| Literature DB >> 32438866 |
Ke Zhou1,2,3, Shao-Chun Chen1,2, Fan Yang3, Stijn van der Veen3,4,5, Yue-Ping Yin1,2.
Abstract
Global dissemination of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae ceftriaxone-resistant FC428 clone jeopardizes the currently recommended ceftriaxone-based first-line therapies. Ceftriaxone resistance in the FC428 clone has been associated with the presence of its mosaic penA allele 60.001. Here we investigated the contribution penA allele 60.001 to ceftriaxone resistance and its impact on biological fitness. Gonococcal isolates expressing penA allele 60.001 and mosaic penA allele 10.001, which is widespread in the Asia-Pacific region and associated with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone and cefixime, were genetic engineered to exchange their penA alleles. Subsequent antimicrobial susceptibility analyses showed that mutants containing penA 60.001 displayed 8- to 16-fold higher ceftriaxone and cefixime minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) compared with otherwise isogenic mutants containing penA 10.001. Further analysis of biological fitness showed that in vitro liquid growth of single strains and in the competition was identical between the isogenic penA allele exchange mutants. However, in the presence of high concentrations of palmitic acid or lithocholic acid, the penA 60.001-containing mutants grew better than the isogenic penA 10.001-containing mutants when grown as single strains. In contrast, the penA 10.001 mutants outcompeted the penA 60.001 mutants when grown in competition at slightly lower palmitic acid or lithocholic acid concentrations. Finally, the penA 60.001 mutants were outcompeted by their penA 10.001 counterparts for in vivo colonization and survival in a mouse vaginal tract infection model. In conclusion, penA allele 60.001 is essential for ceftriaxone resistance of the FC428 clone, while its impact on biological fitness is dependent on the specific growth conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Neisseria gonorrhoeae ; penA 60.001; FC428; biological fitness; ceftriaxone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32438866 PMCID: PMC7448936 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1773325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Ceftriaxone and cefixime susceptibility of gonococcal wild-type strains and penA allele exchange mutants.
| Strain | MIC (mg/L) | |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftriaxone | Cefixime | |
| ATCC49226 | 0.016 | 0.03 |
| SZ20 | 0.5 | 2 |
| SZ20- | 0.5 | 2 |
| SZ20- | 0.03 | 0.25 |
| SRRSH78 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
| SRRSH78- | 0.06 | 0.25 |
| SRRSH78- | 0.5 | 2 |
Figure 1.In vitro growth curves of the gonococcal penA60/penA10 allele exchange mutants in liquid culture. (A) Growth of single-strain SZ20 penA mutants (SZ20-penA60 and SZ20-penA10) determined by absorbance measurements (OD600) in liquid culture. (B) Growth of single-strain SRRSH78 penA mutants (SRRSH78-penA60 and SRRSH78-penA10) determined by absorbance measurements (OD600) in liquid culture. (C) Growth of strains SZ20-penA60-catA2 and SZ20-penA10-kanR in competition in liquid culture determined by CFU counts on selective agar plates. (D) Growth of strains SRRSH78-penA60-catA2 and SRRSH78-penA10-kanR in competition in liquid culture determined by CFU counts on selective agar plates. (E) Growth of strains SZ20-penA60-kanR and SZ20-penA10-catA2 in competition in liquid culture determined by CFU counts on selective agar plates. (F) Growth of strains SRRSH78-penA60-kanR and SRRSH78-penA10-catA2 in competition in liquid culture determined by CFU counts on selective agar plates. The graphs represent the average and standard deviation of three biological independent experiments.
Figure 2.In vitro growth of the gonococcal penA60/penA10 allele exchange mutants in the presence of palmitic acid and lithocholic acid. (A) Growth curves determined by OD600 measurements of SZ20-penA60 and SZ20-penA10 in the presence of 2 mg/L palmitic acid. (B) Growth curves determined by OD600 measurements of SRRSH78-penA60 and SRRSH78-penA10 in the presence of 4 mg/L palmitic acid. (C) Growing fraction of the penA mutants on agar plates containing 12 mg/L (SZ20 derivatives) or 160 mg/L (SRRSH78 derivatives) palmitic acid relative to growth on control agar plates. (D) Growth curves determined by OD600 measurements of SZ20-penA60 and SZ20-penA10 in the presence of 10 mg/L lithocholic acid. (E) Growth curves determined by OD600 measurements of SRRSH78-penA60 and SRRSH78-penA10 in the presence of 85 mg/L lithocholic acid. (F) Growing fraction of the penA mutants on agar plates containing 10 mg/L (SZ20 derivatives) or 70 mg/L (SRRSH78 derivatives) palmitic acid relative to growth on control agar plates. The graphs represent the average and standard deviation of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences between the penA60/penA10 mutants at corresponding time-points were identified by Student’s two-tailed unpaired t-test (GraphPad Prism). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 3.In vitro competition assays of the gonococcal penA60/penA10 allele exchange mutants in the presence of palmitic acid. (A) Growth of strains SZ20-penA60-catA2 and SZ20-penA10-kanR in competition in liquid culture containing 1.25 mg/L palmitic acid. (B) Growth of strains SRRSH78-penA60-catA2 and SRRSH78-penA10-kanR in competition in liquid culture containing 1.5 mg/L palmitic acid. (C) Growth of strains SZ20-penA60-kanR and SZ20-penA10-catA2 in competition in liquid culture containing 1.25 mg/L palmitic acid. (D) Growth of strains SRRSH78-penA60-kanR and SRRSH78-penA10-catA2 in competition in liquid culture containing 1.5 mg/L palmitic acid. Competitive growth was determined by CFU counts on selective agar plates. The graphs represent the average and standard deviation of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences between the penA60/penA10 mutants at corresponding time-points were identified by Student’s two-tailed unpaired t-test (GraphPad Prism). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 4.In vitro competition assays of the gonococcal penA60/penA10 allele exchange mutants in the presence of lithocholic acid. (A) Growth of strains SZ20-penA60-catA2 and SZ20-penA10-kanR in competition in liquid culture containing 5 mg/L lithocholic acid. (B) Growth of strains SRRSH78-penA60-catA2 and SRRSH78-penA10-kanR in competition in liquid culture containing 60 mg/L lithocholic acid. (C) Growth of strains SZ20-penA60-kanR and SZ20-penA10-catA2 in competition in liquid culture containing 5 mg/L lithocholic acid. (D) Growth of strains SRRSH78-penA60-kanR and SRRSH78-penA10-catA2 in competition in liquid culture containing 60 mg/L lithocholic acid. Competitive growth was determined by CFU counts on selective agar plates. The graphs represent the average and standard deviation of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences between the penA60/penA10 mutants at corresponding time-points were identified by Student’s two-tailed unpaired t-test (GraphPad Prism). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 5.In vivo competition assays of the gonococcal penA60/penA10 allele exchange mutants in a mouse vaginal tract infection model. (A) Recovery of SZ20-penA60-catA2 and SZ20-penA10-kanR CFUs from the mouse vaginal tract after competitive colonization. (B) Competition indices (CIs) between SZ20-penA60-catA2 and SZ20-penA10-kanR based on recovered CFU counts from the mouse vaginal tract. (C) Recovery of SRRSH78-penA60-catA2 and SRRSH78-penA10-kanR CFUs from the mouse vaginal tract after competitive colonization. (D) CIs between SRRSH78-penA60-catA2 and SRRSH78-penA10-kanR based on recovered CFU counts from the mouse vaginal tract. The CIs were calculated as (penA10/penA60)output/(penA10/penA60)input. Significant differences in recovered CFUs between penA60/penA10 mutants and between CIs calculated for the in vivo mouse vaginal tract infection model and in vitro growth in liquid culture at corresponding time-points were identified by Student’s two-tailed unpaired t-test (GraphPad Prism). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.