Literature DB >> 32443040

Viscosity of Commercial Food-based Formulas and Home-prepared Blenderized Feeds.

Bridget Hron1, Rachel Rosen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to quantify the differences in viscosity of over a range of commercial food-based formulas and home-prepared blenderized feeds used for enteral feeding in the clinical management of gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux-related aspiration in children with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
METHODS: The viscosity of commercial and home blends was measured using digital rotational viscometer and International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative Syringe Flow Test. Additional testing was performed to determine the impact of added cereal, water flushes, and freezing/thawing on formula viscosity.
RESULTS: There were significant variations in viscosity between commercial blends with values ranging from extremely to mildly thick by Syringe Flow Test. The highest centipoise (cP) value was 13,847 and the lowest 330 and 438 cP. Dilution of 240 mL of commercial blend with 30, 60, and 90 mL of water resulted in a decrease in viscosity of 31%, 62%, and 85%, respectively. Exposure to 1 freeze/thaw cycle decreased viscosity by as much as 59% to 80% depending on the blend. Thickening conventional pediatric formulas with rice or oatmeal did not achieve consistency equivalent to most blenderized feeds.
CONCLUSIONS: Commercial food-based formulas and home prepared blends vary greatly in viscosity, ranging from thin to extremely thick liquids, with the majority achieving viscosity greater than thickened formula. Viscosity is reduced by addition of free water and with freezing and thawing. These data can inform the clinical choice of feeding regimen depending on the goals of nutritional therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32443040      PMCID: PMC8530412          DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  11 in total

1.  Nutritional analysis of blenderized enteral diets in the Philippines.

Authors:  Mary M Sullivan; Pearl Sorreda-Esguerra; Maria Bernadette Platon; Cynthia G Castro; Nancy R Chou; Susan Shott; Gail M Comer; Pedro Alarcon
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.662

2.  Inhibition of gastroesophageal reflux by semi-solid nutrients in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Shinji Nishiwaki; Hiroshi Araki; Yohei Shirakami; Junji Kawaguchi; Naofumi Kawade; Masahide Iwashita; Atsushi Tagami; Hiroo Hatakeyama; Takao Hayashi; Teruo Maeda; Koushirou Saitoh
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Factors Influencing the Freeze-Thaw Stability of Emulsion-Based Foods.

Authors:  Brian M Degner; Cheryl Chung; Vicki Schlegel; Robert Hutkins; David Julian McClements
Journal:  Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.811

4.  Through Thick and Thin: The In Vitro Effects of Thickeners on Infant Feed Viscosity.

Authors:  Jenny K Koo; Averyl Narvasa; Lars Bode; Jae H Kim
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.839

5.  Use of Blenderized Tube Feeding in Adult and Pediatric Home Enteral Nutrition Patients.

Authors:  Lisa Epp; Lisa Lammert; Nishanth Vallumsetla; Ryan T Hurt; Manpreet S Mundi
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.080

6.  Health Outcomes and Quality of Life Indices of Children Receiving Blenderized Feeds via Enteral Tube.

Authors:  Bridget Hron; Eliza Fishman; Margot Lurie; Tracie Clarke; Zoe Chin; Lisa Hester; Elizabeth Burch; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Pureed by gastrostomy tube diet improves gagging and retching in children with fundoplication.

Authors:  Scott Pentiuk; Therese O'Flaherty; Kathleen Santoro; Paul Willging; Ajay Kaul
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Deconstructing Pediatric Blenderized Tube Feeding: Getting Started and Problem Solving Common Concerns.

Authors:  Stacey Zettle
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 3.080

9.  Prevention of late complications by half-solid enteral nutrients in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding.

Authors:  Jiro Kanie; Yusuke Suzuki; Hiroyasu Akatsu; Masafumi Kuzuya; Akihisa Iguchi
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.140

10.  Efficacy of half-solid nutrient for the elderly patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Toshitsugu Shizuku; Kyoichi Adachi; Kenji Furuta; Misa Niigaki; Yuko Miyaoka; Setsushi Katoh; Kyoko Kobayashi; Mitsuru Otani; Kohsaku Kawashima; Jun Otani; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.114

View more
  3 in total

1.  Blenderized enteral nutrition in pediatric short gut syndrome: Tolerance and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Wenjing Zong; Renee Troutt; Jamie Merves
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.204

2.  Effect of Added Free Water to Enteral Tube Feeds in Children Receiving Commercial Blends.

Authors:  Suzanna Hirsch; Toni Solari; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 3.  Nutrition and preparation of blenderized tube feeding in children and adolescents with neurological impairment: A scoping review.

Authors:  Ghita Brekke; Anne Mette Terp Raun; Sarah B Sørensen; Karin Kok; Jette L Sørensen; Alfred P Born; Christian Mølgaard; Christina E Hoei-Hansen
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.204

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.