Literature DB >> 32437276

Perceived Access to Abortion Among Women in the United States in 2018: Variation by State Abortion Policy Context.

Krista M Perreira1, Emily M Johnston1, Adele Shartzer1, Sophia Yin1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To describe perceptions of access to abortion among women of reproductive age and their associations with state abortion policy contexts.Methods. We used data from the 2018 Survey of Family Planning and Women's Lives, a probability-based sample of 2115 adult women aged 18 to 44 years in US households.Results. We found that 27.6% of women (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.3%, 32.7%) believed that access to medical abortion was difficult and 30.1% of women (95% CI = 25.6%, 35.1%) believed that access to surgical abortion was difficult. Adjusted for covariates, women were significantly more likely to perceive access to both surgical and medical abortions as difficult when they lived in states with 4 or more restrictive abortion policies compared with states with fewer restrictions (surgical adjusted odds ratio [AORsurgical] = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.15, 2.21; AORmedical = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.95). Specific restrictive abortion policies (e.g., public funding restrictions, mandatory counseling or waiting periods, and targeted regulation of abortion providers) were also associated with greater perceived difficulty accessing both surgical and medical abortions.Conclusions. State policies restricting abortion access are associated with perceptions of reduced access to both medical and surgical abortions among women of reproductive age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32437276      PMCID: PMC7287558          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   11.561


  18 in total

1.  The efficacy of medical abortion: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J G Kahn; B J Becker; L MacIsaa; J K Amory; J Neuhaus; I Olkin; M D Creinin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  "Medical" and "surgical" abortion: rethinking the modifiers.

Authors:  T A Weitz; A Foster; C Ellertson; D Grossman; F H Stewart
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Medical Compared With Surgical Abortion for Effective Pregnancy Termination in the First Trimester.

Authors:  Luu Doan Ireland; Mary Gatter; Angela Y Chen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The Implications of Unintended Pregnancies for Mental Health in Later Life.

Authors:  Pamela Herd; Jenny Higgins; Kamil Sicinski; Irina Merkurieva
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Jenna Jerman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-02-03

6.  A framework for the study of access to medical care.

Authors:  L A Aday; R Andersen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008?

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Jenna Jerman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas.

Authors:  Liza Fuentes; Sharon Lebenkoff; Kari White; Caitlin Gerdts; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  "I wouldn't even know where to start": unwanted pregnancy and abortion decision-making in Central Appalachia.

Authors:  Jenny O'Donnell; Alisa Goldberg; Ellice Lieberman; Theresa Betancourt
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2018-12

10.  What are people looking for when they Google "self-abortion"?

Authors:  Jenna Jerman; Tsuyoshi Onda; Rachel K Jones
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quality of top webpages providing abortion pill information for Google searches in the USA: An evidence-based webpage quality assessment.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pleasants; Sylvia Guendelman; Karen Weidert; Ndola Prata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.