Literature DB >> 32436728

Why do psychiatrists doubt the value of early intervention? The power of illusion.

Patrick D McGorry1, Cristina Mei1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Face validity and the best available evidence strongly support the value of early intervention (EI) for psychotic disorders, and increasingly for other mental illnesses. Yet its value continues to be intensely criticised by some academics and doubted by many psychiatrists. This disconnect is examined through the lens of the 'clinician's illusion'.
CONCLUSIONS: A number of sources fuel resistance to EI; however, the cumulative exposure to persistent and disabling illness that dominates the day-to-day experience of psychiatrists may be a key influence. This experience forms the basis of the clinician's illusion, a hidden bias health professionals develop as a natural consequence of their clinical experiences, which shapes belief and perception of prognosis, and breeds therapeutic nihilism. This bias has been reinforced by grossly under-resourced systems of mental health care, undermining morale and adding a sense of learned helplessness to our mindset.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early intervention; clinical staging; clinician’s illusion; psychosis; youth mental health

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32436728     DOI: 10.1177/1039856220924323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Psychiatry        ISSN: 1039-8562            Impact factor:   1.369


  2 in total

1.  Designing and scaling up integrated youth mental health care.

Authors:  Patrick D McGorry; Cristina Mei; Andrew Chanen; Craig Hodges; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Eóin Killackey
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Headspace, an Australian Youth Mental Health Network: Lessons for Canadian Mental Healthcare.

Authors:  Jeffrey C L Looi; Stephen Allison; Tarun Bastiampillai; Stephen R Kisely
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.