Literature DB >> 15563445

Nutritional analysis of blenderized enteral diets in the Philippines.

Mary M Sullivan1, Pearl Sorreda-Esguerra, Maria Bernadette Platon, Cynthia G Castro, Nancy R Chou, Susan Shott, Gail M Comer, Pedro Alarcon.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the nutritional quality and viscosity of blenderized enteral tube feedings (BTFs) from four hospitals in the Philippines. Samples of two different BTFs (one standard and one modified) were collected from each hospital on three separate occasions and analyzed for macronutrients, micronutrients, and viscosity. There was considerable variation among the BTFs for the concentrations of most nutrients measured. For standard BTF samples, the caloric density ranged from 66-123 kcal/100g and the percentages of total weight for protein, carbohydrate, and fat ranged from 1.5-4.0%, 8.6-21.4%, and 0.27-3.40%, respectively. Levels of specific vitamins were undetectable in 10 standard and 15 modified BTF samples. In samples where vitamin levels were detectable, results were: vitamin A, 625-8850 IU/kg; riboflavin, 0.40-5.00 mg/kg; and pyridoxine, 0.14-3.00 mg/kg. Mineral concentrations also varied greatly (eg calcium, 64-524 mg/kg; sodium, 148-886 mg/kg; iron, 3.0-13.7 mg/kg; and zinc, 1.8- 11.5 mg/kg). Correlation coefficients were statistically significant only for carbohydrate (r = 0.48, P = 0.017). Measured values tended to be lower than expected values for all nutrients, although the difference was statistically significant only for calories (P = 0.023). The viscosity of BTF samples ranged from 2.3-45,060 centipoise, excluding three samples that were too viscous for analysis. This study demonstrates that hospital prepared blenderized enteral tube feedings render unpredictable levels of micronutrients and macronutrients and appear likely to deliver less than the desired amounts of nutrients. Additionally, the viscosity of these feedings may be unsuitable for infusion through feeding tubes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15563445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0964-7058            Impact factor:   1.662


  10 in total

1.  Making Nutrition Management Scientific, Objective and Simple with the Help of Technology.

Authors:  Sanjith Saseedharan; Edwin Joseph Pathrose
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

2.  Health Outcomes and Quality of Life Indices of Children Receiving Blenderized Feeds via Enteral Tube.

Authors:  Bridget Hron; Eliza Fishman; Margot Lurie; Tracie Clarke; Zoe Chin; Lisa Hester; Elizabeth Burch; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Viscosity of Commercial Food-based Formulas and Home-prepared Blenderized Feeds.

Authors:  Bridget Hron; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  Effect of Added Free Water to Enteral Tube Feeds in Children Receiving Commercial Blends.

Authors:  Suzanna Hirsch; Toni Solari; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Nutrition of Patients with Severe Neurologic Impairment.

Authors:  Anija Orel; Matjaz Homan; Rok Blagus; Evgen Benedik; Rok Orel; Natasa Fidler Mis
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Comparison of Energy and Nutrient Contents of Commercial and Noncommercial Enteral Nutrition Solutions.

Authors:  Nahid Ramezani Jolfaie; Mohammad Hossein Rouhani; Maryam Mirlohi; Mina Babashahi; Saeid Abbasi; Peiman Adibi; Ahmad Esmaillzadeh; Leila Azadbakht
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2017-10-16

7.  An Evaluation of the Nutritional Value and Physical Properties of Blenderised Enteral Nutrition Formula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omorogieva Ojo; Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye; Osarhumwese Osaretin Ojo; Xiaohua Wang; Joanne Brooke
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  The parental experience and perceptions of blenderized tube feeding for children with medical complexity.

Authors:  Joanna Soscia; Sherri Adams; Eyal Cohen; Clara Moore; Jeremy N Friedman; Kelsey Gallagher; Margaret Marcon; David Nicholas; Natalie Weiser; Julia Orkin
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  Blenderised Tube Feeds vs. Commercial Formula: Which Is Better for Gastrostomy-Fed Children?

Authors:  Neha Chandrasekar; Kate Dehlsen; Steven T Leach; Usha Krishnan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 10.  Nutrition and preparation of blenderized tube feeding in children and adolescents with neurological impairment: A scoping review.

Authors:  Ghita Brekke; Anne Mette Terp Raun; Sarah B Sørensen; Karin Kok; Jette L Sørensen; Alfred P Born; Christian Mølgaard; Christina E Hoei-Hansen
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.204

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.