Neural Mechanisms Linking Hearing Loss and Social Isolation.

Authors:  Sarah M Keesom; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-06-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.