Literature DB >> 32445361

Volumetric Microsampling of Capillary Blood Spot vs Whole Blood Sampling for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporin A: Accuracy and Patient Satisfaction.

Michael M Mbughuni1, Maria A Stevens2, Loralie J Langman1, Yogish C Kudva1, William Sanchez3, Patrick G Dean4, Paul J Jannetto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressant therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) usually requires outpatient travel to hospitals or phlebotomy sites for venous blood collection; however Mitra® Microsampling Device (MSD) sampling could allow self-collection and shipping of samples to a laboratory for analysis. This study examined the feasibility of using volumetric microsampling by MSD for TDM of tacrolimus (TaC) and cyclosporin A (CsA) in transplant patients, along with their feedback on the process.
METHODS: MSD was used to collect TaC and CsA from venous (VB) or capillary (CB) blood. The MSDs were rehydrated, extracted, and analyzed using on-line solid phase extraction coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-MS/MS). We report an abbreviated method validation of the MSD including: accuracy, precision, linearity, carry-over, and stability using residual venous whole blood (VB) samples. Subsequent clinical validation compared serially collected MSD + CB against VB (200 µL) from transplant patients.
RESULTS: Accuracy comparing VB vs. MSD+VB showed high clinical concordance (TaC = 89% and CsA = 98%). Inter- and intra-precision was ≤11.5 %CV for TaC and CsA. Samples were stable for up to 7 days at room temperature with an average difference of <10%. Clinical validation with MSD+CB correlated well with VB for CsA (slope = 0.95, r2 = 0.88, n = 47) and TaC (slope = 0.98, r2 = 0.82, n = 49). CB vs. VB gave concordance of 94% for CsA and 79% for TaC. A satisfaction survey showed 82% of patients preferred having the capillary collection option.
CONCLUSION: Transplant patients favored having the ability to collect capillary samples at home for TaC/CsA monitoring. Our results demonstrate good concordance between MSD+CB and VB for TaC and CsA TDM, but additional studies are warranted. © American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LC-MS/MS; Mitra®; Neoteryx®; SPE-MS/MS; cyclosporine; dried blood spot; microsampling; patient satisfaction; tacrolimus; therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32445361     DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Lab Med        ISSN: 2475-7241


  4 in total

1.  Clinical validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors in dried matrix on paper discs.

Authors:  Ignacio Guillermo Bressán; María Isabel Giménez; Susana Francisca Llesuy
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab       Date:  2022-06-04

2.  Promising Tools to Facilitate the Implementation of TDM of Biologics in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Rani Soenen; Christophe Stove; Alessio Capobianco; Hanne De Schutter; Marie Dobbelaere; Tahmina Mahjor; Merel Follens; Jo Lambert; Lynda Grine
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Validation of a Capillary Dry Blood Sample MITRA-Based Assay for the Quantitative Determination of Systemic Tacrolimus Concentrations in Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Nasrullah Undre; Ian Dawson; Varuna Aluvihare; Nassim Kamar; Faouzi Saliba; Nicholas Torpey; Swapneel Anaokar; Gbenga Kazeem; Imran Hussain
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Quantitation of Tacrolimus in Human Whole Blood Samples Using the MITRA Microsampling Device.

Authors:  Nasrullah Undre; Imran Hussain; John Meijer; Johannes Stanta; Gordon Swan; Ian Dawson
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.681

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.