| Literature DB >> 32436654 |
Abstract
Phagocytes, notably macrophages, are critical sentinels of their environment, patrolling for and eradicating unwanted components. The ability of cells to process extracellular cargo in an appropriate manner is important for both clearance of the cargo and eventual return to homeostasis. Although the evolutionarily conserved pathway of autophagy involves the degradation and recycling of unnecessary or dysfunctional cellular components during starvation, we now appreciate that the reach of autophagy extends beyond nutrient deprivation, notably including cellular quality control (e.g., mitophagy) and host defense against internalized pathogens (i.e., xenophagy). Despite being seemingly disparate, autophagic functions are unified as conserved mechanisms for containment and immunosuppression, suggesting an original immune function for autophagy. A recently described pathway called LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) marries the ancient concepts of phagocytosis and autophagy, revealing new ways in which the autophagy machinery, in a molecularly distinct pathway, contributes to the inflammatory response. In this article, protocols to detect LAP by electron microscopy, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, and phagosome purification are described, allowing the user to detect multiple characteristics of LAP in both qualitative and quantitative manners. Published 2020. U.S. Government. Basic Protocol 1: Detection of LAP by electron microscopy Basic Protocol 2: Detection of LAP by confocal microscopy of LC3-GFP-expressing cells Alternate Protocol 1: Detection of LAP by confocal microscopy using immunofluorescence Basic Protocol 3: Detection of LAP using flow cytometry of LC3-GFP-expressing cells Alternate Protocol 2: Detection of LAP using antibody staining and flow cytometry Basic Protocol 4: Detection of LAP by western blot of purified LAPosomes. Published 2020. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.Entities:
Keywords: LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP); autophagy; confocal microscopy; electron microscopy; flow cytometry; phagosome purification
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32436654 PMCID: PMC9285819 DOI: 10.1002/cpcb.104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Protoc Cell Biol ISSN: 1934-2616
Figure 1Molecular mechanisms of the LC3‐associated phagocytosis (LAP) pathway. Engulfment of pathogens, dying cells, or antibody‐coated particles via TLR, PtdSer, and FcR, respectively, triggers recruitment of the RUBCN‐containing Class III PI3K complex to the cargo‐containing phagosome. RUBCN also binds and stabilizes the NOX2 complex. RUBCN activity is required for recruitment of the downstream ubiquitin‐like conjugation systems to generate LC3‐II and localize it to the cargo‐containing phagosome to form the LAPosome.
Figure 2Molecular overlap of canonical autophagy and LAP. The genes required for canonical autophagy are shown on the left; for LAP, on the right; and for both, in the center.
Figure 3Structural comparison of rapamycin‐induced autophagosomes (A, white arrowheads) and zymosan‐induced LAPosomes (A and B, black arrow) by electron microscopy. Reprinted with permission from Springer Nature (Sanjuan et al., 2007).
Recommended Volumes and Cell Densities for Chamber Slides
| Nunc™ Lab‐Tek™ II Chambered Coverglass cat. no. | Number of wells | Cell culture volume (ml) | Recommended cell concentration (×104/ml) | Wash or reagent volume (ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 155360 | 1 | 2.0‐4.5 | 20 | ∼2.0 |
| 155379 | 2 | 1.0‐2.0 | 10 | ∼1.0 |
| 155382 | 4 | 0.5‐1.0 | 5 | ∼0.5 |
| 155409 | 8 | 0.2‐0.5 | 2.5 | ∼0.25 |
Figure 4Visualization of LC3‐GFP recruitment to a LAPosome containing zymosan A–Alexa Fluor 594 by confocal imaging. The still images are from time‐lapse imaging of LC3‐GFP+ macrophages’ phagocytosis of zymosan A–Alexa Fluor 594, followed by recruitment of LC3‐GFP to the zymosan‐containing LAPosome. Top, t = 10 min; middle, t = 20 min; bottom, t = 30 min.
Figure 5Use of flow cytometry to measure LAPosome‐associated LC3‐GFP. The workflow and example data are shown for the flow cytometric method for measuring LAPosome‐associated LC3‐GFP.
Figure 6Phagosome purification to assess protein association with LAPosomes. The workflow and example data (reprinted from Martinez et al., 2015) are shown for phagosome purification to analyze protein association.
Troubleshooting Guide for Detection of LC3‐Associated Phagocytosis
| Problem | Solution |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Holes in membranes | Begin dehydration series with lower concentration of ethanol |
| Cell structures look small | Use alternative fixative |
| Adjust concentration of salt to avoid hypertonic solution | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Not many cells in chamber slide | Use different extracellular matrix solution or allow cells to adhere longer |
| Excessive LC3‐GFP puncta | Increase percentage of serum in cell culture medium |
| Speckled LC3‐GFP | Reduce dilution of anti‐LC3 antibody |
|
| |
|
| |
| No difference in LC3‐GFP fluorescence in positive control or other samples | Increase concentration of or incubation with digitonin solution |
| Increase rapamycin concentration or incubation time | |
| Excessive LC3‐GFP fluorescence in negative control or other samples | Decrease concentration of or incubation with digitonin solution |
|
| |
| No bands or signal | Increase cell number for harvest |
| No UNC93B bands in sample | Repeat purification to avoid contamination with proteins not from bead‐containing phagosomes |