Literature DB >> 32436366

Preliminary support for using the Atypicality Scale from the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition, to screen for psychosis-spectrum disorders within a college counselling centre.

Elizabeth C Thompson1,2,3, Joseph S DeLuca1, Emily Petti1, Pamela Rakhshan Rouhakhtar1, Jason Schiffman1.   

Abstract

AIM: Evidence supports the use of brief psychosis-spectrum screeners for identifying individuals at risk for psychosis. Screening has not been well-studied in help-seeking college samples. This study investigated the use of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2) Atypicality Scale as a psychosis-spectrum screening tool within a university counselling centre.
METHODS: Atypicality scores from the BASC-2 were compared to interview-based assessment, the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS), to explore associations across the measures and evaluate the scale's ability to identify individuals who meet criteria for a psychosis-spectrum diagnosis.
RESULTS: Forty-three participants completed the BASC-2 and SIPS, and 23 were SIPS-positive. Compared to the SIPS-negative group, the SIPS-positive group had significantly higher Atypicality scores. Exploratory results indicated that Atypicality scores identified SIPS-positive individuals with an overall accuracy of 72% (78% sensitivity, 65% specificity).
CONCLUSION: The Atypicality Scale may be an appropriate first-line psychosis-spectrum screening tool in college counselling centres.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BASC-2 Atypicality Scale; clinical high risk; college counselling; psychosis risk screening; psychosis-spectrum disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32436366      PMCID: PMC7679286          DOI: 10.1111/eip.12972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry        ISSN: 1751-7885            Impact factor:   2.732


  13 in total

1.  Increased Rates of Mental Health Service Utilization by U.S. College Students: 10-Year Population-Level Trends (2007-2017).

Authors:  Sarah Ketchen Lipson; Emily G Lattie; Daniel Eisenberg
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Emotional and behavioral symptomatology reported by help-seeking youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Thompson; Emily Kline; Lauren M Ellman; Vijay Mittal; Gloria M Reeves; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Using parent and youth reports from the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition to identify individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Thompson; Emily Kline; Gloria Reeves; Steven C Pitts; Kristin Bussell; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Psychosis screening in schools: Considerations and implementation strategies.

Authors:  Monet S Meyer; Adi Rosenthal; Khalima A Bolden; Rachel L Loewy; Mark Savill; Ruth Shim; Jacqueline Rodriguez; Victoria Flores; Earl Pavao; Tara A Niendam
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.732

5.  Comorbidity of severe psychotic disorders with measures of substance use.

Authors:  Sarah M Hartz; Carlos N Pato; Helena Medeiros; Patricia Cavazos-Rehg; Janet L Sobell; James A Knowles; Laura J Bierut; Michele T Pato
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.596

6.  Impact of "psychosis risk" identification: Examining predictors of how youth view themselves.

Authors:  Lawrence H Yang; Kristen A Woodberry; Bruce G Link; Cheryl M Corcoran; Caitlin Bryant; Daniel I Shapiro; Donna Downing; Ragy R Girgis; Gary Brucato; Debbie Huang; Francesca M Crump; Mary Verdi; William R McFarlane; Larry J Seidman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Comorbid diagnoses for youth at clinical high risk of psychosis.

Authors:  Jean Addington; Danijela Piskulic; Lu Liu; Jonathan Lockwood; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Carrie E Bearden; Daniel H Mathalon; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Trends in college students' mental health diagnoses and utilization of services, 2009-2015.

Authors:  Sara B Oswalt; Alyssa M Lederer; Kimberly Chestnut-Steich; Carol Day; Ashlee Halbritter; Dugeidy Ortiz
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2018-10-25

Review 9.  Psychosis risk screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Kline; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness-persistence-impairment model of psychotic disorder.

Authors:  J van Os; R J Linscott; I Myin-Germeys; P Delespaul; L Krabbendam
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  1 in total

1.  Preliminary evidence supporting the practice of psychosis-risk screening within an inpatient psychiatric setting serving adolescents.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Thompson; Katherine Frost Visser; Jason Schiffman; Anthony Spirito; Jeffrey Hunt; Jennifer C Wolff
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.222

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.