Pedro R Genta1, Fabiola Schorr1, Bradley A Edwards2,3, Andrew Wellman4, Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho1. 1. Laboratorio do Sono, LIM 63, Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2. Sleep and Circadian Medicine Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Although obstructive sleep apnea results from the combination of different pathophysiologic mechanisms, the degree of anatomical compromise remains the main responsible factor. The passive pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit) is a technique used to assess the collapsibility of the upper airway and is often used as a surrogate measure of this anatomical compromise. Patients with a low Pcrit (ie, less collapsible airway) are potential candidates for non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies. However, Pcrit determination is a technically complex method not available in clinical practice. We hypothesized that the discrimination between low and high Pcrit can be estimated from simple anthropometric and polysomnographic indices. METHODS: Men with and without obstructive sleep apnea underwent Pcrit determination and full polysomnography. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to select the best cutoff of each variable to predict a high Pcrit (Pcrit ≥ 2.5 cmH₂O). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to create a clinical score to predict a high Pcrit. RESULTS: We studied 81 men, 48 ± 13 years of age, with an apnea-hypopnea index of 32 [14-60], range 1-96 events/h), and Pcrit of -0.7 ± 3.1 (range, -9.1 to +7.2 cmH₂O). A high and low Pcrit could be accurately identified by polysomnographic and anthropometric indices. A score to discriminate Pcrit showed good performance (area under the curve = 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.00) and included waist circumference, non-rapid eye movement obstructive apnea index/apnea-hypopnea index, mean obstructive apnea duration, and rapid eye movement apnea-hypopnea index. CONCLUSIONS: A low Pcrit (less collapsible) can be estimated from a simple clinical score. This approach may identify candidates more likely to respond to non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Although obstructive sleep apnea results from the combination of different pathophysiologic mechanisms, the degree of anatomical compromise remains the main responsible factor. The passive pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit) is a technique used to assess the collapsibility of the upper airway and is often used as a surrogate measure of this anatomical compromise. Patients with a low Pcrit (ie, less collapsible airway) are potential candidates for non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies. However, Pcrit determination is a technically complex method not available in clinical practice. We hypothesized that the discrimination between low and high Pcrit can be estimated from simple anthropometric and polysomnographic indices. METHODS: Men with and without obstructive sleep apnea underwent Pcrit determination and full polysomnography. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to select the best cutoff of each variable to predict a high Pcrit (Pcrit ≥ 2.5 cmH₂O). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to create a clinical score to predict a high Pcrit. RESULTS: We studied 81 men, 48 ± 13 years of age, with an apnea-hypopnea index of 32 [14-60], range 1-96 events/h), and Pcrit of -0.7 ± 3.1 (range, -9.1 to +7.2 cmH₂O). A high and low Pcrit could be accurately identified by polysomnographic and anthropometric indices. A score to discriminate Pcrit showed good performance (area under the curve = 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.00) and included waist circumference, non-rapid eye movement obstructive apnea index/apnea-hypopnea index, mean obstructive apnea duration, and rapid eye movement apnea-hypopnea index. CONCLUSIONS: A low Pcrit (less collapsible) can be estimated from a simple clinical score. This approach may identify candidates more likely to respond to non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.
Authors: Bradley A Edwards; Scott A Sands; Robert L Owens; Danny J Eckert; Shane Landry; David P White; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Bradley A Edwards; Scott A Sands; Danny J Eckert; David P White; James P Butler; Robert L Owens; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: J Physiol Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Craig L Phillips; Ronald R Grunstein; M Ali Darendeliler; Anastasia S Mihailidou; Vasantha K Srinivasan; Brendon J Yee; Guy B Marks; Peter A Cistulli Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Danny J Eckert; David P White; Amy S Jordan; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Melania Marques; Pedro R Genta; Ali Azarbarzin; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Ludovico Messineo; Lauren B Hess; Gail Demko; David P White; Scott A Sands; Andrew Wellman Journal: J Physiol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Kate Sutherland; Olivier M Vanderveken; Hiroko Tsuda; Marie Marklund; Frederic Gagnadoux; Clete A Kushida; Peter A Cistulli Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Daniel Vena; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Ali Azarbarzin; Sara Op de Beeck; Melania Marques; Olivier M Vanderveken; Bradley A Edwards; Laura Gell; Nicole Calianese; Lauren B Hess; Reza Radmand; Garun S Hamilton; Simon A Joosten; Johan Verbraecken; Marc Braem; David P White; Susan Redline; Scott A Sands; Andrew Wellman Journal: Sleep Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 6.313