Literature DB >> 32437046

The influence of facial expression at perceptual threshold on electrodermal activity and social comfort distance.

Alice Cartaud1, Laurent Ott1, Tina Iachini2, Jacques Honoré1, Yann Coello1.   

Abstract

Interpersonal distance, an essential component of social interaction, is modulated by the emotion conveyed by others and associated physiological response. However, in modern societies with overcrowded and hyperstimulating environments, we can only surreptitiously glimpse the faces of others in order to quickly make behavioral adjustments. How this impacts social interactions is not yet well understood. In the present study, we investigated this issue by testing whether facial expressions that are difficult to identify modify the physiological response (Electrodermal Activity, EDA) and subsequent judgment of interpersonal comfort distance. We recorded participants' EDA while they provided comfort judgments to interpersonal distances with a Point-Light Walker (PLW). The PLW, with an emotionally neutral gait, moved toward and crossed participants at various distances after the latter were exposed to a negative (anger), positive (happiness) or neutral facial expression presented at the perceptual threshold. Bayesian analyses of the data revealed an increase versus decrease of interpersonal comfort distance with the PLW depending on the negative versus positive emotional valence of the facial expression. They also showed an increase in EDA when the approaching PLW violated interpersonal comfort distance after participants were exposed to an angry facial expression. These effects correlated with the subjective assessment of the arousal of facial expressions. Thus, previous exposure to barely visible facial expressions can alter the representation of social comfort space and the physiological response associated with a violation of interpersonal comfort distances, depending on the valence and arousal of the emotional social stimuli.
© 2020 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrodermal activity; facial expression; interpersonal space; perceptual threshold; physiological response; social interaction; visual masking

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32437046     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  3 in total

1.  Analysis of the Relationship between Employee Health Level and Building Office Space and Environment.

Authors:  Shiyu Ma
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Body-Space Interactions: Same Spatial Encoding but Different Influence of Valence for Reaching and Defensive Purposes.

Authors:  Chiara Spaccasassi; H Chris Dijkerman; Angelo Maravita; Oscar Ferrante; Maartje C de Jong
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.420

3.  The Interrelation Between Peripersonal Action Space and Interpersonal Social Space: Psychophysiological Evidence and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Yann Coello; Alice Cartaud
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.