| Literature DB >> 32439336 |
Albert Kwok1, Ilona Zvetkova1, Sam Virtue1, Ineke Luijten2, Isabel Huang-Doran1, Patsy Tomlinson1, David A Bulger1, James West3, Steven Murfitt3, Julian Griffin4, Rafeah Alam5, Daniel Hart1, Rachel Knox1, Peter Voshol6, Antonio Vidal-Puig1, Jørgen Jensen7, Stephen O'Rahilly1, Robert K Semple8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Insulin signalling via phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) requires PIK3R1-encoded regulatory subunits. C-terminal PIK3R1 mutations cause SHORT syndrome, as well as lipodystrophy and insulin resistance (IR), surprisingly without fatty liver or metabolic dyslipidaemia. We sought to investigate this discordance.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Insulin resistance; Lipids; Lipotoxicity; PI 3-Kinase; Pik3r1; p85
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32439336 PMCID: PMC7385515 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Metab ISSN: 2212-8778 Impact factor: 7.422
Figure 1Effect of (A) Representative image of Pik3r1 (WT/WT) and Pik3r1 (WT/Y657∗) mice at 18 weeks old. (B) Body lengths (nose to anus) at 18 weeks of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice (n = 11 and 18 respectively). (C) Bodyweight increase from 8 to 16 weeks of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 (n = 16 and 12 respectively). (D) The relationship between lean and fat mass of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice (n = 16 and 12 respectively). Masses of (E) inguinal adipose tissue (IngWAT) (F) Epididymal adipose tissue (eWAT), (G) Brown adipose tissue (BAT), (H) Liver, and (I) Heart of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice (n = 11 and 7 respectively). (J) Food intake (n = 13 for Pik3r1 and n = 14 for Pik3r1), (K) Energy expenditure and (L) Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (n = 7 for Pik3r1 and n = 13 for Pik3r1) of wild-type and heterozygous mice assessed at 18 weeks old. All data shown are from male mice. Masses and energy expenditure are shown relative to total lean mass, and were analysed statistically by ANCOVA. ∗ = p < 0.05; ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ = p < 0.0001. Mean ± SD are shown for plots in (B), (C) and (L).
Figure 2Response of (A) Bodyweight increase from 8 to 16 weeks of Pik3r1 (WT/WT) and Pik3r1 (WT/Y657∗) (n = 16 and 12 respectively). (B) The relationship between lean and fat mass of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice (n = 16 and 12 respectively). Masses of (C) Epididymal adipose tissue (eWAT), (D) Inguinal adipose tissue (IngWAT), (E) Brown adipose tissue (BAT), (F) Liver, and (G) Heart of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice (n = 12 for both genotypes). (H) Representative histological appearance of haematoxylin and eosin-stained eWAT from Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice. Scale bars = 100 μm (I) Adipocyte size distribution in eWAT based on quantification of >1000 cells per genotype from 4 wild-type and 4 heterozygous mice. The inset shows a zoomed-in view of the percentage of cells smaller than 10 000 μm2. (J) Representative images of ex vivo differentiated stromal vascular cells from ingWAT stained with Oil Red O. (K) Percentage of CD4+ and regulatory T cells in the eWAT (n = 3 for Pik3r1 and n = 3 for Pik3r1). (L) Food intake (n = 13 for Pik3r1 and n = 14 for Pik3r1) and (M) Energy expenditure (n = 17 for Pik3r1 and n = 10 for Pik3r1) of wild-type and heterozygous mice assessed at 18 weeks old. All masses and energy expenditure are shown relative to total lean mass, and were analysed statistically by ANCOVA. (N) Locomotor activity of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice (n = 17 and n = 10 respectively). (O) Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (n = 17 for Pik3r1 and n = 10 for Pik3r1) of wild-type and heterozygous mice assessed at 18 weeks old. All data shown are from male mice. Mean ± SD are shown. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Fasting plasma biochemical profile of male Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice. See also Supplemental Table S1 for fasting biochemical profile for chow-fed female mice. N.D. = not determined. Statistical comparisons were undertaken using Student's t-test.
| Chow | 45% Fat diet | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting | Fed | Fasting | Fed | |||||||||
| Pik3r1WT/WT ( | ||||||||||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 10.2 ± 1.1 | 9.0 ± 1.1 | 0.43 | 12.5 ± 0.7 | 13.2 ± 0.5 | 0.48 | 9.7 ± 0.8 | 7.9 ± 0.5 | 0.06 | |||
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 469 ± 77 | 693 ± 102 | 0.09 | 424 ± 73 | 1313 ± 494 | 0.104 | ||||||
| Adiponectin (mg/L) | 33.2 ± 1.5 | 35.6 ± 1.0 | 0.2 | 37.0 ± 1.1 | 40.6 ± 1.5 | 0.07 | 40.3 ± 2.2 | 42.8 ± 1.1 | 0.3 | |||
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | ||||||||||||
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | ||||||||||||
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 0.15 | |||||||||
| NEFA (mmol/L) | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 0.3 | |||||||||
| VLDL (mg/mL) | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 7.9 ± 0.3 | 7.4 ± 1.2 | 0.25 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 11.9 ± 0.8 | 0.13 |
Figure 3(A) Glucose infusion rates during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamping of Pik3r1 (WT/WT) and Pik3r1 (WT/Y657∗) mice on chow (n = 4 and 4) or 45% fat diet (n = 10 and 11) at 16 weeks old. (B) Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and corresponding comparison of areas under the curves (AUC) of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice on chow at 12 weeks old (n = 10 and 9). (C) Insulin concentrations and AUC for the same OGTT as in (B). (D) Insulin tolerance test and AUC comparison for the same mice 1 week later. (E) Glucose disposal and (F) suppression of hepatic glucose output by insulin during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamping of Pik3r1 and Pik3r1 mice on chow at 18 weeks old (both n = 4). (G) Glycogen content of livers during a fasting–refeeding cycle in chow fed animals at 16 weeks old (both n = 6). (H) Plasma non-esterified free fatty acid concentrations during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamping (both genotypes n = 4). (I)–(L) Representative images of immunoblots and corresponding quantifications of tissue lysates from mice injected intraperitoneally with 2 U/kg insulin 10 min prior to sacrifice, showing pAktSer473, total Akt and their ratio: (I) Liver, (J) Skeletal muscle (K) eWAT, (L) ingWAT (n = 6 per genotype and condition). (M) Insulin-induced fold increase of glucose uptake into ex vivo incubated soleus (n = 18 for Pik3r1, n = 11 for Pik3r1) and Extensor Digitorum Longus (EDL) (n = 20 and 11). (N) Representative immunoblots of Soleus and EDL lysates from the same paradigm as in (M). (O) Quantification of pAktSer473 to total Akt ratios from soleus and EDL immunoblots (n = 5 and 4 for both). Data are from male mice. Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SD. ∗ = p < 0.05, ∗∗ = p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗ = p < 0.0001.
Figure 4Lipid handling and liver phenotype of (A) Representative images of Oil-Red-O-stained livers of chow-fed and 45% fat diet-fed Pik3r1 (WT/WT) and Pik3r1 (WT/Y657∗) mice. Scale bars = 200 μm. (B) Hepatic triglyceride and (C) Hepatic total cholesterol concentration during a fasting refeeding cycle of chow fed mice at 16 weeks old (n = 6 per genotype). (D) Lipid tolerance testing and comparison of areas under the curve (AUC), also of chow-fed mice, at 16 weeks old. Triglyceride concentrations were equalised at baseline by matching the difference between genotypes with the lower values of heterozygous mice, and the same fixed correction was applied to all points on the graph (n = 11 and n = 17 for wild-type and heterozygous mice respectively). (E) Faecal energy content determined by bomb calorimetry of chow fed mice at 16 weeks old (n = 8 and 8). (F) De novo palmitate measured by stable deuterium enrichment (n = 7 and n = 10 for wild-type and heterozygous mice respectively). (G)–(M) Liver mRNA expression, determined by quantitative real time PCR of (G) Srebp1 and its transcriptional targets (H) Acc1, (I) Fasn, and (J) Scd1, and of (K) Srebp2 and its transcriptional targets (L) Mvk and (M) Nsdhl in chow fed mice during a fasting refeeding cycle at 16 weeks old (n = 6 per genotype per condition). All data shown are from male mice. Numerical data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 5Pathway analysis of liver transcriptomes of fed and fasted mice. Volcano plots are shown for predicted upstream regulators derived from Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis (IPA®) of transcriptomes of fed and fasted male Pik3r1 (n = 6,6) mice and wild-type littermates (n = 6,6). Outside plots show regulators showing differential activity in the fasting state compared to the fed state for wild-type (WT; left) and Pik3r1 (right) mice. Central plots show regulators with differential activity in Pik3r1 vs WT mice in the fed state (top) and fasting state (bottom). The green dots represent data point with an activation z score <−2 or >+2 and a p-value <1 × 10−5. Regulators showing differential activity in either genotype-based comparison are coloured red (activation z score > +2 in Pik3r1 vs WT mice) or blue (activation z score < −2 in Pik3r1 vs WT mice) in the outside plots showing differences based on nutritional state. Statistical analysis was performed using a general linear model with Bonferroni correction.