Literature DB >> 33476340

Quality of top webpages providing abortion pill information for Google searches in the USA: An evidence-based webpage quality assessment.

Elizabeth Pleasants1,2, Sylvia Guendelman1,2, Karen Weidert2,3, Ndola Prata2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the internet is widely used to seek health information. Despite an estimated 18 million Google searches on abortion per year and the demonstrated importance of the abortion pill as an option for pregnancy termination, the top webpage search results for abortion pill searches, as well as the content and quality of those webpages, are not well understood.
METHODS: We used Google's Custom Search Application Programming Interface (API) to identify the top 10 webpages presented for "abortion pill" searches on August 06, 2018. We developed a comprehensive, evidence-based Family Planning Webpage Quality Assessment Tool (FPWQAT), which was used to assess webpage quality for the five top webpages presenting text-based educational content.
RESULTS: Of the top webpages for "abortion pill" searches, a plannedparenthood.com page was the top result and scored highest on our assessment (81%), providing high-quality and useable information. The other four webpages, a Wikipedia.com page and three anti-abortion information webpages, scored much lower on our assessment (14%-43%). These four webpages had lower quality of information in less useable formats. The anti-abortion pages also presented a variety of disinformation about the abortion pill.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the lack of accurate clinical content on the majority of top webpages and the concerning disinformation they contained raise concerns about the quality of online abortion pill information, while underlining challenges posed by Google search results to informed choice for consumers. Healthcare providers and consumers must be informed of online abortion pill content that is not based in current clinical evidence, while advocates and policymakers should push for online information that is credible and useable. These changes are imperative given the importance of sound abortion pill information for reproductive decision-making at a time when in-person abortion services are further challenged in the US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33476340      PMCID: PMC7819599          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  28 in total

1.  Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer.

Authors:  D Tallon; J Chard; P Dieppe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Raymond; Caitlin Shannon; Mark A Weaver; Beverly Winikoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Quality of Information Available Online for Abortion Self-Referral.

Authors:  Laura E Dodge; Sharon J Phillips; Dayna T Neo; Siripanth Nippita; Maureen E Paul; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Medical management of first-trimester abortion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Health information needs of pregnant women: information sources, motives and barriers.

Authors:  Sudabeh Kamali; Leila Ahmadian; Reza Khajouei; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2017-11-13

6.  "It's not something you talk about really": information barriers encountered by women who travel long distances for abortion care.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman; Lori Frohwirth
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Medication Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine in Four U.S. States.

Authors:  Julia E Kohn; Jennifer L Snow; Hannah R Simons; Jane W Seymour; Terri-Ann Thompson; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses.

Authors:  Nora Hutchinson; Grayson L Baird; Megha Garg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Quality of online health information about oral contraceptives from Hebrew-language websites.

Authors:  Yehuda Neumark; Lior Flum; Catalina Lopez-Quintero; Ronny Shtarkshall
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2012-09-24

10.  Identifying Measures Used for Assessing Quality of YouTube Videos with Patient Health Information: A Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Elia Gabarron; Luis Fernandez-Luque; Manuel Armayones; Annie Ys Lau
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.