Literature DB >> 32437016

Obesity predisposes to the risk of higher mortality in young COVID-19 patients.

Fengqin Zhang1, Ying Xiong2, Yanqiu Wei1, Yi Hu3, Feng Wang4, Gang Li5, Kui Liu1, Ronghui Du6, Cong-Yi Wang7, Wenzhen Zhu2.   

Abstract

Although emerging data demonstrated mortality of young COVID-19 patients, no data have reported the risk factors of mortality for these young patients, and whether obesity is a risk for young COVID-19 patients remains unknown. We conducted a retrospective study including 13 young patients who died of COVID-19 and 40 matched survivors. Logistic regression was employed to characterize the risk factors of mortality in young obese COVID-19 patients. Most of the young deceased COVID-19 patients were mild cases at the time of admission, but the disease progressed rapidly featured by a higher severity of patchy shadows (100.00% vs 48.70%; P = .006), pleural thickening (61.50% vs 12.80%; P = .012), and mild pericardial effusion (76.90% vs 0.00%; P < .001). Most importantly, the deceased patients manifested higher body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.354; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.075-1.704; P = .010), inflammation-related index C-reactive protein (OR = 1.014; 95% CI = 1.003-1.025; P = .014), cardiac injury biomarker hs-cTnI (OR = 1.420; 95% CI = 1.112-1.814; P = .005), and increased coagulation activity biomarker D-dimer (OR = 418.7; P = .047), as compared with that of survivors. Our data support that obesity could be a risk factor associated with high mortality in young COVID-19 patients, whereas aggravated inflammatory response, enhanced cardiac injury, and increased coagulation activity are likely to be the mechanisms contributing to the high mortality.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; cardiac damage; coagulation activity; inflammatory responses; obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32437016      PMCID: PMC7280697          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   20.693


INTRODUCTION

Since the initial outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2), approximately 2.7 million people have been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), which caused 190 000 deaths worldwide. , Earlier data suggested that aged subjects, particularly those with comorbidities, are at a higher risk of developing a severe or critical type of COVID‐19 than that of the younger subjects. In contrast, young subjects are considered to only have a mild type of COVID‐19 without hospitalized treatment that is unlikely to cause death. As such, the infected young subjects were usually subjected to more optimistic and less apprehensive treatment. The truth that we observed, however, was unfulfilling. A 33‐year‐old young obese male patient was diagnosed with COVID‐19 based on the nucleic acid assays and was then arranged by the Outbreak Control Center for hospitalized treatment in Tongji Hospital at the end of January 2020. He had stable vital signs and mild flu‐like symptoms without underlying disease on admission. Moreover, his computed tomography (CT) imaging only manifested slight ground‐glass opacity. In general, we considered this patient to be optimistic during the conversation on his first day of admission. Unexpectedly, the disease progressed so rapidly that he died of respiratory failure within a week of admission, which really surprised us remarkably. To dissect the causative factors relevant to rapid disease progression and death, our team reviewed all of his clinical records. We first noted that he was overweight. This finding brought to our attention for the first time of obesity in young COVID‐19 patients. Indeed, obesity has been suggested to increase the risk of influenza complications, such as cardiovascular disorders along with reduced natural killer cell activity, thereby leading to higher morbidity and mortality following viral infection. , , , , However, whether obesity is a risk for young COVID‐19 patients remains unknown. As the pandemic progresses, more and more young COVID‐19 patients (20 to 45 years old) were noted necessary for hospitalized treatment. Particularly, the mortality rate for young COVID‐19 patients ranged from 0.19% to 0.44% as reported in China, the United States, and Italy. To dissect the risk factors relevant to the mortality in young COVID‐19 patients, we, thus, conducted a retrospective survey of young COVID‐19 patients admitted in Tongji Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital from 7 February to 27 March 2020, which included 13 deceased patients and 40 matched survivors.

METHODS

Patients

From 7 February to 27 March 2020, Tongji Hospital received 3201 COVID‐19 patients, 285 of whom were deceased, whereas 11 of 285 deceased patients were young patients (14 to 45 years old). During the same period, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital admitted 753 COVID‐19 patients, 55 of whom were deceased, and 2 of 55 deceased patients were young patients. In this retrospective study, we included all 13 young deceased patients and 40 matched young COVID‐19 survivors. The clinical features, laboratory results, CT imaging, and management data were extracted from each patient. The COVID‐19 nucleic acid assays were conducted in Tongji Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. The study was approved by the Human Assurance Committee of Tongji Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. According to the COVID‐19 Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol, a mild case was defined as moderate clinical symptoms with the absence of typical pneumonia changes on CT scans. A severe case was defined as follows: (a) respiratory distress (RR) ≥ 30 times per minute; (b) oxygen saturation less than or equal to 93% at rest; and (c) PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa). A critical case was defined as follows: (a) respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; (b) occurrence of shock; and (c) functional failure of other organs and ICU care was required.

Data collection

Epidemiological data including patients' age, sex, body mass index (BMI), clinical symptoms, blood routine results, and CT scans were collected through the standardized data collection tables from the electronic medical records. BMI was calculated using self‐reported height and weight from the National Population Health Survey (NPHS) or Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). In general, there is a high correlation between self‐reported and measured height and weight. Overweight and obesity were calculated by BMI definition recommended by the Working Group on Obesity in China (BMI: normal weight, 18.5‐23.9; overweight, 24‐27.9; and obesity, ≥28). In case some of the data were missed from the records or specific clarification was necessary, those data were obtained by directly communicating with the attending doctors and health ­care providers.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR) for skewed distributed data or mean and standard deviation (SD) for normal distributed data. Categorical variables were expressed as number (%). For continuous variables, Student's t test was used for normal distributed data, whereas the Mann‐Whitney U nonparameter test was used for skewed distributed data. Pearson's χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test were applied for categorical variables. Unconditional logistic regression was applied to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between factors and the clinical outcomes of COVID‐19. A two‐sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (22.0) software.

RESULTS

Generally, the mortality rate of COVID‐19 patients admitted in Tongji Hospital was 8.9% (285 of 3201), whereas it was only 0.34% in young COVID‐19 patients, which accounted for 3.8% (11 of 285) of all deceased patients. The mortality rate in Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital was 7.3% (55 of 753), but only two young patients died of COVID‐19 (0.26%). Surprisingly, nine deceased young COVID‐19 patients only displayed mild type infection at the time of admission, but died within a week of admission, whereas three cases diagnosed as the severe type and one case as the critical type. Among all admitted patients, 40 young COVID‐19 survivors were statistically matched with those deceased young COVID‐19 patients at an approximate ratio of 4:1 based on age, sex, and disease severity at the time of admission. All demographic data and clinical features of these subjects are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiographic findings of patients

IndicatorsTotalAliveDead P value
Characteristics
BMIN = 4324.38 ± 4.00N = 3123.38 ± 3.02N = 1227.79 ± 5.18.036 a
N = 4323.39 (21.62‐26.34)N = 3123.18 (21.62‐24.59)N = 1229.32 (28.91‐29.40).021 b
Initial symptoms
FeverN = 5340 (81.6%)N = 4033 (82.5%)N = 1310 (76.9%).663 c
ChillN = 531 (2.0%)N = 400 (0%)N = 132 (15.4%).184 c
Dry coughN = 5313 (26.5%)N = 408 (20%)N = 138 (61.5%).043 c
ExpectorationN = 532 (4.1%)N = 400 (0%)N = 133 (23.1%).031 c
FatigueN = 532 (4.1%)N = 401 (2.5%)N = 132 (15.4%).337 c
DyspneaN = 534 (8.2%)N = 400 (0%)N = 136 (46.2%)5.94 × 10−4 c
DiarrheaN = 533 (6.1%)N = 402 (5%)N = 132 (15.4%).464 c
Muscle acheN = 532 (4.1%)N = 401 (2.5%)N = 132 (15.4%).337 c
Chest painN = 530 (0)N = 400 (0%)N = 130 (0%)1.000 c
Sore throatN = 531 (2.1%)N = 401 (2.5%)N = 130 (0%)1.000 c
VomitingN = 531 (2.0%)N = 400 (0%)N = 132 (15.4%).184 c
HeadacheN = 530 (0)N = 400 (0%)N = 130 (0%)1.000 c
DizzinessN = 530 (0)N = 400 (0%)N = 130 (0%)1.000 c
OthersN = 533 (6.1%)N = 401 (2.5%)N = 133 (23.1%).083 c
CT findingsN = 52N = 39N = 13
Ground‐glass opacity34 (65.4%)24 (61.5%)10 (76.9%).460 c
Patchy shadows32 (61.5%)19 (48.7%)13 (100%).006 c
Fibrous stripes10 (19.2%)10 (25.6%)0 (0%).172 c
Pericardial effusion10 (19.2%)0 (0%)10 (76.9%).000 c
Pleural thickening13 (25.0%)5 (12.8%)8 (61.5%).012 c
Lymphadenia13 (25.0%)3 (7.7%)10 (76.9%).000 c
Bilateral pulmonary39 (75.0%)29 (74.4%)10 (76.9%).662 c
Right lung19 (36.5%)11 (28.2%)8 (61.5%).051 c
Left lung16 (30.8%)7 (17.9%)9 (69.2%).007 c
Laboratory examination
Cytokines
IL‐6, pg/mLN = 3411.27 (2.11‐20.91)N = 279.50 (1.79‐18.09)N = 722.88 (18.90‐27.76).117 b
IL‐10, pg/mLN = 345.20 (5.00‐13.05)N = 275.00 (5.00‐7.90)N = 722.00 (14.73‐60.00).008 b
IL‐8, pg/mLN = 349.50 (6.55‐17.35)N = 279.40 (6.55‐15.85)N = 729.05 (14.35‐56.75).118 b
TNF‐α, pg/mLN = 347.70 (6.10‐10.10)N = 277.60 (5.65‐9.00)N = 723.00 (9.65‐44.23).042 b
IL‐1β, pg/mLN = 345.00 (5.00‐5.00)N = 275.00 (5.00‐5.00)N = 75.00 (5.00‐25.88).390 b
IL‐2R, U/mLN = 34536.00 (426.00‐825.00)N = 27529.00 (385.00‐754.50)N = 71729.50 (1277.25‐2181.75).078 b
Inflammatory factors
CRP, mg/LN = 5325.80 (7.23‐57.73)N = 4013.05 (4.70‐47.68)N = 1358.40 (51.45‐141.25).002 b
Organ damage index
ALT, U/LN = 5319.50 (11.00‐36.50)N = 4019.50 (11.00‐32.00)N = 1319.50 (12.50‐44.50).855 b
AST, U/LN = 5327.00 (20.00‐41.00)N = 4025.00 (20.00‐35.00)N = 1338.00 (28.75‐64.50).069 b
Urea, mmol/LN = 533.85 (2.80‐5.00)N = 403.75 (2.80‐4.50)N = 135.50 (2.75‐7.48).104 b
Estimated glomerular filtration rateN = 52114.10 (103.80‐120.00)N = 40114.80 (102.83‐118.85)N = 12112.70 (107.90‐129.50).308 b
Total cholesterol, mmol/LN = 533.51 (3.01‐4.08)N = 403.66 (3.26‐4.15)N = 132.97 (2.90‐3.34).016 b
Triglyceride, mmol/LN = 311.56 (0.95‐2.08)N = 231.42 (0.89‐1.93)N = 91.88 (1.57‐3.52).118 b
Creatinine, μmol/LN = 5362.50 (55.25‐76.00)N = 4063.00 (56.75‐77.50)N = 1361.50 (51.25‐67.50).331 b
NT‐proBNP, pg/mLN = 3541.50 (11.50‐333.50)N = 2329.00 (8.00‐47.50)N = 12639.00 (504.00‐1602.00)1.55 × 10−5 b
hs‐cTnI, pg/mLN = 382.10 (1.90‐4.45)N = 271.90 (1.90‐2.30)N = 1119.45 (12.55‐98.67)3.26 × 10−5 b
Creatine kinase, U/LN = 3378.50 (47.25‐180.25)N = 2583.00 (52.00‐181.00)N = 827.00 (19.00‐120.00).278 b
Immune globulin
Albumin, g/LN = 5336.91 ± 5.67N = 4038.63 ± 4.59N = 1330.02 ± 4.224.66 × 10−5 a
Blood routine
Lymphocytes count, per μLN = 531.11 ± 0.53N = 401.25 ± 0.49N = 130.58 ± 0.359.63 × 10−5 a
Monocytes count, ×109/LN = 530.41 (0.32‐0.53)N = 400.39 (0.31‐0.51)N = 130.51 (0.37‐0.60).403 b
Neutrophils count, ×109/LN = 532.98 (1.95‐5.58)N = 402.63 (1.98‐4.19)N = 135.58 (1.76‐5.87).291 b
Eosinophils count, ×109/LN = 530.01 (0‐0.03)N = 400.01 (0‐0.05)N = 130.022 b
N = 530.035 ± 0.092N = 400.042 ± 0.102N = 130.004 ± 0.010.024 a
Platelets count, ×109/LN = 53165.50 (138.00‐213.00)N = 40170.00 (144.75‐215.50)N = 13126 (33.50‐168.75).055 b
Coagulation
APTT, sN = 4240.21 ± 5.06N = 3240.25 ± 4.65N = 1039.99 ± 7.12.927 a
PT, sN = 5313.75 (13.20‐14.68)N = 4013.60 (13.08‐14.43)N = 1314.50 (14.15‐16.20).006 b
D‐dimer, μg/mLN = 510.47 (0.36‐1.09)N = 400.44 (0.31‐0.57)N = 112.42 (1.55‐5.59)1.89 × 10−5 b
Fibrinogen, g/LN = 424.15 ± 1.42N = 324.68 ± 1.19N = 103.77 ± 2.15.316 a

Note: Continuous variables were described as median and IQR or mean and SD. Categorical variables were described as number (%).

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C‐reactive protein; hs‐cTnI, hypersensitive cardiac troponin; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; IL‐6, interleukin 6; IL‐10, interleukin 10; IL‐8, interleukin 8; IL‐1β, interleukin 1β; IL‐2R, interleukin 2 receptor; IQR, interquartile range; PT, plasma prothrombin time; SD, standard deviation; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Calculated by Student's t test.

Calculated by the Wilcoxon sum‐rank test.

Calculated by Fisher's exact test.

Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiographic findings of patients Note: Continuous variables were described as median and IQR or mean and SD. Categorical variables were described as number (%). Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C‐reactive protein; hs‐cTnI, hypersensitive cardiac troponin; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; IL‐6, interleukin 6; IL‐10, interleukin 10; IL‐8, interleukin 8; IL‐1β, interleukin 1β; IL‐2R, interleukin 2 receptor; IQR, interquartile range; PT, plasma prothrombin time; SD, standard deviation; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Calculated by Student's t test. Calculated by the Wilcoxon sum‐rank test. Calculated by Fisher's exact test. Fever was the predominant symptom both in the deceased young COVID‐19 patients (76.90%) and survived counterparts (82.50%). Similarly, the comparison of other symptoms between the two groups failed to detect a significant difference such as chill (15.40% vs 0.00%), fatigue (15.40% vs 2.50%), diarrhea (15.40% vs 5.00%), muscle ache (15.40% vs 2.50%), sore throat (0.00% vs 2.50%), and vomiting (15.40% vs 0.00%). However, a higher proportion of these deceased young COVID‐19 patients displayed dry cough (61.50% vs 20.00%; P = .043), expectoration (23.10% vs 0.00%; P = .031), dyspnea (46.20% vs 0.00%; P < .001), as compared with those of survivors (Table 1). The typical CT images derived from either deceased young COVID‐19 patients or survivors were characterized by the ground‐glass opacity (76.90% vs 61.50%). Remarkably, these deceased young COVID‐19 patients were featured by a higher severity of patchy shadows (100.00% vs 48.70%; P = .006), pleural thickening (61.50% vs 12.80%; P = .012), mild pericardial effusion (76.90% vs 0.00%; P < .001), and lymphadenia (76.90% vs 7.70%; P < .001), as compared with the young counterparts. Further analysis of the lesion sites revealed that these deceased young COVID‐19 patients were more likely to exhibit lesions in the left lung (69.20% vs 17.90%; P = .007) (Table 1). To characterize the mechanisms that predispose young obese COVID‐19 patients to death, we compared laboratory results between the two groups. The deceased young COVID‐19 patients displayed comparable neutrophils as their counterparts (5.58 × 109 vs 2.63 × 109/L), and similarly for the counts of monocytes and platelets, the level of creatine kinase, renal function, and liver function. In sharp contrast, these deceased young COVID‐19 patients displayed a significantly lower level of lymphocytes (0.58 ± 0.35 × 109 vs 1.25 ± 0.49 × 109/L; P < .001), eosinophils (0.00 × 109 vs 0.01 × 109/L; P = .022), total cholesterol/albumin (2.97 vs 3.66 mmol/L; P = .016), albumin (30.02 ± 4.22 vs 38.63 ± 4.59 g/L; P < .001), but significantly higher level of BMI (29.32 vs 23.18; P = .021), IL‐10 (22.00 vs 5.00 pg/mL; P = .008), TNF‐α (23.00 vs 7.60 pg/mL; P = .042), CRP (58.40 vs 13.05 mg/mL; P = .002), D‐dimer (2.42 vs 0.44 µg/mL; P < .001), PT (14.50 vs 13.60 seconds; P = .006), NT‐proBNP (639.00 vs 29.00 pg/mL; P < .001), and hs‐cTnI (19.45 vs 1.90 pg/mL; P < .001) (Table 1). Logistic regression models were then constructed to establish the correlation between risk factors and clinical outcomes in young COVID‐19 patients (Figure 1). Remarkably, BMI seemed to be the factor predisposing young COVID‐19 patients to the risk of mortality (OR = 1.354; 95% CI = 1.075‐1.704; P = .010). Other factors relevant to obesity are also highly correlated with mortality, such as hs‐cTnI (a marker for cardiac injury; OR = 1.420; 95% CI = 1.112‐1.814; P = .005), NT‐proBNP (OR = 147.5; P = .008), and coagulation activity (D‐dimer; OR = 418.7; P = .047) (Figure 1). In contrast, albumin (OR = 0.644; 95% CI = 0.492‐0.843; P = .001), eosinophils count (OR = 0.167; 95% CI = 0.031‐0.889; P = .036), and lymphocytes count (OR = 1.001; 95% CI = 1.001‐1.002; P = .024) were negatively associated with the poor outcomes of COVID‐19 (Figure 1). Collectively, these findings suggest that obesity could be a risk factor contributing to high mortality in young COVID‐19 patients. In addition, we interestingly observed that ACE2 is widely expressed in adipocytes by the analyses of single‐cell sequencing data (Figure S1).
Figure 1

Logistic regression models were constructed to establish the correlation between risk factors and clinical outcomes in young COVID‐19 patients. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C‐reactive protein; cTN, cardiac troponin; OR, odds ratio; PT, plasma prothrombin time

Logistic regression models were constructed to establish the correlation between risk factors and clinical outcomes in young COVID‐19 patients. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C‐reactive protein; cTN, cardiac troponin; OR, odds ratio; PT, plasma prothrombin time

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective study, we compared the clinical features between the deceased young COVID‐19 patients and their survival counterparts in Tongji Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital from 7 February to 27 March 2020 for the absence of pre‐existing diseases. A total of 53 young COVID‐19 patients were included, 13 of whom died from COVID‐19, whereas the rest of them survived. Among these deceased patients, nine cases were mild type, three cases with severe type, and one case of critical type in terms of disease severity at the time of admission, but all patients died of COVID‐19 within a week of admission. Remarkably, obesity was characterized as the critical factor contributing to the death of these patients, as evidenced by the fact that the BMI of the young deceased patients was significantly higher than that of the survivors. Previous studies have revealed that, during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, , , , obesity was epidemiologically associated with an increased risk of the disease. Furthermore, obese individuals had a greater risk of hospitalization and death due to H1N1 than individuals with normal weight. Notably, the prevalence of pneumonia by COVID‐19 (53%) is higher than that of H1N1 influenza (11%) ; therefore, the risk of COVID‐19 patients with obesity should not be underestimated. Moreover, according to the data analysis of single‐cell sequencing, the expression of SARS‐CoV‐2 receptor ACE2 in fat cells is found to be high, which supports the assumption that obesity may be a risk factor for the poor prognosis of young COVID‐19 patients. Despite the fact that the deceased COVID‐19 patients (77.80%) and the survivors (82.50%) shared similar primary symptoms such as fever; the deceased patients, however, were more likely to be mostly presented with cough, sputum, and dyspnea. Ground‐glass–like opacity was visible in the CT scans in both the groups, but the severity in deceased patients was significantly higher. This discrepancy was mainly reflected by the increase in inflammation and enlarged lymph nodes. More significantly, pericardial effusion occurred in 7 out of 13 patients (77.80%), and laboratory results further illustrated these phenomena. The significant abnormality of the laboratory results secondary to obesity in the young deceased patients was the expression of inflammatory factors. Specifically, the levels of IL‐10, TNF‐α, and CRP in the young deceased patients were much higher than those of the survivors, which logically explained the increase in consolidation and enlarged lymph nodes in CT scans. Moreover, both hs‐cTnI and BNP, indicators of myocardial damage, were much higher than those of young survivors. Furthermore, D‐dimer, an indicator of secondary fibrinolysis, was also significantly increased, suggesting that the patients had abnormal coagulation and fibrinolysis such as disseminated intravascular coagulation, pulmonary embolism, and so on, which might be the reason of pericardial effusion noticed in the CT images. Peng and his colleagues demonstrated that the D‐Dimer of survivors remained within the normal range for 13 days, whereas the level of D‐dimer of deceased patients continued to rise and exceeded the normal level within 7 to 9 days. Similarly, Cao and his colleagues revealed that a significant increase in D‐Dimer is one of the high‐risk factors for higher mortality in COVID‐19 patients. Therefore, it is of great importance to control and treat microcirculation disorders as soon as possible so as to reduce the risk. In addition, the number of lymphocytes and eosinophils in the deceased young COVID‐19 patients was significantly lower. Previous studies suggested that lymphocytes could be directly infected by the COVID‐19 virus and are consumed greatly during the antiviral process. However, the underlying mechanism of reduced eosinophils in COVID‐19 patients is currently unknown. There is evidence that eosinophils act as innate immune cells and are able to efficiently eliminate respiratory syncytial virus, whereas our studies revealed that SARS‐CoV‐2 could also directly infect eosinophils (unpublished data). Therefore, it would be logical to assume that the reduction of eosinophils could also be the exhaustion caused by the infection of SARS‐CoV‐2. A logistic regression model was adopted to identify the factors for addressing the mechanisms underlying obesity in predisposing young COVID‐19 patients to death. Through which, the inflammation‐related index CRP, cardiac damage, and increased coagulation activity are characterized to be significantly associated with the adverse clinical outcomes in young COVID‐19 patients with abnormal BMI. Moreover, the decrease of lymphocytes and eosinophils or total globulin levels is also correlated with the poor prognosis in these COVID‐19 patients. One major limitation of our study is the limited number of patients included in the study. Therefore, the cardiac insufficiency index NT‐proBNP (OR = 147.5; P = .008) and the increase of thrombus index D‐dimer (OR = 418.7; P = .047) observed in the deceased COVID‐19 patients might be affected by the sample size. It should be warranted to further validate the data in larger samples in the future. In summary, our retrospective study included 13 young patients who died from COVID‐19 and 40 matched controls. Obesity is characterized to be a high risk predisposing young patients to death, which involves aggravated inflammatory responses, cardiac damage, and increased coagulation activity.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests. Supporting information Click here for additional data file.
  24 in total

Review 1.  The effect of obesity on chronic respiratory diseases: pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Magali Poulain; Mariève Doucet; Geneviève C Major; Vicky Drapeau; Frédéric Sériès; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Angelo Tremblay; François Maltais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Pooled patient samples as reference material for D-Dimer.

Authors:  E Adema; U Gebert
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Intensive-care patients with severe novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infection - Michigan, June 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Ryan Zarychanski; Ruxandra Pinto; Deborah J Cook; John Marshall; Jacques Lacroix; Tom Stelfox; Sean Bagshaw; Karen Choong; Francois Lamontagne; Alexis F Turgeon; Stephen Lapinsky; Stéphane P Ahern; Orla Smith; Faisal Siddiqui; Philippe Jouvet; Kosar Khwaja; Lauralyn McIntyre; Kusum Menon; Jamie Hutchison; David Hornstein; Ari Joffe; Francois Lauzier; Jeffrey Singh; Tim Karachi; Kim Wiebe; Kendiss Olafson; Clare Ramsey; Sat Sharma; Peter Dodek; Maureen Meade; Richard Hall; Robert A Fowler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  [Epidemiology, Treatment, and Epidemic Prevention and Control of the Coronavirus Disease 2019: a Review].

Authors:  Rong-Sheng Luan; Xin Wang; Xin Sun; Xing-Shu Chen; Tao Zhou; Quan-Hui Liu; Xin Lü; Xian-Ping Wu; Dong-Qing Gu; Ming-Shuang Tang; Hui-Jie Cui; Xue-Feng Shan; Jing Ouyang; Ben Zhang; Wei Zhang; Emergency Research Group Sichuan University Covid-
Journal:  Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-03

6.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis.

Authors:  Robert Verity; Lucy C Okell; Ilaria Dorigatti; Peter Winskill; Charles Whittaker; Natsuko Imai; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Hayley Thompson; Patrick G T Walker; Han Fu; Amy Dighe; Jamie T Griffin; Marc Baguelin; Sangeeta Bhatia; Adhiratha Boonyasiri; Anne Cori; Zulma Cucunubá; Rich FitzJohn; Katy Gaythorpe; Will Green; Arran Hamlet; Wes Hinsley; Daniel Laydon; Gemma Nedjati-Gilani; Steven Riley; Sabine van Elsland; Erik Volz; Haowei Wang; Yuanrong Wang; Xiaoyue Xi; Christl A Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; Neil M Ferguson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 7.  The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daphne P Guh; Wei Zhang; Nick Bansback; Zubin Amarsi; C Laird Birmingham; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Obesity predisposes to the risk of higher mortality in young COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Fengqin Zhang; Ying Xiong; Yanqiu Wei; Yi Hu; Feng Wang; Gang Li; Kui Liu; Ronghui Du; Cong-Yi Wang; Wenzhen Zhu
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 20.693

9.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Ting Yu; Ronghui Du; Guohui Fan; Ying Liu; Zhibo Liu; Jie Xiang; Yeming Wang; Bin Song; Xiaoying Gu; Lulu Guan; Yuan Wei; Hui Li; Xudong Wu; Jiuyang Xu; Shengjin Tu; Yi Zhang; Hua Chen; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Analysis of 2019 novel coronavirus infection and clinical characteristics of outpatients: An epidemiological study from a fever clinic in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Yanqiu Wei; Yanjun Lu; Liming Xia; Xianglin Yuan; Gang Li; Xinying Li; Li Liu; Wenhua Liu; Peng Zhou; Cong-Yi Wang; Huilan Zhang
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 20.693

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Depression, aging, and immunity: implications for COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity.

Authors:  Bart N Ford; Jonathan Savitz
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 9.701

2.  Association Between Obesity and COVID-19 Disease Severity in Saudi Population.

Authors:  Fulwah Yahya Alqahtani; Fadilah Sfouq Aleanizy; Rania Ali El Hadi Mohamed; Nassr Al-Maflehi; Bahauddeen M Alrfaei; Thamer A Almangour; Nora Alkhudair; Ghada Bawazeer; Ghalia Shamlan; Marzouqah S Alanazi
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.249

3.  Clinical and Neuroimaging Correlation in Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  B C Yoon; K Buch; M Lang; B P Applewhite; M D Li; W A Mehan; T M Leslie-Mazwi; S P Rincon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  The Role of Nutrition in COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity of Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Philip T James; Zakari Ali; Andrew E Armitage; Ana Bonell; Carla Cerami; Hal Drakesmith; Modou Jobe; Kerry S Jones; Zara Liew; Sophie E Moore; Fernanda Morales-Berstein; Helen M Nabwera; Behzad Nadjm; Sant-Rayn Pasricha; Pauline Scheelbeek; Matt J Silver; Megan R Teh; Andrew M Prentice
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of regional risk factors for critical outcomes of COVID-19 during early phase of the pandemic.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Kim; Hyeontaek Hwang; Hyunsook Hong; Jae-Joon Yim; Jinwoo Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Joint Effort towards Preventing Nutritional Deficiencies at the Extremes of Life during COVID-19.

Authors:  Giulia C I Spolidoro; Domenico Azzolino; Raanan Shamir; Matteo Cesari; Carlo Agostoni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  The negative impact of obesity on the occurrence and prognosis of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tahereh Raeisi; Hadis Mozaffari; Nazaninzahra Sepehri; Mina Darand; Bahman Razi; Nazila Garousi; Mohammad Alizadeh; Shahab Alizadeh
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 3.008

8.  Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome?

Authors:  Stephan Katzenschlager; Alexandra J Zimmer; Claudius Gottschalk; Jürgen Grafeneder; Stephani Schmitz; Sara Kraker; Marlene Ganslmeier; Amelie Muth; Alexander Seitel; Lena Maier-Hein; Andrea Benedetti; Jan Larmann; Markus A Weigand; Sean McGrath; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Association Between Mood Disorders and Risk of COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Felicia Ceban; Danica Nogo; Isidro P Carvalho; Yena Lee; Flora Nasri; Jiaqi Xiong; Leanna M W Lui; Mehala Subramaniapillai; Hartej Gill; Rene N Liu; Prianca Joseph; Kayla M Teopiz; Bing Cao; Rodrigo B Mansur; Kangguang Lin; Joshua D Rosenblat; Roger C Ho; Roger S McIntyre
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 25.911

Review 10.  From causes of aging to death from COVID-19.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.